Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AP CEO's letter to Eric Holder
Associated Press ^ | 5/13/13 | Gary B. Pruit

Posted on 05/13/2013 5:24:46 PM PDT by Nachum

Edited on 05/13/2013 5:40:13 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

May 13, 2013
Attorney General Eric Holder
Department of Justice Washington, D . C .

Dear General Holder :

I am writing to object in the strongest possible terms to a massive and unprecedented intrusion by the Department of Justice into the newsgathering activities of The Associated Press.

Last Friday afternoon, AP General Counsel Laura Malone received a letter from the office of United States Attorney Ronald C. Machen Jr. advisin g that, at some unidentified time earlier this year, the Department obtained telephone toll records for more than 20 separate telephone lines assigned to the AP and its journalists. The records that were secretly obtained cover a full two month period in early 2012 and, at least as described in Mr. Machen’s letter, include all such records for, among other phone lines, an AP general phone number in New York City as well as AP bureaus in New York City, Washington, D.C., Hartford, Connecticut, and at the House of Representatives. This action was taken without advance notice to AP or to any of the affected journalists, and even after the fact no notice has been sent to individual journalists whose home phones and cell phone records were seized by the Department.

There can be no possible justification for such an overbroad collection of the telephone communications of The Associated Press and its reporters. These records potentially reveal communications with confidential sources across all of the newsgathering activities undertaken by the AP during a two month period, provide a road map to AP’s newsgathering operations, and disclose information about AP’s activities and operations that the government has no conceivable right to know.

That the Department underto ok this unprecedented step without providing any notice to the AP, and without taking any steps to narrow the scope of its subpoenas to matters actually relevant to an ongoing investigation, is particularly troubling.

The sheer volume of records obtained, most of which can have no plausible connection to any ongoing investigation, indicates, at a minimum, that this effort did not comply with 28 C.F.R. §50.10 and should therefore never have been undertaken in the first place. The regulations require that, i n all cases and without exception, a subpoena for a reporter’s telephone toll records must be “as narrowly drawn as possible.’’ This plainly did not happen.

We regard this action by the Department of Justice as a serious interference with AP’s constitutional rights to gather and report the news. While we evaluate our options we urgently request that you immediately return to the AP the telephone toll records that the Department subpoenaed and destroy all copies. At a minimum, we request that you take steps to segregate these records and prohibit any reference to them pending further discussion and, if it proves necessary, guidance from appropriate judicial authorities. We also ask for an immediate explanation as to why this extraordinary action w as taken, and a description of the steps the Department will take to mitigate its impact on AP and its reporters.

Given the gravity of this situation, I look forward to your prompt response.

Sincerely,

Gary Pruitt


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: alinskygovernment; ap; ap4obama; apletter; apphonerecords; assininepress; associatedpress; bho44; bhodoj; bhofascism; cep; communism; corruption; criminalgovernment; democratmedia; democrats; doj; dojisajoke; dojphonescandal; eric; govtabuse; holder; liberaljournalists; liberalmedia; media4obama; msm; msm4obama; obama; obamamedia; obamavoters; obamedia; phonerecords; pruitt; rapeofliberty; specialprosecutor; surveillancestate; tyranny; undybomber; usscole; waronliberty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-171 next last
To: Nachum

Wasn’t Holder going to quit anyway? Obama is in big trouble, and then this comes out.

“Look at Holder! Look at Holder!”

Are the Democrats really that sneaky? Yep.


101 posted on 05/13/2013 7:19:33 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Can anyone imagine the response of Ben Franklin or perhpas Jefferson?


102 posted on 05/13/2013 7:25:09 PM PDT by cva66snipe (Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

“You didn’t use lube, President Lightbringer! What’s up with that? You promised!”

}:-)4


103 posted on 05/13/2013 7:28:10 PM PDT by Moose4 (SHALL. NOT. BE. INFRINGED.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Welcome to Obamastan.


104 posted on 05/13/2013 7:34:18 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows (You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

You mean laziness? You could have easily gone thru it and inserted paragraph breaks on your own...........just sayin


You’re a jerk. Give the man a break.


105 posted on 05/13/2013 7:38:37 PM PDT by laplata (Liberals don't get it. Their minds have been stolen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
We regard this action by the Department of Justice as a serious interference with AP’s constitutional rights to gather and report the news.

Gary Pruitt's new to the world of Government thugs - he probably thought if he was accepted as a liberal elite, he would get a pass... and they wouldn't come after him or his organization... 'They came for the Jews, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Jew..." so I'll help Gary Pruitt ...

First, if you use the words "constitutional rights' you will be branded as a potential domestic terrorist. Yes, I'm telling you the truth. Homeland Security has that as one of their 'buzz phrases'... you could be pulled into Janet's web...

Also be careful Gary Pruitt - if liberal elites don't like the words you use, you'll have the IRS to deal with... in addition to your file at Homeland Security... you could be on an enemies list already...

106 posted on 05/13/2013 7:41:00 PM PDT by GOPJ ( A gang rape by Eight isn't 'immigration reform'... Send the millions of illegals home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maica

Interesting point you bring up.

Vince Flynn does seem to publish before the fact—I’ve noticed this too.

Mitch Rapp is fiction, even if mythical, unfortunately, with the military playing defense even at home.


107 posted on 05/13/2013 7:48:14 PM PDT by LurkedLongEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Obama Score Card...9 out of 10!

1st: Freedom of speech, press, religion, assembly, and petition..Obama WH Targets Tea Party

2nd: Right to keep and bear arms..Weapons Ban

3rd: Quartering of soldiers

4th: Search, seizures, proper warrants..Boston, Drone Surveillance in US, and now AP

5th: Criminal proceedings, due process, eminent domain WH claims right to kill or Indefinitely Detain Americans

6th: Right to a fair trial..See 5th

7th: Rights in civil cases..Obama WH only brings civil cases when minorities are victims

8th: Bail, cruel and unusual punishment Obamacare Fines

9th: Protects rights not enumerated in the constitution Obama WH corruption

10th: States' rights..Obamacare

108 posted on 05/13/2013 7:50:44 PM PDT by topfile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Sorry, but I'm shocked so many FReepers are buying this Bull Sh*t. Do you folks really think the media would betray their messiah? Ain't gonna happen...EVER!

Sorry, but I think they're running interference for this A$$hole!

109 posted on 05/13/2013 7:53:26 PM PDT by Artcore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

At least Gary spells his name with a single R. Now what are you going do to about it, Gary? Stomp your widdle feeties? Send another angry letter?


110 posted on 05/13/2013 7:53:36 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Impeachment File on Benghazi Coward B. Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, a legal citizen of the sovereign Nation of Indonesia.


111 posted on 05/13/2013 7:56:48 PM PDT by Graewoulf (Traitor John Roberts' Commune-Style Obama'care' violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco; Revolting cat!; EEGator; Nachum

Maybe y’all can get together and FReepmail Nachum with your eazy peazy instructions.


112 posted on 05/13/2013 7:57:43 PM PDT by upchuck (To the faceless, jack-booted government bureaucrat who just scanned this post: SCREW YOU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks Nachum.


113 posted on 05/13/2013 8:01:07 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: upchuck

What are you talking about?


114 posted on 05/13/2013 8:03:11 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

Don’t I recall reading about Jarrett exacting revenge after the election?


115 posted on 05/13/2013 8:06:07 PM PDT by taterjay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Artcore

Have you noticed that the debate between the WH and media is just the talking points? Yeah they are finally doing their job, asking really tough questions on the talking points, which happens to have nothing to do with the brutal deaths of four Americans or the culpability of the administration, in those deaths. It is definitely a sham.


116 posted on 05/13/2013 8:08:54 PM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
We will not comment on an ongoing investigation being conducted by the AG

Is the Justice Department investigating itself?

117 posted on 05/13/2013 8:09:32 PM PDT by Jess Kitting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: taterjay

There were rumors to that effect. It’s looking like those rumors may have been “fake but accurate.”


118 posted on 05/13/2013 8:12:03 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows (You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Artcore

Agreed. This whole story makes zero sense. Am I to understand that the government reached out to let the ap know that had illegally gained phone records? Really?
What would prompt them to do that?

The response by the ap was written by a 5th grader. Jeez, I know middle school kids who can write far better than this letter.

This whole story is illogical and potentially yet another silly diversion. Somebody tell me what I’m missing.


119 posted on 05/13/2013 8:38:25 PM PDT by AllAmericanGirl44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

Comment #120 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-171 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson