Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Grassfire email: "Healthcare Bill May Go Nuclear"
Grassfire Nation [alert@grassfire.net] ^ | Sat 12/5/2009 | Steve Elliott

Posted on 12/05/2009 6:42:26 AM PST by plsjr

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: Liz
There are two ways of avoiding the 60 seat senate rule/vote :

1) Budget reconciliation
2) Change the rules, as Dem Alan Greyson called for. With 50 Senators plus Biden.

I just don't see either. #1 has too many limitations, #2 may have been headed off by the Gang of 14 moderates that we conservatives cursed(over judges 2006).

In fact this is a great test, if Dems do change the rules, RINOS were wrong, if they don't the RINOs are heroes. (I actually was very angry at Gang of 14, but they may have been right and us wrong.)

21 posted on 12/05/2009 8:59:37 AM PST by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the government spending you demand stupid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RonnG

I thought some Dims want to change that date—his brilliant critics from the left, who can’t get the goodies dispensed fast enough.


22 posted on 12/05/2009 9:04:25 AM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Let them do the nuclear option. They will all die from the radiation poisoning that results from that stupid decision.


23 posted on 12/05/2009 9:13:13 AM PST by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: R0CK3T

A stealth play for Communism? Not too darn stealthy in my opinion.


24 posted on 12/05/2009 9:17:07 AM PST by WVNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Liz; All

MORE

Health-care reform bills continue to benefit illegal aliens
3. December 2009 05:13

Amendments Expected to Target Issue

Assurances that the two health-care reform bills would not benefit illegal aliens are not accurate. A new report from the Center for Immigration Studies examines in detail the immigration-related provisions of both the House-passed HR 3962 and the bill now being debated in the Senate, HR 3590. The report concludes that the bills, in their current form, would indeed give illegal aliens access to taxpayer-funded health care well beyond emergency medical treatment.

The report, “Immigration-Related Provisions of Senate and House Health Reform Bills,” is authored by CIS Fellow James R. Edwards, Jr. It is online at http://cis.org/immigration-related-health-provisions.

Key findings include:

* HR 3962 ensures illegal alien access to the exchange and public option. HR 3590 states illegal immigrants are excluded from these.
* Both bills ostensibly bar illegal aliens from receiving the premium subsidy, and both bills use some form of eligibility verification for the subsidy.
* Both bills expand Medicaid eligibility. Both bills lack verification requirements based on citizenship or immigrant status. Both contain serious loopholes to enroll illegal aliens easily into Medicaid. HR 3962 automatically covers anchor babies.
* The eligibility verification process in each bill falls woefully short of protecting taxpayer liability to cover or subsidize people living unlawfully in the United States. Both the House and Senate bills’ verification processes will encourage large-scale fraud and abuse.
* The Senate bill exempts illegal aliens from the mandate that everyone have health insurance or else face a tax penalty. This perverse exemption treats illegal aliens better than the bill treats American citizens.

SOURCE Center for Immigration Studies

http://www.news-medical.net/news/20091203/Health-care-reform-bills-continue-to-benefit-illegal-aliens.aspx


25 posted on 12/05/2009 9:19:40 AM PST by AuntB (If Al Qaeda grew drugs & burned our forests instead of armed Mexican Cartels would anyone notice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: plsjr

I hope Grassley doesn’t seriously believe this petition will make a microgram of difference to what Reid does.


26 posted on 12/05/2009 9:29:05 AM PST by Cyber Liberty (Ram "Health Care Reform" down our throats in '09, and we'll ram it up your @ss in '10.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mvpel
I guess the silver lining is that if they change the rules to pass it, we’ll only need 50 votes to repeal it in 2010.

Which -12nobama will then veto and we won't have the 3/4 majority to override the veto.

I really, really hate to admit this, but it appears that if this is passed, we are screwed.

However, we can mightily express our dissatisfaction by voting out the RATS and all the RINOS in 2010.

27 posted on 12/05/2009 10:09:29 AM PST by upchuck (New sign on my pickup: Are you a "Hope and Change" regretter?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: upchuck; mvpel
Which -12nobama will then veto and we won't have the 3/4 majority to override the veto.

It takes 2/3 to override a veto -- still unreachable.

However, control of either house could make it impossible to fund the programs involved in implementing the legislation.

Any bill that appropriates money for an Obamacare activity should be DOA.

28 posted on 12/05/2009 10:16:01 AM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty
All those who want this to pass:

Do nothing...

... or better yet, grouse about how stupid the U.S. Citizenry is, how we're not going to make any difference, sew doubt and despair and keep some of us who still care about our once great nation from having the heart and will to act...

... I'm sure your new masters will thank you if/when you are successful.

/sarc

Those of us who have faith will keep doing what we can against the evil.

29 posted on 12/05/2009 10:16:53 AM PST by plsjr (<>< ... "there aught to be a law" => more government & more lawyers. Like what we have? Want more?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: plsjr

any more whiners?

(...shameless self bump)


30 posted on 12/05/2009 12:19:42 PM PST by plsjr (<>< ... "there aught to be a law" => more government & more lawyers. Like what we have? Want more?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty

Yes, but it’s still good to register with all our might our opposition to this monstrosity. It’s good for us and all those who will join us to speak out in every way possible.


31 posted on 12/05/2009 12:41:54 PM PST by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Liz; All

“Even stupid Dems know that, for them, it’s curtains in 2010-—unless massive voter fraud takes place. They need to buy votes and must get billions into the hands of their operatives-—ACORN, SEIU, immigrant groups, and others.”

If the tea party folk want to do something constructive, they need to monitor all of the polling places in the country next year.


32 posted on 12/05/2009 1:38:12 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops, and vote out the RINO's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

B U M P


33 posted on 12/05/2009 1:40:18 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops, and vote out the RINO's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: okie01
It takes 2/3 to override a veto -- still unreachable. However, control of either house could make it impossible to fund the programs involved in implementing the legislation.

Thanks for correcting my mistake. If there was a bill to defund existing programs, -14nobama could veto that. But if were new funds (ie, a budget item) the Repubs could leave it out. I suppose that would work.

34 posted on 12/05/2009 1:59:03 PM PST by upchuck (New sign on my pickup: Are you a "Hope and Change" regretter?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: plsjr; 2A Patriot; 2nd amendment mama; 4everontheRight; 77Jimmy; A Strict Constructionist; ...
This ping is being done via a FReepmail request from Larousse2

South Carolina
Ping

Send FReepmail to join or leave this list.

35 posted on 12/05/2009 2:05:09 PM PST by upchuck (New sign on my pickup: Are you a "Hope and Change" regretter?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
"Good Bye America. We hardly knew ye."

No, "Good-bye RAT Party...we knew ye better than you expected!"

36 posted on 12/05/2009 2:24:04 PM PST by Redleg Duke ("Don't fire unless fired upon, but it they mean to have a war, let it begin here." J Parker, 1775)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
There's no evidence - none whatsoever - based on elections that this Congress isn't doing EXACTLY what the People want them to do. I hope the People are happy with their stupidity.

Jim, it ain't exactly stupidity. It's far worse. It's apathetic stupidity. The votes that would have assured Obama's defeat, and that of his cohorts, never showed at the polls. In fact, they NEVER do.

With a 50-55%% turnout or less, in key states, Obama was elected by about 26% of the potential vote. Now the folks who didn't vote, want to change the outcome; that is they wish to escape the consequences of their stupidity.

Good luck to us all.

37 posted on 12/05/2009 2:41:53 PM PST by Kenny Bunk (Eligibility: I ain't lookin' for answers. Just 1 elected Republican to ask the question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: plsjr

BTTT


38 posted on 12/05/2009 3:08:53 PM PST by lula ( If con is the opposite of pro, is Congress the opposite of progress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: WVNan

>>>>A stealth play for Communism? Not too darn stealthy in my opinion.<<<<

Well that is in the sense that 0bama NEVER has acknowledged or admitted what he really believes in, he just talks in great aggregate concepts like HOPE, CHANGE, etc.

He’s (as Paul Begala put it) a relatively unknown State Representative from Illinois so America really has no clue what he really wants or how he fells it must be achieved.

Stealth in that way.


39 posted on 12/05/2009 4:19:35 PM PST by R0CK3T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: R0CK3T

“The Liberal Totalitarians have every intent to obtain their Ends by way of Force.”

Tell us which “force” they’ll use to enforce their dictates.

Will it be fat welfare mommas, bed-wetting college kids or 50 IQ rappers who can’t hold a glock staight?

I’m getting real tired of the drama queens here on FR.

Give me the names of king obuma’s combat commanders. Tell me where king obuma’s troops trained. Tell me how many divisions king obuma has.

The only facts we have is that obuma the ghetto thug attacks the military, hates the miltary and has insulted every veteran in America. Even Hitler had enough brains to embrace the military and get the soldiers on his side.

So you tell me where and how obuma will obtain the “ends by way of force.”

Your words. Not mine.


40 posted on 12/05/2009 4:31:19 PM PST by sergeantdave (obuma is the anti-Lincoln, trying to re-establish slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson