Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP and racists? Thick as thieves (Mega Barf alert)
The Atlanta Journal Constitution ^ | December 15, 2002 | Cynthia Tucker

Posted on 12/15/2002 8:56:59 AM PST by where's_the_Outrage?

The spectacle of conservatives scurrying to denounce Trent Lott has provided comic relief in a Capitol otherwise obsessed with a dubious war. But it's hard to take Lott's GOP critics seriously. After all, he is not the only reactionary in their ranks.

The simple fact is that the modern Republican Party has built a Southern power base by accommodating racists. Lott may become a sacrificial goat --- forced to give up his assumed position as the next Senate majority leader --- but that won't change the dirty little secret that fuels the GOP's Southern juggernaut:

Whenever it is politically expedient, Republicans cozy up to segregationists, Confederate sympathizers, anti-immigrationists and other mossbacks who still resent the civil rights movement.

As political scientists Earl and Merle Black note in their book, "The Rise of Southern Republicans," the ascension of the Republican Party in the South can be traced to Barry Goldwater, who ran for president in 1964 on a states' rights platform that rejected desegregation.

With Goldwater's campaign, they wrote, "the [Republican] party attracted many racist Southern whites but permanently alienated African-American voters. . . . Gradually, a new Southern politics emerged in which blacks and liberal to moderate whites anchored the Democratic Party while many conservatives and some moderate whites formed a growing Republican Party that owed little to Abraham Lincoln but much to Goldwater and even more to [Ronald] Reagan."

Lott has spent the last several days apologizing for his endorsement of the segregationist platform from which retiring Sen. Strom Thurmond (R-S.C.) ran for president as a Dixiecrat in 1948. At a party for Thurmond earlier this month, Lott had reminded his colleagues that his home state of Mississippi had supported Thurmond's bid.

"We're proud of it. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn't have had all these problems over all these years, either," Lott declared.

His apologies notwithstanding, he meant what he said. He had made nearly identical remarks in 1980, after Thurmond gave a fiery speech in support of Reagan's presidential bid. Lott also has a long history of association with the Conservative Citizens Council, an heir of the old segregationist White Citizens' Councils of the 1960s.

But Lott is hardly the only prominent Republican who is comfortable consorting with bigots. In 1998, John Ashcroft, then a U.S. senator, was interviewed by Southern Partisan, the last redoubt of secessionism. Among other quaint views, the magazine celebrates the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, defends slavery and holds in high regard Nathan Bedford Forrest, a founder of the Ku Klux Klan.

Ashcroft praised Southern Partisan.

"Your magazine also helps set the record straight. You've got a heritage of doing that, of defending Southern patriots like Robert E. Lee, Stonewall Jackson and Jefferson Davis. Traditionalists must do more. I've got to do more. We've all got to stand up and speak in this respect, or else we'll be taught that these people were giving their lives, subscribing their sacred fortunes and their honor to some perverted agenda."

Yet President Bush still nominated Ashcroft as his attorney general, and he was easily confirmed.

Indeed, Bush himself yielded to the expediency of the Southern strategy when he found himself in a tough primary campaign in South Carolina. Bush boosted his chances by giving a speech at Bob Jones University, a bastion of ultraconservative Christianity that not only opposed interracial dating at the time but also espoused a virulent anti-Catholicism. In so doing, Bush sent a signal to the fergit-hell crowd that he was on their side.

As recently as this election season, Georgia's governor-elect, Sonny Perdue, sent a similar signal by campaigning as the champion of the Confederate battle flag, which had been exiled by the Democratic incumbent. Thousands of resentful whites threw their support to Perdue, assuring his victory over incumbent Roy Barnes.

Given the Republican Party's rich tradition of cozying up to bigots, Lott's remarks are no surprise. And his GOP colleagues' denunciations are no comfort.

Cynthia Tucker is the editorial page editor. Her column appears Sundays and Wednesdays.

cynthia@ajc.com


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clymer; cynthiatucker; demagogue; idiot; liar; lott; mediawhore; moron; racebaiter; segregation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
Words can't describe the out in left field attitude of this woman.

The last national figure segregationist I remember is Louis Farrakan that wants to partiion areas of this country for Blacks only. He is definately not claimed by the GOP.

1 posted on 12/15/2002 8:56:59 AM PST by where's_the_Outrage?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
Given the Republican Party's rich tradition of cozying up to bigots,...

Cythia, if this was true, according to your article you'd be a Republican.

2 posted on 12/15/2002 9:01:36 AM PST by jigsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
segregationists, Confederate sympathizers, anti-immigrationists and other mossbacks who still resent the civil rights movement.

Let's break this up one by one.
Segregation: Name a Republican who supports this.
Confederate sympathizers: There are multiple schools of thought about the Confederacy. One can theoretically support the idea of the Confederacy and not be a racist.
anti-immigrationists: So Comrade Cynthia, you want our borders overrun with illegals and terrorists?
3 posted on 12/15/2002 9:06:30 AM PST by Sparta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?; All
I truly hope our "friends" on the left keep beating & hammering & harping on this for all it's worth...

1- for every alleged racist Republican, you can point out 3 or 4 or more Democrats who fill the bill, too.
2- the Dems already have a lock on 87-97% of the black vote... a 12% minority in this country. Getting a 100% out to vote will matter in only the tightest races.
3- it will prompt a reconsideration of that all-purpose slander "racist," and more people will see it for the dishonest fraud that it is.
4- it will prompt a backlash... I can see it building already.

Have at it, folks... the world is watching.

4 posted on 12/15/2002 9:19:50 AM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
The overreach of the Left is well underway.
5 posted on 12/15/2002 9:28:51 AM PST by Senator Goldwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: where's_the_Outrage?
And, of course, Cynthia ignores the fact that Dem. Senator Byrd was a member of the KKK.
7 posted on 12/15/2002 9:38:05 AM PST by Atlantian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
The simple fact is that the modern Republican Party has built a Southern power base by accommodating racists.

As with all leftist propaganda there is an element of truth to what they spew. What she of course fails to mention is that they were mildly cozying up to racist democrats in the south about forty years ago to help break the straggle hold the Democrats had in the south.

8 posted on 12/15/2002 9:59:06 AM PST by Fzob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
The attempt to eliminate Lott has many elements of
what Justice Thomas called a "high-tech lynching."
The CBC is holding the rope and the media is beating
the drum.

The heart is desperately wicked (include racist) in
all of us to more or less a degree, like other vices.
It is as hard for white southerns to get over racism
as it is for blacks to expel the psychology of inferiority.

The Republicans have rejected racism. Senator Lott has
repudiated it, calling it morally wrong (partly as a
reminder to himself). If some Republicans want to
choose another leader (I would prefer someone else), let
them pick another venue.
9 posted on 12/15/2002 10:18:54 AM PST by oldcitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
Why in the world don’t the Republicans fire back, and site the long Rat’s history of cozying up to, and being communists? All the commies wanted were to conquer America from within.
10 posted on 12/15/2002 10:39:09 AM PST by dix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Senator Goldwater
The overreach of the Left is well underway.

Yes, it's a hard call on what the GOP response to this should be. Do they...

1. Allow the most rabid members of the left (like Tucker) continue to be the face of the Democrat Party, or

2. Enjoin the debate and refute the charges as a long term, formal strategy.

Right after the Lott gaffe, I leaned toward 2.

But after observing the feeding frenzy of the GOP haters, I think 1. might be the way to go. Let them foam at the mouth. In painting the whole south with the brush of racism, they'll drive every single white person down there to the GOP.

11 posted on 12/15/2002 11:35:08 AM PST by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: randita
Cynthia Tucker's wrong to tar and feather all conservatives as racists. In the rarerified circles in which she travels I bet she hasn't met a conservative worthy of the name. Segregationists? I'm hard pressed to think of a Southern Republican who is one aside from the dubious exception of Lott. Neo-confederates?? The news must have slipped by Ms. Tucker there are a number of black neo-confederates and one in fact is walking all over the South with the much maligned Confederate Battle Flag in hand. Immigration? Most Americans want more, not fewer restrictions on immigration and not all of the are white. No thoughtful person in America claims that racism has been eliminated. But in the 50 years since the civil rights movement's hey-day, its virtually impossible to respectfully advocate, much less than defend racism in America. The fact more conservatives than liberals denounced Lott's statement should have been taken by Tucker as a sign of just how far America's come in relations between the races. Although we still have a ways to go, you think she would be heartened by all the changes that have occured since the 60s. Some people are so wrapped up in their own prejudices that they won't or can't see what's in front of their eyes and its just too bad Tucker is so wrapped up in the comfortable conservative = racism syllogism that she can't see today's Party Of Lincoln for the open and tolerant party that it has truly become.
12 posted on 12/15/2002 5:15:38 PM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
Bump
13 posted on 12/15/2002 6:10:12 PM PST by Atlantian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
Like this article? Thank Trent Lott for it. Without his blurt, this article wouldn't have been written, at least not at this critical juncture, and maybe not for a long time, while the bigotted author waited for another Republican to make an incriminating statement.

Is she a lying sack of hypocrite sh&t? Of course she is.

But the terrain is what it is, and we all know it. Too bad our dickhead SML didn't have the sense to remember where the hell he was, what decade it was, and who he was, and why it mattered what he blurted out.


14 posted on 12/15/2002 7:44:16 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; MAKnight; condolinda; mafree; Trueblackman; FRlurker; Teacher317; ...
Black conservative ping

If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)

Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.

15 posted on 12/15/2002 8:40:19 PM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
Isn't this Lady from Cynthia & Billy McKinney territory, wonder what she said about them?
16 posted on 12/15/2002 9:15:02 PM PST by TheEaglehasLanded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
Boy, I couldn't see this coming.

Naturally, there is no mention of the Democratic Party's rich tradition of giving a place by the fire to rabid racists.

In fact, they have two of the old geezers in the Senate right now (Byrd, Hollings).

Perhaps Cynthia is saving that for next week.

17 posted on 12/15/2002 9:17:05 PM PST by The Iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
Oh, it might still have been written. Tucker does not need an excuse to drag Republicans through the mud or paint with a broad brush.

But thanks to Lott, it has a tiny patina of plausibility.

18 posted on 12/15/2002 9:18:13 PM PST by The Iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
Yep, you're exactly right buzzard. My first reaction to leftist hit pieces like this is always anger at the writer. Now my next impulse is cursing Lott!
19 posted on 12/15/2002 9:24:40 PM PST by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
The AJC is a rag and Tucker its most soiled fiber. We could play "guilt by association" with Democrats all day long too. How many racists who have publicly spewed ethnic slurs have they coddled (Jackson, Byrd, Sharpton, Clintons, etc.)

Besides, the truth is, politicians of both sides are willing to court the most strident left or right wingers to get their vote. They usually try to do it under the radar screen - they want and need their vote, they just don't want it getting out. We just don't hear much about all the commies, socialists, racists, and terrorists that Democrats shmooze with.
20 posted on 12/15/2002 9:29:46 PM PST by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson