Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fifty percent of adults would not vote for Clinton
Harris Poll via The Hill | 3.27.07 | Mia T

Posted on 03/27/2007 11:24:56 AM PDT by Mia T

Campaign 2008

Fifty percent of adults would not vote for Clinton

By Kelly McCormack

March 27, 2007

Half of voting-age Americans say they would not vote for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) if she became the Democratic nominee for president in 2008, according to a Harris Interactive poll released Tuesday.

More than one in five Democrats that participated in the survey said they would not vote for Clinton. Overall, 36 percent say they would vote for the former first lady and 11 percent are unsure of their top choice.

Forty-eight percent of Independent voters also said that they would choose another candidate over Clinton, the poll, which surveyed 2,223 potential voters, states.

Fifty-six percent of men said that they would not vote for Clinton, while 45 percent of women said that she would not be their pick. In addition, 69 percent of those 62 and older said that they would not vote for Clinton.

Nearly half of the respondents said that they dislike Clinton's political opinions and Clinton as a person. Fifty-two percent of people also said that "she does not appear to connect with people on a personal level."

 

With a Q score--a measure of celebrity likability among the hoi polloi--in the toilet, missus clinton can win elections only by running virtually unopposed...

And then only with the help of protheses, props, poses, PR machines, scripted appearances, screened audiences, vetted questions, Secret Service barracades, secret police, softball settings and sycophantic hosts... fictionalizing, 'humanizing,' digitizing and otherwise hiding the real hillary clinton.

And then we have the baggage....

Anyone else but a clinton would have been summarily laughed off the stage.

HILLARY CLINTON'S Q SCORE
Hollywood take note
(WHAT THE HELL IS THIS MORIBUND LOSER DOING IN THE POLITICAL ARENA ANYWAY?)
by Mia T, 01.26.07



HILLARY!
Can a chintzed-and-powdered villain win the White House?
LEADING INDICATORS SAY 'NO'

MISSUS CLINTON'S SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE PROBLEM - PART FIVE
CLINTON-GEFFEN IMBROGLIO-PART SIX
by Mia T, 3.01.07

 





ven the most casual observer of the American political scene would agree: It's a tossup as to whose stage presence, hillary clinton's or Al Gore's, is the more ridiculous.

But as opposed to hillary-on-stage, Al thereon has a saving grace: He doesn't try to appear human. To the contrary, Al Gore embraces his humanoid essence. (In fairness to missus clinton, 'inhuman' is a measurably less salable descriptor than 'humanoid.')

To better understand why this is such an advantage for Mr. Gore, simply consider missus clinton's recent 'conversation' (with herself).

It was risible. Unintentional theater of the absurd: A chintzed-and-powdered villain, a soulless, angry, arrogant scold, oozing cloying, saccharine-coated evil, pulsating to the metronomic swing of stubby appendages--claws too short to grab its prey.

(Gesticulation is a dud's only sign of life... and then only if she has a speech coach to prod her.)


The performance was nothing if not humiliating: A direct measure of hillary clinton's hunger for power. Which reminds me... enough of that red Klingon power jacket already.

The fatal problem with the clinton machine's extravagant, fanciful and elaborate construction is not the absurdity, however. It is the architectonics.

A precarious 20th-century conceit, the hillary! construct totters on a crumbling foundation of clinton lies, abuses and betrayals.

It should have been no surprise that David Geffen's comments to Maureen Dowd would so easily topple it.

But to the average clinton lackey, it apparently was.

A barrage of polls are shooting down the endless post-Geffen-imbroglio clinton-agitprop chatter that had called hillary clinton and her machine the hands-down winner.

According to the latest Zogby Poll, Barack Obama is gaining fast on missus clinton. The Quinnipiac University Poll released today reports that Giuliani has widened his lead over missus clinton in New Jersey (50-41).

But it is this week's Keystone Poll that foreshadows the final outcome. Rudy demolishes clinton in blue Pe-Ay (53-37). But more significantly, hillary clinton's favorable/unfavorable rating is a dismal 32/46. (The other candidates have net positive favorable ratings.)

We have argued elsewhere that the only way missus clinton can win elections is to run virtually unopposed, and then only if she remains immobil, hidden, mute, a prisoner of her own ineptitude, repulsiveness and criminality.

But of the three, it is missus clinton's repulsiveness--her ugliness--that will do her in.

The voters routinely ignore ineptitude, forgive criminality, but they never abide ugliness. Never.





The clintons, as is their wont, are now taking this proxy scheme to even more outrageous extremes.

The latest: an actual hillary clinton proxy presidency, populated on both sides of the camera by assorted rodham and clinton ex-staffers, sycophants and should-be felons, witness the latest hire.

'Commander-in-Chief,' a show that sets out to crown a 'queen,' instead exposes the kitschy simplemindedness of Hollywood fantasy and the special sway and shortsightedness of the pathologic ego.


Mia T, 10.27.05
THE DANGER OF RUNNING VICARIOUSLY
Bill O'Reilly chews up and spits out the hillary clinton candidacy
(clip included)



unning vicariously, as we have argued, has its risks.

What was supposed to be Hollywood propaganda to make a hillary presidency marginally palatable has instead become a parable about missus clinton's own dystopian future.

ABC announced the other day that it is pulling "Commander-in-Chief" off the air "until spring." Missus clinton's proxy presidency, you see, has been in a ratings free fall ever since "American Idol" took it on.

In a perverse life-mirrors-art moment, support for the real-life missus clinton's presidency has plummeted, too. This even sans Rudy, her real-life "American Idol" opponent.

'Ars artia gratis.' Please!

Samuel Goldwyn must be turning over in his grave....


'HIATUS' FOR HILLARY?
by Mia T, 02.02.06

 






COPYRIGHT MIA T 2007

 

 


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: corruption; dud; electionpresident; elections; hillary; loser; terrorism; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: Mia T

BTTT


41 posted on 03/27/2007 1:05:51 PM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
To avoid voting for a 'liberal,' they will place their de facto vote for a Stalinist. (That'll show 'em.)




Thanks for the Link.....Wow, another winner! :) This woman cannot be allowed anywhere near the White House and I will vote for the person I believe can keep her wide butt OUT!
42 posted on 03/27/2007 1:07:30 PM PDT by KATIE-O (Rudy Giuliani - Restoring Optimism in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Big Bump! Mia darling, I was beginning to worry about you. Glad to see you are well and in fabulous form.
43 posted on 03/27/2007 1:11:05 PM PDT by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Exactly. Hillary Clinton is simply too mean, too nasty, too arrogant too phony, and too dull to be elected President, and the worst thing for her is that she cannot hide this horrible character of hers and the media cannot cover it for her no matter how hard they try. Her horribly annoying, nasty, and screeching voice, her wide open mean eyes, will turn the vast majority of voters away from her and at an early stage of the campaign, even before they know anything about her left wing socialist politics and huge flip flops.

As I posted last night...every eve when Brit plays a teeny clip of her droning on, harping about something or other like the mother-in-law from hell, and how she'll do it better when she is president with that smarty pants know-it-all look on her face, I start screaming obscenities at the TV. I'm sure my neighbors think I'm nuts...I wonder, is this happening in living rooms across America?

Quote from Rush on Monday:

"Mrs. Bill Clinton had a town meeting today on Good Morning America. I was watching this, and it was on high definition. And I'm saying to myself, 'Mrs. Clinton, stay away from HD.'"
44 posted on 03/27/2007 1:19:33 PM PDT by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: E.G.C.

thx E.G.C. :)


45 posted on 03/27/2007 1:20:29 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: KATIE-O

Thanx, KATIE-O. :)

I agree. Nothing in this election is more important than keeping the clintons out of the White House. We will not survive another clinton. (We may yet not survive the first.)


46 posted on 03/27/2007 1:23:52 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi

So sweet. Thank you, Miss Didi. :)


47 posted on 03/27/2007 1:24:38 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi
I wonder, is this happening in living rooms across America?

It is happening a lot, enough to make her lose over 40 states if she becomes the democrat presidential nominee in 2008.

48 posted on 03/27/2007 1:25:33 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi
the mother-in-law from hell, and how she'll do it better when she is president with that smarty pants know-it-all look on her face

Luv it.

I heard that HD comment. Altho prudent advice, I'm not sure what the practical consequences of following it would be: missus clinton's ugliness is resolution-independent.

from my essay, above:

But of the three, it is missus clinton's repulsiveness--her ugliness--that will do her in.

The voters routinely ignore ineptitude, forgive criminality, but they never abide ugliness. Never.

49 posted on 03/27/2007 1:34:32 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

I look forward to Missus Clinton's realization that her trophy is slipping from her clutches. She does not wear desperation well.


50 posted on 03/27/2007 1:53:28 PM PDT by windchime (I consider the left one of the fronts on the WOT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: windchime

excellently put. bump.


51 posted on 03/27/2007 2:02:11 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Good! That is great news!!!


52 posted on 03/27/2007 2:11:42 PM PDT by napscoordinator (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
just in time. ;)

I'm assuming that you're referring to post #39. Hmm?

53 posted on 03/27/2007 2:26:05 PM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

The problem is, if 49% will vote for her, she can get Dems most everywhere to counterfeit another 1%.


54 posted on 03/27/2007 2:35:27 PM PDT by Graymatter (Support FREDeralism in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jla

yup ;)


55 posted on 03/27/2007 2:39:04 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

LOL


56 posted on 03/27/2007 2:39:40 PM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Graymatter

See post 27.


57 posted on 03/27/2007 2:40:07 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Graymatter
That is not to deny your excellent point about HILLARY VOTE FRAUD
58 posted on 03/27/2007 2:42:21 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
I always thought Hillary would make a wonderful Democratic Candidate.

Even when Bill was popular, anything that Hillary got involved with seemed to lose the support of the public as a whole.

She's generally popular among communist leaning democrats, but the average liberal wants the government to take care of them and look after their interests.

Who many people really think that Hillary is looking out for anyone but herself?

She's as calculating and poll driven as her husband, but without the charisma.

Half of voters won't vote for her, and an additional eleven percent are unsure, and voters haven't even gotten to she her wonderful personality in a presidential debate yet.

A considerable number of Democrats and independents vote based on how they "feel" about a candidate rather than on their actual positions on the issues.

That serves some politicians like here husband Bill well due to his charismatic nature. He was able to get away with doing just about anything and still retain a high level of support from such people.

For Hillary on the other hand, this will be a curse.

59 posted on 03/27/2007 2:57:38 PM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


60 posted on 03/27/2007 2:59:11 PM PDT by Wolverine (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson