Posted on 05/18/2009 10:10:22 AM PDT by topcat54
Earl Bartman, 37, was once convinced that his mother bore him and loved him. But recent discoveries have caused him to dismiss his old beliefs as mere myths.
“I began to study the events surrounding my so-called birth. There were many discrepancies that just did not make sense. My so-called mother had one account in her diary. My so-called father had another verbal account which I had transcribed. Many so-called facts simply did not match. There was also a birth announcement in the local paper that was well-preserved, but it was not in line with some of the statements of my so-called mother and my so-called father.
“My so-called mother didn’t even have a typewriter at the time of my birth. Therefore, the newspaper account must have been a forgery, typed by someone else.
“My so-called mother told the story of how, immediately after I was supposedly born, two nurses took me and cleaned me. While, my so-called father had a completely different memory of only one nurse who bathed me and measured me immediately after I was born. These inconsistencies cannot be reconciled.
“All of the so-called records of my birth have been completely destroyed. I performed research at the hospital and all that remains are copies of copies of copies of all the original paperwork. And these copies are not even on paper, but on microfilm that must be printed to get a paper copy. When I print out the copies, they are not always clear. So to believe I was really born to this woman and man at this hospital, I would have to believe that this information stored on this film was actually created from real documents from the time of my so-called birth and signed by my so-called mother and my so-called father over 37 years ago and somehow preserved through time. I can’t even find last month’s electric bill in my house, and I’m supposed to believe that some disinterested parties have taken the time to preserve my birth records from 37 years ago?
“When I interviewed my grandparents, they all seemed to have very close to the same story. But not one of them was in the room during my so-called birth. My so-called mother’s mother, who I used to call Grammy, said that I was born on March 5, 1972. I asked her how she knew for sure, and all she could do was say ‘because I remember’ and went to get the same newspaper clipping I had already dismissed as a forgery.
“My so-called father’s mother, who I used to call Me-maw, also claimed the same date, but also was not in the room of my so-called birth. She tried to explain that my so-called mother’s belly swelled slowly over 9 months or so. She tried to explain that it went down a little after that, and my so-called parents brought me home on March 9, 1972, but she again had no proof other than her memory. Her memory was not reliable because I asked her to show me her latest electric bill or just tell me the amount of it, and she failed that test.
“I discovered that all of these so-called witnesses to my birth were simply stating what my so-called mother and so-called father had relayed to them. The divergence of facts of my so-called mother’s and so-called father’s stories only compounded the questions.
“I went back to the hospital that stored the documents to let me speak to the doctor and nurses who delivered me. I only received blank stares for the first few moments. The lady at the information counter stumbled and stammered over quite a few words, tripping over herself continually, and then she went back to a state of blank stares. I refused to leave, and to my shame, even became a bit violent to the point that I was escorted out by two security guards. I could tell by the way they were staring at each other that they were part of a vast conspiracy. They did not want to say it, but I could tell on their faces by the way that they glanced at each other when I asked for proof of my birth. They knew they were caught. They would not admit it, but they knew that I knew that I had never been born.
Obama....is that you????
This would be funnier if we didn’t have a President who has gone to great pains to seal his records to prevent people from finding the truth.
Try the zoo.
Actually, I know someone like this, posting on Free Republic... (name with-held to protect the guilty... LOL...)...
Hmmm yes... ridicule ACTUAL facts with a fictional (and not really funny) account that is NOTHING SIMILAR...
...And they hope this makes us give it up?
The real facts are much much worse and this pathetic attempt to make light of them shows how much more substantive they really are.
HOW ABOUT YOU JUST SHOW US THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE AND COLLEGE RECORDS OBAMBI?
HOW DID YOU GET A SCHOLRSHIP TO GO TO A SCHOOL THAT ONLY ALLOWED INDONESIAN CITIZENS?
HOW COME YOUR GRANDMOTHER REMEMBERS BEING THERE IN KENYA FOR YOUR BIRTH (I think I would remember where my grandson was born)
Why would anyone wish that this Kenyan/American chap have any fewer rights than his father's other children. Since Kenya was part of the UK at the happy hour of our POTUS' birth, I sincerely believe he should be in line for the throne.
If you believe otherwise, my friend, you are a racist, homop... gender-normative, binary thinker, probably patriarchal, definitely hegemonic
Ummm..., I don’t think this poster (that I’m referring to) on Free Republic is Obama posting in disguise, but I could be wrong... you never know...
Yeah Obama, and what hospital is that?
lolol
This guy has more substantial birth records than does Barack Soetero Hussein “Barry” Obama, Jr.
Or whatever his real name is.
You said — This would be funnier if we didn’t have a President who has gone to great pains to seal his records to prevent people from finding the truth.
—
How about the President who threw away all his records so no one could look at them and find out he was not qualified to be President of the United States.
It’s apparently been documented by Leo Donofrio that President Chester Arthur was not qualified, per the Constitution to be President (and threw away most everything he had so that no one could find out).
At least Obama has only “sealed” them..., this other President actually *threw them away* and destroyed most everything... LOL...
Yeah ... it’s pretty sad when his dog has more credible papers than he does.
If this is intended as an argument in favor of 0, it is silly beyond its silliness. All anyone is asking of 0 is for him to make his real birth documents available for public examination. It would be a simple thing for him to do, and cost far less than the millions he is spending to keep them hidden. Until he can and does prove his eligibility to be president, he is a fraud, regardless of what Congress ignores or what the Supreme Court refuses to examine.
I was just going to post that.
BUMP
God Bless
I stopped reading a third of the way through after seeing the words “so-called” for what was the umpteenth time.
Alleged.
Ostensibly.
Purported.
All perfectly good words which could be used in the place of so-called. Maybe if the writer had a decent vocabulary I would’ve bothered to have read the rest of his so-called diatribe.
That’s curious. I wasn’t aware of the Chester Authur controversy.
I really want to see both Congress and the states clamp down some hard procedures to verify the eligibility of the President.
Correction. POTUS s/b POtuS
Fairfield, Vermont* [Chester Arthur’s place of birth is not certain and it may have been Waterville, VT. There were allegations that he was actually born in Canada (making him unqualified for the presidency), and that he adopted the birthplace of his deceased brother. These were never proven.]
Fairfield, Vermont* [Chester Arthur’s place of birth is not certain and it may have been Waterville, VT. There were allegations that he was actually born in Canada (making him unqualified for the presidency), and that he adopted the birthplace of his deceased brother. These were never proven.]
—
Well, while some thought — at the time he was Vice President and President that he was not qualified, per the Constitution, some believe it on the basis that he was not a natural born citizen, because of his father’s status (like some are saying about Obama). Others said, at the time, that he was born in Canada. Either way, he wasn’t qualified to be President, according to the Constitution.
Leo Donofrio outlines on his blog the detailed reasons why Chester Arthur was not qualified to be President.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.