Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

C-Span putting Benghazi on C-SPAN3
5/8/13 | mazda77

Posted on 05/08/2013 4:17:55 AM PDT by mazda77

I just sent the following to viewer@c-apan.org

With all due respect, does your organization, paid for by our tax dollars, honestly think the South Korean Presidents speech is more important than the Benghazi hearings? HONESTLY!?

Put her on 3 and elevate the hearings to either C-Span or C-Span2 where most people are able to see it on their televisions. Of utmost concern, is your access to the bandwidth necessary to eliminate cutouts and drop-offs. DirecTV only has 1 and 2 on their lineup and from what I am told is the case for most other cable providers, without having to buy additional premium services.

Put the hearings where the most people can watch them, easily!


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 113th; benghazihearings; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: mazda77

Thank You and Bookmark


21 posted on 05/08/2013 4:48:11 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: enduserindy

Lemme see. 8:30 local time. C-SPAN 3, Rush and the FR live thread, simultaneously. I better make some extra coffee and get the dogs walked early.


22 posted on 05/08/2013 4:51:46 AM PDT by Homer_J_Simpson ("Every nation has the government that it deserves." - Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Homer_J_Simpson
the media coverage of Benghazi is trivial compared to coverage of Watergate

I too remember. The three networks went wall to wall on Watergate. Deserting our Ambassador and three others to die by a President, Secretary of State, and Secretary of Defense is less because the lame-stream drive bys want protection for their murderers. Nobody died at the Watergate therefore it deserved wall to wall coverage by all three networks but ordering Stand Down to allow our Ambassador and three other Heroes to die deserves no coverage like Watergate received. I live in a nation I no longer recognize, and it pains my soul to see such blatant bias by the news organizations.

23 posted on 05/08/2013 4:56:37 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mazda77

The American public has a limited ability to pay attention to events. They can follow one thing at a time. Kim Kardashian’s a$$ or some basketball player’s sex preferences.

The only thing that gets them out of their stupor is when all the media play in unison, putting something 24/7 on crawlers, and “stay tuned for the latest in...” and on front pages of all the papers.

Informed people like FR readers follow the events and keep up with them.


24 posted on 05/08/2013 5:07:29 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Pi$$ed off yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

I sent an email to CSpan, though not so sure it will do any good changing minds.

Also, for folks who won’t be near a TV, it’s on CSpan radio live. And if you have a smart phone and the TuneIn app, you can listen live.


25 posted on 05/08/2013 5:13:14 AM PDT by onemiddleamerican (FUBO and all your terrorist buddies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

Agreed, but when something starts to happen and one person tells two people, . . . . they need to be able to access it to verify it. It is about access, not only to those immediately interested but also to those who might not normally be.


26 posted on 05/08/2013 5:15:44 AM PDT by mazda77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

27 posted on 05/08/2013 5:19:39 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: gasport

Thanks for the link


28 posted on 05/08/2013 5:20:03 AM PDT by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

29 posted on 05/08/2013 5:27:40 AM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Mater tua caligas exercitus gerit ;-{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

Too right...
When I lived in No.VA, I got to know one of the CSPAN dudes through a family connection.
Complete lib in a completely lib organization.
Like PBS, they don’t have to compete because they are supported by our hard-earned tax dollars...
Cut it off and starve the beast.....


30 posted on 05/08/2013 5:38:46 AM PDT by matginzac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mazda77

Cox Cable did have CSPAN 1 and 2 on their ‘regular’ tier for a while. Then, they re-did their line up and moved CSPAN 2 and CSPAN 3 on an upper tier.

Of course, CSPAN 1-2-3 are offered online. However, many times, the streams are glitchy and won’t stay connected.

Possibly, some of the newsie-websites may be streaming the hearings.


31 posted on 05/08/2013 5:40:45 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matginzac

Please explain how taxpayers fund C-SPAN.


32 posted on 05/08/2013 5:41:44 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: mazda77

I’ve always thought Brian Lamp was completely non partisan. Straight shooter, no favorites.


33 posted on 05/08/2013 5:45:10 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

Oops...sorry...I meant the cable system...
But the point is still the same...
They are not a commercial entity so do not have to be a commercial success to survive...


34 posted on 05/08/2013 5:46:45 AM PDT by matginzac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Don’t confuse them with the facts.


35 posted on 05/08/2013 6:13:35 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: matginzac

I know public radio and television lie about taxpayer funding and use intermediaries and subterfuge. I was wondering if C-SPAN was using the same methods.


36 posted on 05/08/2013 6:19:31 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

bump


37 posted on 05/08/2013 6:21:18 AM PDT by WhirlwindAttack (There is so much I could say. But I'm smart enough not to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Homer_J_Simpson
"I remember watching the Watergate hearings in 1973..."

Iran-Contra with Ollie North and Fawn Hall dominated the airwaves as well. I remember Ollie having to explain to committee counsel John Nields the difference between "covert" and "overt" and making the chief counsel look absolutely foolish.

38 posted on 05/08/2013 6:26:57 AM PDT by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

If we had a Majority Leader with any stones he’d threaten to cut off their House access unless they bumped this to the top channel. If.


39 posted on 05/08/2013 6:30:49 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: onemiddleamerican; kristinn
CSpan-1, the House of Reps channel, carried every Fast & Furious hearing, start to finish. There is no question Obama Thugs made sure such publicity would not happen again.
40 posted on 05/08/2013 7:17:45 AM PDT by Jacquerie (How few were left who had seen the republic! - Tacitus, The Annals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson