Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Investigators: Obama using Connecticut Soc. Sec. Number
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=152773 ^

Posted on 05/12/2010 4:24:22 AM PDT by cycle of discernment

Investigators: Obama using Connecticut Soc. Sec. Number

9:57 pm Eastern

Two private investigators working independently are asking why President Obama is using a Social Security number set aside for applicants in Connecticut while there is no record he ever had a mailing address in the state.

The investigators believe Obama needs to explain why he is using a Social Security number reserved for Connecticut applicants that was issued at a date later than he is known to have held employment.

The Social Security website confirms the first three numbers in his ID are reserved for applicants with Connecticut addresses, 040-049.

"Since 1973, Social Security numbers have been issued by our central office," the Social Security website explains. "The first three (3) digits of a person's social security number are determined by the ZIP code of the mailing address shown on the application for a social security number."

Daniels and Sampson each used a different database showing Obama is using a Social Security number beginning with 042.

"There is obviously a case of fraud going on here," Daniels maintained. "In 15 years of having a private investigator's license in Ohio, I've never seen the Social Security Administration make a mistake of issuing a Connecticut Social Security number to a person who lived in Hawaii. There is no family connection that would appear to explain the anomaly."

Does the Social Security Administration ever re-issue Social Security numbers?

"Never," Daniels said. "It's against the law for a person to have a re-issued or second Social Security number issued."

Daniels said she is "staking my reputation on a conclusion that Obama's use of this Social Security number is fraudulent."

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: certifigate; eligilbility; fraud; ineligible; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-108 next last

1 posted on 05/12/2010 4:24:22 AM PDT by cycle of discernment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

Corsi discussing this now on KHOW.


2 posted on 05/12/2010 4:27:03 AM PDT by tips up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment
Already posted http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2511649/posts
3 posted on 05/12/2010 4:27:10 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tips up

What is KNOW?


4 posted on 05/12/2010 4:29:06 AM PDT by cycle of discernment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

KEEP DIGGING... KEEP DIGGING.

There is so much crap surrounding this Creep-in-Chief.

DO NOT STOP !


5 posted on 05/12/2010 4:29:52 AM PDT by Reagan69 (Let me know when those insurance premiums go down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

“Your mission... should you choose to accept it”...

LLS


6 posted on 05/12/2010 4:30:11 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer ( WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

Boy, SS fraud would be a delicious way of catching him in a birth-origin lie, but, uh, ,,,

Social security numbers are issued at birth. The article says that system of issuing SS numbers was instituted in the 1970s. I’m younger than Obama (by a good deal), but my social security number doesn’t conform to the article’s formula at all.


7 posted on 05/12/2010 4:34:27 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Social security numbers are issued at birth - to those born in the United States. I have yet to find a record on a non-American baby born in Kenya receiving one.


8 posted on 05/12/2010 4:36:02 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Mine doesn’t match the formula either. Doesn’t mean Dear Leader’s SS isn’t fraudulent but does undermine the articles point. : (


9 posted on 05/12/2010 4:37:21 AM PDT by Josa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Social Security numbers have not always been issued at birth. In the 70’s you didn’t get one until you were 16, or old enough to get your first job. That was when you got one. I got mine in 1974, when I was 16 and about to go to work. In the 70’s Obama would have done the same.

It was in the 80’s (as my children were born) that they were issued at birth.

Even then all 3 of my kids beginning 3 numbers matches the state ID.


10 posted on 05/12/2010 4:38:04 AM PDT by conservativegramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: conservativegramma

Post #34 on this thread DOES appear accurate, and DOES jive with the story:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2511649/posts

I think this might take you directly there:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2511649/posts#34


11 posted on 05/12/2010 4:41:19 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1
“Social security numbers are issued at birth -”

Not so. Social Security numbers today might be issued when a child is a baby, when I was growing up you didn't need one for anything until you went to work, and it was quite common to not get them until you were in high school. I was issued one in the State I resided in when I applied, not the State of birth.
Obama wasn't issued one until his college years I bet. And yes, like everything else about him, his is a fraud.

12 posted on 05/12/2010 4:42:49 AM PDT by bitterohiogunclinger (America held hostage - day 393)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Josa

This post explains what the poorly written article meant, and it seems accurate, after all:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2511649/posts#34


13 posted on 05/12/2010 4:43:09 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: conservativegramma

All 6 members of my household match the formula.

Perhaps the formula was modified somewhere along the line.


14 posted on 05/12/2010 4:43:24 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Dangus,

You cut and pasted this exact posting in the other threads about this yesterday-—IDENTICAL.

Plus you’ve been active since, what, May 7, here at FR?

And you’ll all animated—telling us you have the single personal experience that falls outside these expert investigators due diligence.

You certainly are a busy little mole for your man...and with such flair.

Go back to your mommy’s basement Obot.


15 posted on 05/12/2010 4:44:38 AM PDT by cycle of discernment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

It is true that today SS numbers are issued at birth. However, when I was born in 1951, SS numbers were not issued at birth. One applied for it when seeking employment for the first time. So, 0bama’s SS number might not have been issued at his birth just like mine was not.


16 posted on 05/12/2010 4:45:05 AM PDT by rgboomers (This space purposely left blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bitterohiogunclinger

Same for me, but I still resided in the state where I was born. I was a teenager when I got mine. Maybe they’re issued at birth now, but that wasn’t the case 40 years ago.


17 posted on 05/12/2010 4:47:31 AM PDT by tgusa (Investment plan: blued steel, brass, lead, copper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment
You used to be able to tell a lot from a person's Social Security number . . . originally. They scrapped that system and changed to sequential numbering at some point. When that occured I don't know.

Social Security numbers were not oringally issued at birth. You applied for one when when you entered the work force. I got mine at 13 due to a change in the tax law and dear old dad needed me to have one to claim me as a dependent.

The Kenyan's number is fraudalent because he's fraudalent. Why a Connecticut number I can't explain. A number from downstate New York or northern Virginia maybe if he was recruited by the Company while at Columbia. We'll have to wait for Rev. Manning to release his evidence.

18 posted on 05/12/2010 4:47:45 AM PDT by Oratam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus

They are issued at birth now - It has’t always been that way.
I don’t think mine was issued until I was 10 or 11.


19 posted on 05/12/2010 4:47:52 AM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

Obama could have this for a SS number 666-66-6666 and the MSM would not question it.


20 posted on 05/12/2010 4:52:01 AM PDT by Plumres
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitterohiogunclinger

He worked at Baskin Robins when he was 15 in HI


21 posted on 05/12/2010 4:52:22 AM PDT by BushCountry ( I spoken many wise words in jest, but no comparsion to the number of stupid words spoken in earnest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

Not the best job of investigating.

I posted on the more recent one, then I saw the note that the thread was a clone, so I posted on the older one. I’ve been posting and active since 2003, and the vanities I’ve posted alone have a total of several hundred thousand (maybe close to a million) views.

Also, before you could even finish your post, I had updated my original post with a further argument that supports the article. Be a little careful who you call an O-bot.


22 posted on 05/12/2010 4:52:58 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Oratam

Don’t you—for a minute—think that experts, that do this for a living , and have reputations to conbsider, factored what you are saying into their conclusions before they allowed thier names to be associated with this report?

Please.


23 posted on 05/12/2010 4:53:15 AM PDT by cycle of discernment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife

Maybe he had a part time 3 card monte gig in Hartford while he was allegedly at Columbia.


24 posted on 05/12/2010 4:54:07 AM PDT by Mouton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Well then perhaps you should consider shifting your profession to ID theft, having a greater grasp than experts working in the field for 30 years, eh?


25 posted on 05/12/2010 4:54:32 AM PDT by cycle of discernment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment
Here is the screenshot of the Selective Service record that shows he used that number.

Screenshot

26 posted on 05/12/2010 4:54:39 AM PDT by TheCipher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus

SS numbers have not always been issued at birth. I remember applying for mine and receiving it when I was in 7th grade, about 1972. My friends and I all went to the post office at the same time to get the applications.

Yes, I was born in the US, I am 12th generation American, have a family history older than this country, back to the 17th century.


27 posted on 05/12/2010 4:57:08 AM PDT by fredhead (Liberals think globally, reason rectally, act idiotically.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mouton
Maybe he had a part time 3 card monte gig in Hartford while he was allegedly at Columbia.

Except he used that number before he ever went to Columbia

28 posted on 05/12/2010 4:57:27 AM PDT by TheCipher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: dangus

They are not issued at birth.


29 posted on 05/12/2010 4:57:50 AM PDT by secret garden (Why procrastinate when you can perendinate?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

All 5 members of my family match as well. In the 70’s Obama would have applied when he was able to go to work. There is no evidence anywhere that he ever worked in CT.

And it still doesn’t match previous reports during the past year of THIS CT number belonging to a man born in 1899. So, if that number is REALLY Obama’s he was born in 1899.


30 posted on 05/12/2010 4:57:58 AM PDT by conservativegramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bitterohiogunclinger

You could get one when you started a job and I got mine and my job in the 70’s even though I was born in 57.

But the first 3 digits of the Soc Sec number is accurate for the state of CT-where I live now.


31 posted on 05/12/2010 5:00:00 AM PDT by homegroan (Proud member of the Hoi Polloi......ILLIGITIMA NON CARBORUNDUM..... -that's 4U Dad!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bitterohiogunclinger

I did not get a SS # until I registered for the Selective Service in 1974 at age 17. I had to register to go into the military. I wonder, did the Kenyan Village Idiot every register for Selective Service, it is the law now, was when I was a teenager, hmmmm?


32 posted on 05/12/2010 5:00:17 AM PDT by OldGoatCPO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rgboomers; tgusa; Pollster1

In the 70’s S.S. numbers were issued when you sought employment for the first time. I know - I got mine in 1974 when I was 16 seeking my first job. Obama would have been the same.

The being issued at birth began after 1980. My first child was born then and when she was 6 months old I had to apply for her S.S. card. The other 2 born later were automatically issued as the birth certificate information was turned in.

That should help clarify this ‘issued at birth’ from younger posters.


33 posted on 05/12/2010 5:00:52 AM PDT by conservativegramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

No, see, this is where you write “Oops... I didn’t see that” and go away. It’s pretty ironic that you accuse me of being an O-bot who only signed up a couple of days ago, when you could have discovered the truth by simply clicking on “dangus,” but then you write what you just did.


34 posted on 05/12/2010 5:00:58 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: dangus

They were only issued at birth beginning in the 1990’s.


35 posted on 05/12/2010 5:01:08 AM PDT by All Blue State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All
Proof of my earlier post. They are not issued at birth and forms must be filed to receive one.
36 posted on 05/12/2010 5:03:06 AM PDT by secret garden (Why procrastinate when you can perendinate?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: bitterohiogunclinger

I didn’t have a social security number until 1972. My son and I got them only because you had to have them for income tax deductions that year. My husband and I were in Alabama at the time, so we have Alabama social security numbers. This includes my son’s birth in Italy while hubby was stationed there with the Army. Never needed them to get passports either.


37 posted on 05/12/2010 5:03:37 AM PDT by holly go-rightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: conservativegramma

Which begs the question, when did he ever have a mailing address in CT? As far as we know, he didn’t. However, it says this number started being used by him in ‘86 which is right after he moved to Chicago (’85) and about the time the mail carrier says he met him at Tom Ayer’s house where Bernadine Dohrn was also living. Bernadine was into identity theft. That sounds to me like another puzzle piece clicked into place, huh.


38 posted on 05/12/2010 5:04:11 AM PDT by bgill (how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: All Blue State

Well, no... mine was issued at birth long before that; but in post #11 I linked to another thread that does explain how Obama’s SSN does belong to CT.


39 posted on 05/12/2010 5:04:40 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Social security numbers are issued at birth now, but I was born in Hawaii in ‘56. My sister was born in Michigan in ‘63 and we both didn’t have social security numbers until 1970 and we were living in California.


40 posted on 05/12/2010 5:05:42 AM PDT by BulletBobCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bgill

Yep, especially since that CT number belonged to an individual born in 1899. Unless Obama’s carries his age well, its a fraudulent number.


41 posted on 05/12/2010 5:06:24 AM PDT by conservativegramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

Maybe he is an illegal alien.................


42 posted on 05/12/2010 5:07:59 AM PDT by Red Badger (When you see Jerusalem being surrounded by armies, you'll know that its desolation is NEAR. Luke 21)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill
However, it says this number started being used by him in ‘86

He actually used it in 1980 for Selective Service Registration ( if, of course, that record is the original one, and not one created in the past couple of years to cover his tracks )

43 posted on 05/12/2010 5:08:43 AM PDT by TheCipher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: dangus
Back when I got my SSN it was when you got your first job. There is some rhyme to the article but not precisely. My offspring have numbers that were issued shortly after birth that would indicate that they are coded as the article states.
44 posted on 05/12/2010 5:08:52 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (If you can read this you are the resistance. (Oh and the GOP can bite me for $$$))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BushCountry
“He worked at Baskin Robins when he was 15 in HI”

So says He? I wonder if there even was Baskin Robins back then?

45 posted on 05/12/2010 5:09:38 AM PDT by bitterohiogunclinger (America held hostage - day 393)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: dangus

SS numbers were not issued at birth when he was hatched. We didn’t have to get SS numbers for babies until the late 80’s. I didn’t get a SS number until I was a teen in the early 70’s when I got my first real job..............


46 posted on 05/12/2010 5:10:38 AM PDT by Red Badger (When you see Jerusalem being surrounded by armies, you'll know that its desolation is NEAR. Luke 21)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dangus

That’s not true.Social Security numbers were only issued when you applied for it yourself or your parents applied.

I know because I didn’t have one untill I turned seventeen and needed it to get a job.That was in the late 1960’s.


47 posted on 05/12/2010 5:13:35 AM PDT by puppypusher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dangus

In Texas, my children born in the 1980’s did not have social security cards until I had to apply for them in order to list them as dependents on our taxes. In the 1990’s, our children born in Nebraska were issued social securtiy cards when their birth was registered by the state. I applied for mine in the seventies when I got my first job.


48 posted on 05/12/2010 5:13:40 AM PDT by All Blue State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

I wonder if you needed a SS number in the 60’s in order to get a passport ? If so, he must have used another one before this ( since it was issued in the 70’s ) in order to get a passport when he moved to Indonesia.


49 posted on 05/12/2010 5:15:33 AM PDT by TheCipher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus

ss #’s have not always been issued at birth...i was born in (ahem) 1956 and ours was not issued until we were in jr high school....also the first 3 numbers on mine shows it was issued in the state of florida....


50 posted on 05/12/2010 5:16:18 AM PDT by tatsinfla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson