Proof that at least one of two (evolution, ice age) key theories is false

official school material ^ | 04/05/21 | self

[Truth666]

These are three of the dogmas which we are endoctrinated nowadays in school : #1 - origins of the current forms life forms: by evolution from previous forms #2 - appearance of Homo Sapiens (from encarta): The oldest known fossils that possess skeletal features typical of modern humans date from between 130,000 and 90,000 years ago. #3 - last ice age (from encarta): the most recent ice age, the Pleistocene Epoch, lasted from about 1.6 million years to 10,000 years before present ... when temperatures were 5° to 7° C cooler than today.

#1 and #2 are part of current evolution theory; #3 is part of current ice age theory.

There can be no doubts that no other theory has so much impact on modern society as evolution theory. In view of the signs of climate change from the last years, ice age theory is impacting society more by the day.

From these dogmas we immediately can take the following conclusion : homo sapiens has already experienced an ice age.

Now hold on to your seat : relying solely on the assumptions of both theories, there's plenty of evidence that AT LEAST one of these theories is false ! In other words : these theories are incompatible.

Let's take one piece of evidence that any high school student can understand.

Lord Howe Island - living proof

This is not just another coral reef. This is Lord Howe Island, by far the southern-most coral reef in the world. Its existance is only possible due to particular climate conditions that affect an area of the world where no other land rises even remotely near sea level. In fact there's nothing but deep ocean until Port Macquarie, on the NSW coast, 550 kms away.

This wonder of the world would be immediately destroyed, if the ocean temperature would drop just one degree Celsius. If the temperature would drop 5°C both endemic unmistakable palms (including the most popular indoor palm of the world, howea forsteriana) would also perish. So, just to take these two examples, both the coral and the howea would have had to have developed from scratch during the last 10,000 years. A claim that nobody would dare to make.

[Truth666]

At this point it is convenient to recall the "big lie construct techniques" that I mentioned before in this thread, as it was required ...

[Truth666]

How to sell big lie based constructs

"Poor (but successful) liars at work"
- spread a big lie, as part of an agenda
- at some point later in time, add another big lie to the construct, as part of the same agenda. Most of the times event the most simple construct (i.e. just two big lies) will be already incompatible - a well known fact that the more lies, the easier it is to be caught.
Now, how is the problem solved of adding new lies without letting the construct looking immediately grotesque ?

There are several key techniques for that:
Technique #1 - downplay key evidence exposing that lie
see post 92 for an explanation of this, illustrated with an example in the scope of this thread
Technique #2 - make sure that key evidence is never presented
see post 102 for an explanation of this, illustrated with an example in the scope of this thread
Technique #3 - avoid precising any compromising details
see post 110 for an explanation of this, illustrated with an example in the scope of this thread
So now it's time to explain and illustrate Technique #4, the one mentioned at #191 - the technique I was hoping that someone would mention for me ...

[Truth666]

On second thought I will wait a bit more - I mean I'm sure there is AT LEAST one freeper that knows what that technique is ... Hint : check again the link I gave at #218 !

[Truth666]

Another Hint : it's clear to see that CREATION and APOCALYPSE are two sides of the same coin.

[Truth666]

Let's recall the first hint I gave, at #196 :
Hint about the technique #4 : implementing the foundation of the big lie "evolution" relies on three cheap tricks that belong technically in that category.
Two of those tricks them have been mainly used with human evolution / out of Africa.

One of these is actually the most sucessful trick ever from this category, and has been identified in a previous thread : cheap trick behind the most devasting lie in the history of mankind
(see there #50 by wirestripper for the first freeper to get the right path; see #54 by martian_22 for the precise correct answer.)

The trick I mean concerning what we discuss now, is the third one from that category; it is decisive for people to believe in all aspects of evolution, not only in human evolution

[stands2reason]

Timecube

It's FOUR SIMULTANEOUS DAYS!!! :-)

[smonk]

does sounding like al gore "getting with the program"?

[Truth666]

Help for the question I'm asking : North Pole 'was once subtropical' http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3631764.stm An international scientific team which has been drilling beneath the bed of the Arctic Ocean says it enjoyed a sub-tropical climate 55 million years ago.

[al_possum39]

Most of the reefs in the world are not three hundred feet below the surface so they would have been uncovered during the ice age. They have found tree stumps in the Gulf of Mexico so either the water level was lower or the GoM sank. I’m not sure what being out of the water does to coral.

[Truth666]

Ok, I waited enough time and nobody stated the right answer

It's as simple as this : suggesting that evolution took place during

"millions of years"

[Truth666]

don't miss this historic day - and another historic thread about it -ammonite fossils in Mount Everest and crocodiles NOW in the Sahara - evolution censors fooled
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1295748/posts

[geopyg]

"Any idea what a mechanism linking earth's magnetism and climate might be?"

When you want to go to Florida in the Winter, you end up in Canada 'cuz your compass is all messed up.


I'm not real sure what the big deal with the magnetic reversal would be. I think the one thing is they don't know if the field weakens as it revearses, and how long the reversal process takes. The magnetic field protects us from solar radiation. No field and things would warm up pretty quick and dramatically.

Now if we could get enough tinfoil ........

[RightWhale]

I don't think the mag field goes to zero. It's not that uniform. It develops swirls and eddies and the poles move around wildly, sometimes there are two north poles. No kidding.

[judywillow]

"Global warming can cause ice ages. And therefore ice ages can cause global warming. So it was probably warmer on this island during the last ice age. Come on. Get with the program."

Ice happens because of coldness; heat melts ice...

[tet68]

Ah, but what kind of swallow?...

Well, certainly NOT an unladen one.

[SunkenCiv]

Note: this topic is from 2004. Found it searching for something else. Posted by one of my favorite nutjobs, who is now banned.

· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic ·