ALERT! CLINTONS CONTINUE ATTACK ON RELIGIOUS RIGHT

NewsMax via Free Republic ^ | 6.16.06 | Mia T

[Mia T]

ALERT!
CLINTONS CONTINUE ATTACK ON RELIGIOUS RIGHT

by Mia T, 6.15.06

 

 

"For ... the so-called Christian right and its allies, their great sin has been believing they were in full possession of the truth."

bill clinton
Tanenbaum Center For Interreligious Understanding*
New York, New York, 16 June 2006

* Note the irony

WHY THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT MUST MOBILIZE AGAINST HILLARY:
CLINTON CONFLATES EVANGELICAL CHRISTIANS AND ISLAMO-FASCIST TERRORISTS


by Mia T, 03.16.06

It is wrong to demonize and cartoonize one another and ignore evidence and to make false charges and to bear false witness. Sometimes I think our friends on the other side have become the people of the Nine Commandments. It is wrong to bear false witness because we all see through [the] glass darkly....

We have a curious situation in American where the religious right has tried to turn all who disagree with them into two-dimensional cartoons. I read a very moving article in one of our newspapers a few days ago in which someone in the president's hometown said all the Democrats cared about was abortion, gay marriage, and being weak on defense....

[T]hese people really do believe they are in possession of absolute truths. You won't hear about it during this convention. They'll put up their other face. But the truth is that when it all comes down to it, a lot of the religious absolutists believe that all other issues are irrelevant, that all who disagree with them are somehow almost non human, certainly not deserving of basic consideration. Therefore it's nothing but right to concentrate wealth and power in the hands of those who share their values and to constantly assert that whatever position they decide to take is right regardless of the inconvenient evidence....

Our number one threat abroad is fundamentalism, absolutism. Terror is their tactic, but it is their ideas, their hatred, their absolute certainty that they are so right that they can kill people who disagree with them -- that is our enemy.

'All of Us See Through the Glass Darkly'
bill clinton
sermon at Riverside Church
before the start of the Republican convention, 2004

 

linton moral relativism meets an insidious balkanizing brand of clinton fundamentalism. The goal: to render the corrupt, treacherous, utter-failure clintons at once untouchable and empowered.

SERMON ON THE MAKE

Note that clinton made this despicable argument in a church. In a black church. So much for the separation of church and state. So much for racial equality and respect. Miss hillary's plantation prequel....

Calculating a black man's worth to be 5/3 of a vote is no less racist, and arguably more so, than calculating his worth to be 3/5 of a white man; the latter is demeaning, but the former is dehumanizing.

Mia T, 07.23.05
THE FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT?
clinton legacy of lynching update

As for fundamentalism, note that no one is more doctrinaire than the clintons. If the Religious Right eschews science for faith, the clintons corrupt science^* for dogma, treasure and power.

 

* More on that later....

AFTERWORD: A note to the Religious Right

I am not arguing that you change your deeply held convictions. To the contrary.

Your convictions--the evangelical ethos-- is precisely my premise, my starting point. It is precisely why I cannot envision how you would doing anything to help elect hillary clinton, someone who is anathema to all you believe.

But that is exactly what you would be doing if, in the next presidential election, you stay home or vote for a 'Perot.' You don't have to physically pull the lever or mark the box or touch the square next to the name 'hillary clinton' to help elect her. To think otherwise is to play with your mind.

It is tempting to rationalize this issue... even to ignore it. It's a difficult issue. It's a dilemma. But rationalizing the issue won't make your actions morally right... and ignoring the issue won't make it go away.

The clintons equate the Religious Right with the islamo-fascist terrorists, with the enemy. They are attempting to transfer onto the Religious Right the hate and fear and disgust Americans feel for the islamo-fascist terrorists. To disseminate their vile invective, the clintons chose a church for the venue and what the they believe to be a vulnerable, easily demagogued population for the audience. (A population they've exploited forever.)

The purpose of this article is to inform you of the clintons' contemptible and dangerous scheme. To let you hear clinton for yourself.

It is critical that you know fully what the clintons think of you and to what extremes they are willing to go to harm you, to defeat you, to crush you.

You must not ignore or rationalize away this threat to your existence. As a Jew, I tend to be vigilant about such threats. I implore you to be vigilant, too. You must not make the same mistake my brethren made almost seven decades ago.

 

READ MORE

HILLARY DOES JESUS "FURTHER EVIDENCE WHY SHE IS ONE OF THE MOST DESPICABLE POLITICIANS OUT THERE RIGHT NOW" by Mia T, 3.26.06 From a Christian (Catholic) theologian: This is just further evidence of what, in my opinion, is why Hillary Clinton is one of the most despicable politicians that is out there right now in the sense that she's absolutely chameleonlike. When she is pandering to the Left, she wants nothing to do with religion. She sounds like the ACLU. When she's voting against [the banning of] partial-birth abortion, I don't see her invoking the name of Jesus there because I'm sure she can't picture Jesus doing something like that. And she also knows it doesn't play with her far-left base. And now she wants to pander to the center, so she starts invoking the name of Jesus. And as a Christian, I'm offended by her use of Jesus for what I see as her very, very--uh--very self-interested political partisan ambition. I think this is simply a craven attempt to use the name of Jesus for political purposes.... To demonize either side of the immigration issue by invoking the name of Jesus is precisely the point.. This is an issue of prudential judgment that reasonable people can disagree about. They're weighing competing values--humanitarian values vs. values of national sovereignty in the age of terrorism. Neither side of this debate has the moral corner or the moral high ground. Both sides have good points to make and to demonize the other side by invoking the name of Jesus [is despicable]. Larry Chapp, Ph.D. Professor of Theology The O'Reilly Factor READ MORE

WHY THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT MUST MOBILIZE AGAINST HILLARY: CLINTON CONFLATES EVANGELICAL CHRISTIANS AND ISLAMO-FASCIST TERRORISTS AFTERWORD: A Note to the Religious Right GONE WITH THE WIND (miss hillary's 'plantation' blunder) THE VOUCHER RANT OF MISS HILLARY: WHY THE WHIFF OF RACISM EXCEEDS THE WORDS HILLARY CLINTON, DANGEROUS DEMAGOGUE WHAT IS HER VOUCHER RANT REALLY ABOUT ANYWAY? HILLARY DOES JESUS "FURTHER EVIDENCE WHY SHE IS ONE OF THE MOST DESPICABLE POLITICIANS OUT THERE RIGHT NOW" HILLARY VOTE FRAUD missus clinton uses Jesus What's black and white and read all over and is more self-destructive than pre-9/11 thinking? Pre-clinton thinking, that's what.... Putting doctrinal purity ahead of making sure a defective and dangerous clinton never again controls this country is pre-clinton thinking. We no longer have the luxury of time or circumstance to massage our sensibilities, to indulge our indignations. We will not survive another clinton. (We may yet not survive the first one.) THROUGH A GLASS DARKLY: HOW DECADES OF CLINTON DOUBLE-DEALING COMPROMISED OUR NATIONAL SECURITY MISSING CLINTON AUDIO! 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?' (+Albright-Fulbright-Nobel TERRORISM revelations) THE FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT? clinton legacy of lynching update For the children? the clintons ARE pornography downloads

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006

[Mia T]

The clintons are attacking Evangelical Christians specifically by equating them with the Islamo-fascist terrorists. Their tactic is conflation and their implicit argument is that fundamentalism is both a necessary and sufficient condition for terror.

"We have a curious situation in American where the religious right... really do believe they are in possession of absolute truths.... Our number one threat abroad is fundamentalism, absolutism. Terror is their tactic, but it is their ideas, their hatred, their absolute certainty that they are so right that they can kill people who disagree with them -- that is our enemy."

HEAR bill clinton
'All of Us See Through the Glass Darkly'
sermon at Riverside Church
before the start of the Republican convention, 2004

[Mia T]

I forgot the quotation marks in 19. See corrected repost (#21).

The clintons fear the Religious Right politically, so they want to defeat them; they want to quash them. They are doing this by equating the RR with the islamofascist terrorists. How better to marshal American support?

[bmwcyle]

Godless, to whom was Ann thinking when she wrote the book?

[Mia T]

[the clintons'] implicit argument is that fundamentalism is both a necessary and sufficient condition for terror

...seemingly oblivious to their own fundamentalist doctrine that is terrorizing for real.

[Mia T]

bump

Ever wonder if there's something a bit subliminal going on with the title... , i.e., Godless<-->Goddess, but that's for another day, another thread.... ;)

[cinives]

Unfortunately, there's also a far-left Christian contingent. Think the World Council of Churches, leftist elements in the priesthoods of the Catholics and Episcopalians, and ditto in the convents.

These are the people who give the Clintons cover.

[bmwcyle]

Kristinn use to live down the street from the Methodist Church as Bill and Hill walked out on Sunday with the Bible with big letters. It always was when Bill was in the biggest trouble.

[FlyVet]

"For ... the so-called Christian right and its allies, their great sin has been believing they were in full possession of the truth."

Clinton, a Southern Baptist,

Uh, well, Bill, I'm not a Southern Baptist, but I'd wager most of them believe they possess an absolute Truth. Otherwise, why bother calling yourself a Southern Baptist? Part of the fence-straddling plan to get maximum popularity and votes? And you wanna talk about truth?

Mote --------> Beam.

Miabump

[Mia T]

with the Bible with big letters--bmwcyle

THE CLINTONS' MOTTO:
'If the camera can't see the prop, you don't have the prop'

A Scoundrel's Pythagorean Imperative

Mia T, 12.14.03

z = distance between flag lapel pin and chin

d = distance between midpoint of chin and jowl

y = distance between the midpoint of chin and top button

x = distance between top button and flag lapel pin

 

 

And the usual droning-when-not-screeching,¹¹ midwestern-twanged-except-when-g-droppin'-preachin'-to-blacks-or-rubes ⁷ missus clinton was her usual arrogant, banal self, a familiar affect, which she invariably punctuates--just in case--with congruous and correspondingly condescending thematic attire.

Gingham-cum-flag-pin is her standard rube/red-state garb. ⁸

Predictably, missus clinton donned a mandarin-collared shirt--no flag pin in sight--to pander to the Asian-infused, ultra-left-wing San Francisco set.

But she forgot, apparently, to look in the mirror: The image on the screen was more Mao than mandarin ⁹.

Yet some would argue, perversely, that the Mao look was, in fact, precisely what made her choice of attire absolutely perfect.

This is the first in a series of (oops!) inadvertent disclosures made by the not very swift missus clinton during her chitchat with Jane Pauley in the city by the bay.

READ MORE
(including bibliography)

ON THE FICTIONALIZED MEMOIR
by Mia T, 2.10.06

 

[Mia T]

thanx :)

[bmwcyle]

Does it take her a long time to get ready in the morning to be so phony or does it just come naturally?

[presently no screen name]

..their great sin has been believing they were in full possession of the truth."

clinton WAS in full possession of the truth. However, 'carrying' it to church is a prop, since it hasn't reached his heart.


According to willyboy, since no one possesses full truth, one cannot be accountable for sinning. Seems like willyboy is 'trying' to give himself and his godless crowd an out. What a tool of satan, he is. Subtly, holding a bible as a 'shield' of protection to sin.


Since victimhood has been exposed recently, it may have lost it's flavor as a shield; they now use the 'bible' while denying the contents. A direct jab at Ann's book 'Godless'. They are using every shield possible to drag down this nation into the pit through lies - being a pawn themselves by the 'father of lies'.

[HarleyLady27]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1650327/posts


This was just posted yesterday.....and he is full of crap....

[Mia T]

According to willyboy, since no one possesses full truth, one cannot be accountable for sinning.--presently no screen name

bump

As you imply in the rest of your post, I think his thinking goes more like this:

Since no one possesses full truth, HE cannot be held accountable for his sinning.

 

 

PREFACE: Why 'THROUGH A GLASS DARKLY'

It is wrong to demonize and cartoonize one another and ignore evidence and to make false charges and to bear false witness. Sometimes I think our friends on the other side have become the people of the Nine Commandments. It is wrong to bear false witness because we all see through [the] glass darkly.

'All of Us See Through the Glass Darkly'
bill clinton
sermon at Riverside Church
before the start of the Republican convention, 2004

 

'Through a glass darkly' is bill clinton's favorite biblical metaphor and his fixers' spin-of-last-resort.

When properly misconstrued, the phrase at once captures and effectuates the clinton con perfectly, placing clinton conveniently beyond the reach of criticism, impeachment (figuratively speaking), and, most important, punishment.

It is wrong to bear false witness because we all see through [the] glass darkly.--bill clinton

Notice the tenuous, self-serving logic here. Notice how clinton slyly implies that because we all see through a glass darkly, we are unable to see the truth (about him)--ever, all charges past, present and future (against him) are necessarily indeterminable and, therefore, false, and it is wrong, therefore, to bring any charge (against him), ever.*

So, for example, while all the evidence and all the contemporaneous accounts of all the witnesses support the charge that bill clinton raped Juanita Broaddrick and that hillary clinton aided and abetted that rape, we must throw out all the evidence and all the witnesses and keep two rapists in the Oval Office.

Excellent.

---

*

"One thing was certain, that the WHITE kitten had had nothing to do with it:--it was the black kitten's fault entirely." Lewis Caroll THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS' page 1, line 1     'THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS' may be the better descriptor: Notice that as he makes his argument, clinton hurls multiple charges against his "friends on the other side" with no trouble at all. How cheerfully he seems to grin, How neatly spreads his claws, And welcomes little fishes in With gently smiling jaws! ~Alice's Adventures in Wonderland~

READ MORE

 

[presently no screen name]

Notice the tenuous, self-serving logic here. Notice how clinton slyly implies that because we all see through a glass darkly, we are unable to see the truth (about him)--ever, all charges past, present and future (against him) are necessarily indeterminable and, therefore, false, and it is wrong, therefore, to bring any charge (against him), ever.*


BUMP!!

[Mia T]

There's a method to his madness. He--they--are dangerous.

[Quix]

Sometimes, rarely, The Lord will tell a strong Believer if He doesn't want that person to pray for the concernerned individual any longer. There can be various reasons for that. And, some people can cross the line of no return--though I think it's usually harder than most think.

I think/feel that Shrillery has been so fiercely rebellious against God and devoted to satan for so long--that she has likely crossed that line.

[Coldwater Creek]

I agree with your theology, I just hope that you are wrong.

God says, that He is not willing that any should perish. Thank goodness that He a patient God.

I have always felt that when there is no more hope, He will immediately do away with a person.

[Quix]

Thanks, Thanks Thanks.

I don't succeed at 'guessing God's mind' on such matters very often. I think . . . anyway.

Certainly agree with the Scripture and God's patience. Otherwise I'd have been sunk many times.

I don't think He always does away with the person. Though sometimes I've prayed that he

1. Change them; Redeem them
2. Move them away from the situation and hurting others so much

and/or at HIS discretion and priorities . . .

3.take them out of this life.

Have been surprised how often He's done the latter within a few months to a year in a situation that had gone on maybe a decade or more.

I don't understand about His bothering so well with our prayers so much--other than His love and giving us a part in His majestic plan for our benefit . . . so magnanimously.

I do believe He takes some folks out prematurely to what they'd otherwise have had because He doesn't want them to rack up more punishment by staying around longer and doing more horrid things. And, I think our prayers can have a part in that sometimes.

Plenty of mysteries to learn about on the other side.

[PGalt]

Endowed by their enablers.

Peddle your nonsense Bill.

Run Hillary Run!