Skip to comments.
A Baby in the White House?
Leibowitz's Canticle ^
| May 1, 2010
| Leibowitz
Posted on 05/01/2010 9:07:36 PM PDT by Bob Leibowitz
Anyone else notice that Mrs. Obama appears to be with child?
TOPICS: Government; Health/Medicine; History; Politics
KEYWORDS: health; obama; politics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
To: Bob Leibowitz
Oh come on, she’s had hundreds of pictures with Barack in the White House already.
21
posted on
05/01/2010 9:35:56 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
To: bruinbirdman
Is Barry punishing Michelle? ... These are sick, wicked people.
22
posted on
05/01/2010 9:36:29 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Obots, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when they are deceived.)
To: Little Pig
“...having kids that late is irresponsible”
Their business, not ours.
23
posted on
05/01/2010 9:43:21 PM PDT
by
Habibi
("It is vain to do with more what can be done with less." - William of Occam)
To: Bob Leibowitz
nah... she just big boned
24
posted on
05/01/2010 9:43:58 PM PDT
by
sten
To: Bob Leibowitz
Yeah, 41 pounds 5 ounces of concentrated lipids and triglycerides from Lobster and Fillet Mignon on the taxpayer`s dole.
25
posted on
05/01/2010 9:44:56 PM PDT
by
nomad
To: Bob Leibowitz
Does that mean the kid’ll be an American citizen?
26
posted on
05/01/2010 9:48:38 PM PDT
by
Erasmus
(The Last of the Bohicans)
To: Bob Leibowitz
Women have children later these days, fairly routinely. I think shes expecting. I'm one of those 'have them later women', but I was 36, not 46. Michelle doesn't look any different these days than she has since the resident in chief took over, sorry. False meme speculation is like talking about the fat lady next door. Is it real or is it Memorex?
To: Bob Leibowitz
I wonder if John Edwards might be the father????
28
posted on
05/01/2010 9:54:32 PM PDT
by
fish hawk
(Dreaming in my flight, I fly beyond my dreams.)
To: Joe 6-pack
That's her husband.HAH! Perfect.
29
posted on
05/01/2010 10:03:27 PM PDT
by
roamer_1
(Globalism is just Socialism in a business suit)
To: Dallas59
Remember the father in 'Rosmary's Baby? Same guy.
30
posted on
05/01/2010 10:10:32 PM PDT
by
Outlaw Woman
(Control the American people? Herding cats would be easier.)
To: Little Pig
I was born to 44 yr old mother in the early 70’s. Her first doctor suggested she should abort me for that reason.
To: Blogger
No kidding. She'd have to be giving birth to an elephant. I can see the headline now: Shocking shocker!!!! Michelle Obama pregnant with Babar's love calf!!!!
To: Joe 6-pack
33
posted on
05/01/2010 10:51:03 PM PDT
by
patriot08
(TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
To: Bob Leibowitz
You think she’s expecting
I expect you’re not thinking...
34
posted on
05/01/2010 11:19:34 PM PDT
by
AmericanArchConservative
(Armour on, Lances high, Swords out, Bows drawn, Shields front ... Eagles UP!)
To: Little Pig
The incidents of birth defects at ANY AGE is rare. The idea of being irresponsible to have a child later in life is foolish and selfish. What would be better a quiet abortion? As a man who has had two children after 39 and hope to have at least one more with my wife, soon to be 39, and as the brother of TWO siblings born to my mother after the age of 42, I find your attitude repulsive and idiotic. !
35
posted on
05/01/2010 11:20:05 PM PDT
by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: Bob Leibowitz
If so, approval ratings increase a point or two.
To: Jim from C-Town
No, what would be better is to not get pregnant in the first place. Regardless of your opinion, the risk for birth defects rises noticeably after 40, particularly for women. As for foolish and selfish, how selfish do you have to be to have a kid so late in life that you’ll have plenty of time to teach her to drive, since you’ll be retired? That you’ll have to catch the daybus from the “independent living center” to see your kid graduate from college?
37
posted on
05/02/2010 12:46:18 AM PDT
by
Little Pig
(Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici.)
To: Bob Leibowitz
Isn’t she a little old to have a child?
38
posted on
05/02/2010 12:48:28 AM PDT
by
riri
To: Little Pig
People are more than able to raise children over the age of forty. besides the fact that IT'S NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS! Even with the higher risk, the risk is extremely low. Regardless, the fact is that a special needs child is certainly not the end of the World and is often a greater blessing than can be imagined.
As far as selfish is concerned, nothing is more selfish than choosing the one or two child family because you want the new BMW, bigger house in the burbs, and expensive vacations than the privilege of raising a responsible, tax paying, and stable future generation to help pay for not only my own future needs but for those of society as a whole.
The reason the country is in the trouble that it is is because all the wrong people are having all the children. We can not continue to leave the raising of large families to unwed, uneducated women in the ghetto. The middle and upper middle classes MUST have more children if our society is to survive and thrive.
39
posted on
05/02/2010 1:09:26 AM PDT
by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: Bob Leibowitz
40
posted on
05/02/2010 2:11:15 AM PDT
by
Hillbillary
(I know how to deal with Communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson