Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

51 Headless Vikings Found in English Execution Pit?
National Geographic News ^ | July 28, 2009 | James Owen in London

Posted on 07/28/2009 1:34:43 PM PDT by SunkenCiv

Naked, beheaded, and tangled, the bodies of 51 young men -- their heads stacked neatly to the side -- have been found in a thousand-year-old pit in southern England, according to carbon-dating results released earlier this month. The mass burial took place at a time when the English were battling Viking invaders, say archaeologists who are now trying to verify the identity of the slain. The dead are thought to have been war captives, possibly Vikings, whose heads were hacked off with swords or axes... Many of the skeletons have deep cut marks to the skull and jaw as well as the neck... The bodies show few signs of other trauma, suggesting the men were alive when beheaded. One victim appears to have raised an arm in self-defense: "The hand appears to have had its fingers sliced through," Score noted... Unusually, no trace of clothing has been found, indicating the men were buried naked. Even if their weapons and valuables had been taken "we should have found bone buttons and things like that, but to date we've got absolutely nothing," Score said... The burial has been radiocarbon-dated to between A.D. 890 and 1034... The team hopes chemical analysis of the buried men's teeth will show whether they grew up in Britain or Scandinavia... There was little to differentiate Vikings and early English warriors on the battlefield, said Siddorn, founder of Regia Anglorum, a historical-reenactment society... Both used spears as their primary weapons, with swords and axes as backups, Siddorn added... "During the height of the Viking raids, it's reasonable to say it was unsafe to live anywhere within 20 miles [32 kilometers] of the coast."

(Excerpt) Read more at news.nationalgeographic.com ...


TOPICS: History; Science; Travel
KEYWORDS: alfredthegreat; ancientautopsies; canute; danegeld; danelaw; dorset; godsgravesglyphs; gudrum; hardraada; knut; stamfordbridge; unitedkingdom; vikings
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: SunkenCiv

The vikings must have tried to force nationalized health care against the will of the people.


41 posted on 07/28/2009 3:31:09 PM PDT by ThE_RiPpEr.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
"Fetch me my axe, dear."

42 posted on 07/28/2009 3:42:44 PM PDT by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570

Went snoozin’ after cruisin’ and wound up losin’ their heads.


43 posted on 07/28/2009 3:46:29 PM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
I guess they were so afraid of those Viking dudes raising from the dead and killing them in their sleep that they cut their heads off just to make sure :o)

Someone que the VIKING KITTYS!

44 posted on 07/28/2009 3:49:00 PM PDT by Jmouse007 (tot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Deb

The Isle of Man was rediscovered by Vikings; it was already occupied long before that. :’)


45 posted on 07/28/2009 3:57:06 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Busywhiskers

And they didn’t have panties back then.


46 posted on 07/28/2009 4:01:16 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Monkey Face

The Viking invasions (which included the reign of Canute / Knut; his father Svein Forkbeard spent 20 years in Denmark preparing his conquest, and died just before it began) went on for a few hundred years, peaked early, and finally ran out of gas in 1066 (the Battle of Stamford Bridge). What it did was unify the seven kingdoms and motivate their kings to build what may have been the best national army in Europe (again, until 1066; of course, waiting a few days, or maybe a couple of weeks, for mustering to complete, probably would have made the difference at Hastings, when Harold II fell to William the Usurper/the Bastard/the Conqueror).


47 posted on 07/28/2009 4:08:04 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

If I hear “What’s in your wallet?” one more time, I’d do the whole bunch myself with a rusty shovel.


48 posted on 07/28/2009 4:10:46 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

bttt


49 posted on 07/28/2009 4:11:25 PM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

Thanks!


50 posted on 07/28/2009 4:13:51 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Yah. It’s all in the book and my genealogy.


51 posted on 07/28/2009 4:14:17 PM PDT by Monkey Face (RUN, SARAH, RUN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

Whoops, Svein lived to invade England, then died right after. :’o


52 posted on 07/28/2009 4:15:09 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
The Battle of Hastings would probably have been differnet if Harold hadn't had to force march his troops across England after beating up the first invasion...
53 posted on 07/28/2009 4:44:48 PM PDT by Mmogamer (<This space for lease>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; shibumi

Being Irish, Scots, Welsh and Danish, I find myself feeling rather conflicted regarding this.

[bloody Sassenachs!]


54 posted on 07/28/2009 5:47:05 PM PDT by Salamander (Cursed with Second Sight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

“The past is something, we all have some / universal history is a bundle of fun...” — Incredible String Band

My only Danish connection may be confectionery ;’) but basically it’s difficult to tell. I’m English with Scottish and a tad Welsh (one side) with German, Irish, Dutch, Jewish, and who knows what (the other), plus there’s always surprises in the family trees and nowadays in the DNA. ;’)


55 posted on 07/28/2009 5:54:19 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Mmogamer

Agreed.


56 posted on 07/28/2009 5:54:43 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Busywhiskers
Were the Brits to exert the same vigor the repelling the muslim hordes as they did with the Vikings, perhaps the civilized world could survive another 1,000 years.
57 posted on 07/28/2009 5:56:54 PM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
Well the old Britons wouldn't have hesitated repelling the Mohammedan hordes...
58 posted on 07/28/2009 6:00:02 PM PDT by Mmogamer (<This space for lease>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Reckon they shoulda been content with Danelaw.

Saxons could be pretty obtuse as a peoples but being one of them I hold them dearly.

what an irony...fight those pesky raiders for 100s of years and then in 1066 they just waltzed right in under another name and took over forever....more or less though the Saxon bloodline did sneak back in with Henry II’s momma.

oh well brutal necessities of brutal times

there is a story of a Viking King who is captured by the Saxons and as they are about to roast him alive he declares defiantly something like “laugh now because even though the boar is in a pickle when my little piglets hear of this they will surely squeal...and squeal;

he had several sons who all henceforth waged war on the Saxon lands brutally and whose greatgrandchild was ultimately William the Conquerer who as mentioned above waltzed in with a new fancy name

59 posted on 07/28/2009 6:15:05 PM PDT by wardaddy (ASAP, as southern as possible.......Sarah Palin, i love you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monkey Face
.and the Brits claim to be “civilized.

these weren't truly Britons, the Saxons had killed most of them off or intercopulated them baring Wales and other extremities...these were more precisely Saxons in Sussex.....lol...i know

guess these unlucky fellers had come in too far from shore and been outnumbered and shown some Saxon "mercy"

must have been a lot of Saxons because Vikings were indeed hell on wheels or more accurately hell on Draakars.

some of these Viking raids came from the northeast of Britain where Vikings lived as farmer Danes but not this bunch too far south and too close to the coast....Vikings went everywhere friggin where but never really settled for long except Danelaw where they finally just faded into the soup.

60 posted on 07/28/2009 6:28:31 PM PDT by wardaddy (ASAP, as southern as possible.......Sarah Palin, i love you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson