Pennsylvania Ping!
Please ping me with articles of interest.
FReepmail me to be added to the list.
Posted on 11/23/2020 9:06:39 AM PST by BlackFemaleArmyColonel
Same thing I was thinking, Powell was going to have to separate herself from them to concentrate and go after separate issues. Trump goes after audits and recounts to get the illegal ballots throw out and flip states for Trump. She is going after something that could include a lot of dirty people including both sides.
I hate to admit how little I know of this sort of thing, but... will this case be decided by one judge (and we hope they get a Republican in the luck of the draw) or does it go before a whole panel of them, like (I guess) the Supreme Court does it...?
When Dr Franklin says “en banc” it means the whole panel.
One panel can differ from another panel so you go to the whole panel.
OR
Alito decides to show up
I havent read the Executive Order from Trump that has bearing on this that expedited the process so dont know how that plays into it.
Bingo! A plan coming together. If it was not for the 5th column, it would not need to take this course. The left is chopping their own head off. Unbridled resentment creates phycosis and delusion.
I’m deeply regretful that you didn’t enjoy my post.
“3 weeks later and we know nothing more than we did the day after the election.”
Actually, we know a lot more and so does the Trump legal team.
Filings this week will reflect that and certainly in PA later today.
Thank you. So if it goes to the whole panel, we have a chance because it leans right 8 to 6, yes?
Pennsylvania Ping!
Please ping me with articles of interest.
FReepmail me to be added to the list.
Well....that is the question that holds all the marbles.
In theory, it is correct.
But I suspect they punt.
I hope and pray that Alito issues a stay pending review.
Doesn’t matter in my opinion...goal is to get to the Supreme court!!!
Heard this good news on Bannon’s show, this morning.
Yes....praying PLEASE, dear Lord.
Btt
Except when the legislature delegates it to them. As is the case in all 50 states.
Yes, this is an official breaking news message from a campaign attorney.
The very foundation of the republic is at state: one person, one vote.
****************
Roberts’ recent vote contributed in no small way to the mess we’re in. If the Supremes fail to clean it up it will be tantamount to condoning widespread fraud, depriving equal protection, and tolerating a lack of transparency. This, of course, would lead to a lack of confidence in the legitimacy of our governing institutions and the severe erosion of faith in the republic itself.
The stakes couldn’t be higher.
ACB is in a very difficult situation and might not be the savior we are hoping she will be. What in your estimation are the odds that the Supremes will take steps to restore confidence in our voting systems? Will they recognize the implications for the country and do the right thing, or will they look to sidestep the tough decisions thereby perpetuating the problems?
Remember that the main plaintiff in this case is the Trump campaign, not the candidate. So, regardless of that decision, President Trump himself could file a separate action, which isn’t barred. I suspect that there must be some benefit to have the campaign bring the lawsuit, i.e., getting contributions to pay for legal costs.
Welcome to FR, Mr FRanklin....
Are you an attorney, or a Judge?
If so, practicing, or teaching?
Opines the badly written shell script...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.