Posted on 03/14/2009 11:09:15 AM PDT by Natural Law
There is a single name that comes up in every attempt to get the Obama Eligibility issue before the Supreme Court, Court Clerk Danny Bickle. The disturbing thing is that I can find no reference to him anywhere other than as a blocking or impeding party in this issue. Does anyone know who this public servant is, what his education and qualifications are to be a Court Clerk with the Supreme Court of the United States? We need to know who paid for his education, what his current income and assets are, and if they are commensurate with his position. We need to find out w recommended and who hired him, when he was hired, how he is able to sabotage court cases, where he passed the bar, what his political affiliations are, etc? Answer these questions and we will have a much better understanding of what is really going on.
Bickle is not a law clerk to a Supreme Court Justice. He is an employee of the Supreme Court's clerk's office. He is in charge of papers asking for stays. Because all of Orly's motions to stay the inauguration were denied, she is blaming him.
Is that right? Then there has been a lot of confusion about his role. I’ve repeatedly seen him called a “clerk.” In the context of SCOTUS, that’s a very confusing term to use if he’s not a clerk.
So, thanks for the heads up.
The word has two meanings in the context of the Supreme Court. Each Justice has 2 or 3 "law clerks" who are recent law school graduates and serve for 1-2 years (and then usually go on to prestigious law firms). The law clerks assist the judges in reaearching and writing their decisions.
There is also the Court Clerk's office, whose employees are (I belive) civil service employees, and which handles the filing of papers and the like. Bickle works for the Court Clerk's office, not for any of the judges. He is the "Stay Clerk," meaning he is the employee who handles motions for stays. Orly mistrusts him because she cannot believe that her motions to sstay the inauguration were denied because no one on the Court took them seriously; she is convinced he somehow sabotaged her by hiding her papers from the judges or something.
I haven’t kept up with all the details. I think at least some of these papers were diverted when there was a faked up anthrax scare, and others may have been diverted at other times as well. I don’t know specifically why Orly holds Bickle specifically responsible.
Dealing with SCOTUS appears to be a minefield. There are all sorts of technicalities that can hold things up. The regular personnel can certainly sidetrack stuff if they choose to do so. And if you complain about it, as Orly and a couple of others have done, that just gets them mad at you.
As I recall, several others have made similar complaints.
Dealing with any court can be a minefield if you don't know their procedures. Orly is, unfortunately, a lawyer with very little litigation experience, and no experience at all in the U.S. Supreme Court. She has made all sorts of rookie mistakes, and always assumes that there is a great plot against her. She needs to buy a copy of Supreme Court Practice and read it carefully.
BTTT.
Great post Natural Law - Thank you. BTTT
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.