Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Big Bang Theory's Mayim Bialik Slammed For ‘Modesty’ Response To Harvey Weinstein Scandal
Forward ^ | oct 19 2917 ast

Posted on 10/19/2017 12:13:39 PM PDT by drewh

Actress Mayim Bialik has responded to criticism after she wrote a New York Times essay over the Harvey Weinstein scandal.

Bialik wrote of the pressure to appear attractive that she felt as a teen actress, affecting her self-esteem to this day. She added that when she returned to acting after earning a doctorate in neuroscience, she “experienced the upside of not being a ‘perfect 10.’… Those of us in Hollywood who don’t represent an impossible standard of beauty have the ‘luxury’ of being overlooked and, in many cases, ignored by men in power unless we can make them money.”

Bialik, who has been open about her embrace of Orthodox Judaism, explained that in order to protect herself, she has chosen to dress modestly and avoid flirting with men.

“In a perfect world, women should be free to act however they want,” she wrote. “But our world isn’t perfect. Nothing — absolutely nothing — excuses men for assaulting or abusing women. But we can’t be naive about the culture we live in.”

Backlash to the op-ed was swift.

Writer and journalist Ijeoma Oluo called the piece “gross victim-blaming misogyny disguised as feminism.”

Guardian columnist Jessica Valenti wrote, “Being an awkward girl with a big nose never protected me from harassment.”

And fellow actress Patricia Arquette tweeted directly at Bialik, writing, “It is not outrageous for anyone to be expected to be treated in a professional [manner] by anyone in a professional relationship.”

In response, Bialik tweeted Sunday that “ Anyone who knows me knows that’s absurd and not at all what this piece was about. It’s so sad how vicious people are being when I basically live to make things better for women.”

Bialik will appear in a Facebook Live broadcast with the Times on Monday to discuss her piece.

(Excerpt) Read more at forward.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: hollywood; oyvey; perverts; weinstein
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: Vermont Lt

” No man is ever that out of control. “

Perhaps you need to expand your thoughts, because what you wrote seems to indicate that you don’t understand human nature.

IOW - you haven’t been conned into believing that mankind is essentially GOOD - have you?


61 posted on 10/19/2017 3:35:20 PM PDT by jonno (Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: jonno

You think men get so worked up they HAVE to get release? You cannot be serious.


62 posted on 10/19/2017 3:40:12 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (Burn. It. Down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Life is hard.

It’s harder when you are stupid.


63 posted on 10/19/2017 3:52:34 PM PDT by CincyRichieRich (The Left's family value: 'The U.S. is the great enemy of mankind!' (Che Guevara, 1961))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh
she can play a few types...but she is the classic 'best friend' of the lead character.

For some reason I find those hotter than the lead character

Mary Tyler Moore < Valerie Harper < Julie Kavner

Suzanne Somers < Joyce Dewitt

Sarah Michelle Gellar < Alyson Hannigan

64 posted on 10/19/2017 5:59:06 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Winter is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: GOPsterinMA; NFHale; fieldmarshaldj

WB Blossom.


65 posted on 10/19/2017 6:28:50 PM PDT by Impy (The democrat party is the enemy of your family and civilization itself, forget that at your peril.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

When her character first showed up on BBT, I thought she ruined the show. Now she is my favorite character. If they ever got rid of her I would stop watching.

>> no one is looking to jump into bed with her.

I doubt that is true. In the first place, she may not be a Victoria’s Secret model, but she is not bad looking, and what’s more, she looks approachable, not like the kind of woman who would bite your head off for daring to talk to her.

In the second place, ask almost any “homely” or “average” woman if she has been propositioned. They will almost all say yes. Maybe not as often as the “hot” women, but all women get hit on.

And one more thing: Hooray for someone with brains! What a refreshing change from the usual vapid output from Hollywood!


66 posted on 10/19/2017 6:36:45 PM PDT by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen; dfwgator
And, 60% of New York Orthodox Jews voted for Obama in 2008 (about 80% of non-Orthodox Jews voted for Obama).

What do they say about Orthodox Jews? "Live like Episcopalians, vote like Puerto Ricans"
67 posted on 10/19/2017 6:36:56 PM PDT by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Impy

Nyet.


68 posted on 10/19/2017 6:52:16 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Je Suis Pepe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

Either you’re extremely naive, or we are talking about different subjects.

Do you think rape is about the need to “get release”? If so, how does that explain rapists who rape the same victim multiple times.

No, rapists RAPE because they want to, and then plan for it when they think they can get away with it.

And women who dress scantily, hit the party scene, and act like tramps are behaving UNWISELY, because they set themselves up to be victims of abuse - which I believe is the point Ms. Bialik is trying to make.


69 posted on 10/19/2017 9:05:48 PM PDT by jonno (Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
Thanks drewh.
Actress Mayim Bialik... wrote a New York Times essay over the Harvey Weinstein scandal... when she returned to acting after earning a doctorate in neuroscience, she "experienced the upside of not being a 'perfect 10.'… Those of us in Hollywood who don't represent an impossible standard of beauty have the 'luxury' of being overlooked and, in many cases, ignored by men in power unless we can make them money." ...has been open about her embrace of Orthodox Judaism, explained that in order to protect herself, she has chosen to dress modestly and avoid flirting with men. "In a perfect world, women should be free to act however they want," she wrote. "But our world isn't perfect. Nothing -- absolutely nothing -- excuses men for assaulting or abusing women. But we can't be naive about the culture we live in."
She is still a Partisan Media Shill, but that is spot on.

Also spot on is this -- Hollywood is filled with pedarasts and other homosexual predators, yet barely anything is being said about it. What's the matter, doesn't the media want to be inclusive?!? My belief is, the takedown of HW is really about edifying the dysfunctional mutual beard relationship of the Clintoooons -- see, they're not so bad, and look how WHITE MALE AUTHORITY FIGURES LIKE TRUMP blah blah blah. Speaking of white, the excruciatingly white Hitlery's misconduct is bleeding femiinsm white. Good riddance to both.
70 posted on 10/19/2017 11:33:49 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

I actually find her to be extremely attractive, much more so than the other women on that show. But then, I have a crush on Sarah Huckabee Sanders and the gal who plays Garcia on Criminal Minds.


71 posted on 10/19/2017 11:37:08 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

What a perv! Oh, sorry. ;’) On BBT she appears to be deliberately made to look more homely, but apart from that, she ain’t comely. Maybe it’s my age, or my disgust (and jealousy, face facts ‘Civ) at the ridiculous money they pull down on hit shows, along with realization that they’re all pathologically self-centered freaks, but I don’t find any actresses particularly attractive, at all, any more.


72 posted on 10/19/2017 11:49:48 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

73 posted on 10/19/2017 11:57:33 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: drewh

I don’t think she’s in much danger from predators

Sorry


74 posted on 10/20/2017 12:25:03 AM PDT by wardaddy (Virtue signalers should be shot on sight...conservative ones racked and hanged then fed to dogs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie; drewh

Kaley Cuoco Salary: $1 Million Per Episode. ...
Jim Parsons Salary: $1 Million Per Episode. ...
Johnny Galecki Salary: $1 Million Per Episode. ...
Simon Helberg Salary: $750,000 Per Episode. ...
Kunal Nayyar Salary: $750,000 Per Episode. ...
Mayim Bialik Salary: $100,000 Per Episode.
https://www.aol.com/article/finance/2017/03/01/how-much-money-does-the-cast-of-the-big-bang-theory-make/21864890/


75 posted on 10/20/2017 1:02:29 AM PDT by BwanaNdege ("The church ... is not the master or the servant of the state, but the conscience" - Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jonno

You are not getting what I was saying at all. You suggest (correctly) that these episodes are more about power and control. We agree on that.

But then you suggest that the way these women dress has ANYTHING to do with what happened to them. I think the two arguments are in conflict.

What I think we can agree on is that this guy was a predator. What I cannot understand is how these young ladies could not see what was coming at them.

We arrive at the same place in the end.


76 posted on 10/20/2017 3:14:02 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (Burn. It. Down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Trillian

A lot of it goes back to the civil rights movement. Much in the same way that support for the dems in the northeast and midwest among blue collar white males went back to the labor movement (unions). Which means that there is hope that the demographic group can become ‘woke’ to who is actually in their corner and who is not...


77 posted on 10/20/2017 6:21:52 AM PDT by L,TOWM (I don't have a preference for politician or a party. I have God and His standards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; Whenifhow; GregNH; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; White Bear; ...

see #70 - perv review


78 posted on 10/20/2017 12:21:53 PM PDT by bitt (press takes him literally, but not seriously; his supporters take him seriously, but not literally)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Impy

Ehhhh...


79 posted on 10/20/2017 5:40:25 PM PDT by GOPsterinMA (I'm with Steve McQueen: I live my life for myself and answer to nobody.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Too bad the LA basin is such a terrible combination of no-go zones and freak shows, with everything under a veneer of so-called victimless crimes, because, other than the smog on occasion, the weather’s pretty nice most of the time, y’know, if you like the intermittent heat waves that probably inspired “The Towering Inferno”. ;^)


80 posted on 10/21/2017 12:02:04 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson