Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China Sees Iran Forming Anti-American Axis
China Confidential ^ | July 29, 2006 | Andre Pachter

Posted on 07/28/2006 7:49:25 PM PDT by RickBrant

Allah's Axis?

China's Middle East experts--led by Liu Yazhou, a Lieutenant General and Deputy Political Commissar in the People's Liberation Army Air Force--are apparently convinced that Iran is close to creating a new alliance in the Middle East that will unite Shiite and Sunni Muslims in an Islamist-led struggle against Israel and the United States. Grouping Shiite Iran with its Lebanese Shiite proxy, Hezbollah, the Sunni Palestinians and Syria and Shiite-controlled Iraq, the new anti-American axis, or bloc, would have widespread support throughout the region.

In China's view, the currents of power in the Middle East are about to change. Hezbollah's leader, Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, is fast emerging as a popular folk hero. His army's ability to hold out against Israel for more than two weeks is inspiring the proverbial Arab street--as well as Arab artists and intellectuals--in a manner not seen since Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser electrified the Middle East--and the Third World--by nationalizing the Suez Canal....

(Excerpt) Read more at chinaconfidential.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: china; dumbass; idiot; iran; israel; moron; retard; russia; terrorism; troll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 07/28/2006 7:49:27 PM PDT by RickBrant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RickBrant

This suggests the US may have to finish the job.


2 posted on 07/28/2006 7:52:51 PM PDT by brivette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RickBrant
Iran is desperate.

....and for good reason.

Their time is almost up.

3 posted on 07/28/2006 7:54:29 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RickBrant

What I can't seem to understand, and maybe it's our own intel at work, is why we seem to be weaker(?) now that we have Iraq and Afgan under control. Spell me this.


4 posted on 07/28/2006 7:54:55 PM PDT by brivette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RickBrant

Shiites and Sunnis can't get along for a long enough time to form any kind of strong alliance.


5 posted on 07/28/2006 7:56:03 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Everybody's entitled to my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brivette

Somebody's going to have to finish it. If Nasrullah is becoming a hero to the "Arab street," it just shows you how stupid that street really is. And how vicious. At some point, somebody somewhere is going to have to simply make it so awful for them to follow nuts like Nasrullah that they won't even think of it.


6 posted on 07/28/2006 7:56:07 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

I saw your map. I shall say no more.


7 posted on 07/28/2006 7:56:31 PM PDT by brivette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Actually, when it comes to hating us, they seem to be allied just fine. Osama has even called on his rivals to join with him, and I think our reliance on the hatred of various Islamic factions for each other is very much mistaken. The enemy of my enemy is my friend, and all that.


8 posted on 07/28/2006 7:57:58 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: livius

Yes, indeed. I hope we've learned from the Marine deaths in Lebanon, some 20 years ago.


9 posted on 07/28/2006 8:00:13 PM PDT by brivette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: brivette

We should have done it then and we didn't. In fact, there were several other occasions when a fierce response would have been warranted, but we didn't respond at all, and this only encouraged them.


10 posted on 07/28/2006 8:03:07 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RickBrant
Welcome to FR.
I notice you're posting from tomorrow.
What part of the world are you in, if you don't mind me asking?
11 posted on 07/28/2006 8:03:32 PM PDT by kanawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius

I'm no expert. I just found this interesting. Actually, the previous article is more interesting and alarming. It says Iran is escalating the conflict through Hezbollah and trying to drag Syria into the fighting while continuing secret work on nuclear weapons development. The Iranian regime is clearly a determined, vicious enemy that must be defeated. End Islamism before it ends us!


12 posted on 07/28/2006 8:04:23 PM PDT by RickBrant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kanawa

In Tokyo lost in in translation....


13 posted on 07/28/2006 8:05:54 PM PDT by RickBrant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RickBrant

Russia and Putin also see this....

Russia and China know that the terrorism won't be directed towards them. The terrorists know that Russia and China don't play with kid gloves, unlike the west.


14 posted on 07/28/2006 8:07:34 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RickBrant

Good, maybe we can start doing this war correctly by not holding back.

I said before, I would be a terrible soldier and prosecuted for war crimes if I was fighting in the Mid East. If a bullet was shot at my group from a building or town the whole town would be bombed, burned, bulldozed and bleached with gasoline.


15 posted on 07/28/2006 8:07:56 PM PDT by Porterville (Hispanic Republican American Bush Supporter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius

I the US and it's (so called) allies, are succesful in uniting anti-western feelings, we may have a new definition of world war 3 on our hands; btw, i voted for bush.


16 posted on 07/28/2006 8:09:49 PM PDT by brivette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RickBrant
In China's view, the currents of power in the Middle East are about to change. Hezbollah's leader, Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, is fast emerging as a popular folk hero. His army's ability to hold out against Israel for more than two weeks is inspiring the proverbial Arab street--as well as Arab artists and intellectuals--in a manner not seen since Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser electrified the Middle East--and the Third World--by nationalizing the Suez Canal....

Oh come on dude, Nasrallah's "Army" is a bunch of murderers hiding behind civilians armed with a bunch of high tech rockets that they don't build. About any gang could hold out for 2 weeks.

As long as Condi doesn't pull the rug out from under them, Israel will eventually remind the Arab "street" why they don't put on uniforms and fight the IDF like men.

This "expert" needs to deliver the Kung Pao chicken ,and leave the analysis to real experts.

17 posted on 07/28/2006 8:18:09 PM PDT by lawnguy (Give me some of your tots!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Don't forget the truth of the old adage: the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Differences have been put aside to promote the international terrorist jihad against the West.

The Chicoms follow a long Communist tradition of exploiting these sectarian and regional interest groups to serve as their proxies against their principal global opponents - us!

It's not even too far fetched to think of the Chicoms or North Koreans aiding and abetting Iran's nuclear quest. It's already been documented by the Israelis that some of Hezbollah's arsenal originated in China.


18 posted on 07/28/2006 8:21:11 PM PDT by T.L.Sink (stopew)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RickBrant

Iran has ALWAYS been the heart of this beast, and ALWAYS the main objective. Since 1979.

Their demise will happen overnight.


19 posted on 07/28/2006 8:25:58 PM PDT by Spruce (Keep your mitts off my wallet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Porterville
Ah, yes but then you would be guilty of something that's just not tolerated out of the Western civilization at present. You'd be fighting to win not hearts and minds, but the war. Look at the US major military engagement record since the WWII, the last time we played for keeps.

Korean War: Tied, almost one but interference from Communist China without an appropriate response resulted in a tie.

Vietnam: Tactical tie, political loss. Too much civilian oversight and the US and RVN troops not being allowed to fight to win i.e. smash the North's army and infrastructure. (China was a principle cause we failed here as well.)

1991 Gulf War: Tactical Victory, stopped after freeing Kuwait because we were being too hard on the Iraqis. Leaving Saddam in charge was a costly mistake.

GWOT: How do I put this? I don't think we'll ever win their hearts and minds and only a fool negotiates with someone that hateful. So that leaves a total war victory or eventual defeat. I fear we are not fighting a total war.

Funny China is saying this though. I think the smoke behind all these mirrors is coming from the pit of a red dragon.
20 posted on 07/28/2006 8:27:41 PM PDT by Hawk1976 (Borders. Language. Culture. AAA-0. Free Travis Mcgee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson