Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Bishops' Biggest Hope: Life-Affirming Care for All
ZENIT ^ | 2009-12-18 | Kirsten Evans

Posted on 12/18/2009 1:31:16 PM PST by Alex Murphy

WASHINGTON, D.C., DEC. 18, 2009 (Zenit.org).- With only one week left before Christmas, and as ordinary Americans flood shopping malls and prepare for the holidays, the U.S. Senate is working overtime to pass a massive health care reform bill before the end of the year.

President Barack Obama has made health care reform a hallmark issue of his first year in office, calling it the most significant legislation of its kind since Franklin D. Roosevelt's Social Security Act of 1935.

The U.S. episcopal conference has taken an active interest in articulating guidelines for health care reform, and gained national recognition for their influence in advising lawmakers in crafting the "Affordable Health Care for America Act" that passed in the House of Representatives last month, and is awaiting approval in the Senate.

ZENIT caught up this week with Richard Doerflinger, associate director of the bishops' Secretariat of Pro-Life Activities, to ask him about the bishops' interest and involvement in the shaping of health care reform legislation.

ZENIT: Since the presidential election and the inception of the new administration, health care reform has been catapulted to the forefront of American political debate. Was health care reform a concern of the U.S. bishops before 2009?

Doerflinger: Yes, we have been calling for reform to guarantee universal access to health care for over half a century. In recent years, the bishops have been very involved in efforts to expand health care coverage, especially for children and pregnant women, through the Children’s Health Insurance Program established 11 years ago.

ZENIT: Cardinal DiNardo of Galveston-Houston, a relative newcomer to the bishops' conference and chair of the Committee on Pro-Life Activities, has described health care reform as being "urgently needed." Why do the bishops see health care reform as an urgent need?

Doerflinger: We see the right to basic health care as a corollary of the right to life, as Pope John XXIII said in his encyclical "Pacem in Terris." It is a scandal that the wealthiest nation in the world still has tens of millions of people with no health coverage at all.

ZENIT: The bishops have targeted three non-negotiable principles for a just and ethical healthcare reform: respect for life and conscience, affordability, and fair access for immigrants. Could you briefly summarize for us what each of these three issues embodies?

Doerflinger: Respecting life and conscience means that reform must respect everyone's need for health care, from conception to natural death, and never promote abortion or other procedures for taking life. Employers, insurers, insurance purchasers and health care providers must also be free to live according to their conscientious convictions on respect for life.

The criterion of affordability is based on our preferential option for the poor and vulnerable: The first priority in financing the system should be that health care is made affordable for the poor who are most in need of help.

Fairness to immigrants is essential because the right to health care is based on simple membership in humanity, not in political status or place of origin.

ZENIT: There has been a lot of talk recently about the famed Hyde Amendment language and the Menendez Amendment. Could briefly explain to us why these two amendments are so important?

Doerflinger: The Hyde Amendment has prevented federal funding of abortion in most major federal health programs for 30 years, and many parallel provisions have applied this same principle to the remaining programs. Our goal on abortion in the health care reform legislation is very simple: The policy of the Hyde Amendment must be maintained so that this legislation is not used as a vehicle for promoting the destruction of unborn human life.

The Menendez Amendment is part of our effort to maintain fairness to immigrants -- it would allow states to opt out of the current punitive federal policy that prevents legal immigrants from accessing government health care for the first five years they live in our country.

The current policy is both unfair ethically and counterproductive pragmatically -- people deprived of regular access to health care wait until they are very sick and then resort to hospital emergency rooms, where health care is at its most expensive and the cost is passed on to everyone.

ZENIT: The U.S. bishops received a great deal of press and recognition for their impact on crafting the bill that passed in the House last month. This bill contained the Hyde Amendment language we spoke of above. The presence of the bishops was described as decisive in achieving bi-partisan support for this language. To what would you contribute the success of the bishops?

Doerflinger: We are seen by many as an honest broker on issues such as health care and abortion. We strongly support reform, and strongly defend the rights of the unborn; we are not tied to any party, but argue these positions on their merits as moral issues, and we are happy to work with members of both parties to achieve a better policy.

But the decisive factor in the House debate was the active involvement of several dozen pro-life Democrats who shared our twofold commitment to life and health care reform. They made their support for the legislation conditional on the bill's abortion funding problem being fixed. We only lent support and advice -- they put their reputations and careers on the line.

ZENIT: Did you find you made any unsuspected alliances with other organizations in the effort to craft a just health care reform bill?

Doerflinger: I wouldn't say it was unsuspected because it has become a common occurrence. Because we will work with members of Congress on all our issues related to human dignity, we end up being seen as part of the "liberal" coalition on immigration and affordability, and part of the "conservative" coalition on abortion.

We simply see these as complementary aspects of our single message on human dignity. In the effort to address the abortion problem itself, we worked with committed groups ranging from Family Research Council (seen as politically very conservative) to Democrats for Life and Sojourners, seen as being on the liberal side of the spectrum.

ZENIT: Now that the bill has passed to the Senate, we know that the provisions the bishops fought for in the House bill remain at high risk. What is the biggest challenge the bishops are facing as the bill they fought for is now debated on the floor of the Senate?

Doerflinger: Currently the Senate bill falls short of the House version on all three of our criteria. Perhaps the most contentious issue has been abortion, as a majority of the Senate seems committed to using this bill as a way to vastly expand federal subsidies for health plans covering elective abortion.

And the Senate does not have the large number of pro-life Democrats that proved so decisive in the House, though some pro-life members such as [Nebraska's Democratic Senator] Ben Nelson have become especially well-known for their courage in insisting that this issue be addressed. At this point we do not know what the Senate will finally pass, or if it will pass a bill this year.

ZENIT: In concrete terms, what could be some of the conscience issues that ordinary American Catholics could face in the future if a health care reform bill which the bishops do not approve of were to pass?

Doerflinger: Catholic employers could find themselves penalized for trying to purchase health coverage consistent with their core convictions, as they cannot comply with a "basic benefits package" that mandates inclusion of procedures such as contraception and sterilization. Catholic health care providers could also find themselves marginalized in a health system that is required by the government to ensure ready access to procedures that Catholic facilities do not provide. Individual Catholics may no longer be able to find a Catholic health plan in line with their own moral convictions, because Catholic ethical standards do not live up to the government's idea of an essential benefit. These issues need to be addressed in the legislation.

ZENIT: What is the bishops’ biggest hope for health care reform? And what is their biggest fear?

Doerflinger: Our biggest hope is for a renewed health care system focused on basic life-affirming care for all, reflecting our human solidarity and our dependency on each other to live and flourish. Our twofold fear is a continued ailing system that leaves tens of millions without coverage, or a system "reformed" in all the wrong directions to promote the taking of life at its beginning and its end. Neither of those results is acceptable to us.


TOPICS: Catholic; Ministry/Outreach; Religion & Politics; Skeptics/Seekers
KEYWORDS:
[Richard Doerflinger, associate director of the USCCB's Secretariat of Pro-Life Activities]: We see the right to basic health care as a corollary of the right to life, as Pope John XXIII said in his encyclical "Pacem in Terris." It is a scandal that the wealthiest nation in the world still has tens of millions of people with no health coverage at all....

....The criterion of affordability is based on our preferential option for the poor and vulnerable: The first priority in financing the system should be that health care is made affordable for the poor who are most in need of help.

Fairness to immigrants is essential because the right to health care is based on simple membership in humanity, not in political status or place of origin....

....Because we will work with members of Congress on all our issues related to human dignity, we end up being seen as part of the "liberal" coalition on immigration and affordability, and part of the "conservative" coalition on abortion.

We simply see these as complementary aspects of our single message on human dignity. In the effort to address the abortion problem itself, we worked with committed groups ranging from Family Research Council (seen as politically very conservative) to Democrats for Life and Sojourners, seen as being on the liberal side of the spectrum.

1 posted on 12/18/2009 1:31:17 PM PST by Alex Murphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
Are these the same bishops who covered for pedophiles all those years?
2 posted on 12/18/2009 1:34:09 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Imagine the NERVE and GALL of these Bishops to be involved in the HC debate!!!

Scope of Catholic health care in the United States
• There were more than 16.9 million emergency room visits and more than 92.8 million
outpatient visits in Catholic hospitals during a one-year period.1
• Catholic health care systems and facilities are present in all 50 states providing acute care,
skilled nursing, and other services including hospice, home health, assisted living and
senior housing.2
• Catholic hospitals employ 525,193 full-time employees and 233,934 part-time workers.1
• More than 5.5 million patients were admitted to Catholic hospitals during a
one-year period.1
• There are 60 Catholic health care systems.
1. 2007 American Hospital Association Annual Survey
2. 2008 Official Catholic Directory

” Catholic employers could find themselves penalized for trying to purchase health coverage consistent with their core convictions, as they cannot comply with a “basic benefits package” that mandates inclusion of procedures such as contraception and sterilization. Catholic health care providers could also find themselves marginalized in a health system that is required by the government to ensure ready access to procedures that Catholic facilities do not provide. Individual Catholics may no longer be able to find a Catholic health plan in line with their own moral convictions, because Catholic ethical standards do not live up to the government’s idea of an essential benefit. These issues need to be addressed in the legislation.”


3 posted on 12/18/2009 1:37:40 PM PST by OpusatFR (Tagline not State Approved. Thoughts not State Approved. Actions not State Approved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR; nickcarraway; Lady In Blue; NYer; ELS; Pyro7480; livius; Catholicguy; RobbyS; ...
Ping!

.

Abortion Debate Shows the Catholic Bishops' Growing Influence
The Catholic case against health-care reform
Pro-Life Leaders Launch Opposition to Senate Health Bill Following Nelson Amendment Demise

With pro-life amendment's defeat, US bishops urgently call for changes in Senate health bill
More Proof that the US Catholic Bishops are Leading the Charge in Abortion Battle
Bishops Urge Senators to Support [Abortion]Amendment on Health Care; Urge Constituents to Back It
Bishops urged to be tough on pols who would pay for abortion
Health reform still full of thorny problems for Catholics (Vasa comes out for subsidiarity)

Healthcare and Catholics: True and False Arguments

Meddling Bishops Interfere in Political Process

How the Stupak-Pitts Amendment May Change Our Politics
Health Care and the Power of the Bishops' Conference
US Bishops: Abortion Isn't Health Care
Denver Archbishop Chaput says promises were broken on abortion
Catholic Bishops: Health Care Bill ... ‘Money-Laundering System’ for Funding Abortion

Catholic Caucus: The Bishops Go On Offense
US bishops conference mounts late drive against 'unacceptable' health-care reform
Catholic Bishops Urge Members to Oppose Abortion Funding in Health Care Plan [Catholic Uprising!]
Bishops Announce Unprecedented Massive Catholic Opposition to Obamacare
Bishops Call for Massive Catholic Opposition to Abortion in Current Health Care Reform

Archbishop Charles Chaput on the Current Struggle Between Catholics and "Caesar"
The Bishop's Ax Falls on Obama. And on the Vatican Curia (bombshell article)
US Bishops: Heath Package Still Funding Abortions (Urge Congress to Keep Working)
Catholic Bishops Declare They Will ‘Vigorously’ Oppose Health Care Bill as It Now Stands
Bishops Restate Vow vs. Obamacare's Abortion

Important: US Bishops taking the gloves off on health care reform
BREAKING: Catholic Bishops On Health Care - Change Bills Or Else
U.S. bishops warn of vigorous opposition if Congress fails to fix health care bills
List: *41* Bishops against Obamacare (and counting!)
Bishop Murphy Issues Video Statement on Health Care Reform [Diocese of Rockville Centre]

Health Care Principles [Bishop Samuel Aquila, Fargo, ND]
Florida Bishop [Thomas Wenski] Weighs in on Health Care Reform
ObamaCare and Catholic social teaching [Bishop Neckless]
Some Catholic bishops question gov't health care
Boston’s Roman Catholic Cardinal Says He Confronted Obama about Abortion in Health Care Plan....

Iowa Bishop: Don’t Be Railroaded into the Current...Health Care Proposals
in a message issued by the Diocese of Sioux City (The Church on Universal Healthcare)
Nazi Health Care A Catholic Bishop Speaks Out Against "End of Life Care" (Germany, 1941)
Bishop Nickless: "No Health Care Reform is Better than the Wrong Health Care Reform"
Cardinal Rigali, Abp. Chaput Intensify Warnings Against Obamacare's Abortion Expansion

4 posted on 12/18/2009 6:17:56 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

I am Catholic, and a liberal 'friend' of mine just sent me an email chiding me after hearing that O'Reily mentioned that the Bishops are "for the Health Care bill". The Bishops have not been clear in their message, and if they cannot get crystal clear, they need to step away from the microphones. Even I'm confused on EXACTLY what their stance is. I'm still SICKENED by the apparent large number of "Catholics" (CINOS) that voted for Obama. I DO NOT GET IT AND IT IS REALLY BOTHERING ME. I'm going to read the links above, and just finished realing this one:


Health Care and the Bishops of the Cathlolic Church...................


5 posted on 12/18/2009 10:34:41 PM PST by NoRedTape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

.........In Rome, I shook the hand of a great man named Pope Paul the II.

If any so-called Bishops aren't with the "program", they need to leave. Let the cleansing begin. ALL BISHOPS should have a clue like the Bishop of Rhode Island - Bishop Tobin. I know Monsignors with much more sense. We need to fill in the ranks with people of clarity. It will happen. Let the weak wash aside.

6 posted on 12/18/2009 10:39:28 PM PST by NoRedTape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson