Skip to comments.Obama's US Assassination Program? Part 1
Posted on 07/27/2010 11:03:54 PM PDT by neverdem
Sound too conspiratorial to be true? Like the cover-up ops of spy novels? Well, it's reality. And it is possibly the most bizarre, inhumane and abusive way that the White House is expanding its power over the American people.
It's not an extremist belief or theory of the far right. It's a fact that has been confirmed by The New York Times, The Washington Post and MSNBC and even documented by the far-left online magazine Salon.com.
And it's the gravest nightmare of U.S. citizens and abandonment of our Constitution to date: a presidential assassination program in which U.S. citizens are in the literal scopes of the executive branch based upon nothing more than allegations of terrorism involvement as the branch defines it.
Of course, the CIA has executed covert assassinations of foreigners for decades. But tragically, Obama is expanding this program to include American, non-Islamic, stateside, homegrown terrorists.
It all started in January, when The Washington Post reported: "As part of the operations, Obama approved a Dec. 24 strike against a (Yemeni) compound where a U.S. citizen, Anwar al-Aulaqi, was thought to be meeting with other regional al-Qaeda leaders. Although he was not the focus of the strike and was not killed, he has since been added to a shortlist of U.S. citizens specifically targeted for killing or capture."
"A shortlist of U.S. citizens specifically targeted for killing"?
That's right. No arrest. No Miranda rights. No due process. No trial. Just a bullet.
While the Obama administration continues its Bush-blaming for the economy, it is mega-morphing Bush policy in covert ops overseas, which was, according to the Post, "to kill U.S. citizens abroad if strong evidence existed that an American was involved in organizing or carrying out terrorist actions against the United States or U.S. interests."
Well, in recent weeks, the Obama administration has taken this overseas killing op to a new low: stateside assassinations.
A former director of national intelligence, Adm. Dennis Blair, confessed before Congress: "We take direct actions against terrorists in the intelligence community. If we think that direct action will involve killing an American, we get specific permission to do that."
If you are wondering who the "we" are to whom Adm. Blair refers, they are Smith, Wesson and the White House.
Now we know what deputy national security adviser John Brennan meant when he admitted in May, "And under President Obama, we have built upon the work of the previous administration and have accelerated efforts in many areas." (Remember when Bush's eavesdropping on U.S. citizens seemed harsh?)
Brennan further explained then that the problem of homegrown terrorists ranks as a top priority because of the increasing number of U.S. individuals who have become "captivated by extremist ideology or causes." He went on to say, "There are ... dozens of U.S. persons who are in different parts of the world and ... are very concerning to us."
Do you think "different parts of the world" doesn't include their country of origin?
Conveniently, the Obama administration also is integrating a pervasive plan to ensure the termination of radicals as the feds deem them abroad and domestic, too, with the resurrection of the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007, introduced by Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif. Also known as H.R. 1955, it was passed in the House by the Democratic majority but was rejected by the Senate.
Everyone thought that legislation was dead until the Obama administration resurrected its tenets in its 52-page "National Security Strategy," released in May. So alarming is the feds' potential abuse of power that officials from London to the Kremlin are recognizing the threat to U.S. citizens.
The European Union Times reported, "Foreign Ministry reports circulating in the Kremlin today are warning that an already explosive situation in the United States is about to get a whole lot worse as a new law put forth by President Obama is said capable of seeing up to 500,000 American citizens jailed for the crime of opposing their government."
Woodrow Wilson, during his reign as president, incarcerated more than 2,000 U.S. citizens for speaking out against the government. And now for the first time since, a U.S. president is highlighting the threats of homegrown terror and literally hunting U.S. citizens as terrorists. One senior administration official said, "For the first time since 9/11, the (national security strategy) integrates homeland security and national security."
And what type of "integration" does that entail?
President Obama explained in an often overlooked statement within the "National Security Strategy": "We are now moving beyond traditional distinctions between homeland and national security. ... This includes a determination to prevent terrorist attacks against the American people by fully coordinating the actions that we take abroad with the actions and precautions that we take at home."
Could it be any clearer? Right out of the horse's mouth. Or do I need to spell out what "fully coordinating the actions that we take abroad with the actions and precautions that we take at home" means?
Remember the words "a shortlist of U.S. citizens specifically targeted for killing"?
That's right. No arrest. No Miranda rights. No due process. No trial. Just a bullet.
In Part 2 next week, I will give further evidence of "Obama's U.S. assassination program" and explain why I say the administration is going after non-Islamic stateside radicals. Check out other reasons I oppose the Obama administration in my new PSA ("patriot service announcement") at http://www.BlackBeltPatriotism.com.
Mr. Norris is a Martial arts master, actor, and concerned citizen.
Boy, I bet when this story hit the internet the computer snooper software at the US Secret Service Central went ape sh!t...
This came out a few months ago. It sounded weird and markedly out of character for the Bummer, even though he has several dozen screws obviously loose. Why would he ever, ever want to kill a Mooselimb here? He does it only with the greatest reluctance overseas.
Perhaps such an announcement is his way of telegraphing a warning to the targeted person to stay in hiding?
Good thing it’s Chuck Norris who wrote this, then. Sniper rifles always kill their wielders when pointed at him.
This will make a lot more sense to you if you cross-reference it with that report put out last year by DHS about how veterans and people who are against higher taxes are now considered a threat.
Hoo boy, will the pitchforks and tar and feathers come out if evidence surfaces that these are whom the Bummer has in mind.
Hmm, non-Islamic radicals. Wonder if we can find a list of whom they mean? Let’s try here: http://michellemalkin.com/2009/04/14/confirme-the-obama-dhs-hit-job-on-conservatives-is-real/
Yup, Christians, conservatives, and veterans...
Are you serious? Think about Tea Party people. About yourself and other patriots. THOSE are the eventual targets. Remember that brief put out by Homeland security early on? It listed as possible terrorists: Pro-Life, 2nd Amend. former military etc. In MO, LE was suppose to ‘take note’ of bumper stickers for crying out loud.
WE are the target.
I printed out and read that PDF. Those people are insane!
I should have downloaded it since I doubt it's still on-line anywhere.
"Obama is expanding this program to include American, non-Islamic, stateside, homegrown terrorists."
Combined with the DHS memo I linked above (via Malkin), and this is at LEAST an effort at intimidation by some in obama's administration.
I usually don’t do one of these “to all” comments, but several freepers have mentioned last year’s DHS memo, and at least on Freeper thought the tar and feathers would come out if there was evidence that Christians, conservatives, and veterans might be targetted. Well, see my #9, the Malkin article it links, and the DHS memo she links: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2560228/posts?page=9#9
First time that actually happens it is going to blow up in Bummer’s face big time.
Question. Can a Moslem be a martyr if his death is at the hands of a Moslem?
We’ve seen alot in the past 18 months. He started off on a sprint and now is in a dead run...and nothing has blown up in his face yet. And this agenda is no longer covert but a wide open exclamation to us. For example, look at the Disclose act that failed the senate today...it’s already rescheduled for a cloture vote again and that scum Schumer said they were going to keep bringing it up until it passes.
Biggest violation of the 1st amendment since the McCain Feingold reform and the bill is in response to the SCOTUS nuetering that bill. Hasn’t blown up in his face there.
Not sure how it would blow up..because at first, people will just start disappearing quietly. (imo) In any case, I hope you are right but I don’t see it happening. People are extremely angry, this is obvious but whether any action will ever be taken by the citizens is a question mark.
Three guesses what that would lead to.
I wonder how many “cracker babies” are on the list...
He has no idea how many privately held firearms there are in this country.
Furthermore, I don't know of any in the law enforcement or the military who would turn on an American civilian.