Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Strunk v Paterson (Obama)-1st time since 1824 Judge has opined what NBC is. Concludes Obama not NBC.
obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ^ | 1/18/2011 | ObamaRelease YourRecords

Posted on 01/18/2011 1:20:48 PM PST by rxsid

"Strunk v Paterson (Obama): First time in the USA since 1824; Judge has opined on what Natural Born citizen is; Concludes Obama is not a NBC.

Via Chris Strunk; The first time anywhere in the USA since 1824, that any Judge has opined on what Natural Born citizen is and concluding that BHO Jr. is not NBC.

This affidavit will be notarized tomorrow and duly served by two days mail upon Justice Schmidt and the State in regards to the appearance on a personal and confidential basis with the intent that Plaintiffs understanding of the record of the hearing be entered into the court record enabling further action by Plaintiff when the Order shown as Exhibit C is entered and forwarded by the State to Plaintiff.

That I am producing a duplicate for Dr. Orly Taitz Esq. so that she may forward it to the SCOTUS in her action presently there. -snip-

From the affidavit;

1. This is the AFFIDAVIT OF Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse, Witness at the January 11, 2011 Hearing on the Notice of Motion for Amended Complaint in Strunk v Paterson et al. New York State Supreme Court of Kings County Index No.: 29642-08 before the Honorable Supreme Court Justice David I. Schmidt with the appearance of Joan Duffy, Esq. Supervising Assistant Attorney General for the New York Attorney General’s Office and Joel Graber, Esq. Special Assistant Attorney General representing the State of New York as a party-in-interest opposing the Motion to Amend the Complaint.

2. After the Court called those in attendance including several law clerks and the audience to order, the Honorable Justice Schmidt questioned Plaintiff as to the subject request for relief to amend the complaint and status of the underlying complaint without there being a recording or transcript of the proceeding.

3. As to the proposed amended complaint, the Court asked whether Plaintiff expects the Court to remove Barack Hussein Obama from office; to wit Plaintiff responded “NO” as that remains a Federal matter. Plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment as to breach of fiduciary duty by the Defendants failure to provide equal treatment and protection of Plaintiff along with those similarly situated in regards to the certification of the Presidential / Vice Presidential candidates ballot access at the 2008 Election cycle; and as well as plaintiff seeks further discovery as to the scheme to defraud and unjust enrichment.

4. That Plaintiff stated the NYS Board of Elections never responded to the request for documentation of the various certifications of ballot access for the various Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates; and as previously expressed to the Court Plaintiff had filed in Washington DC a FOIA case 08-cv-2234 for the travel records of Stanley Ann Dunham germane herein with a motion for summary judgment decision pending before Judge Richard J. Leon.

5. The Court asked if Plaintiff is seeking to obtain a copy of Barack Hussein Obama Jr.’s (BHO Jr.) Certified Birth record herein; to wit Plaintiff responded "NO". Plaintiff seeks a decision by the Court as to whether or not the Candidate(s) are eligible for Office of President of the United States (POTUS) as required with the United States Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 as required as a regulation by the New York State Board of Elections including inter alias based upon the Certificate of Live Birth published August 21, 2008 by Annenberg Political Fact Check at FactCheck.org http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html (see Exhibit A); and that as a prima facie matter Plaintiff seeks a Court decision herein as to whether or not Obama in fact has Dual Allegiance, is not a Natural Born Citizen per se but merely a Native-Born citizen if that; because BHO Jr.’s father, BHO Sr., is a British subject with a student visa at that time, and is shown to be the purported father of BHO Jr. by both the newspaper announcement and the COLB shown by Fact Check.org; and therefore, at best BHO Jr. is only a "Native" born citizen, if that, with only one U.S. Citizen parent mother as a minor at his birth, and that without two U.S. Citizen parents - BHO Jr. is NOT a "Natural" born citizen at best is “Native” born.

6. The Court asked to know Plaintiff's understanding of the difference between "Native" and "Natural" born citizen, to wit Plaintiff explained on a blood and soil basis as of the Law of Nations as related to the 1961, 1963 and 1969 Vienna Convention Treaty matters as to citizenship status as with the children of diplomats and tourists who were not certified admitted by the U.S. Customs Service; and

7. Plaintiff provided the Court with a copy of the SCOTUS decision in McCreery's Lessee v Somerville 22 US 354 (1824) (see Exhibit B), and

8. That the Court responded favorably to Plaintiff’s argument and contention expressing familiarity with the difference between the Natural and Native born, as there is within Jewish law similar precedent and commented that the Court agreed there is a difference and would read the SCOTUS decision Plaintiff provided....

Full affidavit embedded below.

"

From: http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/01/strunk-v-paterson-obama-first-time-in.html

Affidavit: http://www.scribd.com/doc/47106863/Strunk-v-Paterson-Obama-et-al-Memorialization-of-NOM-Hearing-New-York-State-Supreme-Court-Kings-County-1-11-2011


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; History; Politics
KEYWORDS: certifigate; crack; dike; dyke; naturalborncitizen; obama; strunk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-187 next last
To: rxsid
Good work as usual rsxid. The left is hoping interest in the truth of Barry's ineligibility will cease to interest citizens (though it is certainly well known to other nations). The Constitution, if it is to remain relevant, must be observed. Obama and his politburo have audaciously flaunted the Constitution, using the press, the penetration of government by so many who would be in the Ruling Class, and who see their livelihoods and even their families threatened if they dare to talk about the truth.

Some, whose motives are surely suspect, suggest “Its a done deal now. He'll be a one term President and we have the House. He can't do more damage.” The damage is being done by ignoring the Constitution. They can shut down talk radio and the same people will say “He only has less than two years left. We can return the 1st Amendment after he is gone!” They can require licenses to use the Internet. They can begin the confiscation of personal weapons, using their stooges on the Supreme Court to reinterpret “A well-organized militia” as Cass Sunstein has suggested. Then it won't matter whether he runs again. And every unconstitutional bill, treaty, appointment, will be based upon the will of men rather than the rule of law and this republic is gone, no longer based upon freedoms guaranteed by a Constitution. Then it matters that the will of the men and women in power is that we become a Marxist Utopia, as dreamed by the father of the Utopian-in-Chief, who passed his allegiance to his son, born a Kenyan/British Subject of the British Commonwealth.

We must expose these crimes, even if the resolution comes after Obama has left office. These are crimes against the people and the Constitution. There is no statute of limitations. Most of the bills passed by Obama are Constitutionally questionable, apart from the validity of Obama's signature (we don't even know his real name). Fighting each bill is what they'd like us to do. We will eventually run out of time and energy as they undermine our economy. While we fund the government assuming dictatorial power, the coup will become permanent. Government workers are already making more money with more benefits and guarantees than those in the private sector. Those workers will protect their family's incomes rather than face prosecution without the protections once guaranteed by a Constitution.

The fight must come now, as more are realizing that the puppet who delivers propaganda like he is watching a slow tennis match is just a convenient confidence man. The strings are being pulled by the old left. Our framers provided Article II Section 1, a simple tool for correcting all the other crimes. We must use it, or became another Hong Kong, allowed to do business while it doesn't threaten the lives of the real global power. Our mandarins are positioning themselves to control our spoiled citizens and harness our productivity to allow them to continue vacations on the Riviera and mansions in High Park, for which they have never worked a day producing a product.

41 posted on 01/18/2011 2:55:01 PM PST by Spaulding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP
"I bet not even Fox will touch this story."

Probably not, as they have MUCH invested in backing their position that Barry is legit based on a WWW image of an alleged short form, despite his born with foreign allegiance.

Furthermore, they don't want to be "ridiculed" in the least (like some reps worry about) or "viewed" as "racist" in the worst.

They are terrified of the issue, like so many others.

42 posted on 01/18/2011 2:57:26 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

sfl


43 posted on 01/18/2011 3:15:07 PM PST by phockthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spaulding

snip-—”Indeed, given the patently obvious worthlessness of the posted COLB, it’s as if the site owners have announced to those voters who have expressed concern as to whether Barack Obama is Constitutionally eligible to be the President of the United States: ‘We are banking the political future of the Democratic Party on the fact you are too ignorant to grasp when we insist the “birth certificate” posted on FTS proves, he is, we are not telling the truth.’”

http://jbjd.org/

VERY interesting research going on over there....


44 posted on 01/18/2011 3:17:57 PM PST by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Mortrey

...also, much to be gleaned from the “comment” section...

http://jbjd.org/2011/01/12/de-coder-rings-2-of-2/#comments


45 posted on 01/18/2011 3:21:34 PM PST by Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Danae
Obama published it in his books..

Interesting. So even though the information was out in the open, every Republican member of Congress ignored it, as did the Supreme Court, candidates from both parties and the media. Clearly we're dealing with a conspiracy greater perhaps than Roswell.

46 posted on 01/18/2011 3:25:21 PM PST by Kleon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith
Where does the judge conclude, “BHO Jr. is not NBC.” And I read the thing twice.

The judge didn't conclude that. he kicked Strunk's lawsuit out of his court. Strunk then filed an "affidavit" in which he claims that the judge actually agreed with him that Obama isn't an NBC. Such an "affidavit" is legally meaningless, because the judge's rulings are in his order and in the transcript of the hearing. A party to a case can't file an "affidavit" as to what the judge supposedly said in court.

47 posted on 01/18/2011 3:40:01 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Danae
This denial appears to be one where the defendants motioned for an order to show cause. The Judge denied the motion. Therefore the judge believes there is cause for the case to proceed. I think thats correct. Any Lawyers admitted to the NY Bar please chime in!

No, the judge dismissed the case. Strunk (the plaintiff) then sought an order permitting him to amend the complaint, and the judge denied that motion. Strunk, who is not a lawyer and is representing himself, doesn't seem to understand what is going on.

48 posted on 01/18/2011 3:43:10 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Kleon

Um.... yes. Forgive the tongue and cheek here, but you are a little late to the party.

This is what we (now labled as birthers) have been screaming about for a couple years now.

Obama was never even eligible to RUN for POTUS. We were stating this since before the elections, and I would not be too surprised to know that this is how Hillery got the SOS position, because he and Bill knew about this as well. The GOP didn’t want to touch it, because McCain has the same problem. However, Barack didn’t get a free pass from the senate about his dual citizenship. McCain got a certification from the Senate that he WAS a Natural Born Citizen, but likely didn’t feel too good about the strength of his position on it. Regardless it SHOULD have been an issue in the campaign, and it got smothered.


49 posted on 01/18/2011 3:58:05 PM PST by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais is beatha do cheal deanaimh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

Ummmm you sure about that, it looks like it is a dismissal of the order to show cause by the Defendant.

Please tell me more, because I am not interested in false hopes.


50 posted on 01/18/2011 3:59:08 PM PST by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais is beatha do cheal deanaimh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

Ah, ok I follow you now, disregard my last post to you!


51 posted on 01/18/2011 4:00:57 PM PST by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais is beatha do cheal deanaimh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: rxsid; Red Steel; Spaulding

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?about=3311518710545445566&q=1+MCCREERY’S+LESSEE+V.+SOMERVILLE,22+U.+S.+354+(1824&hl=en&as_


52 posted on 01/18/2011 4:17:34 PM PST by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

The article is about an affidavit (sworn statement of fact) being filed wherein the affiant (Strunk) indicated:

"8. That the Court responded favorably to Plaintiff's argument and contention expressing familiarity with the difference between the Natural and Native born, as there is within Jewish law similar precedent and commented that the Court agreed there is a difference and would read the SCOTUS decision Plaintiff provided.".

This boils down to the affiant believing the Judge "gets it" -- the Judge understands there is a difference between "natural born" and "native born" and is open to the implications that fact holds. Of course, this may still ultimately bear no fruit. The affiant may have misconstrued the Judge's interest, or the Judge's interest may have little bearing on the proceedings of the case. So ... this is not a "win", but maybe, just maybe, a Judge might understand that Mr. Obama lacks the credentials to be POTUS.


53 posted on 01/18/2011 4:32:29 PM PST by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Danae; Kleon; LorenC
Obama was never even eligible to RUN for POTUS. We were stating this since before the election.

No you weren't. The argument based on his father's citizenship didn't surface until after the election, as LorenC has demonstrated. Don't you find that a bit strange?

Also, don't you find it a bit strange that there have been several other candidates for president in the past, with non-citizen fathers, and no one ever raised the arugment with them, either?

54 posted on 01/18/2011 4:34:20 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

bump


55 posted on 01/18/2011 4:50:54 PM PST by tutstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

“Via Chris Strunk; The first time anywhere in the USA since 1824, that any Judge has opined on what Natural Born citizen is and concluding that BHO Jr. is not NBC.”

Actually, the courts in Indiana have already said that anyone born in the USA is a natural born citizen. The basis for their decision was the Wong Kim Ark decision, that opined at length about the original intent of the Founders in using the legal phrase “natural born citizen”.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0169_0649_ZO.html

I suspect that decision will weigh more heavily than “Jewish law”!


56 posted on 01/18/2011 5:04:48 PM PST by Mr Rogers (Poor history is better than good fiction, and anything with lots of horses is better still)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

That is a complete load of BS from LorenC. I am utterly certain that it was discussed before Nov 2008 because I was discussing it with a number of people. Don’t you remember Sammy Scammy and API? Yeah exactly.


57 posted on 01/18/2011 5:13:42 PM PST by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais is beatha do cheal deanaimh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

I agree with you.

The destruction of the rule of law is the issue. 0h0m0 is just one example of this, of course involving tons of people assisting him.

He needs to be exposed for the criminal that he is, those who materially assisted him as well.


58 posted on 01/18/2011 5:27:19 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Danae

So why is it that no state (0/50), and no political party, prevented Obama’s ballot access in 2008?

Why is it no state legislature and no state DA has issued a ruling preventing Obama from being on the ballot in 2012?

Isn’t it a pity they lack your legal expertise?


59 posted on 01/18/2011 5:28:08 PM PST by Mr Rogers (Poor history is better than good fiction, and anything with lots of horses is better still)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

Isn’t it a pity you cannot get you obama kneepads off ...


60 posted on 01/18/2011 5:29:47 PM PST by MHGinTN (Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson