Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Archives Staff Was Suspicious of Berger
Washington Post ^ | July 22, 2004 | John F. Harris and Susan Schmidt

Posted on 07/21/2004 9:25:10 PM PDT by Remember_Salamis

Last Oct. 2, former Clinton national security adviser Samuel R. "Sandy" Berger stayed huddled over papers at the National Archives until 8 p.m.

What he did not know as he labored through that long Thursday was that the same Archives employees who were solicitously retrieving documents for him were also watching their important visitor with a suspicious eye.

After Berger's previous visit, in September, Archives officials believed documents were missing. This time, they specially coded the papers to more easily tell whether some went missing, said government officials and legal sources familiar with the case.

The notion of one of Washington's most respected foreign policy figures being subjected to treatment that had at least a faint odor of a sting operation is a strange one. But the peculiarities -- and conflicting versions of events and possible motives -- were just then beginning in a case that this week bucked Berger out of an esteemed position as a leader of the Democratic government-in-waiting that had assembled around presidential nominee John F. Kerry.

As his attorneys tell it, Berger had no idea in October that documents were missing from the Archives, or that archivists suspected him in the disappearance. It was not until two days later, on Saturday, Oct. 4, that he was contacted by Archives employees who said that they were concerned about missing files, from his September and October visits. This call -- in Berger's version of the chronology, which is disputed in essential respects by a government official with knowledge of the investigation -- was made with a tone of concern, but not accusation.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections; Unclassified; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: berger; johnkerry; kerry; kerryedwards; limberger; loadinhispants; sandy; sandyberger; stinkycheese; toast; trousergate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 321-330 next last
To: agincourt1415
I read that Kerry dumped some pages from his Web Site relative to some Web Pages that can be traced back to stolen Berger Docs.

Over Here

61 posted on 07/21/2004 9:51:08 PM PDT by Leroy S. Mort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
They were the same documents...but with different handwritten notations on them from different Clinton officials.

At least that's my understanding.

62 posted on 07/21/2004 9:51:21 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

you are so right. all this crap the dems have been doing is actually traitorous. how would an open coup look any different?


63 posted on 07/21/2004 9:51:49 PM PDT by phxaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain

They are such shameless bastards. He commits a crime and we are the bad guys.


64 posted on 07/21/2004 9:52:30 PM PDT by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

OMG-------.............


65 posted on 07/21/2004 9:52:31 PM PDT by sissyjane (You're either with us or against us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: what's up

Berger had to know he could be caught and probably would be caught. HE wasn't doing this to protect Clinton's legacy. It's bigger than that for him to risk what he did.


66 posted on 07/21/2004 9:52:33 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: swheats
It's too late for that, this story is far too juicy for the lackeys at the Washington Post.

By Sunday, The NYT's will have no choice but to release the Hounds. This will overshadow the Dem Convention, and those who were truly negligent are going to be exposed in a very short period of time. When Bill Clinton has to chime in about how Sandy Berger was often seen buried under piles of paper at his desk and how much he and his friends laughed about this issue should tell us all that this is a big story.

Bill Clinton defends only those who are running cover for him. After Sandy Berger falls on the Sword for Klinton, he will turn on him, like all the others

67 posted on 07/21/2004 9:52:34 PM PDT by MJY1288 ("KERRY" & "EDWARDS" ARE TWO "JOHNS" THAT NEED FLUSHING!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: detch
Throw another Kerry on the BAR BEE, Hillary timed this perfect.

They might start a DUMP KERRY Campaign.

68 posted on 07/21/2004 9:52:46 PM PDT by agincourt1415 (Dox N Sox)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
Several days later, after he had retained Breuer as counsel, Berger volunteered that he had also taken 40 to 50 pages of notes during three visits to the Archives beginning in July, the lawyer said. Berger turned the notes over to the Archives. He has acknowledged through attorneys that he knowingly did not show these papers to Archives officials for review before leaving -- a violation of Archives rules, but not one that he perceived as a serious security lapse.

no big deal

69 posted on 07/21/2004 9:53:54 PM PDT by woofie ( I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

"40 or 50 pages????????"

That's a pantload, for sure.


70 posted on 07/21/2004 9:54:05 PM PDT by Palladin (Proud to be a FReeper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis

Lockhart was involved? Now he wouldn't talk with any reporters or editors, would he? I mean, he probably doesn't know many of them anyway. I forget, what was his position in the Clinton administration? Tehehehehe.


71 posted on 07/21/2004 9:54:05 PM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
But it was an accident, you know? He accidently kept taking the same report over and over.

I assume that the documents which have disappeared were ones taken on the first visit? After they suspected him, why would they give him originals? These people protect pretty important stuff so I wouldn't expect them to just be dumb.

OR maybe NOTHING has truly disappeared? Maybe there really are copies of everything and someone wants to give Clinton and Co a false sense of security? Wouldn't that be delicious?

72 posted on 07/21/2004 9:55:12 PM PDT by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288

What has Hillary said about all this? She must be creating another warroom with Flynt and CO. I've been missing in action on all this stuff.


73 posted on 07/21/2004 9:55:33 PM PDT by swheats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
At the end of the day, Archives employees determined that that draft and all four or five other versions of the millennium memo had disappeared from the files, this source said.

Does anybody have David Gergen's home phone number? I'd like to give him a call.

74 posted on 07/21/2004 9:55:41 PM PDT by Howlin (~~~~Today is the day AFTER my sixth year FR anniversary~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Remember_Salamis
"Breuer was hired in October, and in January former White House press secretary Joe Lockhart was enlisted to remain on standby if a public controversy blossomed."

Let me get this straight. They hired one of their best junkyard dog press secretaries for this specific scandal in January, and then they accuse the Republicans of "leaking" the story in July???

It makes Kerry look like an idiot too. Apparently the Clintons are still running the show.

75 posted on 07/21/2004 9:56:13 PM PDT by dano1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dianna

On FNC tonight John Gibson said at the My Word segment that Fox contacted their sources (two) who confirmed that Berger was seen stuffing documents in his socks.


76 posted on 07/21/2004 9:56:18 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: The South Texan

??? You think the dems have a shortage of ways to spin things? I remember thinking the same thing when Clinton got his ass in the crack over Monica. I have concluded that the facts don't matter to the dems and the spin machine has extraordinary teflon bearings. Never fear. They will come up with something.


77 posted on 07/21/2004 9:57:10 PM PDT by MistyCA (For some...it's always going to be A Nam Thing!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

No wonder Barbara Bush hates Gergen. He's such a flunkey for the DNC.


78 posted on 07/21/2004 9:57:11 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Peach

yeah.. i regretted my bold boast immediately, lol. i was in the throes of the endorphin rush brought on by the idea.


79 posted on 07/21/2004 9:58:11 PM PDT by phxaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Page A06.


80 posted on 07/21/2004 9:59:33 PM PDT by Remember_Salamis (Freedom is Not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 321-330 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson