Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pope Breaks Taboo By Marrying Couples Who Lived 'In Sin'
Business Insider ^ | Sep. 14, 2014 | Ljubomir Milasin, AFP

Posted on 09/14/2014 12:07:39 PM PDT by Gamecock

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

1 posted on 09/14/2014 12:07:39 PM PDT by Gamecock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gamecock; BlatherNaut; piusv; ebb tide

...


2 posted on 09/14/2014 12:12:14 PM PDT by Wyrd bið ful aræd (Asperges me, Domine, hyssopo et mundabor, Lavabis me, et super nivem dealbabor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: berdie

later


3 posted on 09/14/2014 12:22:12 PM PDT by berdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

There’s no taboo and people “living together” are routinely married everywhere (probably in every church). In the Catholic Church, when they go to prepare for marriage, they are told to live apart until they marry.

I assume the same was the case for these people.

You might like to know that a huge number of early American (mostly Protestant) marriages post-dated the birth of the first child.

These people are just making it right. What’s bad about that?


4 posted on 09/14/2014 12:22:27 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
I have been predicting this for a long time.

The formal annulment process is often corrupt and unfair.

The “internal forum” SHOULD have the support of the Pope. There are circumstances such as alcoholism, drug abuse, mental illness and the like, where a formal annulment process only serves to “stir the pot” with unstable people involved. It can cause turmoil and abuse and even death.

There are some self righteous jerks on these Freeper threads who have argued these points with me before. It is my sincere hope that the Pope soon puts the falsely pious in their places!

5 posted on 09/14/2014 12:22:35 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius
The way the particular cases in the article is presented, a guy with an annulment (fine, in theory at least) is marrying a single mother whose children he is NOT the father of.
6 posted on 09/14/2014 12:24:58 PM PDT by Wyrd bið ful aræd (Asperges me, Domine, hyssopo et mundabor, Lavabis me, et super nivem dealbabor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

It would take a powerful lot of arguing for Comrade Fran to put me “in my place.”


7 posted on 09/14/2014 12:25:51 PM PDT by Wyrd bið ful aræd (Asperges me, Domine, hyssopo et mundabor, Lavabis me, et super nivem dealbabor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

Looking at the actual account it looks like there isn’t any actual Christian controversy mentioned here. It’s a matter of criticism from people who either want to be more Catholic than the pope or more biblical than the bible.


8 posted on 09/14/2014 12:25:57 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

He did this with no instruction with regard to Catholic marriage, at all? And how many of these were non-Catholics?

I smell a an ecclesiastical rat, and wow!, does it ever stink.


9 posted on 09/14/2014 12:26:28 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

I grant you that the Pope is a fool on economic matters.

However? The Pope is right on divorce and marriage issues.


10 posted on 09/14/2014 12:27:31 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Priests have always been marrying couples who were living in sin. And there were plenty back in colonial times, too.


11 posted on 09/14/2014 12:32:44 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

By your reasoning a widow with children can’t remarry in the church? Ridiculous.


12 posted on 09/14/2014 12:45:04 PM PDT by Kirkwood (Zombie Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

So what??

I’m a single mother who was a cradle Catholic but was away from the church for many years. Now that I know my faith & understand why it teaches what it does, I’m back 100%. My boyfriend and soon-to-be fiancé is in a similar situation. He strayed from the church, married a Catholic hater, ended up divorced after 18 months and is not the father of my child. But we now are together, partake in the sacraments, and are talking about getting engaged very soon. We do not live together & abide by church teachings

So again I ask you, so what??


13 posted on 09/14/2014 12:45:53 PM PDT by surroundedbyblue (Bitter clinger & creepy-ass cracker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Wouldn’t they simply have to make a confession, do their penance and ask would be right?


14 posted on 09/14/2014 12:49:23 PM PDT by raybbr (Obamacare needs a death panel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

I agree with you.

It is my understanding regarding Cann. 1055-1165, an invalid marriage is null ab initio. The formal annulment process merely provides a canonical certification of such nullity.

So if a previous marriage is null ab initio, why must, in every case, a lack of certification thereto impede the valid marriage covenant?


15 posted on 09/14/2014 12:52:03 PM PDT by Unknowing (Now is the time for all smart little girls to come to the aid of their country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Incidentally, there is no such “taboo.”


16 posted on 09/14/2014 12:57:13 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unknowing

Exactly!

And very well put I might add!

Those who think the formal annulment process is the ONLY valid solution to remarriage in the Church also avoid the embarrassing facts:

Nearly everyone knows what they need to say in a formal annulment:

I was still seeing others up to the time we married.
I was immature and did not really mean it or understand it.
I married to get my parents off my back.
I married to move out of an unstable home.
I married for the economic benefits.

ETC!

And if a divorced couple CONSPIRE TO LIE during the formal annulment process? The self righteous seem to have no problem with that common practice at all do they?


17 posted on 09/14/2014 12:57:43 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Unknowing

Because the annulment process provides an objective judgment.


18 posted on 09/14/2014 12:58:57 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

Of course the “self-righteous” (whoever they are) have a problem with lying.

If a couple actually conspires to obtain a decree of nullity by lying, then they are culpable. Any attempted subsequent “marriage” will be adultery, though they might carry the secret to their graves.


19 posted on 09/14/2014 1:01:19 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: livius

The liberal media and the vast majority of Catholic bashers on FR have no idea what goes into a Catholic marriage.


20 posted on 09/14/2014 1:02:21 PM PDT by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson