Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Researchers: Ancient human remains found in Israel
Yahoo! News ^ | December 27, 2010 | DANIEL ESTRIN,

Posted on 12/28/2010 9:05:38 AM PST by Immerito

JERUSALEM –

Israeli archaeologists said Monday they may have found the earliest evidence yet for the existence of modern man, and if so, it could upset theories of the origin of humans.

A Tel Aviv University team excavating a cave in central Israel said teeth found in the cave are about 400,000 years old and resemble those of other remains of modern man, known scientifically as Homo sapiens, found in Israel. The earliest Homo sapiens remains found until now are half as old.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Israel; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 398000bce; archaeology; godsgravesglyphs; history; homosapiens; israel; science; telaviv; telavivuniversity; tooth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: Red Badger
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

21 posted on 12/28/2010 5:47:24 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

The Doctor Fun Page

22 posted on 12/28/2010 6:10:16 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: balch3

INDEED.


23 posted on 12/28/2010 6:15:20 PM PST by Quix (Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Immerito

Evolution is just BS to say the most of a lie. Can’t believe our schools actually teach this with the new discoveries in DNA which puts evolution in the sh*t can where it belongs, no debate, no argument, evolution is bunko science.


24 posted on 12/28/2010 8:18:45 PM PST by Karliner (Now this is not the end. .... But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning, Churchill 1942)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Karliner

>> Can’t believe our schools actually teach this with the new
>> discoveries in DNA

Can you cite specific research which supports your claim?


25 posted on 12/31/2010 2:02:22 PM PST by JadeEmperor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: JadeEmperor
Can you cite specific research which supports your claim?

Why don't you site your claim to whatever you believe or think I'm amazed at and disprove me? You saw my post today? Four days after I wrote this? Are you searching for a debate? A debate on what specifically? On evolution? On teachers teaching evolution with few giving alternative views of teaching evolution? The anthropic principle or creationism or a small course just on DNA and how it may support or may de bunk evolution completely?

I'm grasping here. What specifically am I supposed to site?

Is this site a start?

26 posted on 01/01/2011 7:26:17 PM PST by Karliner (Now this is not the end. .... But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning, Churchill 1942)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: 84rules

Beat me to it. Reminds me of the saying oft quoted around here ...

To get an a conservative mad, you tell him a lie. To get a liberal mad, you tell him the truth.

It would appear that many posting here would take offense to this saying now. ;)


27 posted on 01/03/2011 6:36:55 AM PST by SengirV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rahbert

Exactly how were they dated?

Carbon dating that’s not accurate past a few thousand years?
(not to mention carbon 14 that’s been found in “billion year old” diamonds)

or radiometric dating that recently showed newly formed rocks from volcanic eruptions to be “billions of years” old?


28 posted on 01/03/2011 6:41:32 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Karliner

Evolution is more of a worldview than a “science”.


29 posted on 01/03/2011 6:42:34 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Agreed MrB. Have no idea why that person picked me for a joust. Evolution is not a fact, it’s a belief with more holes than a sponge in the “theory.” it’s more a worldview like the hypothesis of “Climate Change.”


30 posted on 01/03/2011 5:57:22 PM PST by Karliner (Now this is not the end. .... But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning, Churchill 1942)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson