Skip to comments.
Congress May Bring Back The Draft
The Partisan ^
| Nick
Posted on 08/01/2010 7:48:14 PM PDT by citizenredstater9271
On July 15, 2010, Democrat Charles Rangle introduced a piece of legislation into Congress that would basically reinstate the draft (compulsory military service). H.R. 5741 will give the President of the United States the power to require all American citizens between the ages of 18 and 42 to perform either military service or civilian service in the interests of "national defense and homeland security." It would also give him the power to require citizens to join the military during wartime to meet the manpower needs of the military.
In February 2009, President Barack Obama asked Congress to send him a bipartisan bill in favor of "national service." Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel outline a plan similar to H.R. 5741 in his book The Plan.
Under this new legislation, nearly every American will be forced into two years of military or security service. Even conscientious objectors will be unable to avoid this new draft. Instead, they would have to choose noncombatant or civilian service, which will be defined by the President.
(Excerpt) Read more at partisan-news.blogspot.com ...
TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: 2012; 2kooky; 4thecommongood; 4themarxistgood; acorn; army; bho44; bhocommunism; bhofascism; bhomarxism; bhusseinfascism; bhusseinobama; charlesrangel; chickenhawk; comenovember; communist; congress; democrats; dnc; dncbrownshirts; dnccommunism; dncmarxism; dnctalkingpoints; donttreadonme; draft; ethics; fascism; governmenttakeover; hussein; husseinfascism; liberalfascism; liberalkoolaid; marx; marxism; military; militarydraft; moralabsolutes; nannystate; nobama; obamafascism; obamarxism; obamathefascist; obamathekenyan; obamathemuslim; obamathesocialist; obamavoters; prayers; rangel; rangelfascism; roadtosocialism; socialism; socialists; standwithourtroops; statesrights; supportourtroops; supportwar; takehimout2012; teaparties; troops; victoryinafghanistan; victoryiniraq; war; waronterror; welcome2socialism; whoisjohngalt; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-145 next last
This is a commie blog so I don't exactly trust it. However it is something of note Rangel might bring back the draft.
To: citizenredstater9271
If Obama does, the hippies will scream for his impeachment.
2
posted on
08/01/2010 7:49:35 PM PDT
by
Niuhuru
(The Internet is the digital AIDS; adapting and successfully destroying the MSM host.)
To: Niuhuru
3
posted on
08/01/2010 7:50:31 PM PDT
by
wally_bert
(It's sheer elegance in its simplicity! - The Middleman)
To: citizenredstater9271
However it is something of note Rangel might bring back the draft. No, Rangel will introduce a bill which if passed would bring back the draft. He's done this a number of times in past sessions, and the bill goes nowhere. This one will do the same.
4
posted on
08/01/2010 7:53:47 PM PDT
by
Abin Sur
To: Niuhuru
LOL the same hippies and limousine liberals who put him in office.
To: citizenredstater9271
lol
man this just keeps getting better and better, I have never seen a polical party so focused on losing power.
To: citizenredstater9271
Not going to happen. ...unless the Dems want to lose every election between between now and doomsday.
7
posted on
08/01/2010 7:55:33 PM PDT
by
Mr. Mojo
To: TexasFreeper2009
draft who
like to see all the hip hops under obama
8
posted on
08/01/2010 7:56:03 PM PDT
by
truthbetold11
(truthbetold11)
To: citizenredstater9271
Idiots didn’t realize that THEY and theirs would end up getting sent to the front.
9
posted on
08/01/2010 7:56:31 PM PDT
by
Niuhuru
(The Internet is the digital AIDS; adapting and successfully destroying the MSM host.)
To: citizenredstater9271
Even the Democrats aren’t that stupid. If they do institute a draft, it’ll be for Mr. Obama’s Civilian National Security Force.
10
posted on
08/01/2010 7:56:54 PM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(No. Try not. Do... or do not. There is no try. ~Master Yoda)
To: citizenredstater9271
A precursor to the start of Obambie’s civilian storm troopers,
kind of like The Red Guard?
11
posted on
08/01/2010 7:57:00 PM PDT
by
AlexW
To: All
Rangel has been trying to bring back the draft for a long time. Here’s his try in 2003.
WASHINGTON (CNN) — Rep. Charles Rangel introduced a bill in Congress Tuesday to reinstate the military draft, saying fighting forces should more closely reflect the economic makeup of the nation.
http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/01/07/rangel.draft/
12
posted on
08/01/2010 7:57:35 PM PDT
by
Gertie
To: citizenredstater9271
If I ever Lock & Load again, it will NOT be under the command of that Commie Tripe.
Some of us are quiet peaceful citizens who are armed and know how to use them. From my cold dead hands, FUBO.
13
posted on
08/01/2010 7:57:45 PM PDT
by
Texas Fossil
(Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.)
To: Niuhuru
They would never make it to the front ... bullet in the back for immediate discharge
14
posted on
08/01/2010 7:57:49 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Dem voters, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when deceived.)
To: MHGinTN
I am still wondering what they would actually do with 8 million people (4 million births per year x 2 years required “service”).
I’ll bet the moron hasn’t thought that through yet.
15
posted on
08/01/2010 7:59:32 PM PDT
by
gthog61
To: citizenredstater9271
RANGEL has been talking about a DRAFT for YEARS... “Them RICH WHITE BOYS going FIRST”
16
posted on
08/01/2010 7:59:33 PM PDT
by
gwilhelm56
(I'm so Right Wing, my symbol is not the Elephant ...it is the ... WOOLLY MAMMOTH!!)
To: Texas Fossil
If I ever Lock & Load again, it will NOT be under the command of that Commie Tripe.
Same here.
FUBO!!
17
posted on
08/01/2010 8:00:04 PM PDT
by
unkus
To: Abin Sur
He's done this a number of times in past sessions, and the bill goes nowhere. This one will do the same. Agreed. Rangel has been pulling this same stunt almost since 2003 or so. What was really shameful was that during Bush's presidency, Rangel kept insisting with a straight face that only the poor & minorities were dying on the front lines in Iraq because the U.S. economy was so bad they had no choice but to join the military.
I seriously think that the Democratic symbol should now be a 99-cent Store Economy Tool Set. What a bunch of Useless Tools...
18
posted on
08/01/2010 8:01:27 PM PDT
by
kromike
To: citizenredstater9271
While Congress could reinstate the draft as it is empowered to maintain the military, compulsory civilian service is slavery, and is unconstitutional.
Of course, none of this matters, as "the first black president wants to reinstate slavery." (This is not my quote, I just heard it somewhere and am repeating it).
I would also imagine that our military isn't interested in reinstating the draft, as the only people they would get would be the same ones they got during the last draft, that is, all the people who were not rich enough, well-connected enough, or daft enough to escape the draft. Sad to say, these are not the kinds of people that we want to be motivating to do something they don't want to do.
19
posted on
08/01/2010 8:01:50 PM PDT
by
pnh102
(Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
To: citizenredstater9271
Considering all the bums... and all the poverty pimps that collect bums for power... not a terrible idea.
20
posted on
08/01/2010 8:02:27 PM PDT
by
Porterville
( I have come here to chew bubble gum and kick ass, and I'm all out of bubble gum)
To: citizenredstater9271
Rangel brings this up about every 2 years.
and then he votes against it.
21
posted on
08/01/2010 8:03:07 PM PDT
by
digger48
To: gthog61
It isn’t supposed to be a sensible law, just meant to create as much division among the American people as they can raise. Democrats are criminal scum. They manipulate to remain in power.
22
posted on
08/01/2010 8:03:16 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(Dem voters, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when deceived.)
To: citizenredstater9271
23
posted on
08/01/2010 8:05:11 PM PDT
by
Texas Fossil
(Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.)
To: Gertie
Congress lost me a long time ago.
24
posted on
08/01/2010 8:05:22 PM PDT
by
Ciexyz
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Even the Democrats arent that stupid. If they do institute a draft, itll be for Mr. Obamas Civilian National Security Force.
Yes, two years of additional socialist training and development of community organizing skills. Brown shirts will be supplied...or are they purple?
To: citizenredstater9271
...two years of military or security service. ... they would have to choose noncombatant or civilian service, which will be defined by the President. Civilian security service, as defined by the President. Gee, would they get to wear brown shirts and knee-high leather boots too? NFW hussein, NFW.
26
posted on
08/01/2010 8:06:56 PM PDT
by
ThunderSleeps
(obama out now! I'll keep my money, my guns, and my freedom - you can keep the change.)
To: citizenredstater9271
I support Obama 100%. It would obviously jack up his ratings in short course, this whole country is just anxious to be armed and looking for a battle.
I am 53 but if I get some of that Just for men hair color I can pass for 42.
I want to be a tanker.
27
posted on
08/01/2010 8:06:56 PM PDT
by
Eye of Unk
("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act" G.Orwell)
To: citizenredstater9271
111th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 5741To require all persons in the United States between the ages of 18 and 42 to perform national service, either as a member of the uniformed services or in civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, to authorize the induction of persons in the uniformed services during wartime to meet end-strength requirements of the uniformed services, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
July 15, 2010
Mr. RANGEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services
A BILLTo require all persons in the United States between the ages of 18 and 42 to perform national service, either as a member of the uniformed services or in civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, to authorize the induction of persons in the uniformed services during wartime to meet end-strength requirements of the uniformed services, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.
(a) Short Title- This Act may be cited as the `Universal National Service Act'.
(b) Table of Contents- The table of contents for this Act is as follows:
Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
TITLE I--NATIONAL SERVICE
Sec. 102. National service obligation.
Sec. 103. Induction to perform national service.
Sec. 104. Two-year period of national service.
Sec. 105. Implementation by the President.
Sec. 106. Examination and classification of persons.
Sec. 107. Deferments and postponements.
Sec. 108. Induction exemptions.
Sec. 109. Conscientious objection.
Sec. 110. Discharge following national service.
TITLE II--AMENDMENTS TO MILITARY SELECTIVE SERVICE ACT
Sec. 201. Registration of females.
Sec. 202. Registration and induction authority.
TITLE I--NATIONAL SERVICE
SEC. 101. DEFINITIONS.
(1) The term `contingency operation' has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(13) of title 10, United States Code.
(2) The term `military service' means service performed as a member of an active or reserve component of the uniformed services.
(3) The term `national service' means military service or service in a civilian capacity that, as determined by the President, promotes the national defense, including national or community service and service related to homeland security.
(4) The term `Secretary concerned' means the Secretary of Defense with respect to the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps, the Secretary of Homeland Security with respect to the Coast Guard, the Secretary of Commerce, with respect to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the Secretary of Health and Human Services, with respect to the Public Health Service.
(5) The term `United States', when used in a geographical sense, means the several States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and Guam.
(6) The term `uniformed services' means the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, commissioned corps of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and commissioned corps of the Public Health Service.
SEC. 102. NATIONAL SERVICE OBLIGATION.
(a) Obligation for Service- It is the obligation of every citizen of the United States, and every other person residing in the United States, who is between the ages of 18 and 42 to perform a period of national service as prescribed in this title unless exempted under the provisions of this title.
(b) Forms of National Service- The national service obligation under this title shall be performed either--
(1) as a member of an active or reserve component of the uniformed services; or
(2) in a civilian capacity that, as determined by the President, promotes the national defense, including national or community service and service related to homeland security.
(c) Age Limits- A person may be inducted under this title only if the person has attained the age of 18 and has not attained the age of 42.
SEC. 103. INDUCTION TO PERFORM NATIONAL SERVICE.
(a) Induction Requirements- The President shall provide for the induction of persons described in section 102(a) to perform their national service obligation.
(b) Limitation on Induction for Military Service- Persons described in section 102(a) may be inducted to perform military service only if--
(1) a declaration of war is in effect;
(2) the President declares a national emergency, which the President determines necessitates the induction of persons to perform military service, and immediately informs Congress of the reasons for the declaration and the need to induct persons for military service; or
(3) members of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps are engaged in a contingency operation pursuant to a congressional authorization for the use of military force.
(c) Limitation on Number of Persons Inducted for Military Service- When the induction of persons for military service is authorized by subsection (b), the President shall determine the number of persons described in section 102(a) whose national service obligation is to be satisfied through military service based on--
(1) the authorized end strengths of the uniformed services;
(2) the feasibility of the uniformed services to recruit sufficient volunteers to achieve such end-strength levels; and
(3) provide a mechanism for the random selection of persons to be inducted to perform military service.
(d) Selection for Induction-
(1) RANDOM SELECTION FOR MILITARY SERVICE- When the induction of persons for military service is authorized by subsection (b), the President shall utilize a mechanism for the random selection of persons to be inducted to perform military service.
(2) CIVILIAN SERVICE- Persons described in section 102(a) who do not volunteer to perform military service or are not inducted for military service shall perform their national service obligation in a civilian capacity pursuant to section 102(b)(2).
(e) Voluntary Service- A person subject to induction under this title may--
(1) volunteer to perform national service in lieu of being inducted; or
(2) request permission to be inducted at a time other than the time at which the person is otherwise called for induction.
SEC. 104. TWO-YEAR PERIOD OF NATIONAL SERVICE.
(a) General Rule- Except as otherwise provided in this section, the period of national service performed by a person under this title shall be two years.
(b) Grounds for Extension- At the discretion of the President, the period of military service for a member of the uniformed services under this title may be extended--
(1) with the consent of the member, for the purpose of furnishing hospitalization, medical, or surgical care for injury or illness incurred in line of duty; or
(2) for the purpose of requiring the member to compensate for any time lost to training for any cause.
(c) Early Termination- The period of national service for a person under this title shall be terminated before the end of such period under the following circumstances:
(1) The voluntary enlistment and active service of the person in an active or reserve component of the uniformed services for a period of at least two years, in which case the period of basic military training and education actually served by the person shall be counted toward the term of enlistment.
(2) The admission and service of the person as a cadet or midshipman at the United States Military Academy, the United States Naval Academy, the United States Air Force Academy, the Coast Guard Academy, or the United States Merchant Marine Academy.
(3) The enrollment and service of the person in an officer candidate program, if the person has signed an agreement to accept a Reserve commission in the appropriate service with an obligation to serve on active duty if such a commission is offered upon completion of the program.
(4) Such other grounds as the President may establish.
SEC. 105. IMPLEMENTATION BY THE PRESIDENT.
(a) In General- The President shall prescribe such regulations as are necessary to carry out this title.
(b) Matter To Be Covered by Regulations- Such regulations shall include specification of the following:
(1) The types of civilian service that may be performed in order for a person to satisfy the person's national service obligation under this title.
(2) Standards for satisfactory performance of civilian service and of penalties for failure to perform civilian service satisfactorily.
(3) The manner in which persons shall be selected for induction under this title, including the manner in which those selected will be notified of such selection.
(4) All other administrative matters in connection with the induction of persons under this title and the registration, examination, and classification of such persons.
(5) A means to determine questions or claims with respect to inclusion for, or exemption or deferment from induction under this title, including questions of conscientious objection.
(6) Standards for compensation and benefits for persons performing their national service obligation under this title through civilian service.
(7) Such other matters as the President determines necessary to carry out this title.
(c) Use of Prior Act- To the extent determined appropriate by the President, the President may use for purposes of this title the procedures provided in the Military Selective Service Act (50 U.S.C. App. 451 et seq.), including procedures for registration, selection, and induction.
SEC. 106. EXAMINATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF PERSONS.
(a) Examination- Every person subject to induction under this title shall, before induction, be physically and mentally examined and shall be classified as to fitness to perform national service.
(b) Different Classification Standards- The President may apply different classification standards for fitness for military service and fitness for civilian service.
SEC. 107. DEFERMENTS AND POSTPONEMENTS.
(a) High School Students- A person who is pursuing a standard course of study, on a full-time basis, in a secondary school or similar institution of learning shall be entitled to have induction under this title postponed until the person--
(1) obtains a high school diploma;
(2) ceases to pursue satisfactorily such course of study; or
(3) attains the age of 20.
(b) Hardship and Disability- Deferments from national service under this title may be made for--
(2) physical or mental disability.
(c) Training Capacity- The President may postpone or suspend the induction of persons for military service under this title as necessary to limit the number of persons receiving basic military training and education to the maximum number that can be adequately trained.
(d) Termination- No deferment or postponement of induction under this title shall continue after the cause of such deferment or postponement ceases.
SEC. 108. INDUCTION EXEMPTIONS.
(a) Qualifications- No person may be inducted for military service under this title unless the person is acceptable to the Secretary concerned for training and meets the same health and physical qualifications applicable under section 505 of title 10, United States Code, to persons seeking original enlistment in a regular component of the Armed Forces.
(b) Other Military Service- No person shall be liable for induction under this title who--
(1) is serving, or has served honorably for at least six months, in any component of the uniformed services on active duty; or
(2) is or becomes a cadet or midshipman at the United States Military Academy, the United States Naval Academy, the United States Air Force Academy, the Coast Guard Academy, the United States Merchant Marine Academy, a midshipman of a Navy accredited State maritime academy, a member of the Senior Reserve Officers' Training Corps, or the naval aviation college program, so long as that person satisfactorily continues in and completes at least two years training therein.
SEC. 109. CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION.
(a) Claims as Conscientious Objector- Nothing in this title shall be construed to require a person to be subject to combatant training and service in the uniformed services, if that person, by reason of sincerely held moral, ethical, or religious beliefs, is conscientiously opposed to participation in war in any form.
(b) Alternative Noncombatant or Civilian Service- A person who claims exemption from combatant training and service under subsection (a) and whose claim is sustained by the local board shall--
(1) be assigned to noncombatant service (as defined by the President), if the person is inducted into the uniformed services; or
(2) be ordered by the local board, if found to be conscientiously opposed to participation in such noncombatant service, to perform national civilian service for the period specified in section 104(a) and subject to such regulations as the President may prescribe.
SEC. 110. DISCHARGE FOLLOWING NATIONAL SERVICE.
(a) Discharge- Upon completion or termination of the obligation to perform national service under this title, a person shall be discharged from the uniformed services or from civilian service, as the case may be, and shall not be subject to any further service under this title.
(b) Coordination With Other Authorities- Nothing in this section shall limit or prohibit the call to active service in the uniformed services of any person who is a member of a regular or reserve component of the uniformed services.
TITLE II--AMENDMENTS TO MILITARY SELECTIVE SERVICE ACT
SEC. 201. REGISTRATION OF FEMALES.
(a) Registration Required- Section 3(a) of the Military Selective Service Act (50 U.S.C. 453(a)) is amended--
(1) by striking `male' both places it appears;
(2) by inserting `or herself' after `himself'; and
(3) by striking `he' and inserting `the person'.
(b) Conforming Amendment- Section 16(a) of the Military Selective Service Act (50 U.S.C. App. 466(a)) is amended by striking `men' and inserting `persons'.
SEC. 202. REGISTRATION AND INDUCTION AUTHORITY.
(a) Registration- Section 4 of the Military Selective Service Act (50 U.S.C. App. 454) is amended by inserting after subsection (g) the following new subsection:
`(h) This section does not apply with respect to the induction of persons into the Armed Forces pursuant to the Universal National Service Act.'.
(b) Induction- Section 17(c) of the Military Selective Service Act (50 U.S.C. App. 467(c)) is amended by striking `now or hereafter' and all that follows through the period at the end and inserting `inducted pursuant to the Universal National Service Act.'.
28
posted on
08/01/2010 8:07:42 PM PDT
by
Texas Fossil
(Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.)
To: citizenredstater9271
Go for it, I threw out my draft card 47 years ago!
29
posted on
08/01/2010 8:09:30 PM PDT
by
dalereed
To: Gertie
Rangle has no clue. While it serves some lofty libtard goal of conscripting the children of the wealthy and not so well off equally, he wants to eliminate the idea that conscripts do not perform as well as volunteers.
30
posted on
08/01/2010 8:10:38 PM PDT
by
Ouderkirk
(Democrats...the party of Slavery, Segregation, Sodomy, and Sedition)
To: Niuhuru
Its great that conservatives and progressive hippie pinkos are getting united against the president.
31
posted on
08/01/2010 8:11:54 PM PDT
by
Munson
To: citizenredstater9271
No they won’t. This election is going to kick their butts hard enough already. Rangle keeps introducing this bill to prove some point that nobody cares about, but it’ll never pass. Not unless they actually find a majority in Congress that want to retire.
32
posted on
08/01/2010 8:13:34 PM PDT
by
discostu
(like a dog being shown a card trick)
To: citizenredstater9271
Charlie the Crook has been trying to do this for years. I don’t see it going anywhere this time either. Especially when the boy already has a ton of ethics problems he is going to have to deal with.
33
posted on
08/01/2010 8:14:33 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Ich bin ein illegal alien! - Barry Obama standing up with Central and South America against Arizona.)
To: citizenredstater9271
congress better bring back sanity.with reid claiming to have saved ford motors , jackson lee praising south vietnam and pelosi claiming 500 billion jobs would have been lost if not for the bail out...we got a big problem with BOZO’s in DC
34
posted on
08/01/2010 8:14:37 PM PDT
by
dalebert
To: citizenredstater9271
(3) The term `national service' means military service or service in a civilian capacity that,
as determined by the President, promotes the national defense, including national or community service and service related to homeland security.
--
SEC. 105. IMPLEMENTATION BY THE PRESIDENT.
(a) In General- The President shall prescribe such regulations as are necessary to carry out this title.
35
posted on
08/01/2010 8:16:08 PM PDT
by
Texas Fossil
(Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.)
To: dalereed
It is supposed to be mandatory for ppl between 18-42. Gov. taking over your life. Welcome to socailism. Too bad the kid who posted this doesnt get that.
To: Texas Fossil
More BHO fascism for you.
To: citizenredstater9271
This bill is not a request born out of need, or even want, on the side of the military. It’s born out of jealousy and malice so Rangel can force “the rich kids” into the military.
38
posted on
08/01/2010 8:18:36 PM PDT
by
Personal Responsibility
(The problem isn't that 1% of muslims are terrorists. The problem is 99% of terrorists are muslim)
To: citizenredstater9271
Commie blog or not, this wouldn’t surprise me one bit. Dear leader’s going to need his own goon squads soon if he keeps up his antics.
39
posted on
08/01/2010 8:19:25 PM PDT
by
RWB Patriot
("My ability is a value that must be purchased and I don't recognize anyone's need as a claim on me.")
To: Eye of Unk
I want to be a tanker.Hell my previous 10 yrs with Uncle Sugar taught me that Supply Sergeant is the slot to get.
Recreation Facility Management is also a good one for those of us getting a bit 'long in the tooth'...;)
As always...RLTW!
40
posted on
08/01/2010 8:19:40 PM PDT
by
Tainan
(Cogito, ergo conservatus)
To: citizenredstater9271
41
posted on
08/01/2010 8:19:51 PM PDT
by
Texas Fossil
(Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.)
To: Gertie
Rep. Charles Rangel introduced a bill in Congress Tuesday to reinstate the military draft, saying fighting forces should more closely reflect the economic makeup of the nation.Yeah that's one version of the verbiage he has used in the past. Another is along the lines that if rich white men have to send their kids off to war along with the people of color who can't get into college they'll be less likely to start wars or some such drivel....
42
posted on
08/01/2010 8:19:54 PM PDT
by
ExSoldier
(Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
To: citizenredstater9271
The 18 - 24 age group is already losing that magical feeling, if this goes through it will be a full fledged Indian Uprising
43
posted on
08/01/2010 8:22:38 PM PDT
by
Foolsgold
(L I B Lacking in Brains)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
itll be for Mr. Obamas Civilian National Security Force.Exactly right.. and I'm sure they have designs of putting our men and women under Interpol command as they try to enforce Fascist multiculturalism and flat earth environmentalism. The truth is the real leftist yearns for and would love to join a brown shirt squad.
44
posted on
08/01/2010 8:23:45 PM PDT
by
Track9
(Liberals are cruel hateful people who think they pass as respectable citizens.)
To: Abin Sur
No, Rangel will introduce a bill which if passed would bring back the draft. He's done this a number of times in past sessions, and the bill goes nowhere. This one will do the same. Exactly. The military doesn't even have the machinations in place to deal with an army of conscripts. The entire process of how the military trains, motivates and leads soldiers would have to be retooled from the top down to deal effectively with legions of draftees that don't want to be there.
And would the military even want conscripts? Short answer, they don't. Even with an all-volunteer service, the military is today turning away prospective recruits. The ranks are full.
45
posted on
08/01/2010 8:29:14 PM PDT
by
Drew68
To: Tainan
LOL
I once dated a girl that served the airforce. Her entire responsibility...YOU WILL NEVER GUESS.
She designed programs and invitations to retiring officer parties. Oh, and also weddings.
46
posted on
08/01/2010 8:31:16 PM PDT
by
mamelukesabre
(Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
To: Personal Responsibility
This bill is not a request born out of need, or even want, on the side of the military. Its born out of jealousy and malice so Rangel can force the rich kids into the military.And Rangel is going to find himself an "Army of One" trying to get this through congress.
It's never going to happen.
47
posted on
08/01/2010 8:31:25 PM PDT
by
Drew68
To: MHGinTN
That’s a good take on it. A lot of common sense.
48
posted on
08/01/2010 8:31:28 PM PDT
by
Track9
(Liberals are cruel hateful people who think they pass as respectable citizens.)
To: citizenredstater9271
Rangel introduces this legislation every session. It never gets out of committee.
Welcome to Free Republic.
/johnny
To: citizenredstater9271
The only way this is going to work out is if it is a scam to get more people on the dole. As in acorn type community organizing disguised as a civilian military. Just another way to funnel more money to the underground marxist organizations.
50
posted on
08/01/2010 8:33:43 PM PDT
by
mamelukesabre
(Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-145 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson