Posted on 05/06/2011 12:16:43 PM PDT by Retired Greyhound
HUNDREDS of Osama bin Laden supporters clashed with English Defence League extremists today as a funeral service for the assassinated terror leader sparked fury outside Londons US Embassy.
Police stepped in to separate the chanting groups amid threats of violence from both sides.
US leaders were branded murderers by radicals, who warned vengeance attacks were guaranteed and shouted: "USA, you will pay."
Abu Muaz, 28, from east London, said: "It is only a matter of time before another atrocity - the West is the enemy.
Meanwhile, EDL members chanted USA, USA as Muslims knelt to pray for bin Laden at the opposite end of the highly-secured embassy, in central London.
An ambulance was called to the scene amid reports that one of the extremists had been attacked.
The pro-bin Laden event was organised by controversial preacher Anjem Choudary.
The former UK leader of the outlawed al-Muhajiroun and member of the poppy-burning Muslims Against Crusades extremist group called on the US to return bin Ladens body to relatives.
Tell me the number one name for male babies born in your country.
Sorry, mate, but THAT myth has been debunked by myself and every other British Freeper. It has come up in many threads here on FR and myself and others like naturalman1975 or winniesboy have had to state its a myth time and time again, so much so that when it does I can simply cut and paste old posts from previous threads.
Thye most popular boys name in Britain is OLIVER.
Mohammed is NOT the number one name in Britain. It is a myth thats arisen from sites like this and rightwing websites and talk radio in the US.
Mohammed is in fact merely no 16 in Britain (and thats only because most male Muslims are named that in the UK, as the Muslim population of Britain is just 3%, which includes all white and black converts). Its only becomes ‘number 1’ if you decide to include every last variable on the name.
Thats like saying ‘America is Catholic’ because most women are called Mary, because you include variations like Molly, Maureen.....
And if we are being overrun by Muslims, why arent there ANY Muslim female names in the list of the top 50 or even 100 female British names?....curious that, innit?.
http://gulfnews.com/news/world/uk/mohammad-most-popular-boys-name-in-england-1.703110
Are you saying that Mohammed is the most popular name if you include all variant spellings? That sort of defeats your entire point.
As in Mohammed, Mohamed, Muhmad, Moammar, etc. THEN it's number one. It's just not number one if you count each variant spelling as a different name...?
How exactly did the Left accuse Bush of inciting more terrorism by his use of military action?
You nitpick on spelling even though their parents’ intents were
similar. The fact that there are so many variants could even be seen
as worse, in fact. Britain is taking in and nonassimilating Muslims from
so many countries. Hanging on spelling is ignoring the problem
See post 45. Also I am stunned you don’t know why the female Muslims’
names don’t group like boys.
We agree that Britain has a problem with Islamic extremists, esp amongst the male young in certain (English, not Scots, Welsh or Northern Irish) cities. We agree that we have let in too many.
But Mohammed is NOT the number 1 boys name in Britain. As I have pointed out, its Oliver. And Mohammed is down the list. ‘Mohammed is no 1’ is a myth thats grown up your side of the Atlantic thanks to sites like this and right wing media. And I say AS a British rightwinger.
I don’t understand; you said Mohammed was not number one in names. Then you said it would be number one in names if one takes all spelling variants into consideration.
I was just trying to get you to clarify what you meant, still isn’t clear.
IMO Britain should kick out every immigrant Muslim tomorrow.
So should the US. Of course that won’t happen. But at least the ones who aren’t citizens, and attend any jihadi mosques or meetings or have jihadi pals, or send money to jihadi organizations, or post jihadi sentiments anywhere. And all mosques should be fitted with minders who speak Arabic and any pro-jihadi ones shut down.
www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Mohammed-popular-baby-boys-ahead-Jack-Harry. html
Mohammed (and its variations) are Number One in 2010.
Muslims don't consider women as individuals; they consider them chattel, and why would 'chattel' be associated with something reverently religious [their meaning, not mine] as the Prophet's name would be?
We are in complete agreement. It was the scotsman who was quibbling, saying that Mohammed was not number one (but was if one takes into account the variant spellings).
Sorry! I mixed you up.
No, we DONT have a ‘very very very bad problem’.
Stop believing the hype that we are a dhimmi conquered nation. The Muslim pop. of Britain is 3%. We are not nor are we ever going to be a Muslim nation.
What I find frightening is that Americans seem to now believe any old crap they read or hear about Britain.
And?.
All that means is that almost all the newborn males of a tiny minority of British society are called one name (and even then, you have to include every last variation in order to make the ‘argument’).
If every new girl in Britain is to be called Mary, does that mean Britain becomes a Catholic nation as opposed to Protestant?.
This hysteria about names in Limeyland dosent mean that Britain is being conquered by the Mooslims. And frankly its laughable to try and make the argument that it does.
All it means is that a lot of little British-Muslim boys have the same name.
No it is not!.
It is no 16. And all that means is that almost all males born to a small minority of Britain have been named Mohammed. So it is 16 only because of mass naming by a small religious group!.
And it is only number one if you tortuously include every last variation. And if you have to do that, then its clearly NOT number one, is it?. In fact, take away the varations and its nowhere near number one!.
The true no 1 name in Britain is Anglo-Saxon or Celtic, as are all the other names.Neither no 16 nor no 1 prove anything about a Muslim conquest of Britain, Limeys are dhimmis, yada yada yada....
All the ridiculous hysteria about this story frankly proves only how stupid, gullable and hysterical some Americans seem to be these days.
Thanks for the clarification. Is London really becoming as “islamified” as we’re hearing? If so, is anyone other than the neo-Nazi types pushing back? Just curious.
To an extent. There IS a problem in London and some other British/English cities with young male Islamic extremism, but the hype that has us conquered by Islam is a gross oversimplification.
As for combatting it, there are many moderate Muslim groups, as well as the current govt is trying to combat it at roots level as well as restrict non-EU immigration.
If you have a problem about the specificity of the facts/reporting take it up with your newpapers, e.g., the Daily Mail UK, not me fella.
And I have read studies where a Muslim immigration level of this magnitude suggests colonization rather than harmless immigration for betterment. You think that Americans becoming concerned about your problems is needless? Okay, fine. I'll stay out of it. You and yours are the ones that better start getting a clue. And, with that - I'll leave your future to you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.