Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Motorcyclists Rev Up To Oppose EPA Rule
Scripps Howard ^ | June 25, 2002 | Joan Lowy

Posted on 06/25/2002 2:20:42 PM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest

The way biker John "Little John'' Swisher sees it, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is out to get him.

"I think the ultimate goal of the EPA and the government is to do away with two-wheel traffic altogether,'' complained Swisher, 52, chairman of the Indiana Motorcyclists' Political Action Committee.

What has Swisher and bikers across the country on the warpath is an effort by the EPA to toughen pollution standards for on-street motorcycles. Bikers fear the regulations will prevent them from customizing engines to make bikes take off faster and sound louder, which can also make them more polluting.

What the EPA calls "tampering,'' motorcyclists call "improvement'' and "individualization.'' In the motorcycle subculture, a "factory ride'' - a bike that hasn't been customized - is for neophytes.

The EPA has been working on a draft proposal that calls for adopting roughly the same pollution controls for motorcycles that California is due to phase in beginning in 2004, said Tom Wyld, a lobbyist for the Motorcycle Riders Foundation in Washington. EPA officials said they expect to announce a formal proposal next month.

Motorcyclists have swamped the EPA with complaints about the draft standards. The Web site of the Indiana motorcyclists' committee features a drawing of a shadowy government worker in dark glasses and combat boots holding what appears to be a semi-automatic rifle. The letters "EPA'' are emblazoned on his chest.

"He's from the government ... but he's not here to help,'' the Web site warns. "He's here to take your heritage, he's here to take your freedom, he's here to take your motorcycle.''

Don Zinger, assistant director of EPA's transportation and air quality office, said he is baffled by the furious response from motorcyclists. He noted that the draft regulations would not affect any bikes currently in use and that it already is illegal to tamper with emissions equipment.

The present air pollution standard for motorcycles is 22 years old. Motorcycles account for only about 1.5 percent of all smog-forming air pollution emitted by vehicles on the road, but that is expected to increase to 2.5 percent as tougher emission standards for cars and trucks go into effect, Zinger said. Furthermore, even though they are more fuel-efficient than cars, motorcycles emit 20 times more pollution per mile because of the laxer standards for bikes, he said.

Currently, about 20 percent of all new motorcycles have catalytic converters, Zinger said. Under the draft proposal, eventually half of all new motorcycles would have the pollution-prevention equipment.

Small motorcycle manufacturers - the fastest-growing segment of the street-bike market - say the California pollution standards could cause the price of bikes to skyrocket. If the EPA were to adopt the standard nationally, they say, it could put them out of business.

"The EPA could get to the point where we literally can't meet some of their standards and there may not be engines available that the public would want to purchase,'' said Ken Crepea, owner of Panzer Motorcycle Works of Canon City, Colo. Crepea manufactures 200 to 300 cosmetically customized bikes a year that meet current pollution standards, but his customers often adjust their engines to improve performance.

"To require the manufacturer to somehow make them tamper-proof in my mind is impossible,'' Crepea said. "I don't think it can be done technologically.''

Crepea's customers are upset about the new standards. "They worry that they will be restricted to the point they will be riding mopeds,'' he said. "That's what they tell me.''

The fears of small manufacturers and their customers are greatly overblown, Zinger said. "We're telling people, 'Trust us. We're confident this is not going to put you out of business.' "

On the Net:

Motorcycle Riders Foundation - www.mrf.org

Environmental Protection Agency - www.epa.gov

Indiana Motorcyclists' Political Action Committee - www.impac1.org


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: enviralists; epa; gop; motorcycles
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

1 posted on 06/25/2002 2:20:42 PM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
We're telling people, 'Trust us. We're confident this is not going to put you out of business.'

This is too stupid for simple words *(& (*^@#$&!!!

2 posted on 06/25/2002 2:42:57 PM PDT by balrog666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
The fears of small manufacturers and their customers are greatly overblown, Zinger said. "We're telling people, 'Trust us. We're confident this is not going to put you out of business.' " What an a$$! This is not your every day run of the mill sheeple class of people ole Zinger is addressing here. He should've saved his breath. Blackbird.
3 posted on 06/25/2002 2:47:29 PM PDT by BlackbirdSST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
Yeah right. And Hillary "can't be responsible for every undercapitolized business in the country". Remember?
4 posted on 06/25/2002 2:47:49 PM PDT by axxmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
The EPA is way out of control. My County taxes will go up next year because the county has to comply with new EPA requirements. Have I elected anyone to the EPA? NO. This is basically taxation without representation in my opinion. Who are they accountable to? Apparently no one.
5 posted on 06/25/2002 2:51:30 PM PDT by TX Bluebonnet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Enviralists
*Index Bump
6 posted on 06/25/2002 2:57:14 PM PDT by Fish out of Water
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
Zinger said. "We're telling people, 'Trust us. We're confident this is not going to put you out of business.' "

Isn't that what the Gemans started off saying to the Jews?

Shameless nazi ref for your enjoyment....

EBUCK

7 posted on 06/25/2002 3:03:30 PM PDT by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TX Bluebonnet
What about the current EPA regulations that forbid, under pain of a FEDERAL violation, installation of louder pipes. This should remain a state and local issue. The Feds have absolutely no business in this, none, zip, zilch.

Someone please bump the biker list as well as the enviralist list.

8 posted on 06/25/2002 3:04:57 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
Ok, Can some math genius tell me how much good will it do for our air quality to put catylitic converters on motorcycles?!?!?!?

Ok, forget math geniuses, how bout an average idiot? I think anyone should be able to figure out the impact motorcycles have on air quality.

What's next? catylitic converters on our weed whackers?
9 posted on 06/25/2002 3:08:34 PM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre
What's next? catylitic converters on our weed whackers?

These federal agencies have way too much time on their hands. I wouldn't be suprised if that is next.

10 posted on 06/25/2002 3:16:19 PM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
"Bikers fear the regulations will prevent them from customizing engines to make bikes take off faster and sound louder, which can also make them more polluting."

This sentence is wrong on so many levels I don't know where to begin. Something tells me this reporter isn't a motorhead.

11 posted on 06/25/2002 3:19:52 PM PDT by ScreamingFist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: BillinDenver
The noise level and the polution level have nothing to do with eachother. A muffler is not a polution control device and a polution control device is not a muffler.
13 posted on 06/25/2002 3:25:16 PM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Is's the 70s all over D-in the EPA then D-in now
14 posted on 06/25/2002 3:29:14 PM PDT by quietolong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
Lets see what happens when the EPA meets the hells angels.
15 posted on 06/25/2002 3:37:52 PM PDT by Sonny M
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre
When I rent equipment (usually hole auger) from united rentals I have to pay an environmental impact fee of about 20 cents....

EBUCK

16 posted on 06/25/2002 3:41:27 PM PDT by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BillinDenver
Your right. EVERY night I get to be woken up by some loser roaring down the street on his crap-cycle. Ban 'em all.
17 posted on 06/25/2002 4:06:37 PM PDT by motzman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: motzman
THat's odd.

I don't use AC, so my windows are always open all night long. I live about 50-70 yards from a 2 lane highway and there are always harleys going down this road 24-7. THey never wake me up at night, but cat fights sometimes do. Last night I was woken twice by catfights. I never see them, I only hear them. Not even in the daytime do I see cats.

Now, 2 stroke dirt bikes are a different story all together. I hate the sound of those despicable things.
18 posted on 06/25/2002 4:18:16 PM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: motzman
Give your local gendarmes a kick in the hiney to get going based on your state or city ordinances. We do not need Uncle Sam to forbid loud pipes in the middle of the Mojave Desert.
19 posted on 06/25/2002 4:18:19 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
"I think the ultimate goal of the EPA and the government is to do away with two-wheel traffic altogether,''

And four-wheel and eighteen-wheel.

20 posted on 06/25/2002 5:52:16 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson