McCain stumps for Senate candidate Norton in Colo. (McCain recruiting RINOs, corrupting more GOPers)

AP ^ | 2010-08-08 | Kristen Wyatt

[tlb]

>>> heck, I’ll even campaign for whatever democRAT is running

Campaign harder then these threads already do ? That would be something.

[douginthearmy]

Merely because someone has an "R" after their name does not mean that he/she is actually a Republican.

I get it, I really do. I sometimes don't know which is worse. At least the democrats don't pretend to be our friends. But I don't know how many more years our country can survive being run by these socialists while we teach RINOs a lesson. I am usually extremely optimistic about the survivability of America, but I honestly don't know how much more damage the country can take before it is irrevocably changed.

[DoughtyOne]

Can you imagine how out of step one would have to be to back this man for re-election? Even during his campaign, he breaks away to commit further subterfuge.

And yet, the brightest woman in the land, remains steadfastly a supporter. What is her agenda anyway?

[MaggieCarta]

I sometimes don't know which is worse. At least the democrats don't pretend to be our friends.

Nice one!

But I don't know how many more years our country can survive being run by these socialists while we teach RINOs a lesson.

They aren't learning a blinking thing, IMHO.

I am usually extremely optimistic about the survivability of America, but I honestly don't know how much more damage the country can take before it is irrevocably changed.

Too late. I would argue that the country changed irrevocably in the 30's with FDR, and continued to slide into the cesspool of socialism under LBJ.

[MaggieCarta]

Can you imagine how out of step one would have to be to back this man for re-election? Even during his campaign, he breaks away to commit further subterfuge.

I am starting to believe that McNuts gets a thrill out of that sort of thing. Either that, or his handlers are asleep at the switch.

[DoughtyOne]

I’m just sorry that Palin ever hitched her wagon to this man.

I was all for it in 2008. Now she’s soiled herself. He has at least partially turned another one.

If she had taken a pass on running with him, she would have served out a full one or two terms in office. McCain would have likely been rousted out of office, and his influence on people like her would have been severely limited.

Now he’s looking like he’ll return to the Senate, return to carrying enough weight to turn others...

It’s just a sad situation.

[meadsjn]

McCain stumps for Senate candidate Norton in Colo.

Well, this should help the Colorado Republican primary voters make a clear choice in this primary.

Jane Norton is clearly NOT the better choice.

[Deb]

The whiners who love threads like this either don't understand that we need majorities in order to win and that means everyone, or they are so deluded by the idea of purity in the ranks they're happy to lose, or they're Democrats hoping to discourage and suppress conservatives.

Don't buy it. Don't be discouraged. You're right.

[meadsjn]

Palin's wagon is NOT hitched to McCain.

You already know this, but you keep blathering the same nonsense for some unknown reason.

[DoughtyOne]

When you endorse people, you indicate that you agree with their politics. Sorry you didn’t know that.

But then you already know this, but you keep blathering the same nonsense for some unknown reason.

[DoughtyOne]

Just curious..., do you support McCain in the Primary against Hayworth?

[meadsjn]

When Palin agreed to endorse McCain, Hayworth was not in the race, and McCain's two opponents at that time were goofballs of the fringe order; neither was viable in a statewide race.

Since the visit last winter when she did endorse McCain, she has not appeared with him again. She has been to AZ and appeared with Jan Brewer, but not with McCain.

Endorsements do not necessarily indicate that you agree with someone's politics. An endorsement may mean you agree with their current opponent(s) less. Or it may be repayment of a debt.

But then you already know this, ...

[meadsjn]

I do support JD Hayworth in the primary against McCain.

[DoughtyOne]

When Palin agreed to endorse McCain, Hayworth was not in the race, and McCain's two opponents at that time were goofballs of the fringe order; neither was viable in a statewide race.

Palin not only endorsed John on campaign swings, and by creating radio spots, she went on FoxNews to do it with John in person.

Hayworth has been in the race for months, and Sarah has been content to not only let that endorsement stand, but to continue to let the radio spots air over and over again in support of John McCain.

Sarah has had plenty of time to reflect on the Arizona race after having been pounded over the subject for months.  And Sarah has opted to leave her support behind the likes of John McCain, despite having been clued in to what a miserable politician he has been for our cause.

Palin hasn't got  a leg to stand on here.  She is either clueless, deaf to Conservatism, or just loves John enough to support him despite anything he has done or what anyone can say.

Since the visit last winter when she did endorse McCain, she has not appeared with him again. She has been to AZ and appeared with Jan Brewer, but not with McCain.

And her radio spots continue to hawk McCain over J. D. Hayworth.  Evidently she doesn't have a concience either.

Endorsements do not necessarily indicate that you agree with someone's politics. An endorsement may mean you agree with their current opponent(s) less. Or it may be repayment of a debt.

So you're going to go with she doesn't agree with him but is supporting him anyway, she disagrees with him less than J. D. Haywroth, or she has sold her views out to repay a debt.

And I'm supposed to consider such a person a sure fire safe bet against selling her beliefs out from the Oval Office?

But then you already know this,...

Yep, I already knew your position was indefensible.

[DoughtyOne]

Why? The person you support has endorsed John McCain. Don’t you trust her over your own less knowledgeable views on the matter?

If you fail to think she is wrong here, why would you side with Hayworth over her endorsement of McCain?

You’re defending a woman you know to be terribly wrong on this matter.

I don’t see much honesty here.

[meadsjn]

You fail to see much, period. And your reading comprehension is pathetic. Or you are being deliberately dishonest.

[meadsjn]

And her radio spots continue to hawk McCain over J. D. Hayworth.

I've not heard of any Palin radio spot that mentions JD Hayworth.

Palin has promised to support Hayworth in the general election if he defeats McCain in the primary.

[DoughtyOne]

And you have the nerve to post this, after your hilarious offering in 36? Wow.

McCain and J.D. Hayworth are the two top candidates to represent the Republican part in a few days, and yet you resort to saying she has not mentioned Hayworth by name so I am being misleading by saying she supports McCain over Hayworth.

You’re a lying asshole. Yes, big whopping deal. She will support Hayworth in the general after making sure he won’t be the Republican nominee in the General.

Have you no shame? The answer is a resounding no, and I’m providing it since you obviously don’t have to tools to work up the correct answer.

[meadsjn]

Do you know when that radio spot you are referencing was recorded?

Find that out before you accuse someone else of lying.

[DoughtyOne]

Honest to God, you are a moron.

Those spots hawk McCain, when there is another man out there who is a 97.6% Conservative according to the American Conservative Union.

No J.D. had not declared yet, but he was expected to at any moment. None the less, the brightest woman in the nation couldn’t wait a few more days. She endorsed McCain. That endorsement still stands. That radio spot is still hawking McCain over Hayworth.

Only two people with a chance are running ace. Who is that spot hawking McCain over at this point, of not Hayworth?

You’re logic trail is looking like a pretzel. Good luck...