Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NEA And GLSEN Seek To Stifle Free Speech
Too good Reports ^ | February 13, 2002 | Rev. Louis P. Sheldon

Posted on 02/13/2002 6:41:01 AM PST by Stand Watch Listen

The National Education Association (NEA) and the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) are teaming up this year to violate the free speech and religious freedom rights of millions of school children. They´re not honest enough to clearly state this as their goal, but it is their objective.

These two groups are engaged in a campaign to establish "anti-harassment" and "anti-discrimination" policies on school campuses that will prohibit students from engaging in honest discussions about the behavior of homosexuality.

Those students who wish to express medically-based or morally-based opposition to homosexuality as a lifestyle will be punished if they dare speak out. The NEA is encouraging pro-homosexual students and teachers to become the equivalent of Nazi Brown Shirts on campus. These Brown Shirts will report any student who dares to exercise his freedom of speech or religious beliefs guaranteed under our U.S. Constitution. One can assume that these students will be herded into "retraining" programs to force them to change their attitudes toward homosexual behavior.

Homosexuals and their NEA allies have created a new "hate crime" on campuses. It´s called the "hate-motivated incident." This may involve something as simple as a student expressing his disapproval of sodomy or verbalizing the truth that homosexual sex frequently leads to HIV infection and death.

GLSEN is sponsoring a "Day of Silence," on April 10 on campuses where it has established homosexual recruitment programs known as Gay Straight Alliance (GSA) clubs. The "Day of Silence" is supposed to dramatize the fear and persecution that homosexual students allegedly experience at the hands of "heterosexism" and the mythical mental illness called "homophobia." (Homophobia is a term created by homosexual activists to stigmatize any person who opposes the normalization of sodomy in our culture.)

The primary goal of this "Day of Silence" is to force school officials to institute draconian anti-free speech policies that will prohibit any rational discussion of homosexuality as a self-destructive sexual behavior. The truth is that this behavior inevitably results in high rates of anal cancer, HIV infections, and devastating bowel diseases from anal intercourse. Yet GLSEN and the NEA would forbid students or teachers from discussing these serious health risks.

Before school officials rush headlong into supporting these anti-religion and anti-free speech policies, they would do well to consider a federal appeals court ruling on this issue in February, 2001. In "Saxe vs. State College Area School District," a panel of judges ruled that a local high school´s anti-harassment policy was unconstitutional.

The lawsuit was brought by Pennsylvania State University Professor David Warren Saxe on behalf of two Christian students. These students maintained that the school´s anti-free speech policy benefiting homosexuals was violating their right to freedom of religion and speech. They won. The court noted that the Constitution does not protect people from being offended by the opinions of others. That´s what freedom of speech is all about.

In January, 2002 a federal judge ruled in favor of a Minnesota high school student who wore a "Straight Pride" sweatshirt to school. He wore it to protest the school´s pro-homosexual policies. The student was told he couldn´t wear the shirt because it "offended" homosexuals on campus. He sued the school and won the case. The judge ruled that this student had the constitutional right to express his beliefs.

Unless schools officials are looking forward to facing costly lawsuits—which they will lose—they would be wise to ignore the anti-free speech rants of both the NEA and GLSEN.

In addition, school officials would be wise to learn why the Broward County School Board in Florida voted against a GLSEN partnership in October, 2001. School officials were angered when they discovered the contents of a GLSEN workbook designed to teach 11- to 13-year-old children a series of 16 filthy words dealing with homosexuality. The Broward School Board chairman was so offended by these words that he refused to allow them to be read at the meeting. Yet this is what GLSEN wants to teach our children.

It is ironic that GLSEN is willing to stifle the freedom of speech of those who oppose homosexuality, yet is eager to teach young teenagers words so obscene that a School Board member wouldn´t say them out loud. Something is very wrong with this picture.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aft; braad; brainwashing; children; education; educationnews; gay; glsen; homeschoollist; homosexual; homosexualagenda; indoctrination; lesbian; lgbt; nea; schools; silenceamerica; teacher; teens; tolerance; voucher
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-74 next last

1 posted on 02/13/2002 6:41:01 AM PST by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
I'm shocked -- shocked! -- to find the NEA doing such things! Funny, I don't see them shutting up those who say that the gay lifestyle is preferable to the heterosexual lifestyle (e.g. most gay activist groups). These scum corrupt the youth of this country with our tax dollars. Blech!
2 posted on 02/13/2002 6:52:21 AM PST by UltraConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
....policies on school campuses that will prohibit students from engaging in honest discussions about the behavior of homosexuality.

Well, they are inadvertantly half right here. There should be no school sponsored discussions of any sexual behaviors. But I doubt that is what they are aiming at.

3 posted on 02/13/2002 6:56:41 AM PST by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArGee;*BRAAD;Khepera;EODGUY;1 FELLOW FREEPER
I wonder if we can sue the NEA for corrupting minors?
4 posted on 02/13/2002 6:57:50 AM PST by Dakmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeTally
Right you are. We both know very well that an immoral posture can be made to look acceptable only by silencing opponents.
5 posted on 02/13/2002 7:01:56 AM PST by Dakmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dakmar
The court noted that the Constitution does not protect people from being offended by the opinions of others.

Well, DUH! But you won't hear Liberals explaining it that way. To hear them tell it, if you suggest that SAD should remain a secret behind closed doors, or treated, then you are de-facto giving the thugs who beat Matthew Shepherd permission to do so.

I'm not sure which is a worse mental disorder, SAD (Same-sex Attraction Disorder) or LTD (Liberal Thinking Disorder).

Shalom.

6 posted on 02/13/2002 7:06:59 AM PST by ArGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: Crunchy Jello
I think it is time the the Evergree Freedom Foundation gets to all NEA state organizations and have the teachers demand that they get some of their dues back. They, EFFwa.org, did get the NEA to pay up for taking teachers dues and then comming up with this kind of program
8 posted on 02/13/2002 7:39:09 AM PST by TACK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
School officials were angered when they discovered the contents of a GLSEN workbook designed to teach 11- to 13-year-old children a series of 16 filthy words dealing with homosexuality. The Broward School Board chairman was so offended by these words that he refused to allow them to be read at the meeting.

I have just 16 words to say to that School Board chairman. I won't say them here.

It's sort of like the WB executives that got bent out of shape when Charlton Heston read the full lyrics from several Ice-T (Body Count) songs for stockholders.

These people defend the indefensible when they try to hold that proper decorum does not permit the materials to be presented in a rational discussion among adults and yet the target audience for the materials is juvenilles.

9 posted on 02/13/2002 7:42:24 AM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Education News
Bump List
10 posted on 02/13/2002 8:55:00 AM PST by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free the USA;all
Here's a Note to Activists:

Want to do something? Go here:

Ignorance Making You Ill? Cure It!

for links, tools, & instructions about how to contact a pile of different people, and how to send a link to this story right here ( or anywhere else ) to a "mass email" using Outlook Express.

11 posted on 02/13/2002 9:05:31 AM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen

Read the truth ! ! !

Fight now before it is too late to fight.

12 posted on 02/13/2002 9:14:58 AM PST by Jimbaugh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dakmar
This is a perfect illustration of why the NEA and the homosexual zealots are in dire need of heterosexual tolerance training, but school is not the forum for the discussion of sexuality.

The NEA should stick to teaching the three R's, if they can remember what they stand for.

13 posted on 02/13/2002 3:36:26 PM PST by EODGUY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EODGUY;ArGee
The court noted that the Constitution does not protect people from being offended by the opinions of others. That´s what freedom of speech is all about.

The Broward School Board chairman was so offended by these words that he refused to allow them to be read at the meeting. Yet this is what GLSEN wants to teach our children.

It is ironic that GLSEN is willing to stifle the freedom of speech of those who oppose homosexuality, yet is eager to teach young teenagers words so obscene that a School Board member wouldn´t say them out loud. Something is very wrong with this picture.

My big question is why are these Chairman and School Board members unwilling to allow/repeat words in material they are approving for students? Something is seriously wrong here.

14 posted on 02/13/2002 7:08:37 PM PST by Dakmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dakmar; ArGee; JMJ333
My big question is why are these Chairman and School Board members unwilling to allow/repeat words in material they are approving for students? Something is seriously wrong here.

This reminds me of the hypocrisy shown by the pro-infanticide crowd that shudders at the pictoral display of abortions.

15 posted on 02/14/2002 5:14:28 AM PST by EODGUY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: EODGUY
This reminds me of the hypocrisy shown by the pro-infanticide crowd that shudders at the pictoral display of abortions.

Speaking of hypocrisy, did you hear the news story about the judge who is forcing the woman who believes in faith healing only to answer questions about being no longer pregnant. He has already put her in jail once when she was 8 mos pregnant so he could ensure that a doctor would be around when she delivered. Now she has been pregnant, and has told the judge she miscarried and it's none of his business.

On the news report I heard this morning a legal professor was saying something like, "Even though I'm very pro Roe v Wade I think she's carrying her right to privacy too far." Other people were talking about her "body count."

Can you believe it?

If I can find a write-up you can bet it will be posted.

Shalom.

16 posted on 02/14/2002 6:06:09 AM PST by ArGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ArGee
And I thought I was reaching the point where I had heard it all. Obviously not!

EODGUY

17 posted on 02/14/2002 6:10:09 AM PST by EODGUY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen;Silence, America!
I just created this category:

Silence, America!:

Silence, America!: for Silence, America!. 

Other Bump Lists at: Free Republic Bump List Register


for the CFR fraud being cheerled by the Media as "the next Good Thing We All Must Go Along With & Do"-- but I'm wondering if it should include all attempts to stifle free speech.

What the "H," I will index it anyway.

CFR is poison, but so are other attempts, like this, to silence people.

18 posted on 02/17/2002 5:07:37 AM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TACK;Crunchy Jello
Let's Help Nail the Teachers Unions -- It is National FReep Time
19 posted on 02/17/2002 6:36:18 PM PST by EdReform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen;UltraConservative;Dakmar;Free the USA;Homosexual Agenda
GLSEN Encourages Teens In Anal SEX "Don't give up."

"...If this presents a realistic look into the life of a child struggling with same sex desires then these children are seduced/molested at an alarmingly high rate and engage in dangerous/abusive sexual activity at a very young age. What's worse is that the adults who purport to care most about them (the editor of this book for example) present this sexual abuse as if they were tender "coming of age" stories. As if the children struggling with same sex desires are showing how healthy they are by engaging in sex with adults and by having sexual encounters regularly beginning at a very young age.

And, the message is clear, if "straight" kids don't want to be closed-minded, if they want to be "open" and "free" they'll mimic the homosexual sexual behavior and promiscuity related in these books.

In several stories intense sexual activity as a child is presented as normal and healthy, even child/adult sex is presented without question. Five and six year old's who regularly engaged in sex are described as children "who were willing" to explore their sexuality "to it's fullest extent." Many stories fondly recount a youthful sexual encounter with a much older man or woman. Sexual promiscuity and engaging in sex as a child/teenager is presented as "sexual freedom".

Heterosexual or "questioning" youth are encouraged to try same sex intercourse because, the Kinseyin theory is repeated over and over, "Everyone's really gay or bisexual." and "You won't know if you like it until you try it."..."

(You'll find the book mentioned on GLSEN's recommended reading list - Young, Gay and Proud! - here and other GLSEN recommended reading lists here).


How GLSEN Encourages Student Experimentation With Homosexuality - GLSEN Manual

"GLSEN's manual "Tackling Gay Issues In School" outlines classroom lessons and staff development activities. Amazingly, many of these lessons assume that students even in middle school could be "fluid" in their sexual feelings and behavior.

So, why does GLSEN claim publicly that kids aren't influenced by pro-homosexual school activities and material?..."


The GLSEN 'Fistgate' conference

Listen to Mass. Depts of Education and Health instruct children on the mechanics of homosexuality.

"On March 25, 2000 the Massachusetts Departments of Education and Health teamed up with the national gay and lesbian group GLSEN (Gay, Lesbian, Straight Education Network) and conducted a conference for school children and educators. The conference was held under the guise of tolerance and safe schools. However, as the Parent's Rights Coalition discovered, this conference was about teaching children the unsafe mechanics of homosexuality. Following the conference, organizers denied claims of misconduct made by the Parent's Rights Coalition. Organizers were forced to concede the truth after the Parent's Rights Coalition made public an audio recording from the conference, which substantiated their claims..."


See the thread Assemblyman MOUNTJOY opposes promotion of homosexuality in public schools for additional information.

20 posted on 02/17/2002 6:54:12 PM PST by EdReform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: erizona
Ping
21 posted on 02/18/2002 6:38:53 AM PST by EdReform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: erizona
"Our youth are under attack and we must be informed."

Bump!!

(see reply #20 above)

23 posted on 02/18/2002 8:06:31 AM PST by EdReform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: erizona
Yes and the sodomites are under attack too and we are the front line. Lets Roll!
24 posted on 02/18/2002 8:06:35 AM PST by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: erizona;khepera
I hate the NEA, so I guess I'm guilty of "hate" speech, take me away and lock me up for having a brain and having the right to use it...

I think homosexuals need to put away somewhere unless they change their ways and repent

25 posted on 02/18/2002 8:10:32 AM PST by wwjdn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: Stand Watch Listen; formerlib; khepera; argee
It's already happening. I know from experience. It's worse than you think. You're not allowed to be a Republican either.
27 posted on 02/18/2002 9:04:44 AM PST by I_Love_My_Husband
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grlfrnd
These folks (Sodomites/perverts) belong in Jail.
28 posted on 02/18/2002 10:23:22 AM PST by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Khepera
Agreed.
29 posted on 02/18/2002 10:55:54 AM PST by I_Love_My_Husband
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
School officials were angered when they discovered the contents of a GLSEN workbook designed to teach 11- to 13-year-old children a series of 16 filthy words dealing with homosexuality.

Sounds like these school officials had their brains on! The kids probably already knew the words, anyway.

30 posted on 02/18/2002 11:01:17 AM PST by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dakmar
I wonder if we can sue the NEA for corrupting minors?

Go for it. This is outrageous.

31 posted on 02/18/2002 11:02:08 AM PST by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
There is no homosexual agenda (sarcasm).
32 posted on 02/18/2002 12:59:55 PM PST by Michael2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dakmar
I wonder if we can sue the NEA for corrupting minors?

I don't know why they can't be charged criminally. If you or I showed other people's children the homosexual literature the NEA pushes on kids, I have no doubt the cops would be there in no time.

33 posted on 02/18/2002 1:10:18 PM PST by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied;Khepera;JMJ333;EODGUY;Brad's Gramma;1 FELLOW FREEPER;Crunchy Jello...
Bump for you should read #33
34 posted on 02/18/2002 3:17:30 PM PST by Dakmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
I don't know why they can't be charged criminally. If you or I showed other people's children the homosexual literature the NEA pushes on kids, I have no doubt the cops would be there in no time.

Any attornies on the forum????

35 posted on 02/18/2002 3:23:43 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
NEA is a corrupt organization taken over by perverts
36 posted on 02/18/2002 3:24:55 PM PST by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma
Be great if a gutsy sheriff acted on a parents complaint and busted a government teacher for exposing kids to homosexual propaganda. I am confident there is a plethora of laws on the books which make disseminating such material to minors illegal.
37 posted on 02/18/2002 3:38:21 PM PST by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
Oh man.....we've GOT to take this country back.
38 posted on 02/18/2002 3:41:46 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma
Oh sure now where is that sheriff.
39 posted on 02/18/2002 3:56:47 PM PST by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Khepera
Hold on. I'll go look.
40 posted on 02/18/2002 4:00:35 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
Not in Massachusetts. A mother wanted to bring charges against a teacher who assigned her son what she thought to be a pornographic book. The local district attorney refused and told her that schools, museums, and libraries were EXEMPT from state porno laws. http://www.insightmag.com/main.cfm/include/detail/storyid/160271.html
41 posted on 02/18/2002 4:26:06 PM PST by bettina0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: bettina0
Wow...amazing article. I don't know what to say. This is sick beyond words.
42 posted on 02/18/2002 5:38:31 PM PST by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Crunchy Jello
btt
43 posted on 02/18/2002 6:23:51 PM PST by GailA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dakmar; Brad's gramma, ArGee, JMJ333; Khepera, larry lied
My wife watched a program on FOX News tonight and it discussed homosexual indoctrination in our public schools and an arrogant, concescending woman from the aclu said flippantly that if people didn't want their children exposed to this, "Perhaps they should home school their children or save up money to send their children to a private school."

My response to her is simple....look bi*ch, public schools exist because they are funded by our tax dollars and therefore MUST be accountable to the people footing the bill. Contrary to her assertion, public schools don't belong to the liberal/homosexual/intolerant of our society.

I am heartened to see people taking legal action against perverse behavior that is condoned in public schools but would be considered contributing to the delinquency of a minor if it was done in a religion class, for example.

Perverted freaks do not have permission to expose to or indoctrinate children in their abhorrent, disgusting, amoral, animalistic lifestyle.

I doubt that my grandchild will ever set foot inside a public school until college, but I suggest the following plan of attack that I have broached with my daughter and her husband.

I will retain an attorney to draft a document stating clearly and comprehensively that any topics, presentations, outside speakers, forums, seminars etc. to which their child is to be subjected must be authorized by the parents of this minor child prior to involving this child in any of the above activities. The presentation of this notarized document will be preceeded by a complete examination of the curriculum planned for the year as well as the texts to be used. The document will conclude with a warning that legal action will be taken immediately against the staff, administration and all others involved should the prior review mandated by this document be violated. Notarized copies will be sent to the school board, principal, teachers' union president and state department of public instruction.

I will also encourage all other concerned parents to take similar steps and use this legal document as a template to recover control of our out-of-control public school system.

EODGUY

44 posted on 02/18/2002 6:59:23 PM PST by EODGUY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: EODGUY

WOW! Hat's off to ya!!!!!

(holy cow....I DID it!!!)

45 posted on 02/18/2002 7:03:11 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma
Gramma, you are more amazing everyday. First it was the picture posting and now the font manipulation.

As they once described a member of the World Wrestling Federation many years ago, you are the "total package".

=)

46 posted on 02/18/2002 7:51:27 PM PST by EODGUY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: EODGUY
Well.......goodness. I don't know what to say.

Thank you. :-)

Now....can someone direct me to a good picture of a pig? You read that one right...I need a picture of a pig that I can use periodically. For those "special" occasions when one would "need" a piggy.

47 posted on 02/18/2002 7:54:56 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma
The only piggy I can think of went to market......or did he stay home? I've got to bone up on my children's stories, there's a lot of reading ahead and I think I should wait until the baby is at least one before I start reading my "Home Handyman" to him/her.
48 posted on 02/18/2002 8:15:03 PM PST by EODGUY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: EODGUY
I beg to differ, young man. You start reading right now to that child. Wait. The child's not in your house right now. Well, OK, then....go to the window, face the direction of said family, (please, turn OFF your outside lights) and start reading. Loudly.

That is, after you go to the site I just pinged you to. You may have to go back a page or two so you can find out WHEN they actually came and took me to the hospital.....(everyone else, don't worry. I didn't really go. Shhhhh....it's a secret though)

49 posted on 02/18/2002 8:18:55 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma
Well, OK, then....go to the window, face the direction of said family, (please, turn OFF your outside lights) and start reading. Loudly

As luck would have it, I live in the country on top of a bluff and could do what you suggest without attracting the attention of anyone except for a few deer and wild turkey (those who haven't been killed by snowmobile exhaust, that is).

:)

50 posted on 02/18/2002 8:57:53 PM PST by EODGUY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson