Posted on 07/13/2011 2:31:32 PM PDT by ejdrapes
Sarah Palin doesnt deserve the ridicule she receives from the mainstream media, nor does she merit the adulation she inspires from her legions of fans. The over-reaction on each side feeds the super-heated response on the other: if she didnt get regularly mocked and mauled by elite commentators, shed never be taken seriously as a presidential possibility by Tea Party conservatives, and if she werent trumpeted as the second coming of Reagan by rightwing true believers she wouldnt absorb the obsessive abuse directed at her by prestige pundits.
In reality, she draws disproportionate denunciation and wildly inflated adoration for the same reason an undeniable factor so awkward and embarrassing that most observers feel uncomfortable acknowledging it in public.
The great Paul Revere debate constitutes a particularly silly example of the irrational obsession with Palins personality. Of course, she badly bungled the attempt to summarize the famous Midnight Ride, erroneously suggesting that Reveres prime purpose involved warning the British, not rousing the Colonial Minutemen. But her clumsy handling of American history hardly constituted an unprecedented gaffe for prominent politicians: in 1992, Vice Presidential candidate Al Gore strode into Jeffersons home at Monticello, gestured at busts of Adams and Franklin and blankly asked a guide, Who are these guys? The same Harvard-educated political prince also mistranslated the national motto E Pluribus Unum, suggesting it meant out of one, many. Meanwhile, Joe Biden, campaigning in 2008, suggested that FDR rallied the country during the Great Depression with his inspiring performances on TV a major feat given the fact that the television medium didnt arrive in American homes until a few years after Roosevelts death.
Unfortunately, rather than simply correcting her goofy Reveres ride stumble, Governor Palin and her defenders tried to insist she was correct after all, twisting accounts of one of the most celebrated episodes in American history beyond recognition. By the same token, Palinistas respond to exaggerated media contempt for the former Governor by offering their own exaggerated praise for a record of public achievement that counts at best as thin and flimsy. They try to justify her resignation after completing scarcely half of her term as governor by asserting that shes still more qualified for high office than was Barack Obama when he first sought the presidency an assertion thats not only inaccurate but utterly irrelevant, since his candidacy in 2012 will boast four full years of experience (full of dubious achievements, to be sure) in the worlds most powerful position.
Sarah Palin hardly counts as uniquely unqualified for high officeafter all, Geraldine Ferraro became a surprise nominee for Vice President in 1984 after barely five years as an obscure Congresswoman from Queens, her only elective office. But the former governor also lacks distinctive talents, eloquence, political posture or accomplishments that would lead reasonable people to select her as the single individual among 300 million best-equipped to lead the nation. While she certainly boasts a solidly conservative perspective on the issues, so do Rick Santorum, Herman Cain, Rick Perry, Michele Bachmann and several other present and perspective presidential candidates.
What drives the obsessive attention to every quirk and quibble regarding Sarah Palin, so that her seat-of-the pants bus tour of historic sites so easily upstaged the announcement of candidacy for frontrunner Mitt Romney?
The answer is that Governor Palin is pretty, sexy, and appealing to watch in nearly all circumstances. She gets more attention than other candidates for the same reason that beautiful young murder victims get more coverage than the plain, the overweight or the merely male.
With literally hundreds of new killings and disappearances every week, can anyone doubt that cable news selects those incidents worth reporting based in part on the availability of photos (or, better, videos) showing a lovely or sympathetic subject?
Along those lines, would Sarah Palin receive the same intensive press scrutiny if she resembled, say, the worthy but craggy Senator Olympia Snowe of Maine? Would John McCain have selected her as his running mate if she looked like a troll or a truck-driver? Has anyone yet proposed a reality show for any of the less attractive female politicians of the Twenty First Century?
It should hardly count as some shocking revelation that good looks matter in our celebrity obsessed culture, with beauty playing an especially important role for women. Katie Couric and Diane Sawyer wouldnt have earned their anchor chairs if not for their striking and elegant appearance; nor would Angelina Jolie grace the covers of countless tabloids, or Palin-lookalike Tina Fey emerge as one of the most popular women on television, without their potent sex-appeal.
Recent years brought a new crop of political glamour girls to high elective office, including Governor Nikki Haley of South Carolina, former Governor Jennifer Granholm of Michigan, Congresswomen Kristi Noem of South Dakota and Michele Bachmann of Minnesota, and many more. But Palin grabs disproportionate attention because she became the first youthful, zesty, fantasy-inspiring female to make a bid for national office. Yes, other women have campaigned for prior presidential nominations but Margaret Chase Smith, Shirley Chisholm, Carol Moseley Braun and Hillary Clinton never earned runner-up status in the Miss Alaska competition (or in any other beauty pageant).
Pointing to the influence of Governor Palins appearance in earning her exhaustive media attention, both negative and positive, will inevitably draw criticism as sexist, superficial, and dismissive. But what other aspect of her political personality counts as distinctive and singular enough to possibly explain the mad competing desires to run her down or build her up?
Rather than continuing the current cycle, with undeserved hostility feeding unwarranted support and then giving rise to still more inappropriate derision, it might uplift our political culture to put Sarah Palin in more proper perspective. Shes a sincere, frequently skillful political communicator who projects warmth, charisma, and intense likeability without an impressive history of accomplishment or substantive policy proposals, and whos worthy of neither the pointedly personal disdain nor worship that mass media encourage with such irresponsible abandon.
Just another psuedo-sophisticate who thinks that simplicity equals ignorance.
Guess what, Medved? We’re smarter than YOU are, and we’re going to restore America!
Go, Sarah!!!!!
ejdrapes, you posted this to try to perpetuate the Big Lie that Gov. Palin said anything wrong when chatting about the Paul Revere tour she just took with her family. But you know that.
That was quite the catty little hit job.
Can’t believe he’s beating Paul Revere’s noble steed when that animal has been dead lo these many years and that statement debated until it’s in tatters.
He spent an inordinate amount of time talking about looks—Sarah’s looks, other women’s looks.
Quite the unsophisticated screed for such a supposedly smart guy.
Wondered the same thing about drapes ... he negates his own tag line daily with little digs at Sarah.
And Medved sounds gay in that column. Is he?
Actually, he is...
Medved Show - 6/2/2011 -Romney announces presidential bid
(at 11:15 mark, after trashing Palin)
Among the the least intelligent/most ignorant people I have ever met, the majority have had ‘big name’ college degrees. The hands-down smartest and most creative had either a ‘normal’ college or even no college degree at all.
The bigger the ‘name’ on the degree, the more apt I am to mistrust that person’s judgement and ability. I have rarely been wrong. Pretty pathetic that it’s come to that.
I believe that you may be correct.
“...the worthy but craggy Senator Olympia Snowe of Maine?”
RINO is written all over that comment, Mr Medved, you cockroach.
“PS, There was another political figure for whom all of this was true...”
Yes, I was thinking about Bachmann too.
Townhall.com
?
It seems Medved goes out of his way to attack Palin. What he never says on his program or writes in his columns is what are the issues he disagrees with Palin. I know he supported the Bush admin amnesty plan and even claimed Reagan would have hated all the talk about tougher immigration laws. How he knows this he’s never explained. The fact is there are only a few other candidates in Palin’s league as far as accomplishments and dedication to conservative ideals. Mitt Romney is not one of them.
1. The article is capitalized properly at the site. It somehow got garbled when it got posted.
2. Authors don’t always create their own titles. Sometimes they leave it up to the editor to create the title.
yeap
“Meow. I suppose Medved is a Romney supporter?”
...very likely. This is a thinly-veiled hit piece on Gov. Palin. The author also degrades those who support Gov. Palin, by calling their support: “unwarranted”. What kind of arrogant tripe is that?
Why not support her? Not her turn? Not a professional establishment politician? No high society pedigree? Not one of the boys (or not even a boy)?
We need to get familiar with her record, then remember that they know that she is likely to send them home (maybe even to jail), and you'll know why they fear her. Medved hasn't paid attention to the facts. He's just repeating what he's heard from the lefties regarding her qualifications.
So was McCain's running mate (who also supported McCain in his Senate primary in 2010).
But do you mean he supported McCain in the presidential primaries? Because I suspect most all of us voted for McCain against Obama.
Every time I hear about the Paul Revere “stumble”, I know that the critic is a shill. I am certain that Medved knows the truth now, that the bells and warning of the British is accurate, so he’s depending on influencing the clueless dupes among those who read his column. Medved is about as sincere as Arianna Huffington. Palin is about to swat these phonies like gnats. Bob
Pro-abortion too!
Medved uses a common debating technique, conceding that she’s not as bad as her fiercest critics say to get some Palin supporters on his side, and then unleashing his own fusillade of criticism. Only one problem: Palin folks are among the most informed in the entire electorate, and we can smell BS from the next county. LOL Bob
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.