Posted on 12/04/2009 4:47:27 PM PST by cycle of discernment
OFFICIAL REQUEST BY CONGRESSMEN TO SEE OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE WILL BE THE STRAW WHICH BREAKS THIS CAMEL’S BACK
Political analysis by John Charlton
Obama's presidential campaign was hailed for its forceful imagery, but after 11 months the public has come to understand the undisputed facts about him, don't fit the requirements of the U.S. Constitution.
(Dec. 4, 2009) — Georgia’s representative in the U.S. House, Nathan Deal announced in early November that he and 10 House colleagues were going to sign a joint letter, asking Obama to publicly reveal his birth certificate,.
The simple enough question was rebuffed and ridiculed by the Main Stream Media, and even the Savannah Morning News, as if a birth certificate was some sort of private journal or diary of past affairs.
The mere fact that the liberals and progressives ridiculed Nathan Deal — whose only interest is to quiet the nation — shows that they have no substantive reason to oppose the request. It further shows that they know that Obama cannot oblige Deal and his co-signatories, for in Democratic circles nothing is a secret.
What will Obama say to Nathan Deal? The answer must come soon. Deal said that he was to send his letter after Thanksgiving. Any delay on the part of Barack Hussein Obama to oblige Deal, will only further erode his political influence in Washington, D.C..
Obama has been effectively checkmated by the concerted effort of public support, publicized lawsuits on the eligibility question, publicity campaigns such as those of World Net Daily and Charles Kerchner to put the issue in the face of liberals on a constant basis, and blogs and bloggers the world over.
If Obama obliges him, then the online image of a Certificate of Live Birth (COLB) provided by his campaign will be proven a forgery, according to the consensus of opinion of citizens who have studied the images posted on the net and found some images of the allegedly same document, contain a HI State seal and some do not.
If Obama does refuses, however, it will only further confirm that he has something to hide.
Palins remark that it is a valid issue and Ogden’s resignation as Deputy U.S. Attorney General in the same week, following the sending of Nathan Deal’s letter, appear to be diagnostic signs that the political establishment understands the risks and imminent crisis about to break. The publicity garnered by the testimony of the U.S. Marine, who goes by the nik, Race Bannon, only further tilt the Obama regime towards political implosion.
Even the pulse of Obama’s political support on the net tells the tale: a lull and quiet among them posting comments at opposition blogs is noticeable. There remain only the violent, the perverse and the somewhat mad to carry on the cheers of “Change,” which were the mind numbing drum beat of the Obama for American campaign, just 14 months ago.
The political momentum of the nation now follows diverse roads to the same destination, and the resulting fireworks are going to be much brighter and invigorating than those of any Fourth of July in many a year!
exactly!
ObaMao’s birth certificate is irrelevant to me. He was born a British subject and a citizen of Kenya. He is a naturalized citizen citizen who can claim to be a native citizen of the United States and does not qualify for the office in which he sits.
The only relevancy to me for the birth certificate is that he refuses to release it, spent millions to hide it, and is possibly illegally using the DOJ to intimidate the judiciary, and defend himself on a personal issue.
He is a liar, a communist, a mafia thug, and a radical muslim who hates Americans, especially successful white Americans as is evidenced by every statement he makes.
I don’t need a birth certificate. I just want to see him escorted out of the White House in handcuffs.
OMG! He did it. Leo finally found a client who meets the qualifications of an “interested person” for quo warranto. This is incredible news! Go Leo!
deport, you made my freaking year!
danae & rxsid, Leo and Steve Pidgeon have been retained by the auto dealers for a quo warranto!
Flatter myself?!? (Scratching head at trying to figure that one out. As if I am desirous of your and your fellow flying monkeys’ attention??! Surely you jest.)
Since the libtards on the other sites you discuss these matters with are sooo much more gentlemanly and civilized, why don’t you just hie yourself back there and continue your nice civilized discussions with them!
Ping to #220 above from deport.
Rumor has it that Leo Donofrio and Steve Pidgeon have been retained by some auto dealers to file a quo warranto in D.C. Challenging Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of POTUS. If this rumor is true, this will be the first serious chance to get a SCOTUS ruling on the definition of NBC.
I think danae had a thread on this earlier today or someone did if I remember correctly.
But this getting into the DC Circuit will be the one to get some action...... And the Car Dealers maybe the vehicle to use to get there.
That is simply not true. Did you make that up, or did someone else do it and you didn't bother to check?
“The whole issue is very strange, but I am leaning on the
side of those that believe he is NOT a US citizen.”
It IS strange, to say the least. However, I believe the question being raised in the courts is: is he a ‘natural born citizen,’ and exactly what did the Framers mean by using that term in the Constitution. They didn’t say the POTUS has to be a citizen, as they did for Senators or Representatives; they said the POTUS has to be a ‘natural born citizen.’
Yeah, those auto dealers meet the requirements of standing without question, IMHO. They have a unique injury caused directly by the actions of Obama as POTUS (rather than candidate Obama.) The court can provide a remedy and has the jurisdiction to do so. This will be the case to watch. I knew when Leo’s blog went dark that he had a client, but I never imagined he would have the perfect clients.
I’ve always suspected that they guy lurks on FReerepublic. I don’t really listen to him too much, but when I do he is always quoting stuff that I have read FReepers say.
And he don't look like us.
Thanks for the ping.
Bump.
Maybe already posted, but here’s an email I received:
“The issue can be resolved by Obama answering one simple question:
What passport did he use when he was shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi ?
So how did a young man who arrived in New York in early June 1981, without the price of a hotel room in his pocket, suddenly come up with the price of a round-the-world trip just a month later?
And once he was on a plane, shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi , what passport was he offering when he passed through Customs and Immigration?
The American people not only deserve to have answers to these questions, they must have answers. It makes the debate over Obama’s citizenship a rather short and simple one.
Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20?
A : Yes, by his own admission..
Q: What passport did he travel under?
A: There are only three possibilities
1) He traveled with a U.S. Passport,
2) He traveled with a British passport, or
3) He traveled with an Indonesia passport.
Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled with a U.S. Passport in 1981?
A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department’s “no travel” list in 1981.
Conclusion:
When Obama went to Pakistan in 1981 he was traveling either with a British passport or an Indonesian passport..
If he were traveling with a British passport that would provide proof he was born in Kenya on August 4, 1961, not in Hawaii as he claims.
And if he were traveling with an Indonesian passport that would tend to prove he relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held, British or American, prior to being adopted by his Indonesian step-father in 1967.
Whatever the truth of the matter, the American people need to know how he managed to become a “natural born” American citizen between 1981 and 2008.
Given the destructive nature of his plans for America, as illustrated by his speech before Congress and the disastrous spending plan he has presented to Congress, the sooner we learn the truth of all this, the better.
For the hundredth time, the above is not true. There were no restrictions on US citizens traveling to Pakistan in 1981.
Don't you ever bother to check anything you read before believing it?
Nice race card, no banana. Sorry.
I know, I posted it earlier! LOL
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2401072/posts
I broke the story actually.
Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled with a U.S. Passport in 1981?
A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department’s “no travel” list in 1981.
LOL........ Do a little checking before you believe every email that hits your inbox........
“Do a little checking before you believe every email that hits your inbox.......”
I never said I believed the email contents; I only said I received the email. Sheesh.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.