Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Per DRUDGE: Romney internals--+1 in OH, tied in WI and PA!
Drudge per Daily Mail ^ | 11/5/2012 | LS

Posted on 11/05/2012 1:15:27 PM PST by LS

Mitt Romney is ahead by a single percentage point in Ohio, according to internal polling data provided to MailOnline by a Republican party source.

Internal campaign polling completed last night by campaign pollster Neil Newhouse has Romney three points up in New Hampshire, two points up in Iowa and dead level in Wisconsin and - most startlingly - Pennsylvania.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Ohio; US: Pennsylvania; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 2012polls; election; obama; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-128 next last
To: LS
Sorry, but I don't buy it. As I said on another thread, any number being "leaked" about internals is a number that comes directly from the campaign staff or even the candidate himself. I don't care how well connected the source is. It's psyops, plain and simple.

Not doubting he's ahead, but leaking that he's up by 3 or 4 or 5 would be a dangerous move, especially given that we have more votes still waiting in OH, and the Dems have more in the can. On the other side, he certainly wouldn't leak that he's down; unless it's out of reach, so if the source really is trustworthy, that says Nevada is gone. That's OK. We don't need it.

61 posted on 11/05/2012 1:46:17 PM PST by FredZarguna ("Post Hoc, ergo propter hoc," is no way to reason through life, son.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65

It won’t this close, I see Ohio going 52-48.


62 posted on 11/05/2012 1:46:23 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

Comment #63 Removed by Moderator

To: VanDeKoik
True. Romney numbers are being conservative, but if RAS is correct in a +5R ID, this won't close.

It will be a tidal wave.

64 posted on 11/05/2012 1:48:22 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: LS
"Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue."


65 posted on 11/05/2012 1:49:22 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

I agree. Real internal polls are almost never leaked for any reason.


66 posted on 11/05/2012 1:49:58 PM PST by LongWayHome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

Comment #67 Removed by Moderator

To: FredZarguna

I wouldn’t count NV out just yet.


68 posted on 11/05/2012 1:50:58 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Shadow44

Another thing going for us in Pennsylvania this year is that up to a week to ten days ago, the DemoCARP fraud machine believed Romney had written the state off. They haven’t had the time to organize their usual fraud in Philly.


69 posted on 11/05/2012 1:50:58 PM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas
Well, I base that on 2008 total turnout of about 5.6m votes. Obviously more or less could turn out, but I think the recount in OH is 1/2 of 1% (about 25,000 votes with the numbers we're using).

In 2008 there were 200,000 provisional ballots cast; and it is estimated that military and overseas ballots number about 20,000 this year.

70 posted on 11/05/2012 1:51:18 PM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

believe that landslide stuff at your own peril. Everyone is saying close even Romney’s internals if you are to believe the source. YES we have more enthusiasm and hopefully that translates into huge turnout for us or at least greater turnout vs dems.


71 posted on 11/05/2012 1:51:40 PM PST by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: meyer
Romney wins, I’m buying a Ford. Romney loses, I’m not buying anything. How’s that for stimulus?

I'm not criticizing, just observing.

It's this attitude times millions that answers why the economy stagnates under a President like zero.

Why the economy stagnates when five trillion is spent above what the economy can produce.

It explains why the stimulus multiplier that economists like to tout, is so low.

zero is an appropriate name for this man and his effect.

72 posted on 11/05/2012 1:52:47 PM PST by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna
"As I said on another thread, any number being "leaked" about internals is a number that comes directly from the campaign staff or even the candidate himself. I don't care how well connected the source is. It's psyops, plain and simple."

They wouldn't leak it to The Guardian if they didn't want it published. (If they leaked it to the NY Times or WaPo it would just be faxed to Chicago.) I think it's probably to encourage the GOTV effort to bring reluctant Romney voters in. I think it would be dangerous to claim a lead of, say 3-4 points, even if that's what they see.

73 posted on 11/05/2012 1:53:32 PM PST by Sooth2222 ("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: LongWayHome

It’s psyops, plain and simple, and the fact that the author is a Romney “insider” makes me even more sure that the real number is somewhere north of this. They’ve decided on a number that 1) is credible 2) is on the positive side, and 3) will maximize turnout by energizing committed voters to show up. In OH, that number is +1. In PA and WI, they probably don’t actually know which way it will go because the recent past history is so different between 2008 and 2010, so they’re questioning their own models — which might look quite good. But in states with some volatility between 2008 and 2010 Party self-ID is going to be a huge variable — and may even be changing as we type...


74 posted on 11/05/2012 1:55:12 PM PST by FredZarguna ("Post Hoc, ergo propter hoc," is no way to reason through life, son.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Sooth2222
They wouldn't leak it to The Guardian if they didn't want it published. (If they leaked it to the NY Times or WaPo it would just be faxed to Chicago.) I think it's probably to encourage the GOTV effort to bring reluctant Romney voters in. I think it would be dangerous to claim a lead of, say 3-4 points, even if that's what they see.

This

75 posted on 11/05/2012 1:56:16 PM PST by Gulf War One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: comebacknewt
A Freeper said that yesterday he voted in Warren, which is heavily rural with some smaller towns such as Lebanon, and it was a three hour wait. That is great news, because you don't get redder than Warren.

NOW I wonder if Freepers will whine about extending voting hours?

76 posted on 11/05/2012 1:56:26 PM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna
I don't know that NV is gone. But if they deliberately leaked this and the OTHER numbers are right, and ZEro's guys know they are right, then maybe just maybe they'd let up enough in NV to win that as well.

It's certainly a fun game, but Rove, the Rs I know around here . . . no one is acting like they lost and every one is acting like they won.

77 posted on 11/05/2012 1:56:26 PM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: wolf24

And even with a +3D model Ras has Romney ahead 1 point and winning indies by 10. Obama can’t get to 50.


78 posted on 11/05/2012 1:56:26 PM PST by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: LS

This is misinformation leaked by RR to get NV voters to get their butts out of their chairs tomorrow and to keep the anxiety levels up in other states so that people actually turn out.

Last thing Romney wants is for Republican voters to fully believe the poll skew reality ... until after the election. This gives everyone a reason to actually engage in the minor inconvenience of voting tomorrow even if they believe it’s in the bag, for fear of guilt that if they don’t, results in a close election could have depended on them.

RR internally knows it’s over.


79 posted on 11/05/2012 1:56:54 PM PST by HannibalHamlinJr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 100American

Rasmussen and Brone(sp?) on Hannity radio...OH state NONE can say who will win it! Both agree FL and VA going to Romney....STILL STUBBORN OH or else he would WIN PRES!! PA maybe both say...wow! NV Obama, CO Romney, WI maybe STRONG...WOW! BOTH don’t predict TSUYOMNEY...sorry..they both say a VERY TIE RACE...it’s ok, looks like ROMNEY HAS THE MO to capture the states that need to be in his column, except OH! None of them wanted to predict winner. DEAR GOD please bring OH to Romney’s column!


80 posted on 11/05/2012 1:56:54 PM PST by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson