Posted on 06/13/2009 9:29:28 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
Darwin-Only Advisors Hunker Down to Re-Strategize
June 12, 2009 — Strict Darwinian materialists are a minority in the United States, yet they enjoy autocracy in educational policy, complete control of scientific institutions, and nearly complete unquestioned support from the mainstream media. Nevertheless, they have to face living in a country that is predominantly religious. Once in awhile they suffer setbacks, like the recent changes in textbook policy in Texas that will require more scrutiny of the claims of evolution. What do they say amongst themselves when strategizing how to handle the public?...
(Excerpt) Read more at creationsafaris.com ...
It tells me the majority of the politically left are from the left side of the Bell curve.
Now we've just got anthropogenic global warming taught in public schools.
For all the whining and crying about what has become of science in public education, the evos/atheists would make far more progress by going after AGW, and eco- anything, making sure the textbooks were accurate, and insisting on higher standards for science teachers.
Going after creation, which isn't even taught in schools any more without threat of lawsuit, is like trying to kill a mosquito with a sledge hammer.
For all the whining and crying about what has become of science in public education, the creationists would make far more progress by going after AGW, and eco- anything, making sure the textbooks were accurate, and insisting on higher standards for science teachers.
fixed.
What argument would that be? The majority in this country are religious. And strict Darwinist materialists are a tiny minority. Those are cold, hard facts. As such, if the Creationists and IDers ever get their act together, the Temple of Darwin can kiss its monopoly over the ideology of science goodbye.
You’re correct.
—Genesis 1:1
"You [God] fixed the earth on its foundation, never to be moved." - Psalm 104:5 NAB
The bible writers got it wrong.
Who created the planets?
You only wish.
People can disagree with the interpretation of the fossil record without rejecting all science. But then, it's not fun to mock and disparage someone for their rejection of speciation (macroevolution) when they accept actual science.
Of course it is.
If you don't put out, you're done for in the scientific community.
It you don't put out according to current consensus, it won't get peer reviewed.
Does your objection to the common descent of apes and man have anything to do with the evidence?
==The bible writers got it wrong.
Tell me, MC, what do you consider to be the foundation of the Earth?
“It you don’t put out according to current consensus, it won’t get peer reviewed.”
—Actually, some criteria for NOT getting published is to say stuff that either isn’t new or isn’t different.
“Does your objection to the common descent of apes and man have anything to do with the evidence?”
If you do not object to the theory that there is a common descent from apes to man can you supply me the transitional model that proves such?
Which in a nutshell is the evo agenda.
Thanks for so concisely putting into words what we all know the evos main goal is.
“The bible writers got it wrong.”
That is why Darwinism can be best described as agenda driven “science”. Darwinism is the cornerstone of atheism and secular humanism. Proven the Bible writers got it wrong is the driving force behind Darwinism.
That is, of course, their agenda, but the Bible most assuredly did not get it wrong...as will be evident once MC replies.
Even as a child in screwel, against all odds, I never bought into Evolution. I am a Bible believing Christian CREATIONIST. I believe that the THEORY of Evo retards science, because, IMO it is based on false assumptions, AND is contrary to the Creator’s account of history.
From Darwinism’s earliest days to today, many of the top Darwinist scientists have been Christian. Also, most Christians are Darwinists, and most Darwinists are Christian. And especially within the realm of scientists, the number of Christian Darwinists vastly outnumber the Creationists.
//responding to the subject matter of the thread now and not continuing with your personal attacks//
He is a evolutionist troll pure and simple, best just to ignore him and not waste any time on him.
If you can't get your facts right, at least get your grammar right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.