Skip to comments.The Surest Sign of a Decadent Culture
Posted on 06/09/2010 9:04:57 PM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
The Surest Sign of a Decadent Culture
|by Deal W. Hudson|
LifeSiteNews has just published a story containing, to my mind, the surest sign of a decadent culture.
The chair of the Department of Philosophy at the University of Cape Town, David Benatar, has pubished a book, "Better To Never Have Been: The Harm of Coming Into Existence."
The basic argument is this: Human existence necessarily contains suffering, therefore it is better not to exist.
My response to Benatar is as follows: Since when did they let college freshmen become tenured professors of philosophy, much less chair an entire department?
But, there is more. Our favorite Princeton professor -- just kidding! -- Peter Singer agrees with Benatar.
Have you ever read a statement more contrary to reason this this? I don't think I can recall one.
To begin from the premise that the experience of suffering, which is an incredibly broad and complex concept, by the way, negates the desirability of human existence is not even nihilism, it's just plain stupid.
Benatar and Singer are basically saying, "If we do not exist as God exists then it is better to not exist at all."
In other words, a life without suffering, which would include death, is the only desirable life.
PS. Let's hope none of Benatar's or Singer's fans are found dead any time soon.
By Peter J. Smith
NEW YORK, June 8, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) Princeton philosopher Peter Singer one of the worlds foremost contemporary utilitarian philosophers infamous for his advocacy of infanticide, would like individuals to consider this question: would sterilizing the human race to spare future generations the pain of existence be a good idea?
In a blog post for the New York Times entitled Should this be the last generation? Singer discusses in glowing terms the thought of South African philosopher David Benatar. Singer calls Benator the author of a fine book with an arresting title: Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence.
To bring into existence someone who will suffer is, Benatar argues, to harm that person, but to bring into existence someone who will have a good life is not to benefit him or her, explains Singer.
Both Singer and Benatar both believe that human beings do not have inherent dignity. Singer, the Princeton Chair of Bioethics, has gained notoriety for asserting that infanticide is justifiable, especially for disabled infants, because they lack self-awareness, which he asserts is a requirement for personhood.
A key difference, however, between Singer and Benatar, an existential nihilist who chairs the Department of Philosophy at the University of Cape Town in South Africa, is that Singer believes life could be worth living in certain conditions. But Benatar flat out rejects existence as good, and the still-living author discusses that view in his controversial book.
Singer explains Benatars antinatalist philosophy, which bases its moral framework by weighing the consequences of existence, in this way: everyone will suffer to some extent, and if our species continues to reproduce, we can be sure that some future children will suffer severely. Hence continued reproduction will harm some children severely, and benefit none.
Singer then invites readers to engage in a thought experiment: So why dont we make ourselves the last generation on earth? If we would all agree to have ourselves sterilized then no sacrifices would be required we could party our way into extinction!
Even if we take a less pessimistic view of human existence than Benatar, we could still defend [this scenario], because it makes us better off for one thing, we can get rid of all that guilt about what we are doing to future generations and it doesnt make anyone worse off, because there wont be anyone else to be worse off, he continued.
Singer distances himself from Benatars conclusions, however, and says, I do think it would be wrong to choose the non-sentient universe. Nevertheless, he said that for the human race to continue justifying reproducing itself over the next two centuries, individuals should ask themselves the hard questions of, Is life worth living? Are the interests of a future child a reason for bringing that child into existence? And is the continuance of our species justifiable in the face of our knowledge that it will certainly bring suffering to innocent future human beings?
Bioethicist Wesley J. Smith, a longtime critic of Singers work, responded to Singers recent article, saying, This is nihilism on stilts and it is polluting the Wests self confidence and belief in universal human equality like the BP oil well is polluting the Caribbean.
Only the resulting mess isnt measured in polluted beaches and dead birds, but existential despair that destroys human lives.
Under the influence of anti-human advocates like Peter Singer, we have gone in the West from seeking to secure the blessings of liberty for ourselves and our posterity, to seriously questioning whether there should be any posterity at all, Smith wrote on his blog. This is not healthy. But it is the natural consequence of rejecting human exceptionalism.
They should be first in line
If this confused, academic knucklehead believed his own obfuscating, illogical bull$hit, he would already have committed suicide.
better not to exist? only the devil and his disciples would come up with that one.
“If we do not exist as God exists then it is better to not exist at all.”
isn’t that why the Devil got kicked out of heaven?vanity?
These people have no business in philosophy, polluting human minds.
He’s mentally ill.
And some people pay to be taught by him.
Tell us how you really feel! LOL!
Researcher finds strong link between contraception and HIV
The Birth-Control Riddle
Social Science Proves Humanae Vitae
"Contraception Is Wrong. Now Here's How You Use It . . ."
Suit claims birth control warning not enough
Natural and Unnatural (father of 5 shocks mother of 1)
Planned Parenthood Uses Teens to Distribute Injectable Birth Control in Rural Ecuador
Study: Low-Dose Birth Control Pills Decrease Bone Density in Young Women
Spanish drug agency confirms grave effects of morning-after pill
Another Woman Dies of Hormonal Contraceptive in Switzerland
Study Finds Half of Women on "Birth Control Shot" Suffer Bone Problems
The Re-Birth of Population Control: Human Life Seen as a Carbon Problem
Radio Replies First Volume - Birth Control
Abortion, birth control pill linked to breast cancer, surgeon says
God before contraception (Australia)
Fighting the 'contraceptive mentality'
Birth control pill creator regrets population decline
Polluted Water, Polluted Culture (one more consequence from contraception)
Abortifacients -- The Other Forbidden Grief
NFP and Contraception: Whats the Difference?
Wisconsin requiring Catholic institutions to provide contraceptives coverage
Contraception: The history you may have missed and would rather not know
Why does Pope Benedict talk about Humanae vitae in the new encyclical? [Catholic Caucus]
New Evangelical Documentary Exposes Abortifacient Qualities of the Birth Control Pill, Promotes NFP
In Quiverfull Movement, Birth Control Is Shunned
Press in a Dither Again over Popes Reaffirmation of Catholic Teaching
How Birth Control Changed America for the Worst
If You Are Contracepting, You Are Part of A Very Big Problem
Vatican and Italian government criticize sale of RU 486 in Italy
New Condom Ads Target Catholics, Latinos
St. Padre Pio, Humanae Vitae, and Mandatory Abortion
Responsible Parenthood in a Birth Control Culture, Part Two [Open]
Responsible Parenthood in a Birth Control Culture, Part One [Open]
Humanae Vitae and True Sexual Freedom Part 6 of 6 [Open]
Contraception v. Natural Family Planning Part 5 of 6 [Open]
Sex Speaks: True and False Prophets Part 4 of 6 [Open]
Contraception and the Language of the Body Part 3 of 6 [Open]
Does Contraception Foster Love? Part 2 of 6 [Open]
Contraception and Cultural Chaos Part 1 of 6 [Open]
Priests still suffering from effects of Humanae Vitae dissenters, Vatican cardinal says (Must read!)
"Provoking reflection" (Contrasting views on Humanae Vitae)
Humanae Vitae The Year of the Peirasmòs - 1968
Catholics to Pope: Lift the Birth Control Ban
[OPEN] The Vindication of Humanae Vitae
Catholic Clergy Challenge Colleagues to Reacquaint Themselves and Their People with Humanae Vitae
White House proposes wide "conscience clause" on abortion, contraception
THE EX CATHEDRA STATUS OF THE ENCYCLICAL "HUMANAE VITAE" [Catholic Caucus]
A degrading poison that withers life
Australia Study: 70 Percent of Women Seeking Abortions Used Contraception
[Fr. Thomas Euteneuer] In Persona Christi: The Priest and Contraception
A Challenging Truth, Part Two: The Day the Birth Control Died
A Challenging Truth, Part One: How Birth Control Works
Ten Challenges for the Pro-Life Movement in 2008
The concept of the "intrinsically evil"
Pope Tells Pharmacists Not to Dispense Drugs With 'Immoral Purposes'
Massive Study Finds the Pill Significantly Increases Cancer Risk if Used more than Eight Years
Birth Control Pill Creates Blood Clot Causing Death of Irish Woman
Seminarians Bring Churchs Teaching on Contraception, Sexuality to YouTube
Abortion and Contraception: Old Lies
History of Catholic teaching on Contraception
Pope: Legislation "Supporting Contraception and Abortion is Threatening the Future of Peoples"
Contraception: Why It's Wrong
On Fox News Fearless HLI Priest Takes on Sean Hannity (may be indebted for saving his soul)
VIDEO - SEAN HANNITY vs REV. THOMAS EUTENEUER (must see!)
The Early Church Fathers on Contraception - Catholic/Orthodox Caucus
Pope on divine love vs. erotic love
Conjugal Love and Procreation: God's Design
Being fruitful [Evangelicals and contraception]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.