Posted on 07/13/2011 2:31:32 PM PDT by ejdrapes
Sarah Palin doesnt deserve the ridicule she receives from the mainstream media, nor does she merit the adulation she inspires from her legions of fans. The over-reaction on each side feeds the super-heated response on the other: if she didnt get regularly mocked and mauled by elite commentators, shed never be taken seriously as a presidential possibility by Tea Party conservatives, and if she werent trumpeted as the second coming of Reagan by rightwing true believers she wouldnt absorb the obsessive abuse directed at her by prestige pundits.
In reality, she draws disproportionate denunciation and wildly inflated adoration for the same reason an undeniable factor so awkward and embarrassing that most observers feel uncomfortable acknowledging it in public.
The great Paul Revere debate constitutes a particularly silly example of the irrational obsession with Palins personality. Of course, she badly bungled the attempt to summarize the famous Midnight Ride, erroneously suggesting that Reveres prime purpose involved warning the British, not rousing the Colonial Minutemen. But her clumsy handling of American history hardly constituted an unprecedented gaffe for prominent politicians: in 1992, Vice Presidential candidate Al Gore strode into Jeffersons home at Monticello, gestured at busts of Adams and Franklin and blankly asked a guide, Who are these guys? The same Harvard-educated political prince also mistranslated the national motto E Pluribus Unum, suggesting it meant out of one, many. Meanwhile, Joe Biden, campaigning in 2008, suggested that FDR rallied the country during the Great Depression with his inspiring performances on TV a major feat given the fact that the television medium didnt arrive in American homes until a few years after Roosevelts death.
Unfortunately, rather than simply correcting her goofy Reveres ride stumble, Governor Palin and her defenders tried to insist she was correct after all, twisting accounts of one of the most celebrated episodes in American history beyond recognition. By the same token, Palinistas respond to exaggerated media contempt for the former Governor by offering their own exaggerated praise for a record of public achievement that counts at best as thin and flimsy. They try to justify her resignation after completing scarcely half of her term as governor by asserting that shes still more qualified for high office than was Barack Obama when he first sought the presidency an assertion thats not only inaccurate but utterly irrelevant, since his candidacy in 2012 will boast four full years of experience (full of dubious achievements, to be sure) in the worlds most powerful position.
Sarah Palin hardly counts as uniquely unqualified for high officeafter all, Geraldine Ferraro became a surprise nominee for Vice President in 1984 after barely five years as an obscure Congresswoman from Queens, her only elective office. But the former governor also lacks distinctive talents, eloquence, political posture or accomplishments that would lead reasonable people to select her as the single individual among 300 million best-equipped to lead the nation. While she certainly boasts a solidly conservative perspective on the issues, so do Rick Santorum, Herman Cain, Rick Perry, Michele Bachmann and several other present and perspective presidential candidates.
What drives the obsessive attention to every quirk and quibble regarding Sarah Palin, so that her seat-of-the pants bus tour of historic sites so easily upstaged the announcement of candidacy for frontrunner Mitt Romney?
The answer is that Governor Palin is pretty, sexy, and appealing to watch in nearly all circumstances. She gets more attention than other candidates for the same reason that beautiful young murder victims get more coverage than the plain, the overweight or the merely male.
With literally hundreds of new killings and disappearances every week, can anyone doubt that cable news selects those incidents worth reporting based in part on the availability of photos (or, better, videos) showing a lovely or sympathetic subject?
Along those lines, would Sarah Palin receive the same intensive press scrutiny if she resembled, say, the worthy but craggy Senator Olympia Snowe of Maine? Would John McCain have selected her as his running mate if she looked like a troll or a truck-driver? Has anyone yet proposed a reality show for any of the less attractive female politicians of the Twenty First Century?
It should hardly count as some shocking revelation that good looks matter in our celebrity obsessed culture, with beauty playing an especially important role for women. Katie Couric and Diane Sawyer wouldnt have earned their anchor chairs if not for their striking and elegant appearance; nor would Angelina Jolie grace the covers of countless tabloids, or Palin-lookalike Tina Fey emerge as one of the most popular women on television, without their potent sex-appeal.
Recent years brought a new crop of political glamour girls to high elective office, including Governor Nikki Haley of South Carolina, former Governor Jennifer Granholm of Michigan, Congresswomen Kristi Noem of South Dakota and Michele Bachmann of Minnesota, and many more. But Palin grabs disproportionate attention because she became the first youthful, zesty, fantasy-inspiring female to make a bid for national office. Yes, other women have campaigned for prior presidential nominations but Margaret Chase Smith, Shirley Chisholm, Carol Moseley Braun and Hillary Clinton never earned runner-up status in the Miss Alaska competition (or in any other beauty pageant).
Pointing to the influence of Governor Palins appearance in earning her exhaustive media attention, both negative and positive, will inevitably draw criticism as sexist, superficial, and dismissive. But what other aspect of her political personality counts as distinctive and singular enough to possibly explain the mad competing desires to run her down or build her up?
Rather than continuing the current cycle, with undeserved hostility feeding unwarranted support and then giving rise to still more inappropriate derision, it might uplift our political culture to put Sarah Palin in more proper perspective. Shes a sincere, frequently skillful political communicator who projects warmth, charisma, and intense likeability without an impressive history of accomplishment or substantive policy proposals, and whos worthy of neither the pointedly personal disdain nor worship that mass media encourage with such irresponsible abandon.
They knew it the first time they saw her.
It's why they go insane every time they think of her.
Anyone disagree with that?
What does Medved have against proper capitalization?
Medved is about as far to the left as I care to read or listen to, and even THAT is pretty damned rare. As far as his support, I believe he has said that if he had to vote today he’d vote Pawlenty.
I stopped paying attention to anything Medved has to say five years ago, when I heard him on his radio show wildly supporting Bush’s amnesty plans.
Medved IS the head RINO.
Big Open-Borders supporter, big-time globalist.
The typical Michael Medved slam at Sarah Palin. Insulting Palin’s supporters as ‘rightwing true believers’, dismissing her accomplishments as governor and making a false comparison to Obama, who, in 2008, had fewer accomplishments on his resume. Medved tries to pretend that the comparison to Obama is only valid in 2012, although he does make it clear that Obama’s presidential ‘accomplishments’ are hardly worthy of respect. Medved’s erroneous and insulting conclusion is that Sarah Palin is only getting media attention because she is an attractive female and if she were a dumpy older woman - or a dumpy man - no one would care about her. What a crock. Apparently Michael Medved hasn’t figured out that Sarah Palin brings more than a pretty face to the 2012 presidential race, including her accomplishments, her integrity and honesty. For conservatives, Sarah Palin brings conservative values she has lived, not simply talked about.She has authenticity and yes, charisma. Medved pretending that Sarah Palin is nothing more than a media curiosity is absurd. The left doesn’t waste a lot of time attacking Mitt Romney, the alleged ‘front runner’ in the GOP nomination race. A man who is equally photogenic but Medved doesn’t seem to believe that matters unless it applies to Sarah Palin. Medved’s hostility to Palin is almost palpable. He can go pound sand.
Medved is a Rino supporter. Whomever has the longest horn Medved is your radio guy. Right now that is “Say anything to get nominated Mitt”. You have to be deaf and blind to support Mitt as a “Conservative”.
I don't support Palin 'cause she's sexy or pretty. I support her because she's "me." She's an honest, hard-working family person with a traditional up-bringing, good working class common sense, and Christian ethics. Furthermore, she has a history of bringing down scumbags....something that desperately needs to be done on a National level. In contrast, Medved is a complete idiot.
It seems evident that the very thought of Sarah Palin puts Michael Medved’s nose out of joint.
Sorry, Michael. You’ll just have to deal with it. Maybe a few sessions on a psychoanalyst’s couch would help.
Or maybe just go to an ENT doctor and get your nose straightened.
He was a McCain supporter in 2008. Nuff said.
It is nice to know that as a Freeper I’m so far beyond movie critics in terms of understanding how things work.
Michael Medved is an estrogen rich male.
“But the former governor also lacks distinctive talents, eloquence, political posture or accomplishments that would lead reasonable people to select her as the single individual among 300 million best-equipped to lead the nation.”
Thanks Mike (psst, your bra straps are showing).
Palin believes in America, the same America I believe in.
Medved is very moderate, he didn’t just settle for McCain, he truly wanted him for president over more conservative people, that is always his goal, and he seems to dislike women in government, although he might be OK with moderate women.
nor does she merit the adulation she inspires from her legions of fans>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Easy diagnosis. Medved has PDS.Try as they might the RINOs and Leftards just cannot disguise all of the obvious symptoms.
GO SARAH!
if she didnt get regularly mocked and mauled by elite commentators, shed never be taken seriously as a presidential possibility by Tea Party conservatives
Think about it.
He writes:"But the former governor also lacks distinctive talents, eloquence, political posture or accomplishments that would lead reasonable people to select her as the single individual among 300 million best-equipped to lead the nation.
...AFTER The Undefeated has been seen in public.
If he's seen it, he's lying; if he hasn't (as a movie critic by trade) he's incompetent.
Cheers!
1. She’s truly conservative.
2. She’s tough (i.e. she has guts, and the inner peace and sense of self not to take it personally when she is attacked).
3. She’s happy. She has a cheerful, likeable demeanor that keeps her toughest political statements from seeming mean-spirited.
I tend to think (also after having read her books) that all three of these come from her deeply-held faith in God.
PS, There was another political figure for whom all of this was true...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.