Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Neverending Story (The Christian Chronicles)
Associated Press ^ | 3/24/01

Posted on 03/30/2002 7:53:37 PM PST by malakhi

The Neverending Story
An ongoing debate on Scripture, Tradition, History and Interpretation.


Statesmen may plan and speculate for liberty, but it is religion and morality alone which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand. The only foundation of a free constitution is pure virtue. - John Adams

Previous Thread


TOPICS: General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 65,521-65,537 next last
To: DouglasKC
People are in heaven but God the father has not shown himself to them.

This is the Orthodox belief. God the Father remains beyond us, even in heaven.

281 posted on 04/01/2002 10:46:38 AM PST by Wordsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
. This would be Catholic, as I don't recall Protestant writing Latin hymns in that time period. So there.

The words are by "unknown" 1308 (I believe). Protestants put many prayers and poems to music. I wouldn't be surprised if you haven't loved some hymns by Martin Luther. So there.
282 posted on 04/01/2002 10:54:22 AM PST by OLD REGGIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

Comment #283 Removed by Moderator

To: angelo
Elijah was a prophet, Elisa was the heir apparent of his role, Elisa wanted some of Elijahs spiritual gifts imputed to him. The mantle was literally passed to Elisha (2 Kings 2:14)
Elisha didn't ask Elijah to 'lend' him these spiritual gifts. He asked to 'inherit' them. You can't 'inherit' something from someone who is still on this earth.

Where did you get the word "inherit" from? Which translation? The six versions I've looked at all have this: 2Ki 2:9 It happened, when they had gone over, that Elijah said to Elisha, Ask what I shall do for you, before I am taken from you. Elisha said, please let a double portion of your spirit be on me.

The word "yarash" is usually translated as "inherit" and that doesn't appear anywhere in the verse.

It makes more sense that he actually wrote the letter and didn't go to heaven...
Only because of your other presumptions. If Elijah was still on this earth, where was he? If he was close enough to easily arrange the delivery of a letter, then why did he not just come in person? If he was far away, then how did he arrange for it to be delivered? No Fed Ex available back then. Not even the Roman postal system. Why didn't he come and give his message in person? It sure would have been easier on Jeremiah if he could have sent his prophecies to Jerusalem by slow camel. I'm sure Jonah would have preferred to write a letter rather than going to Ninevah in person.

Beats me. But the fact remains that a Jeromeh was reading a letter from Elijah years after he supposedly went to heaven. Scripture doesn't say how he got it though.

Enoch dies but we don't know what God did with him,
That contradicts the passage from Hebrews I cited. It says that Enoch "was taken up so that he should not see death". If you believe the whole of the Christian scriptures to be inspired, you need to reconcile what Jesus said with what the author of Hebrews said.

Heb 9:27 And as it is appointed to men once to die, but after this the judgment,

Enoch had to have died a physical death. Even Christ had to endure a physical death. Maybe Paul was just saying that God took him away somewhere to save him from being killed by someone or something...who knows? The scripture is silent again.

284 posted on 04/01/2002 10:57:49 AM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
Reggie, what are you talking about? Does the failure of many spoiled modern people to follow the Teaching of Truth void such? Since we can not possibly avoid all sin, should we just re-define it as we go along? Or should we preach what is True, regardless?

Heavens no, just deny that it happens, frequently with the majority, and go off fat, dumb, and happy with "The Church Teaches" thus and so. Bah! Be sure to keep your eyes closed when they are buried in the sand.
285 posted on 04/01/2002 11:01:50 AM PST by OLD REGGIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Wordsmith
People are in heaven but God the father has not shown himself to them.
This is the Orthodox belief. God the Father remains beyond us, even in heaven.

That's tough for me to accept. It seems to make much more sense that everybody is asleep in their graves right now and nobody is in heaven. It fits in exactly with what Jesus taught about nobody "ascending" to heaven and nobody ever seeing God the father.

At some point I think we will be outside of this physical universe and will be able to "see" and commune with God the father.

286 posted on 04/01/2002 11:04:57 AM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE
Is this an article of faith or do non-canonical writings of the earliest Church Fathers survive which express their position?
287 posted on 04/01/2002 11:09:13 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: dadwags
A possible "reason" for Christ's death, using "logic" Since Adam and Eve offended God in Eden, Any offense against the Almighty is deserving of death . So, the proper atonement for that offebse is death . However, the offense was commited by man and , therefore must be paid by man . Then again, the Person offended was God, so payment could be adequately made only by God . Ergo, Christ, as both man and God paid the price for OUR sins . This is a "logical explanation . It is obviously inadequate because , as limited as our human understanding is, we can never fully understand the mysteries of God's loving relationship with us, IMVHO

Yes, I agree...but I'm trying to understand the mechanism I guess...you're probably right in that it's impossible to describe anything outside of the frame of our reality.

288 posted on 04/01/2002 11:09:41 AM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave;pegleg
(Reggie)His mother's sons were what???

Um, non-existent?

According to RC teaching -

Psalm 69:8 RSV I have become a stranger to my brethren, an alien to my mother's sons.

1. Who is I?

2. Who are my mother's sons.?
289 posted on 04/01/2002 11:11:45 AM PST by OLD REGGIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE
Psalm 69:8 RSV I have become a stranger to my brethren, an alien to my mother's sons.

1. Who is I? David.

2. Who are my mother's sons.? David's brothers.

290 posted on 04/01/2002 11:14:02 AM PST by IMRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: allend
Funny you should mention the Boston Globe. I receive a monthly called The Texas Catholic. An article on the front page mentions a Globe article about how the Diocese of Dallas has recovered from the Rudy Koss incident, indictment and settlements and has become the model diocese for dealing with pedophile priests (and keeping them out). I'll dig around for the article and see if I can find a URL for you.
291 posted on 04/01/2002 11:18:36 AM PST by al_c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: Invincibly Ignorant
No my point is that we both make judgements (you call it reading hearts). Christ told us to make righteous judgement.

This was the verse I was referring to regarding reading hearts.

“Therefore don't judge anything prematurely, before the Lord comes, who will both bring to light what is hidden in darkness and reveal the intentions of the hearts. And then praise will come to each one from God. (1Co 4:5)”

You're a bitter man. (oops, I'm ready hearts again)

Not bitter at all Steven. Just shaking my head in amazement. Just because you can’t distinguish between veneration and worship you don’t anybody can or should.

292 posted on 04/01/2002 11:18:53 AM PST by pegleg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE
Which passage in the New Testament do you believe makes reference to anyone, other than Jesus, as the "son of Mary"?
293 posted on 04/01/2002 11:22:59 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: IMRight;pegleg;SoothingDave
(Reggie) Psalm 69:8 RSV I have become a stranger to my brethren, an alien to my mother's sons.

(IMR) 1. Who is I? David.

2. Who are my mother's sons.? David's brothers.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now tell me what this introduction in the Douay-Rheims Bible means?

Christ in his passion declareth the greatness of his sufferings, and the malice of his persecutors the Jews; and foretelleth their reprobation.

Note: The corresponding chapter in Douay-Rheims is 68.

Douay says Christ. You say David. What does the RCC say?
294 posted on 04/01/2002 11:28:01 AM PST by OLD REGGIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
Where did you get the word "inherit" from? Which translation?

An online RSV. Typically, I've found it to be an accurate translation. I use this particular online reference because it has good search capabilities. In this case, I did not check it against other translations. I looked up a Jewish translation and it also renders the passage "let a double portion of thy spirit be upon me". I cede the point on "inherit" to you. However, I continue to disagree about the fate of Elijah.

295 posted on 04/01/2002 11:30:18 AM PST by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
I think we will be outside of this physical universe and will be able to "see" and commune with God the father.

I was just reading some interesting commentary on this idea, heavy on Scriptural and Patristic sources. I'll try to find a couple of passages later and quote them. I believe that the traditional position is that the Person of the Trinity that will be manifest to us in heaven will be the Son. We will be aware of the presence of God the Father, but He will still not be visible to us.

The church fathers distinguish between the essence and the energies of the Father, and speak of how we can know Him, or commune with Him, through His energies but never through His essence.

I don't have verses at the moment, but don't even the Seraphim not see the Father - two of their wings cover their eyes?

296 posted on 04/01/2002 11:33:49 AM PST by Wordsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: allend
Found the following on Boston Globe's site. Gotta register to read the entire article and I didn't want to spend the money on that. If anyone here already subscribes to the Globe online, could you post the article here?

RENEWAL OF FAITH
Published on March 19, 2002. Author(s):    Tatsha Robertson, Globe Staff

ROILED BY ABUSE SCANDAL, DALLAS DIOCESE RECOVERED BY REACHING OUT

DALLAS - Every recent Wednesday and Thursday night, a rush of children has packed the choir loft at All Saints Catholic Church here to rehearse for an upcoming Easter program.

The youthful enthusiasm is one sign of resurgence in the sprawling parish, which was the epicenter of one of the biggest sex scandals to hit the Roman Catholic Church in the 1990s. A former pastor of All Saints was sentenced to life in prison for sexually abusing boys, and the Diocese of Dallas paid his 11 victims and
Click for complete article

297 posted on 04/01/2002 11:34:02 AM PST by al_c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE
Note: The corresponding chapter in Douay-Rheims is 68.

That explains the confusion from the last time you brought this up. You just said 68.

Douay says Christ. You say David. What does the RCC say?

The same thing Old Reggie would have said the last time if he hadn't gotten in a huff and dropped the subject. Ps. 69 is a Messianic Psalm, but not every verse of the psalm is Messianic. I pointed out one verse that could not possibly refer to Christ Why do you insist that this one verse must refer to Christ? Does Douay (is that pig latin for Udo?) reference that one verse? Or all of 68/9?

298 posted on 04/01/2002 11:34:40 AM PST by IMRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: al_c
Did you see the vicious rant of little Andy Rooney, 60 minutes resident idiot? They really should not allow him to go on the air while intoxicated.
299 posted on 04/01/2002 11:35:20 AM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: IMRight
RCs are torn up inside over the sinfull actions (at so many levels) of members of our church. Just as you would be if the sin of members of your congregation were made known and tied to you. Allend doesn't agree with child molestation any more than you agree with abortion. Why even make a comparisson?

Just asked him a question. How would I know. Based on his behavior around here I think the question is legit.

300 posted on 04/01/2002 11:37:23 AM PST by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 65,521-65,537 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson