Posted on 07/15/2009 11:24:16 AM PDT by balls
Major Cook has been fired from his civilian defense contractor job. See details at link.
Huh?
His company didn't order him to go.
Brought to you by the same people who think it's perfectly A-OK for the government to fire the CEO of GM?
(813) 828-5884
is the number noted in the article from which Major Cook received notification that his deployment orders were recinded
The number is a land line in the Tampa, FL area
The Zero and Rhamm method is to attack the individual, attack and attack and attack. Ignore the issue and attack the person. They will do nothing at all but prepare unless this appears to gain traction. They will not dignify it by recognition of it.
Notice also that this is a STAY of execution of the orders.
They will flay this poor fellow. There are operatives out now looking for dirt on Major Cook from the day he was born and even before, I will lay odds for it.
I must be missing it at the link...but I don’t see where it says this at the link.
A lot can be said for the Death By A Thousand Cuts.
Happens every time, throughout history, when collectivists get state power.
Not laughing.
I want the pitchfork and torch concession, though...
As I read it he didn't refuse the order to deploy, he filed suit to find out if it was a lawful order.
DOD's response was to cancel his military deployment and to inform his employer that he was no longer welcome at his civilian job at McDill Air Force base, effectively firing him.
One thing to remember - the peasants were carrying the pitchforks because that was the best weapon they had available. Just sayin’.
OK, never been in the military nor have I been a military civilian contractor, but here in the private sector, the quickest way to lose your job is to refuse to do it.
Not really coincidence at all.
More like the 2.7 TRILLION dollar question...
Mr. Cook's recent activities are sufficient cause for them no longer to be comfortable with his presence.
When did he refuse to do his civilian job?
I missed that part.
Please show me a reference for that, mmmm'K?
Destroy the person who questions the corruption.
I wonder what Craig Livingstone is doing these days?
Moreover, however, retaliation has occurred or begun against Plaintiff Stefan Frederick Cook for the exercise of his First Amendment right to petition for redress of grievances and Plaintiff Cook accordingly here seeks an injunction against the continuance or full implementation of this official governmental retaliation or in the alternative for a writ of mandamus, order to show cause, or rule nisi be issued to the Department of Defense commanding it to cease, cure, or remedy all retaliation against Plaintiff Cook. The circumstances are as follows:
Late on Tuesday afternoon, July 14, 2009, at around about 4:30 pm, Plaintiff Stefan Frederick Cook returned a call to an unknown telephone call from (813) 828-5884 and was told that his services were no longer required in Afghanistan and that he need not report for duty. In addition Plaintiff an e-mail with the revocation order attached from Master Sargent Miguel Matos (Exhibit C). Upon receipt of the revocation, Plaintiff Major Cook called his civilian boss, the CEO of Simtech, Inc., a closely held corporation that does DOD contracting in the general field of information technology/systems integration, at which Plaintiff Major was employed until taking a Military Leave of Absence on Friday July 10, 2009, a senior systems engineer and architect, in preparation for his deployment to Afghanistan. (Plaintiff has five Cisco Systems certifications in information technology dating from 2000 and just recertified in June 2009 for the Cisco Certified Design Expert qualification exam.)
The CEO of Simtech, Inc., Larry Grice, explained to Plaintiff over a series of four conversations within the next two hours, that he had been terminated. Grice told the Plaintiff that he would no longer be welcome in his former position at SOCOM but that Grice wanted to see whether he could find something within the company (Simtech, Inc.) for Cook. The upshot was that at this time Grice did not have anything for Plaintiff to do. Grice told Plaintiff, in essence, that the situation had become “nutty and crazy”, and that Plaintiff would no longer be able to work at his old position.
Grice explained that he had been in touch with Defense Security Services (an agency of the Department of Defense[1], with regional offices located in SOCOM Headquarters at McDill Airforce Base in Tampa, Florida), and that DSS had not yet made a determination whether Plaintiff Major Cook’s clearances would be pulled, but Grice made clear to Cook that it was DSS who had compelled Cook’s termination. Essentially, because of the “nutty and crazy” situation and the communications received from DSS was no longer employable by him at all. So he was not optimistic about getting me another job at the company. Grice also reported to Plaintiff that there was some gossip that “people were disappointed in” the Plaintiff because they thought he was manipulating his deployment orders to create a platform for political purposes. Grice then discussed Plaintiff’s expectation of receiving final paychecks (including accrued leave pay) already owed, without any severance pay, and wished the Plaintiff well.
A federal agency (such as the Department of Defense, acting through the Defense Security Services Agency) clearly violates the Whistleblower Protection Act if it takes or fails to take (or threatens to take or fail to take) a personnel action with respect to any employee or applicant because of any disclosure of information by the employee or applicant that he or she reasonably believes evidences a violation of a law, rule or regulation; gross mismanagement; gross waste of funds; an abuse of authority; or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety. What has happened in the present case of Stefan Frederick Cook is that a federal agency appears to have taken action against Stefan Frederick Cook’s private employer, Simtech, Inc., which is a closely held corporation owned and operated by members of a single family, who are as much victims of the Department of Defense’ heavy-handed interference with Plaintiff Cook’s private-sector employment as is Plaintiff Cook himself.
It’s called Fascism.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.