Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul slams Boston police. Has he gone too far?
Yahoo! News ^ | 04/30/2013 | Peter Grier

Posted on 04/30/2013 4:15:04 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

Ron Paul, in a posting on the website of a libertarian activist, accused US law enforcement of 'a military-style occupation of an American city' in its response to the Boston bombing. Former GOP presidential candidate Ron Paul has slammed US law enforcement for responding to the Boston Marathon bombing with “police state tactics.” In a post on the website of libertarian activist Lew Rockwell, Mr. Paul said Monday that the governmental reaction to the tragic explosions was worse than the attack itself...

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: boston; bostonbombing; bostonpd; leo; ronpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: EVO X
That takes a citizen or a group of citizens filling a lawsuit. If nobody files, then there is no claim they weren't....

Really? Today's citizenry? They probably have no idea their rights were violated they are so used to being told what to do.

41 posted on 04/30/2013 5:07:43 PM PDT by raybbr (People who still support Obama are either a Marxist or a moron. No, they are both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad

“I’ve noticed no one has a solution for a better way for Law Enforcement,,,,”

You’re kidding, right? Yes, there were better ways. Plenty of them.
First, when they were identified as terrorists and placed on the watchlist last year, law enforcment (FBI) failed in their responsibility.
Next, after the bombing, they had clear photos of those two DAYS before the first shootout. They showed them to the media, but not to us. Had they done so, someone would have known them. They likely could have been rolled up and stopped before the murder of the MIT cop, and the carjacking.

Again, when they had the first shootout at the traffic stop, they could have won the shootout, and preveted either from leaving. But say they screwed THAT up and one got away. With the effort commonly used to find a burglar or car theif, they should have apprehended him quickly.

The tactic of sealing off a mid size city, telling everyone to stay indoors, and searching in the manner they did is an option that reveals an utter lack of skill and intelligence.

They FBI and FBI blew numerous chances to do good policing, then when it was a full crisis, they argue that they had no choice other than to re-enact D-day in Boston. This is a red herring.

PS,,for extra fun, remember how he was in the backyard, in a boat, clearly visible on FLIR? Theres a hint there. NO matter how you slice it, that was low skill policing on display.


42 posted on 04/30/2013 5:09:09 PM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad

That’s my point. Sure there were problems but screeching about them doesn’t solve anything. We’ve got to find solutions and implement them.

One of my neighbors is a former Detroit cop. He suggests that neighbors get to know each other and find some trusted locals to go door to door asking to look around with the understanding that all they report is whether they did or didn’t find the perp.


43 posted on 04/30/2013 5:09:33 PM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
Did I miss something? We are not speaking about a noise complaint, are we? What occurred in Boston didn't have anything to do with a barking dog that was being left unattended, right? There was an actual criminal act perpetrated by islamic jihadis bent on killing and maiming as many civilians as they possibly could, right? That, in your opinion, is a problem which should have been left to take care of itself?

Wow!

44 posted on 04/30/2013 5:09:40 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud dad of an Army Soldier who has survived 24 months of Combat deployment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: EVO X

None resisted the lawless home searches.
Too frightened or too eager to please their master and find Johar.


45 posted on 04/30/2013 5:09:48 PM PDT by omega4179
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

They turned Boston into an episode of “The Running Man.”


46 posted on 04/30/2013 5:12:02 PM PDT by ez (Muslims do not play well with others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad
What the cops did, that didn't fix the problem, did it?

The problem was resolved.

Only problem is that what the cops did violated the Constitution.

I've got issues with that.

/johnny

47 posted on 04/30/2013 5:22:06 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
First, when they were identified as terrorists and placed on the watchlist last year, law enforcment (FBI) failed in their responsibility.

Hindsight is always 20/20. Unfortunately, it doesn't address a problem that was allowed to occur by the feds, and doesn't answer the question regarding a better way for law enforcement to have reacted after the fact

Next, after the bombing, they had clear photos of those two DAYS before the first shootout.

Would showing photos to the general public have guaranteed the two islamists would have surrendered without any further violence?

The tactic of sealing off a mid size city, telling everyone to stay indoors, and searching in the manner they did is an option that reveals an utter lack of skill and intelligence.

Actually, this is a tactic that has been utilized in a number of cities where law enforcement had to hunt down and locate dangerous individuals. What was done is not extraordinary.

PS,,for extra fun, remember how he was in the backyard, in a boat, clearly visible on FLIR? Theres a hint there. NO matter how you slice it, that was low skill policing on display.

Yes, he was visible on FLIR, AFTER the resident contacted police AFTER finding the individual was hiding in the resident's boat. Is there a point here?

Arguing that the feds failed before the fact (before these two islamists carried out their attack) is pointless when discussing the after the fact response of local law enforcement in looking for the perps. Given that Obozo cares not a wit about stopping islamists, it is not surprising the feds failed. Expect more attacks in the future. Could law enforcement have done a better job in hunting these two perps? Of course. That could be said about almost every incident where law enforcement has had to hunt down dangerous suspects. There is also the added component of how badly the media failed, given they did everything possible to attempt to shift attention away from anyone not white, male, and conservative tea party members.

48 posted on 04/30/2013 5:22:14 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud dad of an Army Soldier who has survived 24 months of Combat deployment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad
All that Constitution trampling, and they still didn't catch their man.

A civilian did.

/johnny

49 posted on 04/30/2013 5:23:13 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: EVO X

Maybe we will learn more as time goes on and the lawsuits start flying, but emergency cerfews are not unconstitutional. Tell me how the searches were unreasonable - that is the Constitutional standard. As far as I could tell, they were contained, focused on the suspect, and nobody was arrested for anything the police may have seen in their houses during these searches?


50 posted on 04/30/2013 5:23:23 PM PDT by Owl558 (Those who remember George Satayana and doomed to repeat him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
You have to remember that at some point in time, "law enforcement" ceases to be a public necessity and starts to become an industry. We're way past that point right now. That's why the instinctive reaction of the police in Boston was to get every officer on the street on overtime pay, get every Humvee and armored vehicle rolling on the streets, and get every helicopter airborne.
51 posted on 04/30/2013 5:24:25 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I am the master of my fate ... I am the captain of my soul.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
What the cops did, that didn't fix the problem, did it?

The problem was resolved.

Seems to me that law enforcement ended the ability for these two islamists to continue their mass killings and maimings. What was it that the cops didn't do, then? And, in what manner was the problem resolved WITHOUT law enforcement involvement?

52 posted on 04/30/2013 5:24:53 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud dad of an Army Soldier who has survived 24 months of Combat deployment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: windsorknot
Next time there is a terrorist attack shriek in fear and beg for the feral government to protect you.
53 posted on 04/30/2013 5:25:22 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam is a religion of peace, and Moslems reserve the right to behead anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
A civilian did.

Ah. So, it was the home owner who took the man into custody. Got it./s

54 posted on 04/30/2013 5:26:33 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud dad of an Army Soldier who has survived 24 months of Combat deployment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad
No, the cops burned a bunch of ammo, and the younger brother ran over his older brother's neck. Scratch one.

And then, after the cops got tired of trampling the Constitution, a citizen ID'ed him and the cops showed up to burn yet more ammo without killing the guy.

Those are the facts, as I've heard them.

You could leave out the entire episode of forcing people out of their homes at gunpoint without a warrent, and the thing would have gone down the same.

I despise statists.

/johnny

55 posted on 04/30/2013 5:28:44 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

My little town doesn’t have a regular police force. These days we see a county squad car roll through a couple times per month.


56 posted on 04/30/2013 5:30:12 PM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Yep, too many thugs in blue for my money. Local police can be very good. The FBI was once average to not too good. However they all are going downhill between Homeland Security and political correctness. JMO


57 posted on 04/30/2013 5:31:26 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad
The people you are defending are not Elliot Ness, doing a careful job of investigation and showing pictures around. They trample the Constitution.

They did a crappy job in LA, and they did a crappy job in Boston.

If they had a perfect record, I'd still say 'pound sand' on those that trample the Constitution.

/johnny

58 posted on 04/30/2013 5:32:08 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Next time there is a terrorist attack shriek in fear and beg for the feral government to protect you.

Naw, I'll just call you.

59 posted on 04/30/2013 5:32:16 PM PDT by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
The first things you all who support this gov tyranny should ask yourself is why do you trust what the media said about it and why do you trust government

here is a video that some media morons let slip some of what really happened in this police crackdown and it was tyranny

the police didn't ask them, they pointed guns at all residents and ordered them to get out of their house with hands up and patted them down like suspects. here is the video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=B_Gb6i5DF9k&NR=1

the liberal mass governor also ORDERED a million citizens to not leave their house and for no one to go in

60 posted on 04/30/2013 5:32:41 PM PDT by Democrat_media (D's & Mary Landrieu voted 4 UN to take away our 2nd amendment rights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson