Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Catholic Caucus] The Ancient Mass in “House Churches” Was Not as Informal as Many Think
Archdiocese of Washington ^ | 03-26-19 | Mark Rothe

Posted on 03/27/2019 9:23:21 AM PDT by Salvation

The Ancient Mass in “House Churches” Was Not as Informal as Many Think

The Catholic Faith was illegal in the Roman Empire prior to 313 A.D., when the Emperor Constantine issued the Edict of Milan permitting it to flourish publicly. Prior to that time, Church buildings as we know them today were rare – Mass was usually celebrated in houses.

These “houses” were usually rather sizable, with a central courtyard or large room that permitted something a little more formal than Mass around the dining room table. I remember being taught (incorrectly) that these early Masses were informal, celebrated facing the people, and had a relaxed, communal atmosphere. In fact, the people didn’t just sit around a table or on the floor in circle – not at all. They sat or stood formally, with everyone faced in one direction: east.

The drawing above shows the layout of an ancient house church (more often called a Domus Dei (House of God)), based on an excavated 3rd century house church in Dura-Europos (located in what is now Syria).Baptistry at Dura Europos

The assembly room is on the left, and a priest or bishop is depicted conducting a liturgy (facing east) at an altar against the east wall. A baptistry is on the right, and a deacon is shown guarding the entrance. The lonely-looking deacon in the back of the assembly hall is there to “preserve good order,” as you will read below.

What is remarkable about these early liturgies is how formal they were despite the less-than-ideal circumstances. The following text is from the Didiscalia, a document written in about 250 A.D. Among other things, it gives rather elaborate details about the celebration of the early Catholic Mass in these “house liturgies.” I have included an excerpt below (in bold italics); my comments are shown in red text.

Now, in your gatherings, in the holy Church, convene yourselves modestly in places of the brethren, as you will, in a manner pleasing and ordered with care.

These “house liturgies” were not informal; good order and careful attention to detail were essential.

Let the place of the priests be separated in a part of the house that faces east.

Even in these early house Masses, the sanctuary (where the clergy ministered) was distinct from where the laity gathered. People were not all just clustered around a dining room table.

In the midst of them is placed the bishop’s chair, and with him let the priests be seated. Likewise, and in another section let the lay men be seated facing east. For thus it is proper: that the priests sit with the bishop in a part of the house to the east and after them the lay men and the lay women,

Everyone faced east, laity and clergy. Notice that men and women sat in separate sections, which was the tradition in many churches until relatively recently (the last 150 years or so).

and when you stand to pray, the ecclesial leaders rise first, and after them the lay men, and again, then the women. Now, you ought to face to east to pray for, as you know, scripture has it, Give praise to God who ascends above the highest heavens to the east.

Again, note that Mass was not celebrated facing the people, as some suppose of the early Church. Everyone faced in the same direction: east. The text cites Scripture as the reason for this: God is to the east, the origin of the light.

Now, of the deacons, one always stands by the Eucharistic oblations and the others stand outside the door watching those who enter,

Remember that this was a time of persecution; the early Christians were careful to allow only baptized and bona fide members to enter the sacred mysteries. Only the baptized were permitted to enter the Sacred Liturgy. This was called the disciplina arcanis (discipline of the secret), and deacons guarded the door to maintain it.

and afterwards, when you offer let them together minister in the church.

Once the door was locked and the Mass began, it would seem that the deacons took their place in the sanctuary, with one remaining outside it to maintain “good order” among the laity.

And if there is one to be found who is not sitting in his place let the deacon who is within, rebuke him, and make him to rise and sit in his fitting place … also, in the church the young ones ought to sit separately, if there is a place, if not let them stand. Those of more advanced age should sit separately; the boys should sit separately or their fathers and mothers should take them and stand; and let the young girls sit separately, if there is really not a place, let them stand behind the women; let the young who are married and have little children stand separately, the older women and widows should sit separately.

This may seem a bit complicated, but the upshot is that seating was by sex and age. Note that those with young children were to stand in a separate area (the cry rooms of the day!).

And a deacon should see that each one who enters gets to his place, and that none of these sits in an inappropriate place. Likewise, the deacon ought to see that there are none who whisper or sleep or laugh or nod off.

The early Christians did such things? Say it isn’t so! Today, ushers preserve “good order.”

For in the Church it is necessary to have discipline, sober vigilance, and attentive ear to the Word of the Lord.

Well, that is clear and to the point – and the advice is still needed. It is also a fitting way to end today’s post.



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; History; Theology
KEYWORDS: catholic; liturgy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: Campion; morphing libertarian
The West spoke Latin. The East spoke Greek.

And to this day, the Mass is offered in Latin in some western-derived Catholic churches. In eastern-derived Catholic Churches, the Divine Liturgy is offered in Greek (with some Aramaic, old church Slavonic, and perhaps a few other languages.) It has nothing to do with "The worldwide Latin mass was imposed later so that the poor and illiterate couldn’t follow because they couldn’t read and only clergy and the wealthy understood latin." That bit is counter-historical nonsense.

21 posted on 03/27/2019 1:15:21 PM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

Please inform those ignorant amongst us why the church went all ,latin after the message of pentecost

The church is infamous for not doing much to uplift the poor and kow towing to the land owners, kings, princess, and wealthy to maintain their own power base. There’s not much profit in educating and uplifting peons. But your version of history may enlighten me, m as I admit I missed a few days of class when i majored in history and studied church history since..


22 posted on 03/27/2019 1:23:11 PM PDT by morphing libertarian ( Use Comey's Report; Indict Hillary now; build Kate's wall. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

Exactly.


23 posted on 03/27/2019 1:23:20 PM PDT by Campion ((marine dad))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian

No Marxist claptrap there, nosiree.


24 posted on 03/27/2019 1:24:08 PM PDT by Campion ((marine dad))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian
"The worldwide Latin mass was imposed later so that the poor and illiterate couldn’t follow because they couldn’t read and only clergy and the wealthy understood latin."


25 posted on 03/27/2019 1:25:08 PM PDT by fidelis (Zonie and USAF Cold Warrior)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Campion

you are ignoring the first preaching down by the apostles and the early spread of the church. The people gathered at pentecost didn’t all speak only latin or greek or there would be no reason for the Holy Ghost to bring the gift of tongues.

THE LATIN MASS WAS MANDATED ABOUT 160 YEARS LATER.


26 posted on 03/27/2019 1:26:41 PM PDT by morphing libertarian ( Use Comey's Report; Indict Hillary now; build Kate's wall. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: fidelis

MUST HAVE NOT READ YOUR OWN POSTS


27 posted on 03/27/2019 1:27:24 PM PDT by morphing libertarian ( Use Comey's Report; Indict Hillary now; build Kate's wall. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian
I cannot "inform" as to something that did not happen.

People in the western part of the Empire spoke what language? In what language was the Mass offered in the western part of the Empire?

People in the eastern part of the Empire spoke what language? In what language was the Divine Liturgy offered in the eastern part of the Empire?

The church is infamous

The rest of your post is inconsistent with reality.

28 posted on 03/27/2019 1:28:12 PM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Campion

Have you ever worshiped with our eastern Catholic brethren? The Liturgy in Greek is beautiful. Also, it is characterized by discipline, sober vigilance, and [an] attentive ear to the Word of the Lord. I used to live within an hour drive of a Melkite-Greek Catholic Church, and visited a few times.


29 posted on 03/27/2019 1:30:33 PM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

You continue to say language when the plural is accurate languages. I suggested early those of you who think Pentecost is meaningless read some world history then you will see what languageS people spoke where the apostles preached.

Also you may not know or have been to Jerusalem to realize it was a major crossroads of roads regions and brought trade in from tribes and lands which didn’t speak Greek or latin.


30 posted on 03/27/2019 1:33:25 PM PDT by morphing libertarian ( Use Comey's Report; Indict Hillary now; build Kate's wall. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian

preaching DONE


31 posted on 03/27/2019 1:34:01 PM PDT by morphing libertarian ( Use Comey's Report; Indict Hillary now; build Kate's wall. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian

I’m out. I can’t believe on a catholic forum thread people don’t understand pentecost or who was in Jerusalem on that day.

The Epistle for the Feast of Pentecost, Acts 2:1-11, gives to us a description of the events which constitute the basis for the Feast.

When the Day of Pentecost had fully come, they were all with one accord in one place. And suddenly there came a sound from heaven, as of a rushing mighty wind, and it filled the whole house where they were sitting. Then there appeared to them divided tongues, as of fire, and one sat upon each of them. And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance.

And there were dwelling in Jerusalem Jews, devout men, from every nation under heaven. And when this sound occurred, the multitude came together, and were confused, because everyone heard them speak in his own language. Then they were all amazed and marveled, saying to one another, “Look, are not all these who speak Galileans? And how is it that we hear, each in our own language in which we were born? Parthians and Medes and Elamites, those dwelling in Mesopotamia, Judea and Cappadocia, Pontus and Asia, Phrygia and Pamphylia, Egypt and the parts of Libya adjoining Cyrene, visitors from Rome, both Jews and proselytes, Cretans and Arabs – we hear them speaking in our own tongues the wonderful works of God.”


32 posted on 03/27/2019 1:43:35 PM PDT by morphing libertarian ( Use Comey's Report; Indict Hillary now; build Kate's wall. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Hi. Interesting article.

“Go to your inner room and pray in secret...”

5.56mm


33 posted on 03/27/2019 2:41:29 PM PDT by M Kehoe (DRAIN THE SWAMP! BUILD THE WALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

We have a Freeper who attends a Maronite Mass (aligned with the Pope). Their Mass is in Aramaic with some Hebrew. Not sure on this. But the description of the Mass sounds absolutely beautiful.


34 posted on 03/27/2019 3:12:01 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: All
The Other Catholics: A Short Guide to the Eastern Catholic Churches
Ukrainian (Catholic) Church an example of 'synodality' for Pope
What Do You Mean You Are a "Maronite" Catholic?
Ukrainian (Catholic) Church an example of 'synodality' for Pope
Traditional Rites in Union Now with the Catholic Church
Catholic conservatives: A traditionalist avant-garde
The Rites of the Catholic Church [Catholic Caucus]
One and Many Churches (origins of the Church)
THE RITES OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH -- There are many!
(Cardinal) Newman on Rites and Ceremonies
35 posted on 03/27/2019 3:16:10 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian
The worldwide Latin mass was imposed later so that the poor and illiterate couldn’t follow because they couldn’t read and only clergy and the wealthy understood latin.

Not true. That's a falsehood.

But one of the blessings of Vatican 2 was the local language mass returning to the original message of pentecost.

There have been no "blessings" from VC II. Just look around: kiddy masses, clown masses, homo masses, folk masses, communion in the paw and on the hoof, winks at birth control and abortion, communion for those in mortal sin and even non-catholics.

36 posted on 03/27/2019 3:37:28 PM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian; JoeFromSidney
"The worldwide Latin mass was imposed later so that the poor and illiterate couldn’t follow..."

This is a strikingly ahistorical and cynical (not to say paranoid) take on the motives for the Latin Mass.

For the first 1000 years,there really weren't any written national languages, no English, French, or even Italian as we know them today. In the West, to be literate was to read Latin; in the East, Greek; and Aramaic, Ge'ez and Arabic in the surviving churches in the lands subsumed under the rule of Islam.

The great advantage of Latin was its inclusiveness: people could share the greatest of literature and correspond and converse in the same language from Prague to Cadiz and from Oslo to Gibraltar. (This applied not only to Liturgy, but to Philosophy, Literature, History, Mathematics, Astronomy, Medicine --- a continent-wide community of people who could travel everywhere and be understood. There's a kind of Pentecost for you.)

Most European mother-tongues had no written form, not even an alphabet, for centuries. (For instance: Dante is considered the first writer in vernacular Tuscan, later Italian: -- this is 14th century, which is early Renaissance.) Books, being either hand-written or printed by woodblock, were extremely costly to produce, and it would have been physically and culturally impossible to accommodate people's mother-tongues,


Rusyn
Polish
Ukrainian
Serbo-Croatian
Czech
Bulgarian
Slovak
Belarusian
Slovene
Macedonian
Lower Sorbian
Upper Sorbian
Kashubian
Bosnian
Croatian
Montenegrin
Serbian
Most of the above had to make do with Old Church Slavonic as their liturgical language--- not their mother tongue,
French, a dozen dialects
Italian, a dozen dialects,
Spanish, a dozen dialects,
...including Mozarabic, which was a liturgical language
Romanian
Portuguese
Sicilian
Catalan
Galician
Basque
Sardinian
Cretan
Cypriot
Maltese
Corsican
Tuscan
Dalmatian
Lombard
the Rhaeto-Romance languages
the Gallo-Italic languages
the Occitano-Romance languages
Occitan
Catalan
Aragonese
Astur-Leonese
Galician-Portuguese
Castilian

I'm not even 1/4 of the way through and I'm exhausted. I haven't even mentioned the many dialects of German, the language of the Angles, the language of the Saxons, the six major divisions of Celtic, all of which would have been incomprehensible even to a middle-English speaker like Geoffrey Chaucer (like Dante, 14th century).

Standardized European languages did not exist.

Bottom line, if you're still with me: Latin was the only way people could write, be published, and communicate beyond their own, oh, Manx or Frisian or Aragonese-speaking valley or village.

And a surprising number of people DID speak Latin, especially anybody (missionaries, traders, for instance) who had any occasion to venture from their childhood hearth and home.

St. Patrick, born in Roman Britain, educated in Auxerre,France, preached in Ireland in several Goidelic (Gaelic) languages, but wrote to the pagan Franks --- his Letter to the soldiers of Coroticus (Latin: Epistola) --- in Latin. Why? Because the Franks were priests? (No.) Because Latin was the international language. It was what pagan Frankish soldiers spoke.

But that's a topic for later. Suppertime!

37 posted on 03/27/2019 3:55:35 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("If he refuses to listen even to the Church, regard him as you would a pagan or a tax collector.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

It is clear that God intended the apostles to spread the gospel in native languages. The message of Pentecost. The required latin mass came 160 years later.

I agree with most of the benefits you list, but to say it was beneficial to the majority of people who were poor and uneducated is a fantasy. Until the printing press and universal education people were much easier to hold down and control as they are now.


38 posted on 03/27/2019 5:09:21 PM PDT by morphing libertarian ( Use Comey's Report; Indict Hillary now; build Kate's wall. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

We share some of the dislike of V 2 I mentioned 1 change that is beneficial for missionary work and ongoing catholics worldwide and in the sprint of Pentecost and you got carried away.

For those of you hanging on my every word and denying what is right there in the bible, which I posted two verses of, I am tired of fighting off the hours.

Have a good one. I would post in Latin, but I want you all to understand.


39 posted on 03/27/2019 5:13:06 PM PDT by morphing libertarian ( Use Comey's Report; Indict Hillary now; build Kate's wall. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian
VC II was a nail in the coffin for missionary work.

Catholic Church, Where Are You? The Cry of a Frontier Missionary

Open your eyes.

40 posted on 03/27/2019 5:19:55 PM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson