Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nationís children push back against Michelle Obama-backed school lunch regs
The Daily Caller ^ | September 22, 2012 | Caroline May

Posted on 09/23/2012 7:12:18 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Children and parents across the country are fed up with the restrictive new school meal regulations implemented by the Department of Agriculture under the “Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010,” which has long been touted by first lady Michelle Obama.

The standards — which cap meal calories at 650 for students in kindergarten through fifth grade, at 700 calories for middle school students and 850 for high school students — also dictate the number of breads, proteins, vegetables and fruits children are allowed per meal.

A spokeswoman for Iowa Republican Rep. Steve King, who earlier this month introduced legislation to roll back the new standards, told The Daily Caller that King’s office has heard more complaints about the issue during the past few weeks than any other.

“This year, we’ll be hungry by 2:00,” one student, Zach Eck, told KAKETV in Kansas. “We would eat our pencils at school if they had nutritional value.”

Iowa mom Robin Wissink told TheDC that she now provides her autistic daughter Molly, a junior in high school, with a bag lunch because her school’s new menu is so unappealing. Students at St. Mark’s in Colwich, Kan. have also been “brown bagging” their meals.

And some student-athletes in Wisconsin are arguing that the calorie caps hit them especially hard, given their intense workouts and scrimmages.

“A lot of us are starting to get hungry even before the practice begins,” Mukwonago High senior Nick Blohm told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. “Our metabolisms are all sped up.”

The new lunch standards have led to the removal of some old food favorites, including a particularly popular item at one school in upstate New York: chicken nuggets.

“Now they’re kind of forcing all the students to get the vegetables and fruit with their lunch, and they took out chicken nuggets this year, which I’m not too happy about,” Chris Cimino, a senior at Mohonasen High School in upstate New York, told the Associated Press, which gave the rules a “mixed grade.”

Students in the Plum Borough School District in Pennsylvania are protesting the new federal restrictions on Twitter.

“everyone.. if you agree school lunches are expensive and small, RT this. we can fight the school! tweet #BrownBagginIt,” @TornadoBoyTubbs tweeted, according to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.

Administrators have scrambled to find creative ways to make the new menus appealing. A school district in Lake County, Fla., for example, is planning to conduct a survey to determine how to make vegetables more appealing to children, who often throw them out.

“[The regulations do] limit the food that you can put on the plate,” Alden Caldwell, the director of food services at a Brookline, Mass. school, told Wicked Local. “In theory, it’s a good idea, but in practice we’re finding that there are issues with it.”

Despite the outrage, some parents believe the ongoing obesity epidemic justifies the tight calorie standards.

“I think it’s smart to be pre-emptive and proactive at getting more nutrition fed into the kids,” Amos Johnson, a parent with students in the Lee Summit, Missouri school system, told the Lee’s Summit Journal. “I see that more as a multi-beneficial supporter for health and academic performance. I think that’s the thing I would look at. You should be healthier, and if you’re nourishing the brain and getting the fuel right, academic outcomes should maintain or improve.”

When the legislation was signed into law in 2010, it received bipartisan support, including a big endorsement from Michelle Obama.

“As parents, we try to prepare decent meals, limit how much junk food our kids eat, and ensure they have a reasonably balanced diet,” the first lady said in a statement at the unveiling of the new standards in January. “And when we’re putting in all that effort the last thing we want is for our hard work to be undone each day in the school cafeteria. When we send our kids to school, we expect that they won’t be eating the kind of fatty, salty, sugary foods that we try to keep them from eating at home. We want the food they get at school to be the same kind of food we would serve at our own kitchen tables.”

Obama welcomed students back to school this year with a YouTube video explaining the importance of the new meal plans.

King and Kansas Republican Rep. Tim Huelskamp introduced the “No Hungry Kids Act,” which would repeal the USDA rule that resulted in the new standards, last week.

“The goal of the school lunch program is supposed to be feeding children, not filling the trash cans with uneaten food,” Huelskamp said in a statement. “The USDA’s new school lunch guidelines are a perfect example of what is wrong with government: misguided inputs, tremendous waste, and unaccomplished goals. Thanks to the Nutrition Nannies at the USDA, America’s children are going hungry at school.”


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Iowa; US: Kansas; US: Massachusetts; US: Michigan; US: Missouri; US: New York; US: Pennsylvania; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: athletes; brownbagginit; caloriecaps; calories; children; flotusmichelle; food; foodpolice; health; hunger; kids; menu4kiddies; michelle0bummer; michelleobama; moochelle; nannystate; nohungrykidsact; nutrition; obesity; schoollunch; standards; usda; wideload
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-175 next last
Moochelle's video included in original.
1 posted on 09/23/2012 7:12:24 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084; SheLion; Gabz; Hank Kerchief; 383rr; libertarian27; traviskicks; bamahead; CSM; ...

Do any of these nanny statists remember how much stuff they ate when they were teenagers?

Nanny State PING!


2 posted on 09/23/2012 7:13:41 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Obama should change his campaign slogan to "Yes, we am!" Sounds as stupid as his administration is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

A local radio host volunteered at the cafeteria of his daughter’s school. Chris talked about working the salad bar. Repeatedly kids would walk up and ask for just the grated cheese.

My daughter feeds her children what they will eat. She encourages them to eat certain items but she is not a food nazi.


3 posted on 09/23/2012 7:16:35 PM PDT by jimfree (In Nov 2012 my 12 y/o granddaughter has more relevant&quality executive experience than Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
When 2nd graders are becoming the mob... perhaps your plan isn't working out like you thought it would...

/johnny

4 posted on 09/23/2012 7:17:36 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Look people. The government doesn’t care if 100% of us hate it, it’ll be a “mixed grade” and nothing will happen to change it back.


5 posted on 09/23/2012 7:17:54 PM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Sorry, but I’ve seen the eating Moo does “on the road” WITH her kids, Goose and Gander stuff. Don’t tell US what to eat when you’re eating out all the time.


6 posted on 09/23/2012 7:17:58 PM PDT by Shadowstrike (Be polite, Be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Nevertheless, children should be seen and not heard.

7 posted on 09/23/2012 7:21:16 PM PDT by I see my hands (It's time to.. KICK OUT THE JAMS, MOTHER FREEPERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

If my children were in elementary school, they would not be having their lunch bags examined, nor having their food or drink I packed tossed.

The lunches provided by schools are probably the worst nutrition-wise a child could eat. It’s all processed crap.


8 posted on 09/23/2012 7:22:51 PM PDT by nicmarlo (I'll Take the Mormon Over the MORON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Having a kid that plays high school football, I know the school lunches don’t begin to cover the calories burned working out daily.


9 posted on 09/23/2012 7:23:10 PM PDT by peyton randolph (FUBO and his wookie beard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I was underweight as a child because of severe asthma.

Does this idiot Michelle realize there are other kids that may have different dietary needs?


10 posted on 09/23/2012 7:23:57 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I hypothesize that there is, in fact, a rebound effect in which children who are deprived of the food they want to eat at school and are forced to eat nothing but “healthy” food then go home and overeat to make up for the feelings of deprivation they experienced at school.

It looks like a fairly easy hypothesis to test.


11 posted on 09/23/2012 7:26:56 PM PDT by exDemMom (Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
The standards — which cap meal calories at 650 for students in kindergarten through fifth grade, at 700 calories for middle school students and 850 for high school students.

That's not going to work for the 6'7" 270 lb defensive end. He will take what he needs.

12 posted on 09/23/2012 7:28:24 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Take two Aspirin and call me in November - Obama for Hindmost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

My kids are among the brown-bag rebel brigade. I have been packing more lunches this year than I can ever remember.


13 posted on 09/23/2012 7:34:24 PM PDT by Cloverfarm (This too shall pass ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

It’s going to be a hoot to see how New Yawkers respond to Little Mikey Bloomer’s and his Big Gulp Nazis’ ban on soft drinks.


14 posted on 09/23/2012 7:34:24 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Proud to be a 53 percenter American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Recently we were invited to school to have lunch with our grandson. When we met up with him and ask what was for lunch, he told us all he would get was the milk because the rest of the food was “garbage”..(his words)..We decided to give the food a try....he was correct - it was garbage. We threw ours away, he drank his milk and I’m sure he is starving by the time he gets home.


15 posted on 09/23/2012 7:35:26 PM PDT by nsidetrk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

This is a starvation diet..plain and simple.


16 posted on 09/23/2012 7:36:23 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

They interviewed a high school athlete who purchases school lunch the other day.

His meal is capped at 850 calories, but his chemistry teacher calculated that he burns about 3000 calories in school between class, weight-lifting, and football practice ...

He states that his energy level has gone way down since these new regulations have been put in place ...

Nice goin’, Michelle ...


17 posted on 09/23/2012 7:38:39 PM PDT by Lmo56 (If ya wanna run with the big dawgs - ya gotta learn to piss in the tall grass ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Michelle's dictum, issued from her lobster breath:
--food vendors are 'wasting' MILLIONS because of this dictated menu reformulation
--students are THROWING away these new offerings
--nutrition is adversely affected
--schools ARE losing money (many self supported) as school lunches are WAY DOWN
--the purported 'free' breakfest/lunch programs are a sham as nutrition is not adequately provided
info provided by three districts consisting of 3 HS, 7 Middle schools, 16 elementary schools.
18 posted on 09/23/2012 7:43:47 PM PDT by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56

My six year old granddaughter,all 38 pounds of her,is starving when she gets home from school.


19 posted on 09/23/2012 7:46:23 PM PDT by tapatio (In memory of my Dad 5-27-26 2-4-2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
This bill was passed in 2010 in a BI-PARTISAN vote????Who were the RINOs that voted for this??? Or are they lying again to pretend that both sides are to blame?
20 posted on 09/23/2012 7:46:45 PM PDT by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

This is how it works when we all become a “collective”

The kindergartener and the high school senior are given the same treatment - same portions -same calories.

You have a problem with that?

I guess you don’t want that nice federal aid do ya?


21 posted on 09/23/2012 7:51:28 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I support the wookie in this whole thing.

Make those school lunches so lousy that the parents (many of whom we give food stamps, WIC, and a litany of other stipends for food) start getting their a&&es out of bed to make breakfast and pack a lunch for their kids.


22 posted on 09/23/2012 7:52:35 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (Democrats...the party of Slavery, Segregation, Sodomy, and Sedition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I don’t know about other places but my kids can take to school whatever I give them, my son loves MREs and the pouches I vacuum seal of dehydrated bananas, peaches and pears I make in my food dehydrator, plus is the 30 gram protein bars.


23 posted on 09/23/2012 7:56:09 PM PDT by Eye of Unk (OPSEC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimfree

I read an article the other day that talked about schools serving hummus and black bean salad. What? I wouldn’t eat that crap and personally don’t know one kid that would touch it.


24 posted on 09/23/2012 7:56:39 PM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye
Ayes Noes NV Democratic 247 4 4 Republican 17 153 9 TOTALS 264 157 13 ______________________ While it was bipartisan, Republicans voted overwhelmingly against it.

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2010/roll603.xml

25 posted on 09/23/2012 7:59:54 PM PDT by PghBaldy (I am sick of Obama's and Hillary's apologies to muslims, especially after 11 September 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Photobucket "Children and parents across the country are fed up ... Photobucket
26 posted on 09/23/2012 8:00:43 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56

The athletic young men I coach can easily put away several “quad” cheeseburgers at one sitting - plus fires.

Not one of them is obese.

I had one fellow who could not make it through practice without eating a burrito during water break. He is now a starting linebacker for a Division 1 college football team.

These new meal rules seem to be designed to starve athletes into submission.


27 posted on 09/23/2012 8:02:27 PM PDT by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

Well tht turned out nicely ‘)


28 posted on 09/23/2012 8:04:12 PM PDT by PghBaldy (I am sick of Obama's and Hillary's apologies to muslims, especially after 11 September 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

My daughter’s 17, and weighs 100# after a good eating weekend. Her pant size is 00.

Thankfully, she has never gotten all weird about diet and exercise. She eats when she wants, and quits when she’s full. Years of gymnastics and dancing have given her joy, but she doesn’t go out of her way to shape her body.

My concern is that in forcing young kids to focus on calories, portion size and exercise to stay slim, a lot of girls are going to go on extreme diets. Those who are prone to anorexia don’t need any encouragement.


29 posted on 09/23/2012 8:05:19 PM PDT by keats5 (Not all of us are hypnotized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

This ‘brown bag it’ resistance is really taking off in the red counties in Minnesota.

I told my son he’s on the leading edge. In eleven years, I’ve made him about 2,000 lunches. I know what goes into it, he likes it and doesn’t mind, as a sophomore, that he brings his lunch. Nobody razzes him about it and they’re jealous of his homemade chocolate chip brownies.


30 posted on 09/23/2012 8:06:42 PM PDT by mplsconservative (Impeach Obama Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tapatio

We could hardly wait to get home when we were kids because we could eat a horse. Back then we usually took a lunch or at least I did b/c I didn’t like the cafeteria food.

You can’t do what we did on 2000 calories a day. Nobody could.

When we did football and weights we ate just about anything and everything that was in the house. I was 6’ 2” and weighted 180# back then. Nobody but Mom got in our way when we wanted something to eat. And she seldom refused us.


31 posted on 09/23/2012 8:07:41 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Half the people are below average, they voted for oblabla.s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

2nd grade mobs, that’s funny.
I have a grandson in the 2nd grade, he buys two lunches, because he said they are so small, he is starving by the time school gets out.
My 4th grade granddaughter, wont eat the lunches, she says they are are horrible. The kids buy snacks so she just get stuff like apples and yogurt.
Oh, at their school they are not allowed to bring lunches from home (eye roll) because heaven forbid someone might bring something that someone is allergic to.


32 posted on 09/23/2012 8:09:08 PM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Michelle's dictum, issued from her lobster breath:

As reported in Wa Po, this is what Michelle likes to pound down her throat when she goes out with her gal pals to the Shake Shack ...

Oh - I forgot, she DOES order a diet soda with this ...

33 posted on 09/23/2012 8:10:10 PM PDT by Lmo56 (If ya wanna run with the big dawgs - ya gotta learn to piss in the tall grass ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

Oh my gosh!

The original picture with the prairie dog was taken with my neighbors across the street in 2009. They were on a camping trip.

So weird to see it again in that fashion. LOL! The wife is quite liberal, the guy very laid back.

I don’t think I’ll mention this one to them, though I had a good chuckle.


34 posted on 09/23/2012 8:13:04 PM PDT by mplsconservative (Impeach Obama Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye
This bill was passed in 2010 in a BI-PARTISAN vote????Who were the RINOs that voted for this??? Or are they lying again to pretend that both sides are to blame?

From http://thomas.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:SN03307:@@@R|/home/LegislativeData.php|.

It passed in the Senate by unanimous consent, so every Republican Senator can be blamed. The House vote was:

FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 603

(Democrats in roman; Republicans in italic; Independents underlined)

      S 3307      RECORDED VOTE      2-Dec-2010      3:36 PM
      QUESTION:  On Passage
      BILL TITLE: Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010

Ayes Noes PRES NV
Democratic 247 4   4
Republican 17 153   9
Independent        
TOTALS 264 157   13

The 17 House Republicans were: Bachus, Cao, Capito, Castle, Dent, Djou, Ehlers, Emerson, Fortenberry, Gerlach, Jones, Latham, LaTourette, Tim Murphy, Platts, Reichert and Young (AK)

35 posted on 09/23/2012 8:13:56 PM PDT by KarlInOhio ("Government is the only thing that we all belong to"=implicit repeal of the 13th amendment for all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Just getting them ready for when the Food Stamp President crashes the economy!


36 posted on 09/23/2012 8:22:59 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (God is a victim of identity theft by anointed progressive academics and intellectuals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

which cap meal calories at 650 for students in kindergarten through fifth grade, at 700 calories for middle school students and 850 for high school students
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

HAHAHAHA!!!!

what a bunch of morons!

When I was a teenager I ate 2000 calories per meal and ate 4 meals per day. AND I WAS SKINNY! You can’t force a teen to eat ONLY 2500 calories per day! What kind of an idiot dreamed this up??


37 posted on 09/23/2012 8:32:38 PM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigBobber
It goes beyond just calories, folks. My wife teaches and the cafeteria at her middle school has NO salt to be found anywhere. The food is barely seasoned, thanks to the new “standards”, which makes it even less appealing. It has gotten so bad there that the cafeteria has started charging teachers and kids for napkins because they are losing money so fast they can't keep up. Kids refuse to eat the crap. I have a 14 year old HS freshman who is just over 5'6" and barely over 100 pounds soaking wet. He eats like there is no tomorrow most of the time. he has been known to polish off half a large pizza by himself and is skinny as a rail. He has a very high metabolism, marches in band and walks everywhere. My 12 year old youngest son is a couple of inches shorter that his brother and about 90 pounds, plays football and every other sport and grazes all day long. He could blow through 700 calories in an hour at football practice. And you just wait. If they don't get rid of these asinine "one size fits all" regs, the nanny-staters will start pushing to inspect lunch boxes and brown bags. It has already happened here in NC before these stupid "standards" we're enacted The problem with childhood obesity isn't what kids eat at school anyway. It is what their lazy-arse parents feed them at home. Watch Honey Boo Boo and her dysfunctional family sometime to see what I mean. Most of these parents are too lazy to even pick up a pan, much less use one, so they drive through somewhere or pick up a microwave meal loaded with salt and fat and give it to junior to eat while he plays his X-Box for 6 straight hours to stay out of mommy's way until bedtime. You want to make a real change? Stop paying for some crack-whore and her sperm donor to spawn repeatedly and then throw money at them to buy junk to throw at the product of their copulation to keep him fed.
38 posted on 09/23/2012 8:37:34 PM PDT by Littlejon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: BigBobber

“The athletic young men I coach can easily put away several “quad” cheeseburgers at one sitting - plus fires.”

“plus fires”? Dont know what you coach, but I’m AFRAID of them.


39 posted on 09/23/2012 8:42:01 PM PDT by ConservativeChris (I feel like Marvin Boggs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

The same kind of idiots that just took over our entire health care system


40 posted on 09/23/2012 8:49:33 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

And so the party that once accused republicans of “wanting” to starve children by messing with the school lunches is actually implementing a child-starvation plan by messing with the school lunches. They’re even doing this just 2 months before a presidential election.
And, again the commie MSM is letting them get away with it.


41 posted on 09/23/2012 9:03:18 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife
When Michelle Obama’s butt no longer needs its own zip code, I will then listen to her ideas about diet.
42 posted on 09/23/2012 9:17:59 PM PDT by cpdiii (Deckhand, Roughneck, Mud Man, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist. THE CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii

Even if she were thin as a rail....she is not an elected official.

Republican First Ladies always find a good cause to represent - but you don’t see them trying to seize power that normally belongs to elected representatives.

Hillary tried to seize the health care industry - and here we see Michelle acting like an empress....usurping the authority of parents, school boards, and school staffs.
If the people don’t want to play by her rules, their school suffers a crippling reduction in aid.

She doesn’t have the authority to do this! My head is exploding.


43 posted on 09/23/2012 9:23:34 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I swear I thought this was an onion article. I think my daughter will be taking her lunch from now on. I’m not going to subject her to this communist crap. If it’s a further issue, I’ll pull her out of school and home school her.


44 posted on 09/23/2012 9:43:27 PM PDT by BCR #226 (02/07 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

A recent study showed that overweight teens actually eat LESS than their normal weight peers. There is more to weight than just calories. Activity levels and genetics are very important contributors to weight. These so-called experts are depriving kids of what they need, and ironically, setting them up for later weight gain by putting them on restricted feeding.

What I really don’t understand is why parents put up with all this nonsense. Why do people still send their kids to government schools?


45 posted on 09/23/2012 9:54:11 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX ( The state is the great fiction by which everybody seeks to live at the expense of everybody else. ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX

and people have forgotten about the whole BMI garbage going on too.

They are collecting data on the BMI’s of the kids and the school nurses are supposed to be gathering the info.


46 posted on 09/23/2012 10:12:52 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
GUARANTEED: by the name "Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010" these bastards KNEW they were going to starve kids.

Evil is, as evil does. And this is evil.

47 posted on 09/23/2012 10:27:06 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

It looks like they are trying to convert the children to vegetarianism. Hitler would be happy if he were around today since he practiced it.


48 posted on 09/23/2012 10:38:22 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

My friend’s sister is a lunch lady at the local high school, and she was ready to tar and feather Moochelle.

The first thing they did was take out the salad bar.
The second thing they did was take out the potato bar.
They are no longer allowed to use salt and pepper.... only approved by the government spices..... which hadn’t arrived by the start of school. So they were serving naked ugly veggies.
The kids can get a prepackaged salad if they want..... with 1 (count them.... 1) extra veggie. So, they can have lettuce and carrots, or lettuce and cucumber, or lettuce with tomato.... not lettuce with all three. And the cooks are absolutely forbidden to add cheese to the salad. The kids beg them, and they cannot. So the kids are taking their prepackaged salads and dumping them in the trash at the end of the service line. They aren’t even pretending they will eat them.

Tell me how this is an improvement.


49 posted on 09/23/2012 11:06:08 PM PDT by Grammy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
When the legislation was signed into law in 2010, it received bipartisan support

If true, it figures...

50 posted on 09/23/2012 11:15:33 PM PDT by sargon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson