Posted on 04/12/2016 4:05:50 PM PDT by centurion316
Edited on 04/12/2016 4:27:20 PM PDT by Sidebar Moderator. [history]
I knew it was a waste of Trump’s time!!!
It's a State issue - not a national issue. States elect Presidents.
He’d be a wonderful Prime Minister
Perfect.
Nope. 1st time with standing in the Federal Judiciary. Can’t wait. The ruling is not even doubt.
Bought with Cruz's hookers, no doubt.
I agree!!
That’s what I thought too.
You Trump supporters kill me with the whoppers you come up with.
What is this? About the eighth or so judge that has ruled in Ted’s favor?
There’s no there, there.
Don’t expect the trumpeter swans to stop honking about it though. Even when the SC rules in Ted’s favor.
Let me guess. You're a Trump supporter, right?
If I could hold my nose for Romney, I guess I could for the Cubanadian, but he’s making it harder every day.
Respectfully, in the scenario you mention, does it matter if he did it in the U.S.?
I know it is crazy to think of George III touring the states, but it was almost as likely as him taking a run at an American ex-pat at the time, and actually claiming the child.
My point is that plenty of communist, and even islamic terrorist sympathizers are born here every day. Our sovereignty is not particularly in jeopardy if an American citizen procreates here or elsewhere. The NBC stipulation is vague. One must decide intent by precedent and writings of the day, not what-ifs.
Just my opinion, and as I said, it is submitted respectfully.
I don't think any of the federal cases have concluded with a ruling the objector/plaintiff has standing. At least two of those are still cooking. The Utah case is pending before the Circuit Court and has a SCOTUS petition, and a decision is pending in the Texas case, at the District Court level.
All three cases where standing and judiciability were found were state proceedings.
Let me know if you think anything I said then is misleading or inaccurate.
ML/NJ
“He’d be a wonderful Prime Minister”
Heck how about both? El Presidente Prime Minister Cruz...... kind of rolls off the tongue dont it!
For if one supreme legislative body, in which the whole continent of America have not a single voice, have power to make laws which shall be binding upon us in all cases whatsoever, rights, liberties, legislative powers, under such absolute suspending, dispensing, establishing annihilating power as this, are meer shadows, Jack o’lanterns serving only to mislead and engulph us.
There can be no doubt but it is fit, and perfectly consistent with the principle of all laws human and divine, to resist robbers, murderers and subverters of the government of free states, whether these crimes are committed by individuals or nations, or more properly a despotism endeavouring to establish itself over the most free and happy nation on the globe. The only question is, whether it be prudent to risque resistance.
To All Nations fo Men
Boston 1773
Daniel Leonard 1740-1820
A “judge” cannot order you to vote for Obama or Cruz, although Clinton v. Cruz is a Uniparty WIN/WIN.
Uh, no. It's a State issue. States elect Presidents - not people. As for your tagline, I will always remember Colorado as the place where Trump's incompetence was put on display (and the whining that followed). I never realized before what a yuge whiner Trump was.
Excellent report. Cruz is not eligible. Missed it by 150 miles. Too bad.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.