Posted on 06/07/2018 11:21:25 AM PDT by Simon Green
Day to day, it’s easy to lose sight of an astonishing fact: Since 2012, humankind has been driving a nuclear-powered sciencemobile the size of an SUV on another planet.
This engineering marvel, NASA’s Mars rover Curiosity, has revolutionized our understanding of the red planet. And thanks to the intrepid rover, we now know that ancient Mars had carbon-based compounds called organic molecules—key raw materials for life as we know it.
A new study published in Science on Thursday presents the first conclusive evidence for large organic molecules on the surface of Mars, a pursuit that began with NASA’s Viking landers in the 1970s. Earlier tests may have hinted at organics, but the presence of chlorine in martian dirt complicated those interpretations.
“When you work with something as crazy as a rover on Mars, with the most complex instrument ever sent to space, it seems like we’re doing what may have been perceived earlier as impossible,” says lead author Jennifer Eigenbrode, a biogeochemist at NASA Goddard. “I work with an amazing group of people on Mars, and we have discovered so much.”
Curiosity's latest data reveal that the watery lake that once filled Mars’s Gale Crater contained complex organic molecules about 3.5 billion years ago. Hints of them are still preserved in sulfur-spiked rocks derived from lake sediments. Sulfur may have helped protect the organics even when the rocks were exposed at the surface to radiation and bleach-like substances called perchlorates.
By themselves, the new results aren't evidence for ancient life on Mars; non-living processes could have yielded identical molecules. At a minimum, the study shows how traces of bygone martians could have survived for eons—if they existed at all—and it hints at where future rovers might look for them.
“This is an important finding,” says Samuel Kounaves, a Tufts University chemist and former lead scientist for NASA's Phoenix Mars lander. “There are locations, especially subsurface, where organic molecules are well-preserved.”
In addition to ancient carbon, Curiosity has caught whiffs of organics that exist on Mars today. The rover has periodically sniffed Mars’s atmosphere since it landed, and in late 2014, researchers using these data showed that methane—the simplest organic molecule—is present in Mars’s atmosphere.
Methane’s presence on Mars is puzzling, because it survives only a few hundred years at a time, which means that somehow, something on the red planet keeps replenishing it. “It’s a gas in the atmosphere of Mars that really shouldn’t be there," says NASA Jet Propulsion Lab scientist Chris Webster.
“It would be nice if they could admit they don’t know how life is built.”
It’s pretty clear how life is built, and from what.
They mystery (to some), of course, is the Builder.
Which leads to this question: If all the “building blocks” are there, why didn’t life begin on Mars? Could it be that life doesn’t just spontaneously happen?
†*************************************************
Perhaps it did, untold billions of years ago and then ended. What we are findings is what remains after a world dies.
Which leads to my question above.
Could be, I just read it one way. I guess the climate change scientists have given me a negative view of the professional scientist.
See Cementjungle’s link
http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3661313/posts?page=23#23
I suspect crude oil...
Yes, but all of those places are on planet Earth where we have fairly good proof that the conditions for life do exist.
This is cool, but it reminds me of an old anecdote.
Tell somebody there are billions of stars in the sky, and they will believe you. Tell them a bench has wet paint on it, and they have to touch it.
Frankly, my dears, I don’t give a damn......
Are you the professor from Gilligan’s Island?
That proves it’s ALIENS! LOL!
I understand. Too many of our formerly respected professions and institutions have let us down, so it is hard to trust anymore. Once the basis for trust is eroded, everything becomes suspect.
Maybe a NASA scientist accidentally spit some chaw on the foot of the rover before it went up.
And my point is if life can arise in such hospitable places, why not Mars? Maybe life doesn’t just spontaneously arise. Maybe there is a Creator.
I understood your point but even the most inhospitable places on Earth have conditions that don’t exist on Mars. Not even close.
My daughter just wrote a musical about the Mars Rovers, with Curiosity as the main character. It opens in July here in Seattle. She’s a science geek with a theater degree.
That’s a good way to put it.
Cause the Bible doesn’t mention it. The Bible doesn’t have any dentists either...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.