Posted on 01/05/2009 2:29:18 AM PST by Hang'emAll
At approximately 4:45 p.m. on Thursday, August 21, 2008, I was in the Clerk of Court's office in the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia doing part of my job as a legal writer and reading the civil cases which had been filed that day. (Snip)
After the man left, the clerk told me that I should probably take a look at the complaint. (Snip)
You filed a new lawsuit last week. Tell me about it.
This lawsuit is an interpleader action, and the reason we went this way is because an interpleader action will shift the burden of proof to Barack Obama. Notice that we didn’t sue Obama, though. Ee sued Barry Soetoro, mainly because we believe that is his real name. We’ve seen no documentation showing that he has changed his name from Soetoro to Obama. So, when he was registering himself in all of the states—and there are 50 states, Barack—he was registering with the wrong name. That’s fraud. His name was Barry Soetoro when he was adopted in Indonesia, and nothing shows that it has been changed since. (snip)
Okay. Back to the case.(Snip)
Do you think the scheduling is because Justice Scalia knows more about three of his colleagues than he lets on, and things that they’ll grant cert on Friday, or do you think that they’re merely putting all aspects of this case through the progressions so as to ward off future actions?
I don’t know. It could be either. It certainly is interesting. Two conferences make it unique. The order of the docket entries kind of makes it unique.
By scheduling the injunction for a week after the petition, does that mean that they are considering the injunction ahead of time? (Snip)
(Excerpt) Read more at americasright.com ...
Provides insight into the mechanics of the process.
I still think the Supremes are planning to kill this. If I read correctly Berg’s is the last case. Personally, I don’t trust or like Berg because of the 9-11 thing. If they had any intention of reviewing this in a meaningful way, they would have done so already.
Berg’s was the first case, not the last. There are plenty more in the pipeline.
There’s something I truly don’t understand. Why wouldn’t Hillary reveal all this dirt on Obama and just knock him out so she could win the Presidency? Did she actually believe she couldn’t beat McCain?
She probably got the information too late. So she waited until she could make her demands.
I am disturbed that the Supreme Court won’t protect the constitution with this simple request to prove that the incomming president is a US citizen, qualified to be president. It’s fundamental. It’s their job to protect the constitution. It’s also alarming that even the conservatives on the court refuse to do so.
She would have lost the black voters and Obama voters.
It bothers me that Supreme Chief Justice will swear in a usurper of power without questioning it.
Will the supremes risk, Levenworth, to abet this treason?
Betcha it didn’t bother the traitors in SCOTUS for a nanosecond.
***Will the supremes risk, Levenworth, to abet this treason?***
Who will put them there.?
They certainly dont risk Leavenworth. The Constitution is what is at risk.
I see...Berg seemed to indicate that his was the first and last case...I was wondering about that. Are there any cases pending that have more legitimate people involved? I do not like Berg nor do I trust him.
Hillary had such high negatives that she would not have won over McCain. The base would have been there, even for him, if Hillary was the alternative.
This was the way for the unelectable Hillary to become the Queen. The Secretary of State has tremendous opportunities to conduct world wide protection rackets. Plus she is 4th in line for POTUS in case things happen...
I can’t for the life of me fathom how ANY US Citizen could NOT have standing to bring such a suit as this. SO...there should be another 60 million or so lawsuits on the horizon, IMO.
Do you think Hil ‘n Bill are blackmailing BHO?
I believe that one of these Obama non-citizenship cases will have him DQ’d. You can’t change the rules after the game starts- otherwise Arnold Schwarzenegger may have pursued the Presidency or altered his strategy.
http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244
I think that is the only explanation. She couldn’t risk alienating all those voters.
The Dems know the truth too. A willing conspiracy against the Constitution.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.