Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran - The Next Secular Revolution?
Free Inquiry ^ | June 2005 | Austin Dacey

Posted on 06/18/2005 5:51:25 PM PDT by F14 Pilot

March 15, 2005. Tehran. Somewhere, a Qur'an is burning. It is Tchahr Shanbe Souri, the traditional Persian fire festival, and in major cities throughout the country Iranians are turning the celebration-denounced as pagan by the ruling clerics-into a protest. There are reports of revelers chanting "Down with the Islamic Republic" and casting Islamist literature and even scripture into bonfires.1 Government militia respond brutally, and violent clashes with demonstrators continue into the night.

The episode is not isolated but appears to be part of a trend in which large numbers of Iranians are taking to the streets, as they did in July 1999, October 2001, November 2002, and July 2003. During the fire festival of 2000, so many bushes were set ablaze that the pilot of an Air France plane attempting to land in Tehran changed course, thinking that a revolution had begun in Iran. The pilot may have been right. Twenty-six years ago, 98 percent of Iranians voted in favor of Ayatollah Khomeini's referendum calling for an Islamic republic. Today, half the population is between the ages of fourteen and twenty-five. They were not even born at the time of the revolution. An August 2002 telephone public-opinion poll found that only 19 percent of Iranians supported a politically active clergy, while 68 percent said their family's financial situation had gotten worse since the Islamic Revolution of 1979.2 An overwhelming majority favor a new referendum, which asks simply: theocracy or democracy?

As in 1979, university students are at the forefront of the fundamental shifts now underway in Iranian society. The election of President Mohammad Khatami in 1997 on a platform of reform gave them fresh hope. Throughout the 1990s, they organized under the auspices of a national umbrella group, the Office of Consolidation Unity, or OCU. But by 2004, Khatami's initiatives were stalled, and most student activists had come to regard the reformist program as a sham.

"The theocratic regime is nonreformable," says Aryo B. Pirouznia, coordinator of the Student Movement Coordination Committee for Democracy in Iran or SMCCDI, a Texas-based network of activists inside and outside Iran. According to Pirouznia, SMCCDI represents the orientation of the current generation of activists: pro-Western, media-savvy, anti-"reformist," and explicitly secularist.

Today's activists are secularist in two senses. First, they are convinced that "religion is to go back to the mosques and the hearts of those who want it," says Pirouznia. "Even the Ayatollahs are saying that a majority of Iranians is no longer attending regular services. A lot of young Iranians are changing their Islamic names, like Mohammad, to Persian names. That can give you a very clear indication that they are turning their backs to Islam, rejecting a privilege of having the name of the prophet." The goal is absolute separation of mosque and state: "Islamic democracy is in itself a pure contradiction. What's going to happen to Jews, Christians, Zoroastrians, and atheists?"

Today's activists are also increasingly operating independently of any religious organizations, including the OCU, which descends from a state-backed body of religious students involved in the Cultural Revolution of the 1980s that Islamicized Iranian universities. Today's street demonstrations are spontaneous outpourings rather than centrally planned actions. The ultimate goal of these demonstrations? The overthrow of the Islamic Republic. By what means? That depends on whom you ask. SMCCDI favors a nonviolent popular uprising to oust the mullahs, the creation of a transitional government that would administer a UN-monitored referendum on the theocracy, and the formation of a National Commission for Reconciliation to begin a process of national healing.

Mass media are crucial to this secular movement. Again, SMCCDI is representative. Their Web site averages sixty thousand hits a day. They disseminate their calls for secular democracy through the many Los Angeles-based radio and satellite-TV programs that broadcast in Iran, as well as Voice of Israel, Voice of America, and the BBC. In the words of SMCCDI's charter, which has been read in Farsi repeatedly over the airwaves:

The most effective way the outside world can help the democratic movement in Iran is by publicizing the Iranian people's grievances and their yearning and struggles for freedom. The world's media need to focus on our peaceful resistance to establish basic human rights. TV coverage, not bullets and tanks, will end Iran's theocracy and bring democracy and tolerance to the Middle East.3

Many anticipate a general boycott of the June 2005 Iranian elections. Few will venture predictions, but with increased pressure by an emboldened Bush administration, the country might look radically different by the time of Tchahr Shanbe Souri next year. This special section of Free Inquiry aims to introduce readers to the secular student movement, which may play a pivotal role in the future of Iran. Effort has been made to present various perspectives, including the neocon foreign policy expert Michael Ledeen (interviewed by author Ibn Warraq), a former OCU member, and a young woman who was among the crowd of students whose exasperation with "reform" boiled over at President Khatami at Tehran University in December 2004. The editors would like to acknowledge the assistance of Pooyan Aslani, Azam Kamguian, Majid Mohammadi, Ibn Warraq, and three translators who wish to remain anonymous.

Notes 1. "Traditional 'Pagan' Celebration Turns into Street Fights against Regime Forces," SMCCDI Information Service, March 15, 2005. 2. Public Opinion Survey in Iran, August 23-28, 2002, Tarrance Group. 3. Available at www.daneshjoo.org.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: americans; ancient; aryo; christians; democracy; freedom; iran; iranianelection; iranians; islam; jew; ledeen; media; mideast; mullahs; people; persia; quran; regime; revolution; smccdi; student; studentmovement; texas; us; west
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: CaptainAwesome2
You're wrong. The Iraqi people in general are working very hard for a secular government. They've achieved an incredible amount in an extremely short time. Don't denigrate their achievements, or those of our military.

in addition, the mad mullahs are continuing the clod war they had with Saddam by sending in terrorists to pose as "insurgents", disrupt the fledgling Iraqi government, take over Iraq at last AND score a major victory against the hated US without officially firing a shot. While the mad mullahs are distracted in Iraq....anything can happen in Iran.

41 posted on 06/18/2005 7:17:19 PM PDT by cake_crumb (Leftist Credo: "One Wing to Rule Them all and to the Dark Side Bind Them")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
"Clod war" was supposed to be "cold war". Sheesh!
42 posted on 06/18/2005 7:19:20 PM PDT by cake_crumb (Leftist Credo: "One Wing to Rule Them all and to the Dark Side Bind Them")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot

which is exactly why some iranian students wont be able to defeat islam. it is in peoples heads. they cant let it go.


43 posted on 06/18/2005 7:19:37 PM PDT by CaptainAwesome2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb

our soldiers are working very hard but management has made a bad decision.


44 posted on 06/18/2005 7:20:33 PM PDT by CaptainAwesome2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

45 posted on 06/18/2005 7:21:00 PM PDT by Khashayar (Screw You and Your Gas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: CaptainAwesome2

They're not trying to "defeat Islam". They're trying to defeat the Islamist theothugs who rule with an iron fist. They want a secular government, not a society free from religion.


46 posted on 06/18/2005 7:22:52 PM PDT by cake_crumb (Leftist Credo: "One Wing to Rule Them all and to the Dark Side Bind Them")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: CaptainAwesome2
"our soldiers are working very hard but management has made a bad decision."

The bulk of the Iraqi people would disagree.

47 posted on 06/18/2005 7:24:13 PM PDT by cake_crumb (Leftist Credo: "One Wing to Rule Them all and to the Dark Side Bind Them")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot

I have a dear friend who is an Iranian. One time I wished him a blessed Eid and he said "Thank, but I don't go in for that Islamic crap." :o)


48 posted on 06/18/2005 7:24:49 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Khashayar

Nice graphic :-)


49 posted on 06/18/2005 7:24:55 PM PDT by cake_crumb (Leftist Credo: "One Wing to Rule Them all and to the Dark Side Bind Them")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

Great to hear that!


50 posted on 06/18/2005 7:30:52 PM PDT by F14 Pilot (Democracy is a process not a product)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot
There is only one way to bring down the mullah's régime of jihad. The same way the Taliban and Saddam's Ba'athists were overthrown, except in the case of the radical Shi'ite clerics the stakes are far higher, unless they are brought down swiftly.

There are also potential serious risks for the continuing stability of global economics due to the geostrategic location of Iran, her offensive missiles arsenal and the petroleum sea-lanes exiting the Persian Gulf, plus the Saudi & Kuwaiti oil fields open to air attacks, if something were to go wrong in toppling the current dictatorship.

Either way the current collection of mullahs must be prevented in gaining any nuclear advantage.

51 posted on 06/18/2005 7:34:57 PM PDT by M. Espinola (Freedom is never free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thierrya
Why didn't Iranians support the Shah, instead of helping the mollahs taking over their country?

Because they have seen Shah as a dictator supported from abroad.

52 posted on 06/18/2005 7:37:31 PM PDT by A. Pole (Alexander Solzhenitsyn: "Live Not By Lies")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: voletti
The present generation of students were likely born after 1979 and have no clue about the Shah regime's relative freedoms.

How the elections under Shah compared to the elections today? How the SAVAK police compared with the Revolutionary Guard today?

53 posted on 06/18/2005 7:39:33 PM PDT by A. Pole (Alexander Solzhenitsyn: "Live Not By Lies")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

The revolution wasnt supported by majority of Iranians but liberal media portrayed it as if it was supported by masses in Iran.


54 posted on 06/18/2005 7:40:34 PM PDT by F14 Pilot (Democracy is a process not a product)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

You can not compare them with each other!


55 posted on 06/18/2005 7:41:19 PM PDT by F14 Pilot (Democracy is a process not a product)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

Whatever be the case, I find it hard to believe that the Shah's regime was in any sognificant way way worse for ordinary people that mullah rule is now.


56 posted on 06/18/2005 8:07:13 PM PDT by voletti (One Ring to rule them all, one Ring to find them....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: F14 Pilot
You can not compare them with each other!

Why not?

57 posted on 06/18/2005 8:22:13 PM PDT by A. Pole (Alexander Solzhenitsyn: "Live Not By Lies")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: voletti
Whatever be the case, I find it hard to believe that the Shah's regime was in any sognificant way way worse for ordinary people that mullah rule is now.

The reason why Shah was overthrown was that he was seen as a foreign puppet. If you had choice for USA to be ruled by some homegrown neo-Puritans or by the tolerant regime imposed by UN/EU, what would you prefer?

58 posted on 06/18/2005 8:26:04 PM PDT by A. Pole (Alexander Solzhenitsyn: "Live Not By Lies")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

The Shah may have been a dictator, but Khomeini wanted to take Iran back into the Dark Ages.


59 posted on 06/18/2005 8:35:57 PM PDT by WestVirginiaRebel (Carnac: A siren, a baby and a liberal. Answer: Name three things that whine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: thierrya

Blame who you will for 1979. What’s real now, is much bigger than then. Middle East could easily change forever...


60 posted on 06/18/2005 10:24:24 PM PDT by Reza2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson