Posted on 08/13/2015 5:23:27 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Forget the Twitter blog for emoji responses to how millennials feel about student debt. As the New York Daily News’ Alejandro Alba notes, the condescending approach didn’t generate much respect from Hillary Clinton’s target audience. The beleagured Democrat tried to shift attention to policy from the e-mail scandal, focusing on her $350 billion proposal to overhaul higher-education finances, which is in a shambles largely due to federal government intervention in the first place.
Mission not accomplished:
While some users thought the question was “relatable,” others believed the question was offensive and condescending.
Many users began to reply to the tweet with jokes and alternate versions of the question.
“How does finally handing over your server to federal investigators make you feel? Tell us in three emojis or less,” replied @Benc jacobs.
The execution may have been poor, but Hillary aimed at the right target. She has to find a way to engage the millennial vote in the next election (assuming she can win the nomination), as well as progressives that are currently lifting Bernie Sanders to rock-star status. It’s bad policy but smart politics, as I argue in my column today for The Fiscal Times, and Republicans cannot afford to ignore it:
In order to get a share of Obama’s energy for a general election, Hillary has to pander to younger voters, as well as the less affluent and minority demographics. Those voters have a massive student loan burden, largely thanks to those pushing government subsidies that inflated the higher education bubble in the first place. For older Americans, the chief economic issue will be jobs and growth, but younger voters have a more acute situation.
They need real solutions to their debt burden, and will likely see that as a key issue in any economic plan from the Parties and the candidates. This is her bid to gain traction in demographic categories that might otherwise write her off as a holdover from a nearly bygone political era. …
Republicans have a real chance to make inroads among younger voters in this election cycle. Not only will Obama finally retire from the scene and with him the emotional connection that sustained Democrats in the last two cycles, but all of the potential Democratic successors are pushing 70 or past it. Sanders is already 74, and will be 75 on Election Day. Joe Biden, the Flavor of the Week as Hillary’s legal woes expand, will be almost 73, and has been in Washington nearly twice as long as the Clintons have.
In comparison, most of the Republican field is far younger. Donald Trump will be 70 next year, and Rick Perry 65, but the rest of the field is significantly younger. Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Bobby Jindal, and Scott Walker are all in their 40s and the rest in their 50s. That won’t be enough, though. Republicans have to address the real issues facing these millennials, especially those created by activist government and top-down market interventions that have rendered them unable to acquire wealth in the traditional manner even after they got their college degrees. If Hillary Clinton’s proposal remains unanswered, or simply shrugged off without any substantive policy option to offer, millennials will gravitate to the party that at least speaks to their lives.
Here’s a fun fact: Any one of those Democratic contenders — Hillary, Biden, or Sanders — would be the oldest non-incumbent presidential nominee in the party’s history. The current record-holder is Lewis Cass, who lost to Zachary Taylor in 1848 at the age of 66. Other than Martin O’Malley, who blew his opening at Netroots Nation this summer, the field resembles the later-stages Soviet Politburo when it comes to youth and vigor.
Even so, Republicans have to actually make a case on policy to keep Hillary from buying their support with another destructive top-down entitlement system. If Hillary’s plan is an encroachment on state funds and operations (it is), then Republican candidates need a plan that will work on a plan to address the crushing debt that progressive policies have created for millennials. They need to talk about it, feature it in campaign speeches (especially on campuses), and explain why conservative principles and policies will improve their lives directly, and not just in general terms.
There’s still plenty of time for the GOP to build this case, but they’d better have a plan to address it at some point before the end of the primaries. Otherwise, we’ll end up conceding the voters that will be deciding elections for a long, long time.
Hillary needs to explain more about where the 350 billion is coming from. The “tax the rich” crap is not an explanation.
perhaps shes hoping to hit up her pal, The Donnie
Because the colleges don’t have enough money.
The answer is NO!!
You need jobs first. It doesn’t make sense to provide free higher education when there are no jobs.
You can’t forgive student loans from Alcatraz
This would be an unnecessary move, as post-secondary education is slowly moving onto the web for free access anyway.
They should answer with a proposal similar to the way libs met the medical care problem - since inflation in college education costs has been rising at about twice the rate of medical costs, the federal government should step in with a program which would control costs and set rates for all colleges - let’s see how the progressive professors like having their independence throttled by big government bureaucrats....
“Why the GOP needs to answer Hillary’s $350B college subsidy plan”
Unfortunately, the GOP answer will be to pass the legislation when it is put before them. The Boehner Congress fully funds all Democrat programs.
Here, better than Hell no.
1. Only to verifiable unbiased Universities.
2. Only well established citizens. 10+ years as a citizen.
3. Only upon passing with a GPA average of 3.5 and obtaining a degree in a classic scientific field I.E physics, chemistry, math, Biology and an engineering discipline.
Hillary is just proposing Obamacare for Education.
A great new entitlement for everyone but the middle-class, a Federal takeover, forcing standards and regulations on the states and private education, co-opting stakeholders by allowing them a crony-capitalist rent-seeking position, all greased with a lot of printed, zero-interest unbacked Federal Reserve debt.
Make the profs teach 5 classes per day.
Works for higher education.
Works for Obamacare.
Works for tax reform.
Works for everything.
“That won’t be enough, though. Republicans have to address the real issues facing these millennials, especially those created by activist government and top-down market interventions that have....”
The way to “address” those “real issues” created by the activist government and top down market interventions is with freedom and opening up the markets. Removing government intervention.
When that is proposed, how will these same Milennials react? I suspect they will mock and laugh at the idea of freedom as they’ve never actually experienced it. What many (not all) expect is the Republicans to offer a different version of activist government, top down market solutions. Most people don’t understand that it doesn’t matter who offers those types of solutions.
It’s those types of solutions that are the problem - not who offers them.
“Hillary needs to explain more about where the 350 billion is coming from. The “tax the rich” crap is not an explanation.”
It is if you’re a Hillary voter.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.