Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Thought it was Improper to Filibuster Judicial Nominees
May 19, 2005 | FR Researchers

Posted on 05/19/2005 8:17:55 AM PDT by Peach

Sen. Joseph Biden (D-Delaware) March 19, 1997: “But I also respectfully suggest that everyone who is nominated is entitled to have a shot, to have a hearing and to have a shot to be heard on the floor and have a vote on the floor.”

Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Illinois)September 28, 1998: “We should meet our responsibility. I think that responsibility requires us to act in a timely fashion on nominees sent before us. ... Vote the person up or down.”

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-California) September 11, 1997: “Let’s bring their nominations up, debate them if necessary, and vote them up or down.”

Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Massachusetts)February 3, 1998: “We owe it to Americans across the country to give these nominees a vote. If our Republican colleagues don’t like them, vote against them. But give them a vote.”

Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont) May 10, 2000: “The Founding Fathers certainly intended that the Senate advise as to judicial nominations, i.e., consider, debate, and vote up or down. They surely did not intend that the Senate, for partisan or factional reasons, would remain silent and simply refuse to give any advice or consider and vote at all.”

Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) 5/14/97 : “It is not the role of the Senate to obstruct the process and prevent numbers of highly qualified nominees from even being given the opportunity for a vote on the Senate floor.”

Sen. Tom Daschle (D-SD): “I find it simply baffling that a Senator would vote against even voting on a judicial nomination.” (Congressional Record, 10/5/99)

Sen. Tom Daschle (D-SD): “Hispanic or non-Hispanic, African American or non-African American, woman or man, it is wrong not to have a vote on the Senate floor.” (Congressional Record, 10/28/99)

Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-ND): “My expectation is that we’re not going to hold up judicial nominations. …You will not see us do what was done to us in recent years in the Senate with judicial nominations.” (Fox News’ “Special Report With Brit Hume,” 6/4/01)

Richard Durbin (D-IL) "If, after 150 days languishing on the Executive Calendar that name has not been called for a vote, it should be. Vote the person up or down." (Cong. Rec., 9/28/98, S11021)

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA): “Let’s bring their nominations up, debate them if necessary, and vote them up or down.” (Congressional Record, 9/11/97)

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA): “It is our job to confirm these judges. If we don’t like them, we can vote against them.” (Congressional Record, 9/16/99)

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA): “Our institutional integrity requires an up-or-down vote.” (Congressional Record, 10/4/99)

Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA): “[The filibuster process] is used … as blackmail for one Senator to get his or her way on something that they could not rightfully win through the normal processes.” (Congressional Record, 1/4/95)

Tom Harkin (D-IA) "Have the guts to come out and vote up or down….And once and for all, put behind us this filibuster procedure on nominations." (Cong. Rec., 6/22/95, S8861)

Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA): “I urge the Republican leadership to take the steps necessary to allow the full Senate to vote up or down on these important nominations.” (Congressional Record, 9/11/00)

Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA): “We owe it to Americans across the country to give these nominees a vote. If our Republican colleagues don’t like them, vote against them. But give them a vote.” (Congressional Record, 2/3/98)

Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA): “It is true that some Senators have voiced concerns about these nominations. But that should not prevent a roll call vote which gives every Senator the opportunity to vote ‘yes’ or ‘no.’ ... Parties with cases, waiting to be heard by the federal courts deserve a decision by the Senate.” (Congressional Record, 9/21/99)

Sen. Herb Kohl (D-WI): “These nominees, who have to put their lives on hold waiting for us to act, deserve an ‘up or down’ vote.” (Congressional Record, 9/21/99)

Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT): “I hope we … will accept our responsibility and vote people up or vote them down. … If we want to vote against them, vote against them.” (Congressional Record, 10/22/97)

Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT): “Now, every Senator can vote against any nominee. … But it is the responsibility of the U.S. Senate to at least bring them to a vote.” (Congressional Record, 10/22/97)

Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT): “ "I have stated over and over again … that I would object and fight against any filibuster on a judge, whether it is somebody I opposed or supported …” (Congressional Record, 6/18/98)

Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT): “[E]arlier this year … I noted how improper it would be to filibuster a judicial nomination.” (Congressional Record, 10/14/98)

Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT): “[I]f the person is otherwise qualified, he or she gets the vote. … Vote them up, vote them down.” (Congressional Record, 9/21/99)

Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV): “[W]e should have up-or-down votes in the committee and on the floor.” (CNN’s “Evans, Novak, Hunt & Shields,” 6/9/01)

Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY): “[W]e are charged with voting on the nominees. The Constitution does not say if the Congress is controlled by a different party than the President there shall be no judges chosen.” (Congressional Record, 3/7/00)

Carl Levin (D-MI) "If a bipartisan majority of the U.S. Senate is prepared to vote to confirm the President's appointment, that vote should occur." (Cong. Rec., 6/21/95, S8806)


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 109th; cary; cnim; democrats; doublestandard; filibuster; filibusterquotes; flipflop; hypocracy; hypocritedemocrats; judicial; nominees; obstructionistdems; quotes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-170 next last
To: RetiredArmy

I agree with you. 100%.


41 posted on 05/19/2005 8:54:19 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: MileHi

I don't know the answer to that question.


42 posted on 05/19/2005 8:54:46 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

I hadn't known you had a blog, Oxen. What a great site!


43 posted on 05/19/2005 8:55:16 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Peach

President Bush ought to call a press conference and READ THIS LIST OFF in front of ALL the Media!


44 posted on 05/19/2005 8:56:24 AM PDT by princess leah (\)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Peach

can someone check a few of these quotes? the Congressional Record is online and searchable. I tried to check a couple and my browser won't open the text. But some of the page numbers appear in discussion that don't seem to be about judges.


45 posted on 05/19/2005 8:56:49 AM PDT by edwinland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach

I just happened on that thread when I did a search for filibuster. I saw the fourth one down and just said "HHHMMMMMMM".

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/search?m=any;o=score;s=filibuster%20


46 posted on 05/19/2005 8:56:55 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (Give Byrd the Byrd option now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: cweese

Here's a bit more:

http://exposingtheleft.blogspot.com/2005/04/political-expediency-personified.html


47 posted on 05/19/2005 8:57:30 AM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952

I would have missed that had you not linked it here and hope you are able to link it to other threads as well.


48 posted on 05/19/2005 8:58:35 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: princess leah

I agree with you!


49 posted on 05/19/2005 8:58:56 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: edwinland

Most of those quotes give the date and where the statement can be found.


50 posted on 05/19/2005 8:59:53 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Peach
"Well, that was different!" (/sarcasm)

Sarcasm aside, I'm sure this is their claim if someone brings it up. After all, according ABC News, the Republicans were the ones filibustering against civil rights.

51 posted on 05/19/2005 9:00:15 AM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach

I saved that and several more to a word document for a fast backup to the search feature.


52 posted on 05/19/2005 9:00:22 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (Give Byrd the Byrd option now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: edwinland

I'll reply to myself ... I managed to get my browser working and I did check one quote which is a little out of context (it's about secret holds not filibusters) but the basic idea is the same.


53 posted on 05/19/2005 9:00:41 AM PDT by edwinland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Arrowhead1952
I think I'm going to start saving to Word documents too; it's easier to alphabetize and keep well ordered.

My "favorites" files has simply gotten unusable.
54 posted on 05/19/2005 9:01:27 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Oh, those pesky facts. The MSM is not interested


55 posted on 05/19/2005 9:01:49 AM PDT by P.O.E.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Reid made the observation today that these comments of DEMS were in relation to getting nominees out of Committee, and onto the floor.

So, he is making the argument to get all of the nominees out of committee. That could be the next battle, it certainly is a different battle from getting votes on nominees now on the floor.

56 posted on 05/19/2005 9:02:09 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edwinland

It looks like it's all from the Congressional Record of the late 90s. Pretty unimpeachable source...


57 posted on 05/19/2005 9:02:52 AM PDT by ArmyTeach (NOT ON MY WATCH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Peach

I started doing that way back when, and have several word files just for FR. That is much eaiser to work with and I can find most within minutes.


58 posted on 05/19/2005 9:07:31 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (Give Byrd the Byrd option now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Peach

bttt


59 posted on 05/19/2005 9:10:37 AM PDT by PogySailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA; Peach; Pride in the USA; Stillwaters
I just pulled those quotes from about 4 or 5 right leaning sites that already had them clipped out.

Thought it would be a good idea to put them all together.

Good job! This makes the point so effectively. I hope Rush, Fox and others pick this up, since we know we'll never hear it anywhere else.

60 posted on 05/19/2005 9:11:06 AM PDT by lonevoice (Vast Right Wing Pajama Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-170 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson