Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fake Obama Kenya birth certificate?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/18018714/Fake-Obama-Kenya-birth-certificate ^ | 08/02/2009

Posted on 08/02/2009 4:56:30 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

And then one of our moderators spotted this:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/18018714/Fake-Obama-Kenya-birth-certificate

It has several clues, but also there's this question:

Who is E. F. Lavender?

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=earth+friendly+lavender&aq=f&oq=&aqi

Earth Friendly Lavender detergent?


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: allahpundit; areyouseries; article2section1; bc; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; charlesjohnson; citizenship; edmorrissey; eligibility; fake; hawaii; hillary; hoax; honolulu; hotair; indonesia; ineligible; kenya; lgf; littlegreenfootballs; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; obama; orly; orlytaitz; pumas; republicofkenya; taitz; thisishugh; usurper; waitforit; worldnutdaily
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 881-900901-920921-940 ... 1,181-1,190 next last
To: PowerPro
What if it’s not a matter of not asking for that information as much as deciding it’s not necessary to include all of those details on certificate of birth form?

Agreed completely. That's why I think the Birth Register form is so important in this mess. The form provided to the parents may or may not have all the information, but the form provided to the parents could not have more information than was in the register form.

For instance, I would imagine the name of the doctor would probably be recorded in their record books, but it’s not included on the forms.

Exactly, take a look at items 3 and 4 (midwife / doctor) within block 8 of the registry form.

BTW...I’m still very agnostic on this whole issue here...I’m just throwing out questions and thoughts as they come about and believe that we should all take a kind of wait and see attitude regarding the authenticity of what’s been posted.

Agreed. I'd be thrilled to death if it turns out to be legit, but won't hold my breath one way or the other.

901 posted on 08/03/2009 11:03:30 AM PDT by markomalley (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 883 | View Replies]

To: SeattleBruce
"imho, the SCOTUS has not made a definitive statement about this, perhaps because it’s never come up in quite this way."

Yes, you're exactly right. There have been other cases that have touched on the issue in a peripheral way, but never one that addressed this central issue directly. Ark v. US, comes closest. And, I think it can be fairly said that the majority opinion in that case does go quite a long way in narrowing or clarifying what "natural-born" actually means. And, in their definition, Obama would be eligible. But, they don't go all the way.

As I said to another poster on this thread. It's my opinion that Obama doesn't qualify (assuming he's born in the States), but I could argue the position that he does with equal force and perhaps even more substantiation in case law. But, as the framers wrote and intended, I don't believe he qualifies. Unfortunately, that standard is not always the law of the land.

902 posted on 08/03/2009 11:07:56 AM PDT by OldDeckHand (No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 894 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

Thanks for summing up your position on the “BIRTHER” claims, Athos.

What it shows me is that you are not in a place to make a judgement either way. Like me. I am not a believer in anything. I am interested in WND’s claim that Orly’s document matches REAL documents from the period they have acquired. But I am also interested in the doubts spread throughout the thread.

I don’t see how you can be so sure, without seeing the orginal document and having it examined by an expert. You also have to know where it orginated to judge it’s validity. I can’t say until that is done because circumstanial evidence provided by Orly, you and others, won’t do.

I have to wait and see for my own standards of “proof.” I find it amazing that you are so sure it is all fake at this point. And even if the document is fake, Bambam has to provide his documents and history to prove otherwise and for historian research.


903 posted on 08/03/2009 11:11:32 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 885 | View Replies]

To: Peter Horry

And it could also cause Rino, Democrat and media hysterics. Thanks. We share the same theory. Waiting for proof...that may only come through an honest judge. Are there any left?


904 posted on 08/03/2009 11:13:52 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 880 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

You are really slow, aren’t you. The article used the term in the process of reporting that people in Kenya were using the term. The people using the term were Kenyans. The London TImes reported what they said.

My only error was in attributing it to Kenyatta’s people rather than the opposition. Kenyatta’s side did, however, come on board and they later used the term themselves.

When a newspaper account reports that Joe Blow said X, Y, and Z, it is Joe Blow who is saying it.

And I said so. And you misrepresented what I wrote.


905 posted on 08/03/2009 11:15:31 AM PDT by Houghton M.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 893 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

You and I are brain twins. This is my position exactly.


906 posted on 08/03/2009 11:16:33 AM PDT by PowerPro (2009 - Conservative Revolution Reborn (Go Palin!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 903 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952

Just a very long-time lurker who hasn’t posted since the previous e-mail changed. Felt it was necessary to correct the gross misinformation. Orly Taitz was explicit in taking no position regarding the authenticity of the document. It also needs to be noted the document is not purported to be a Kenyan birth certificate. It clearly states in its title that it is a copy used like the Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth (COLB) to report there is supposed to be an original birth certificate document on file in the government’s offices. If the document is authentic, a court will be able to specify exactly where and what records may be discovered for a court proceeding. If the document is false, the court may or may not use its discretion to authorize the procdures of discovery to produce the authentic document/s wherever they are located. Either way, there may be an opportunity to move the legal proceedings one or more steps closer to the goal of securing legal evidence regarding the eligibility issue.


907 posted on 08/03/2009 11:18:49 AM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 693 | View Replies]

To: Third Person; All

Fake.

No way this would just have a coincidental series of numbers matching so closely with things that tie with Obama’s presidency.

47, 44, O....please.

It’s a really good fake, but a fake.


908 posted on 08/03/2009 11:20:09 AM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson
I don’t see how you can be so sure, without seeing the orginal document and having it examined by an expert. I find it amazing that you are so sure it is all fake at this point.

You are totally misrepresenting my position and what I have said. You sure you read my response?

I have not said I am sure it is a fake!
My response said I am open to the possibility it is real, and I offer BP's recent theory as support to why it might be real.
I point out that I was the first freeper to point out the close proximity of the divorce and the document, lending credence to it.

I am continually debunking false claims because I want the discussion to be based on facts, not things we can prove are false. I can prove that the Kenyan constitution did not call Kenya a republic, when many are falsely claiming it does. I can prove stamps did not exist before dec 1964 that call kenya a republic, when several falsely claimed they did. It's a good thing to eliminate false claims from a discussion.

I can't prove the document is a fake. I have a healthy skepticism because of the seal and header, but BP has offered a way that this could possibly be resolved in favor of the document. I'm open to the possibility it is real and have offered several bits of information in support of it.
909 posted on 08/03/2009 11:25:10 AM PDT by Mount Athos (A Giant luxury mega-mansion for Gore, a Government Green EcoShack made of poo for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 903 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

I haven’t spoken to Orly in months. Life is too short to waste talking to Orly.

An Awesome Soldier/Patriot demanded an apology from Claire McCaskil today at a town hall meeting. Arm that Patriot
with the Bill of Rights and we’ll take Our Country back!

http://townhall.com/blog/g/9e0aeed2-43d4-42df-817c-883674c84813&comments=true

We Patriots can thank Our Founding Fathers for these 12 Simple Steps because they gave us the RIGHT to form GRAND JURIES in the BILL OF RIGHTS. It was the way they designed for Patriots to keep control of the Government. The Grand Jury Process is the Fourth Branch of Government and it is the Branch that was designed for We the People to control Our politicians, not the other way around.

12 Simple Steps to Clean up Corruption in Washington:

1) Advertise and Promote the Fact that you are forming a Grand Jury in Blogs, Local Newspapers and Community Organizations.
2) Form the Grand Jury and select a Foreman.
3) Select a Private Attorney General to make Presentments to Grand Jury, if local DA refuses to make presentments.
4) Select a convenient Meeting Place.
5) Communicate with all Citizens who have criminal information to present.
6) Schedule presentments by said Citizens.
7) Subpoena documents from Government Offices and Officials.
8) Schedule presentment of said Documents to Grand Jury by Grand Jury Attorney General.
9. Have Grand Jury Attorney General present said Documents to Grand Jury.
10) After investigation and deliberation is completed, vote and issue a True Bill (Indictment) or No True Bill.
11 Announce all Indictments to the Press.
12) Serve the Indictment on the Judiciary for the Issuance of Arrest Warrants.

http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/07/our-privilege-our -right-our-duty.html


910 posted on 08/03/2009 11:30:49 AM PDT by L_Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 904 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

“No way this would just have a coincidental series of numbers matching so closely with things that tie with Obama’s presidency. 47, 44, O....please.”

Right just like

1)Lincoln was elected in 1860, Kennedy in 1960, 100 years apart

2) Both men were deeply involved in civil rights for African Americans.

3) Both men were assassinated on a Friday, in the presence of their wives.

4) Each wife had lost a child while living at the White House.

5) Both men were killed by a bullet that entered the head from behind.

6) Lincoln was killed in Ford’s Theater. Kennedy met his death while riding in a Lincoln convertible made by the Ford Motor Company.

7) Both men were succeeded by vice-presidents named Johnson who were southern Democrats and former senators.

8) Andrew Johnson was born in 1808. Lyndon Johnson was born in 1908, exactly one hundred years later.

9) The first name of Lincoln’s private secretary was John, the last name of Kennedy’s private secretary was Lincoln.

10) John Wilkes Booth was born in 1839 [according to some sources] Lee Harvey Oswald was born in 1939, one hundred years later.

11) Both assassins were Southerners who held extremist views.

12) Both assassins were murdered before they could be brought to trial.

13) Booth shot Lincoln in a theater and fled to a warehouse. Oswald shot Kennedy from a warehouse and fled to a theater.

14) LlNCOLN and KENNEDY each has 7 letters.

15) ANDREW JOHNSON and LYNDON JOHNSON each has 13 letters.

16) JOHN WlLKES BOOTH and LEE HARVEY OSWALD each has 15 letters.

17) A Lincoln staffer Miss Kennedy told him not to go to the Theater. A Kennedy staffer Miss Lincoln, told him not to go to Dallas.

No way all that could happen...


911 posted on 08/03/2009 11:30:51 AM PDT by bluecollarman (Everybody, looks good...at the starting line......."Paul Thorn")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 908 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX
Orly Taitz was explicit in taking no position regarding the authenticity of the document.

Then she should not have gone rushing off to court at the very first opportunity waving it around saying "look what I've got now!!" If she was a serious person, she would would be doing the legwork herself to find out the veracity of the document instead of demanding that the courts force the Kenyan government and American State Department to do everything for her.

The more I see of her and her antics (she's already cost one man his job) the more of a joke she appears to be. How many times does Taitz and her 39 social security numbers have to be laughed out of court (she will be this time too) before you guys stop taking her seriously?

912 posted on 08/03/2009 11:33:47 AM PDT by tyke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 907 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
I've seen one poll that says only 26% of the country thinks that we need to see the real BC

Do you recognize how profound that is...that 26% of the country has some question as to the eligibility of the President of the United States (by place of origin...not by the legitimacy of the election)?

That has got to be a first in US history.

If you are frustrated or think this distraction has no meaning, ruminate on those words a bit...

913 posted on 08/03/2009 11:38:44 AM PDT by markomalley (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 892 | View Replies]

To: nufsed

The larger goal is to get him to open ALL of his records. So far it is alledged that much of his life, as he reported it, is a lie. So let’s see what’s there and let the chips fall where they may.
+++++++++++++

Totally right. Let’s see what else is missing:
his kindergarten records,
his Punahou school records,
his Occidental College records,
his Columbia University records,
his Columbia thesis,
his Harvard Law School records,
his Harvard Law Review articles,
his scholarly articles from the University of Chicago,
his passport,
his medical records,
his files from his years as an Illinois state senator,
his Illinois State Bar Association records,
any baptism records, and
his adoption records.

Yeah, but we’re the NUTJOBS...uh huh...


914 posted on 08/03/2009 11:40:57 AM PDT by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country & the Tea Party! Take America Back! (Objective media? Try BIGOTS.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 895 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

I haven’t spoken to Orly in months. Life is too short to waste talking to Orly.

An Awesome Soldier/Patriot demanded an apology from Claire McCaskil today at a town hall meeting. Arm that Patriot
with the Bill of Rights and we’ll take Our Country back!

http://townhall.com/blog/g/9e0aeed2-43d4-42df-817c-883674c84813&comments=true

We Patriots can thank Our Founding Fathers for these 12 Simple Steps because they gave us the RIGHT to form GRAND JURIES in the BILL OF RIGHTS. It was the way they designed for Patriots to keep control of the Government. The Grand Jury Process is the Fourth Branch of Government and it is the Branch that was designed for We the People to control Our politicians, not the other way around.

12 Simple Steps to Clean up Corruption in Washington:

1) Advertise and Promote the Fact that you are forming a Grand Jury in Blogs, Local Newspapers and Community Organizations.
2) Form the Grand Jury and select a Foreman.
3) Select a Private Attorney General to make Presentments to Grand Jury, if local DA refuses to make presentments.
4) Select a convenient Meeting Place.
5) Communicate with all Citizens who have criminal information to present.
6) Schedule presentments by said Citizens.
7) Subpoena documents from Government Offices and Officials.
8) Schedule presentment of said Documents to Grand Jury by Grand Jury Attorney General.
9. Have Grand Jury Attorney General present said Documents to Grand Jury.
10) After investigation and deliberation is completed, vote and issue a True Bill (Indictment) or No True Bill.
11 Announce all Indictments to the Press.
12) Serve the Indictment on the Judiciary for the Issuance of Arrest Warrants.

http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/07/our-privilege-our -right-our-duty.html


915 posted on 08/03/2009 11:43:39 AM PDT by L_Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 904 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
I think we may be seeing a lot of fake Kenyan BC flooding out there by Obama goons to discredit “constitutionalists.”

That's the one claim everyone here can have complete faith in without bothering to authenticate. Those seeking to discredit all of Obama's political opposition as ignorant nutters are no doubt busy behind the scenes trying to play birthers & their fellow conservatives as well as all Republicans as fools. We should all be VERY wary of elaborate hoaxes.

Photobucket

916 posted on 08/03/2009 11:45:23 AM PDT by leilani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

Hey, I worked midnight shift Saturday night and i am ashamed to say I took someone’s word for it and don’t even see that number. Lesson learned.
thanks
melissa


917 posted on 08/03/2009 11:48:26 AM PDT by mel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 789 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

Hey, I worked midnight shift Saturday night and i am ashamed to say I took someone’s word for it and don’t even see that number. Lesson learned.
thanks
melissa


918 posted on 08/03/2009 11:48:30 AM PDT by mel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 789 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

and I wanted to make sure people understood that reference was from 1865
++++++++++++++

Fair enough..


919 posted on 08/03/2009 11:48:33 AM PDT by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country & the Tea Party! Take America Back! (Objective media? Try BIGOTS.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 900 | View Replies]

To: leilani

Let the idiot DUer’s forge their brains out.

The more BCs floating around, the more absurd it becomes that Obama does not step forward to clear the chaos and release his long form.

starting to wonder...does he even have one?


920 posted on 08/03/2009 11:48:41 AM PDT by cycle of discernment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 916 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 881-900901-920921-940 ... 1,181-1,190 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson