Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Baby in the White House?
Leibowitz's Canticle ^ | May 1, 2010 | Leibowitz

Posted on 05/01/2010 9:07:36 PM PDT by Bob Leibowitz

Anyone else notice that Mrs. Obama appears to be with child?


TOPICS: Government; Health/Medicine; History; Politics
KEYWORDS: health; obama; politics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: Bob Leibowitz

Oh come on, she’s had hundreds of pictures with Barack in the White House already.


21 posted on 05/01/2010 9:35:56 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Is Barry punishing Michelle? ... These are sick, wicked people.


22 posted on 05/01/2010 9:36:29 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Obots, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig

“...having kids that late is irresponsible”

Their business, not ours.


23 posted on 05/01/2010 9:43:21 PM PDT by Habibi ("It is vain to do with more what can be done with less." - William of Occam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

nah... she just big boned


24 posted on 05/01/2010 9:43:58 PM PDT by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

Yeah, 41 pounds 5 ounces of concentrated lipids and triglycerides from Lobster and Fillet Mignon on the taxpayer`s dole.


25 posted on 05/01/2010 9:44:56 PM PDT by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

Does that mean the kid’ll be an American citizen?


26 posted on 05/01/2010 9:48:38 PM PDT by Erasmus (The Last of the Bohicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz
Women have children later these days, fairly routinely. I think she’s expecting.

I'm one of those 'have them later women', but I was 36, not 46. Michelle doesn't look any different these days than she has since the resident in chief took over, sorry. False meme speculation is like talking about the fat lady next door. Is it real or is it Memorex?

27 posted on 05/01/2010 9:49:53 PM PDT by mplsconservative (0bama = Epic Fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

I wonder if John Edwards might be the father????


28 posted on 05/01/2010 9:54:32 PM PDT by fish hawk (Dreaming in my flight, I fly beyond my dreams.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
That's her husband.

HAH! Perfect.

29 posted on 05/01/2010 10:03:27 PM PDT by roamer_1 (Globalism is just Socialism in a business suit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
Remember the father in 'Rosmary's Baby? Same guy.
30 posted on 05/01/2010 10:10:32 PM PDT by Outlaw Woman (Control the American people? Herding cats would be easier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig

I was born to 44 yr old mother in the early 70’s. Her first doctor suggested she should abort me for that reason.


31 posted on 05/01/2010 10:22:16 PM PDT by When do we get liberated? (STATE CONTROLLED ECONOMIES SUCK ! LONG LIVE AMERICA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Blogger
No kidding. She'd have to be giving birth to an elephant. I can see the headline now: Shocking shocker!!!! Michelle Obama pregnant with Babar's love calf!!!!
32 posted on 05/01/2010 10:24:36 PM PDT by JoeDonnellymakesmepuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

LOL Hilarous.


33 posted on 05/01/2010 10:51:03 PM PDT by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

You think she’s expecting

I expect you’re not thinking...


34 posted on 05/01/2010 11:19:34 PM PDT by AmericanArchConservative (Armour on, Lances high, Swords out, Bows drawn, Shields front ... Eagles UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig
The incidents of birth defects at ANY AGE is rare. The idea of being irresponsible to have a child later in life is foolish and selfish. What would be better a quiet abortion? As a man who has had two children after 39 and hope to have at least one more with my wife, soon to be 39, and as the brother of TWO siblings born to my mother after the age of 42, I find your attitude repulsive and idiotic. !
35 posted on 05/01/2010 11:20:05 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

If so, approval ratings increase a point or two.


36 posted on 05/01/2010 11:51:06 PM PDT by ConservativeStatement (Obama "acted stupidly.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

No, what would be better is to not get pregnant in the first place. Regardless of your opinion, the risk for birth defects rises noticeably after 40, particularly for women. As for foolish and selfish, how selfish do you have to be to have a kid so late in life that you’ll have plenty of time to teach her to drive, since you’ll be retired? That you’ll have to catch the daybus from the “independent living center” to see your kid graduate from college?


37 posted on 05/02/2010 12:46:18 AM PDT by Little Pig (Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

Isn’t she a little old to have a child?


38 posted on 05/02/2010 12:48:28 AM PDT by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig
People are more than able to raise children over the age of forty. besides the fact that IT'S NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS! Even with the higher risk, the risk is extremely low. Regardless, the fact is that a special needs child is certainly not the end of the World and is often a greater blessing than can be imagined.

As far as selfish is concerned, nothing is more selfish than choosing the one or two child family because you want the new BMW, bigger house in the burbs, and expensive vacations than the privilege of raising a responsible, tax paying, and stable future generation to help pay for not only my own future needs but for those of society as a whole.

The reason the country is in the trouble that it is is because all the wrong people are having all the children. We can not continue to leave the raising of large families to unwed, uneducated women in the ghetto. The middle and upper middle classes MUST have more children if our society is to survive and thrive.

39 posted on 05/02/2010 1:09:26 AM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz
It's those re-fried beans

Turn up the speakers.

40 posted on 05/02/2010 2:11:15 AM PDT by Hillbillary (I know how to deal with Communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson