Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John Spratt (D, SC-5) to hold town halls in Sumter, Rock Hill
Congressman John Spratt ^ | August 27, 2009

Posted on 08/27/2009 8:57:00 PM PDT by MitchellC

08/27/09

Spratt to Hold Second and Third Town Meetings on Health Care

WASHINGTON - U.S. Rep. John Spratt (D-SC) will hold his second and third town hall meetings on health care next week in Sumter and Rock Hill.

Spratt held his first town hall on health care in Rock Hill on July 2, with AARP. Since early August he has been recovering from foot surgery at his home in York. Over the past few months, Spratt has met with numerous constituents, the South Carolina Hospital Association, SC Blue Cross/Blue Shield, and a wide assortment of physician groups to hear their concerns about heath care reform.

The following town hall meetings have been scheduled for next week:

Sumter
Time: 5:00 pm
Date: Wednesday, September 2
Place: Central Carolina Technical College – Building 400, 506 N. Guignard Street

Rock Hill
Time: 5:00 pm
Date: Thursday, September 3
Place: York Technical College – Baxter Hood Center, 452 S. Anderson Road

At the meetings, priority seating will be given to residents of the 5th Congressional District of South Carolina. In addition, people who want to ask questions will be asked to write their name on an index card at the door and place the card in a box that most closely matches their position on health care reform – for, against, or undecided. During the question and answer session, names will be drawn from the boxes, one by one, and members of the audience will be called on to ask their question.

Continued...


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Announcements; News/Current Events; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: johnspratt; townhalls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Is it just me, or do these Dem press releases announcing town halls sound defensive? Just like David Price, Spratt insists that he hasn't been hiding from his constituents.
1 posted on 08/27/2009 8:57:00 PM PDT by MitchellC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: upchuck

SC ping


2 posted on 08/27/2009 8:58:55 PM PDT by MitchellC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC

Spratt is long past due to be defeated. That’s a Republican district.


3 posted on 08/28/2009 1:03:42 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
I hope they find someone good to challenge him (here's one suggestion), because this might be the only real opportunity to defeat him.

He was held to 52% in '94. Since then the challenges are rarely serious, but Ralph Norman put in a very serious effort in 2006 and Spratt came in with a relatively low 57%, and that's with a good year for Democrats and a last minute blitz of 'gotcha' ads from the DCCC.

I suspect the district now benefits from a lot of 'white flight' from Charlotte.
4 posted on 08/28/2009 4:05:17 AM PDT by MitchellC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2A Patriot; 2nd amendment mama; 4everontheRight; 77Jimmy; Abbeville Conservative; acf2906; ...
South Carolina
Ping

Send FReepmail to join or leave this list.
5 posted on 08/28/2009 4:32:19 AM PDT by SC Swamp Fox (Aim small, miss small.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC
I suspect the district now benefits from a lot of 'white flight' from Charlotte.

I'm not so sure. My experience with those fleeing liberal enclaves is that they bring their goofy ideas with them. They don't seem to realize that liberal/socialist ideas and policies are the cause of the failures they are fleeing. They move to rural conservative areas and immediately start whining about the lack of gov't services and control.

6 posted on 08/28/2009 4:56:25 AM PDT by SC Swamp Fox (Aim small, miss small.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SC Swamp Fox

Those attending should ask about healthcare AND the AUDIT the FED.

Federal Reserve Loses Bloomberg FOIA Lawsuit, Sensitive Disclosures Forthcoming

http://bytestyle.tv/content/federal-reserve-loses-bloomberg-foia-lawsuit-sensitive-disclosures-forthcoming

Why is this being ignored by the politicians and media?


7 posted on 08/28/2009 4:58:36 AM PDT by GoreNoMore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SC Swamp Fox

My evidence is anecdotal, but as Charlotte has gotten increasingly liberal, a lot of former suburban Charlotteans have moved to surrounding towns. The most obvious cases are the towns within Mecklenburg County, which remain Republican as their populations explode. I suspect that explains some of the GOP’s success in York County.


8 posted on 08/28/2009 5:16:15 AM PDT by MitchellC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC

Spratt reminds me somewhat of the situation we have in TN-6 (and perhaps TN-4). Bart Gordon in TN-6 succeeded Al Gore when he went to the Senate in ‘84, and at the time, there was not much of a GOP presence in that district (aside from one particular suburban Nashville county), outside of supporting the GOP for President. Over time, the district moved further and further into the GOP column, and at the legislative level, nearly (or above) a majority are now Republican, but despite that, no one has seriously challenged Gordon since ‘94 (like Spratt). He faced Marsha Blackburn in the early ‘90s when she was a second-tier candidate, but not yet a star. The state GOP is trying to entice a prominent State Senator (Jim Tracy) to run against Gordon, but it’s like pulling teeth. Gordon didn’t even have a GOP opponent in ‘08 despite the district going handily for McCain.

One reason why a lot of serious Republicans aren’t attempting to do so is because we’re expected to control redistricting for the first time essentially ever, and we’re going to drastically reconfigure the heavily-Dem gerrymandered districts (it took us decades to bust the gerrymander, we’d been getting a majority of the vote for the House since ‘94, but didn’t get a majority until last November, but that was ruined by a single East TN RINO who “fixed” it with the entirety of the Democrat party to elect him Speaker while he kept the Dems in control - but we’ll fix that next year), so once the lines are redrawn (and we’re going to draw a 7R-2D delegation, hopefully, taking out Davis, Gordon & Tanner), you’ll see the top tier guys run in ‘12... but why wait when we can take out at least Davis and Gordon in ‘10 ?

As for SC, I believe they’ll be getting back a 7th seat in 2012 for the first time since they lost it in 1933, so the legislature should be able to reconfigure Spratt’s seat. But the bad news is that based on the Black-White percentage, the Justice Dept. will likely mandate a 2nd Black Dem seat be drawn (although the good news is that for the other remaining Republicans, it’ll make the districts safer for them, since it’s getting downright uncomfortable in the Charleston-based 1st, whose county went for Zero, and for which Henry Brown barely beat a Lesbian moonbat by a 52-48% margin).


9 posted on 08/28/2009 5:33:47 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SC Swamp Fox

Thanks Swampy.


10 posted on 08/28/2009 5:33:59 AM PDT by upchuck (Neuter them in 2010 - Send them packing in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC

Here’s some info for those going: http://www.collinsreport.net/the-50-reasons-to-stop-obamacare/ top of http://collinsreport.net


11 posted on 08/28/2009 5:44:48 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

re: un-gerrymandering

Hopefully 2010 will see a 1994-like tidal wave here in NC so that we can take the legislature in order to do just that - I personally am far more concerned about that than unseating Kissell and Shuler, given the long-term implications, esp. if we end up with another seat...

Unfortunately, no matter how we carve this state up, I’m not sure any of the districts, assuming they look anything like they do now, will become significantly more favorable to Republicans.


12 posted on 08/28/2009 6:42:07 AM PDT by MitchellC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC
I don't know what happened to the state, it was going so great in '94, capturing the House there, only to lose it by '98. The Senate has been way too rodent-heavy, and that was also an impediment to getting control of redistricting (along with the fact that it has been 21 years since you guys last elected a GOP Governor). But clearly at the Congressional level, as with the State Senate, it's got too many Democrats in districts that should be GOP. If we got control there, there's no reason we couldn't squeeze a 10R-3D majority out of it (leaving the Justice Dept. mandated 1st and 12th, and the 4th for the moonbat Chapel Hill/Research Triangle for the rodents).

Shuler didn't win his seat due to gerrymandering, but because of his GOP predecessor (that district is really just acknowledging a GOP lean), but the Hayes/Kissell seat WAS designed to elect a rodent, it just took 6 years for it to finally happen. I was astonished to see Hayes making the serious mistake for a Republican of moving leftward, voting (according to the ACU) in the 90s% or high 80s (with only one fluke 76 in his second year in 2000), up until 2006, but dropped to an astonishing 48% Conservative by '08, which officially made him a liberal Republican. I'd have likely left that office blank in '08 seeing the direction he was going. Conservatives aren't stupid, they're not going to tolerate (nor should) their members moving leftward. 10 years in and Hayes jumped the shark.

13 posted on 08/28/2009 7:01:51 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
If we got control there, there's no reason we couldn't squeeze a 10R-3D majority out of it (leaving the Justice Dept. mandated 1st and 12th, and the 4th for the moonbat Chapel Hill/Research Triangle for the rodents).

You may be right on 10, but probably only in terms of being R+ and not actually voting for Republicans for US House. Likely, some of the Dems would end up even more entrenched a s a result. Just far, far too many liberals in the upper Piedmont combined with black Dems in Charlotte and allegedly 'conservative' gimmie-gimmies out east and to some extent the SW. The 13th could be changed around, so that it doesn't do those ridiculous grabs into Greensboro and Raleigh and instead swaps those with, say, the 6th...

But then there is the problem of the added district.

And, I'd consider it a failure to leave the 12th looking anything like it does today, even though changing it would have huge negative effects on Republican districts. A district could be carved out of 2/3 or 1/2 of Mecklenburg Co. (Charlotte) instead and could probably fit the ridiculous race quota, while possibly remaining competitive.
14 posted on 08/28/2009 7:20:14 AM PDT by MitchellC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC
I'm going to the Rock Hill meeting, on the 3rd.
I would like to heard what questions you would like for me to ask if called upon.
I work at a High School and am planning on wearing a school faculty golf shirt.. they might think I'm a Lib, NEA ‘Boma supporter
15 posted on 08/28/2009 7:25:02 AM PDT by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC

One problem we face is that the districts have to pass muster with Justice. To even have districts whose makeup and lines are being dictated by the federal government based on race IS discriminatory. I’m a Caucasian in a State Senate district in Nashville (TN) that is “ordered” to be majority Black by Justice, and that leaves me without representation (because the Sen. is a Democrat and a moonbat and has never had a GOP opponent). The Dems seem to be able to draw lines with little interference, but we are prevented from having a free hand even when we are in charge. Why shouldn’t Caucasians in these sorts of districts not rise up and sue the federal gov’t for discrimination ?


16 posted on 08/28/2009 7:47:20 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GoreNoMore
This was a response from another thread

I think that bytestyle.tv article is a “link only” source. Actually, the story originated at Bloomberg news. Here are some links of interest.

“Federal Reserve Loses Bloomberg FOIA Lawsuit, Sensitive Disclosures Forthcoming” from ByteStyle.tv

A thread yesterday about the Bloomberg ruling (with 50 comments)

H.R. 1207, including text of legslation and list of 282 co-sponsors

S.604, including the text of the legislation and list of 23 co-sponsors in the Senate.

My post yesterday to a “Fed apologist” who pointed out that there are consolidated financial statements (audited by Deloitte and Touche) available online at the Fed website. cripplecreek wrote: Does anyone know if there is a threshhold number of cosponsors that can trigger an automatic vote or is this one up to Nazi Pelousy alone?

Unfortunately, the majority party controls the calendar in the House. And Queen Nancy is the leader of the majority party right now.

This is why local elections for your Congressional district have national consequences. GoreNoMore wrote: I would like to know.

Anyone attending the townhall meetings should be bringing this up. The war on America has been defined and we send out men to die to defend us but we do not do what is necessary to defend ourselves.

The town hall I went to Monday with Ginny Brown-Waite (R, FL-5) was tightly controlled, only written questions, and only a few of those covered. The topic of auditing the Fed was a point of conversation in the crowd waiting to get in. And I seem to remember the point coming up briefly within discussion of the financial aspects of Health Care Reform, which was the “topic of the day” for this town hall meeting.

17 posted on 08/28/2009 8:05:20 AM PDT by GoreNoMore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SC Swamp Fox; upchuck
FYI- The location for the Sumter town hall has been changed:
Sumter - New Location
Time: 5:00 pm
Date: Wednesday, September 2
Place: USC-Sumter - Nettles Building, 200 Miller Road

18 posted on 08/31/2009 8:46:09 AM PDT by MitchellC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC; 2A Patriot; 2nd amendment mama; 4everontheRight; 77Jimmy; A Strict Constructionist; ...
Note location change.

South Carolina
Ping

Send FReepmail to join or leave this list.

19 posted on 08/31/2009 3:00:47 PM PDT by upchuck (Neuter them in 2010 - Send them packing in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC

BTTT


20 posted on 08/31/2009 3:40:58 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson