Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Neverending Story (The Christian Chronicles)
Associated Press ^ | 3/24/01

Posted on 03/30/2002 7:53:37 PM PST by malakhi

The Neverending Story
An ongoing debate on Scripture, Tradition, History and Interpretation.


Statesmen may plan and speculate for liberty, but it is religion and morality alone which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand. The only foundation of a free constitution is pure virtue. - John Adams

Previous Thread


TOPICS: General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,181-2,2002,201-2,2202,221-2,240 ... 65,521-65,537 next last
To: OLD REGGIE
Be pleased with the RSV and be sure to thank the Protestant scholars who compiled it.

Indeed I do, as I am sure they thanked Jerome for his Vulgate. :-)

The Catholic scholars had to make relativly few corrections. But they did correct that passage. Given the heat the issue raises outside the RC Church, it seems clearly "political" for the RSV(p) to translate the passage as they do.

2,201 posted on 04/08/2002 9:15:23 PM PDT by ventana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2175 | View Replies]

To: JHavard
I am glad you are a real father.

You may know that I am a survivor of the Holocaust. After the Nazis experimented on me I could not be a real father. But through their cruelty I found hope and salvation in Jesus Christ, and I learned that what they had done to me for evil, I could offer up to God for Him to make a greater good from it. I could choose to be a eunuch for the Lord as He said in the 19th Chapter of Matthew. It was deeply meaningful to me that after the teaching on eunuchs immediately Jesus took children into his arms and blessed them. And so it is promised that we who follow in this way will see sons raised up to us in abundance. As the Apostle Paul said so have I become a "father in the Gospel" to many. And so the Lord is kind and gracious and allows me to be a spiritual father to many.

We will no doubt disagree for time and eternity about whether the Lord was directing his teaching "Call no man Father or Master" at the Pharisees or if he was declaring a new commandment. For my part as well as that of my Church, we believe that argument was with Christ's opponents and not with his friends or followers.

2,202 posted on 04/08/2002 9:17:02 PM PDT by father_elijah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2194 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Brian Kopp
Thought you didn't have a dog in this fight, Angelo? A bit selective on your copy and paste.

I said I was going to bring up one point from that thread, and that is exactly what I did. The reason I did is that on that thread you conceded the likelihood of the actual usage being 'c'atholic vs. 'C'atholic. This is something you failed to mention in the discussion tonight on this thread. As far as the authenticity of the Ignatian epistles go, I have zero interest on that subject. But I'm sure you will find others here eager to discuss it with you! ;o)

2,203 posted on 04/08/2002 9:25:27 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2183 | View Replies]

To: angelo
Small C or Big C, the matter boiks down to the existence of hierarchy. A bishop and a rabbi are very different animals.
2,204 posted on 04/08/2002 9:29:29 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2203 | View Replies]

To: Havoc; father_elijah; DouglasKC
father_elijah: Sorry. No sale. The statistical numbers on the appearance of "obey" and "obedience" in a concordance do not alter the extraordinary value of the New Covenant and Jesus teaching of the new commandment of "love" together with the revelation that God is Love. The Holy Spirit who leads the Church into all Truth has made it abundantly clear for the Church that Christ Jesus brought the Good News of God's Love written in His own Blood. Love is not defined so much by scripture as it is defined by Christ's death on the cross to save you and me.

Havoc: Scuse me; but, it isn't about how many times the word shows up. It's about what each of those individual references has to say on the topic. Which pretty much obliterates the notion that it's all about love and then we can do whatever we please. You aren't a hippy by chance are you?

If I may interject, it seems to me that the concern expressed by Havoc and DouglasKC is that your emphasis on love rather than obedience has the tenor of antinomianism. Since I'm sure this is not how you would like to be understood, perhaps you would like to clarify your remarks?

2,205 posted on 04/08/2002 9:29:46 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2182 | View Replies]

Comment #2,206 Removed by Moderator

To: Titanites;father_elijah
love one another, for he who loves another has fulfilled the law. To me this means that fulfillment of the commandments comes from love; not that fulfillment of the law defines love. In Romans 13:9 You shall love your neighbor as yourself results in the commandments metioned earlier in the passage being kept; not that keeping the commandments defines love. It is the same with John 14:21 and 1John 5. He who loves God keeps the commandments.

I agree completely. Allowing God's love to grow makes us naturally follow the ten commandments...that ability to love came from the death of Christ, which gave us access to God and his great love. In other words, if our spiritual and physical lives aren't conforming to the ten commandments, we don't know God's love or aren't allowing his love to work in us.

2,207 posted on 04/08/2002 9:34:42 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2199 | View Replies]

To: ventana
To work that hard to change Gods word cannot be good, no matter what you think of the Pope

And coming to her, he said, "Hail, favored one! The Lord is with you." (Luke 1:28 - NAB)

Better take this up, then, with the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and the Vatican, who approved the Lectionary based upon this translation in 1998.

2,208 posted on 04/08/2002 9:38:39 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2185 | View Replies]

To: angelo
I find that very funny indeed. Antinominianism?

I do undestand that the tension is seen between legalism and antinominianism, but the moral order that arises from the love of Jesus Christ is hardly license in any fashion nor is it a rejection of moral order. Moral order finds its meaning int he love of Christ displayed on the Cross and the crosses we bear for love of him. It is ordered, patterned, and beautiful, but it is not cut and dried, it is not a checklist, and it means a very deep attention to the full theological meaning of Love on the Cross and how that is lived in the Body of the Risen Christ. The tension is actually between the cross and the empty tomb and the only thing that makes sense of it is divine Love.

2,209 posted on 04/08/2002 9:41:48 PM PDT by father_elijah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2205 | View Replies]

To: father_elijah
I normally read the New Testament in Arabic because of my work.

Yours must be a fascinating story! How did you ever happen to find Free Republic?

2,210 posted on 04/08/2002 9:42:02 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2195 | View Replies]

To: allend
"Have you hugged your catholic Apologist today?"

BigMack

2,211 posted on 04/08/2002 9:43:49 PM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2206 | View Replies]

To: father_elijah
And I would underscore that the Torah of God is not so much a legal code for men as it is a divine instruction to God's people

Yes.

I delight to do thy will, O my God;
thy law is within my heart." (Psalm 40:8)

that is fulfilled and manifested in earnest in Jesus Christ.

On this, of course, I disagree with you.

2,212 posted on 04/08/2002 9:50:40 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2195 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
Small C or Big C, the matter boiks down to the existence of hierarchy. A bishop and a rabbi are very different animals.

And the relevence of this to my comment is...?

2,213 posted on 04/08/2002 9:54:31 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2204 | View Replies]

To: father_elijah; Havoc; DouglasKC
I do undestand that the tension is seen between legalism and antinominianism, but the moral order that arises from the love of Jesus Christ is hardly license in any fashion nor is it a rejection of moral order

Thanks for the clarification.

2,214 posted on 04/08/2002 9:57:43 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2209 | View Replies]

To: father_elijah
To unpack this, I would want to begin with the word "command" and the word "commandments" and how they relate to the Hebrew word "torah" and the understand of God's commandments as "Teaching" or "Instruction" rather than legal code. I normally read the New Testament in Arabic because of my work. For example, in the Arabic translation of "Joh 14:21 He who has My commandments and keeps them, he it is who loves Me. And he who loves Me shall be loved by My Father, and I will love him and will reveal Myself to him." if I were to translate back into English it would read "He who holds fast to what I have taught you and thereby lives out my teaching, he is the one who loves me. And whoever loves me, My Father will love, and I will love him and manifest myself to him." This sense is really throughout the New Testament in Arabic, Hebrew or the very old Syriac and Chaldean lectionaries in Aramaic and Chaldean. I know this must sound like it is coming from another planet, but it is a way of thinking that is as old as the Negev. In short, the New Testament references to obeying or obedience to commandments could just as easily be translated differently -- as they in fact are in most Semitic and north African languages. And I would underscore that the Torah of God is not so much a legal code for men as it is a divine instruction to God's people that is fulfilled and manifested in earnest in Jesus Christ.

Excuse me. No kid gloves - I've read the greek. Not one of the state of being words used in the original text intones or suggests love or is derived from the same root. In short, you're running to another translation to find something that isn't in the original text. It's bad enough that followers err in such matters - you, sir, claim to stand in a pulpit. And to that end you're telling me that you're teaching even now, philosophy rather than what the actual scripture says. If you'd like, I can post all the Greek words tomorrow. I'm a bit fired up right now and I'm restraining myself as much as I can from going off. But I'd appreciate greatly as a man of God an explanation for such a thing. It may be an interesting notion; but, it isn't what the scriptures say. Difference - one is God's word being taught and the other is not.

So I'll give you a chance to respond. And I'll hold my temper for the moment. But, I'll tell you this for nothing. I've little respect for anyone that stands in a pulpit representing God and sells philosophy instead of scripture. And it appears to me based on your prior posts that this is precisely what you're doing. If that be the case, God help you. If not, good for you. I'll let you respond.

2,215 posted on 04/08/2002 10:04:40 PM PDT by Havoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2195 | View Replies]

Comment #2,216 Removed by Moderator

Comment #2,217 Removed by Moderator

Comment #2,218 Removed by Moderator

To: allend
And coming to her, he said, "Hail, favored one! The Lord is with you." (Luke 1:28 - NAB)

Better take this up, then, with the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and the Vatican, who approved the Lectionary based upon this translation in 1998.

2,219 posted on 04/08/2002 10:52:45 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2218 | View Replies]

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain;Dr. Brian Kopp
PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain;Dr. Brian Kopp

May God Bless you abundantly. When you answer my thesis on one of those other two threads, only then can you preach to
Catholics here. Non-Catholic Christianity mars the marital bed by the mutual masturbation of sodomitic sin. Your reformers
would turn over in the graves (if they weren't already mouldering in purgatory for the fruits of their doctrines---I'm being
charitable here) if they knew the reprobate moral theology teachings of modern non-Catholic Christianity.

2135 posted on 4/8/02 7:27 PM Mountain by Dr. Brian Kopp

Mt. 5:43 “You have heard that it was said, `Love your neighbour [Lev.
19:18] and hate your enemy.’
Mt. 5:44 But I tell you: Love your enemies [Some late manuscripts
enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who
hate you] and pray for those who persecute you,
Mt. 5:45 that you may be sons of your Father in heaven. He causes his
sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the
righteous and the unrighteous.
Mt. 5:46 If you love those who love you, what reward will you get?
Are not even the tax collectors doing that?
Mt. 5:47 And if you greet only your brothers, what are you doing
more than others? Do not even pagans do that?
Mt. 5:48 Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.

There seems to be a great deal of sodomy in Boston

Chuck <truth@YeshuaHaMashiach>

2,220 posted on 04/08/2002 10:53:22 PM PDT by Uri’el-2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2135 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,181-2,2002,201-2,2202,221-2,240 ... 65,521-65,537 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson