Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"What If" hypothetical question for those who are familiar with world politics.
My Brain | August 24th, 2012 | America_Right

Posted on 08/24/2012 2:39:24 PM PDT by America_Right

Heya Freepers,

I have a problem. I started writing a book, and I am getting in over my head, here. I am at a point in the notes for the book where the Middle East is broke because oil is pretty much worthless.

Will the Mid East population roll over Europe? Will they get control of European nukes? Will they immediately use those nukes on Israel and the US? What would our reaction be? Would we defend ourselves or try to appease them with more Muslim outreach programs a la NASA? Would Russia and China help us?

Believe it or not, this is just the beginning of an epic sci-fi story. Politics is only important in the first part. With this in mind, I suppose I could take the story far enough into the future that current politics may not even be a factor, but it isn't as fun and poignant.


TOPICS: Books/Literature; Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: conflict; middleeast; nuclear; oil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: mamelukesabre
They would over run africa first. Africa has raw materials and slave-like labor and lots of ground for farming.

Wow, I never even thought of that! It is hard to imagine Africa as having enough resources to be worth taking militarily given their lifestyle.

Keep in mind, I was going to have Europe be taken over without a shot being fired. It seems to me that they are welcoming a Muslim takeover via immigration.

At any rate, Africa just made it into the book. I was just going to use Egypt, but that would be a poor use of MY resources.

21 posted on 08/24/2012 3:45:36 PM PDT by America_Right (Remember, Republicans have a lot more in common with Democrats than they do with Tea Partiers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: America_Right

european colonists didn’t take over africa because it was a waste of time. They colonized africa because there are rich lands there and no one with the organization talent to extract them.


22 posted on 08/24/2012 3:54:44 PM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: America_Right; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; ...

Eurabia will eventually get muzzified, apart from France (I know this is hard to believe); France and Britain have nuclear arsenals they developed and control. I’m not sure any other nation in Europe (apart from the USSR, oops, I mean Russia) have done so. There are US warheads in Europe as part of the NATO defense treaty.


23 posted on 08/24/2012 4:04:46 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 98ZJ USMC
What technological game changer comes about to do that?

THAT is the whole crux - the keystone, if you will, of the story. Can't spoil that for you. :)

24 posted on 08/24/2012 4:21:12 PM PDT by America_Right (Remember, Republicans have a lot more in common with Democrats than they do with Tea Partiers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Rightwing Conspiratr1
Let's play cowboys and muzzies.

You bet!

25 posted on 08/24/2012 4:28:16 PM PDT by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: America_Right

Congratulations on taking the plunge!

One of the great joys of science fiction - as opposed to fantasy - is that it might actually happen...eventually.

As for your particular question, the short answer is “what do you want to happen?” as in “what events would move your plot along towards the climatic conflict and resolution”?

Also for consideration: some new technology that would make oil nearly worthless would (a) not make it completely worthless, as technology adoption is never 100% and (b) may affect certain uses such as fuel more than others such as plastics, and (c) would take a significant time span to alter world economics, with the time required being related to the adoption curve of the new technologies.

Even something as radical as - for example - practical Tesla-style power broadcasting on a global scale - would take time for the information required to use it to propagate across the globe, for vehicles to be adapted, and so on. And of course there’s always an “old guard” that never adapts (Luddites, in the extreme cases, Amish, gasoline-engine fanatics, etc).

So the upset in the middle east - or Texas - would not happen overnight, but would be gradual. Possibly even decades, or more.

The people in charge would most likely see it coming, and vanish/bail/emigrate et al. The huddled masses would most likely remain huddled masses - they simply don’t have the knowledge or resources to migrate elsewhere. Prime fodder for warlords and opportunists, as demonstrated by the current political climate ;)

That being said, I strongly urge you to consider everything suggested in this thread (the thought about Africa is a good one, for example), and then throw it all out and make happen whatever you want to happen.

good luck, and let us know when it’s done!


26 posted on 08/24/2012 4:44:43 PM PDT by CzarChasm (My opinion. No charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: America_Right

Interesting, I think you’ll have fun with this project.

Here’s my $.02 for what its worth:

Most of the Middle East will simply die. The incinerated will linger as a dispersing stench; the irradiated will starve. Jerusalem will be ringed with massive Aegis-style systems firing off from time to time as the surviving Jews hunker down against the odd biomissile launched by fading regional mujahid avenging what was left of the Kaaba. Indonesia starves and self-consumes as the rest of the remaining powers isolate Islam, there no longer being any advantage to pandering to the rabidity of the Faith. China continues to pour engineers and infrastructure resources into sub-Saharan Africa, their occasional genocidal mass killings only opposed by impotent proclamations from a terrified Europe and a self-absorbed United States dying under unsustainable entitlements...


27 posted on 08/24/2012 5:23:02 PM PDT by Robert Teesdale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

Airplanes, ships, trains, and small engines would be hard to operate on anything but petroleum.

I would see oil dropping 50 to 70 percent.


28 posted on 08/24/2012 5:40:43 PM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: CzarChasm
for example - practical Tesla-style power broadcasting on a global scale - would take time for the information required to use it to propagate across the globe, for vehicles to be adapted, and so on.

Bah, you guessed it... Ok, at least some people will know what I am talking about. So much for not spoiling the story. I was planning on having a rather sudden "switch" to the Tesla broadcast after a rather lengthy ramp up to the new grid. Remember the switch to digital TV? Like that, only with more far-reaching implications.

I am definitely using the Africa angle. That was brilliant, as have been some of the other posts on this thread.

I really like the idea of a slow emigration of Mid Easterners. It could (will?) solve the problem of getting the Muslim takeover of Europe underway sooner rather than later.

Thanks for the interest! I will put you on my list of people to email the book to when it is done.

29 posted on 08/24/2012 6:23:37 PM PDT by America_Right (Remember, Republicans have a lot more in common with Democrats than they do with Tea Partiers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
Airplanes, ships, trains, and small engines would be hard to operate on anything but petroleum.

Ships already run on electricity (nuclear). Trains would just need REALLY powerful engines. They would suck down the juice really fast, but with this SCI-FI technology, they will have all the juice they need. I am thinking the same thing with planes. They will have to have a LOT of power, more than could be put into a battery with current technology. However, once again, they will have all the juice they need as long as their "receiver" is intact.

Sci-fi is great. I love playing with tech that isn't available yet, or is just this side of feasible!

30 posted on 08/24/2012 6:33:47 PM PDT by America_Right (Remember, Republicans have a lot more in common with Democrats than they do with Tea Partiers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Robert Teesdale
Interesting, I think you’ll have fun with this project.

Yeah! The only problem, however, is that I have to hold down a full time job while I am writing this. Established writers are lucky to have all the time they need to work on their books.

I like your ideas, and some of them would be really cool (in a bad way) in a real-world scenario, but it kinda screws up the story. Indonesia is just a bucket full of Muslims that will be peacefully invading (immigrating to) Australia and New Zealand. They will serve no other purpose in the book.

31 posted on 08/24/2012 6:46:37 PM PDT by America_Right (Remember, Republicans have a lot more in common with Democrats than they do with Tea Partiers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: America_Right; SampleMan; verum ago
 
 
I'm voting with the above on how the middle-east would disintegrate. You might want to throttle back on the sci-fi tech research and expand on the middle-east - matter of fact it may take up more time to research than all else. There are constants of culture, tribes and religions over there that have never changed and they would fracture right along those lines. The trick would be in determining who would zig and who would zag when they did. As for "immigrants" I think the term refugees would be more fitting since people would be trying to flee the never ending dust-ups and depredation going on. And as ever, there would be bad guys interspersed with the hapless, hoping to hide out while trying to build or continue a conquest in absentia, hoping to gather in and utilize resources from their hosts in order to do so - the most infamous of such European "guests", the Ayatollah Khomeini comes to mind. Guarantee you could come up with a few interesting plot twists.
 
 

32 posted on 08/24/2012 8:42:17 PM PDT by lapsus calami (What's that stink? Code Pink ! ! And their buddy Murtha, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson