Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin: Joan of Arc reborn (the resignation in light of the 2010 elections) [vanity]
Free Republic ^ | July 3, 2011 | Paul Goldman

Posted on 07/03/2011 8:47:55 PM PDT by techno

Today is the two year anniversary of Sarah Palin resigning from being Governor of Alaska.

In the light of that resignation here is a piece written before the midterm election which highlights the impact that resignation had on the election and the future of the Republican party.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2590825/posts

(Excerpt) Read more at freerepublic.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: iquitarod; joanofarc; palin; politics; sarahpalin; wapo; washingtonpost
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: vladimir998

Believe the Left would love to burn Palin at the stake and they look at her as much of a threat to their survival as the English army did Jeanne d’Arc so many hundreds of years ago.


41 posted on 07/04/2011 6:30:12 AM PDT by techno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: techno
Check out the NEW thread:
LISTEN LIVE: "Bob & Mark" on KWHL in Alaska [Fourth of July]
Will SARAH PALIN call in today?

Betting the Farm on Sarah Palin ^ | July 4, 2011 | RonDog [and FRiends]
Posted on Monday, July 04, 2011 1:48:18 AM by RonDog

From: Betting the Farm on Sarah Palin

Post 12: To: onyx

Per Jack Wheeler, he has been told she will announce her candidacy on JULY 4TH.

[He had no way to confirm this, but that was what he was told by a close connection to Sarah.]

12 posted on Saturday, July 02, 2011 8:55:37 AM by shield

If he's right, we will know soon!

From xfinitytv.comcast.net:

She did promise that if she ever announces that she’s running,
she’ll announce it first on this Anchorage morning show
apparently the "The Bob and Mark Show" on KWHL-FM, "K-Whale."
From KWHL.com/airtimes_schedule: click here to LISTEN LIVE!

Monday Through Friday

5:35am - 10:00am [Alaska time] - Bob and Mark
CLICK HERE for the rest of that thread

42 posted on 07/04/2011 6:34:24 AM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12; All
I knew my comment would get more response than I could answer. I shouldn't have called her a loser with such a broad stroke, she's not. She has great role to play in the upcoming elections as a kinda kingmaker, but if she was gonna win the general election she would have brought in the votes to put McCain over the top. I think for every person who loves Palin, another person can't stand her.

McCain was the moderates dream. War hero, worked with the Dems, Senate Maverick (of course we know that means he went against Bush often) the big thing missing was the Conservatives hated the guy as a backstabber. In comes Palin, the candidate to bring in the Conservatives to the fold, instead she drove out some and brought in others. If McCain picked Huckabee he might have won.

43 posted on 07/04/2011 7:59:23 AM PDT by normy (Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
That is her role. She is also a reason some seats were lost. A Palin endorsement in the right spot puts you over the top, a Palin endorsement in the wrong spot loses an otherwise winnable seat. I will give her much credit for her role in the House elections though.
44 posted on 07/04/2011 8:04:57 AM PDT by normy (Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: techno
At least she's not Reagan this week.
45 posted on 07/04/2011 8:06:45 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (De Oppresso Libre.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MountainDad

I have never voted for a Democrat, but you’re right, my eyes will have to be opened because right now I just don’t see it. Happy Independence Day to you too.


46 posted on 07/04/2011 8:07:15 AM PDT by normy (Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: tlb

And she heard voices in her head.


47 posted on 07/04/2011 8:08:49 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (De Oppresso Libre.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: normy

McCain’s suspension of his campaign to vote for TARP, his refusal to blame Dems for the crisis that THEY created, and his unwillingness to hammer away at the Punk’s radical connections were the main reason that he lost. No one could have helped Juan enough for him to win. And they wasted Sarah, giving her standard boilerplate pabulum to deliver in her speeches. Gone was the energetic, on fire woman who delivered her convention speech flawlessly after her prompter broke a few minutes into the speech.
Normy, you massively underestimate what Sarah will be able to do and say now, speaking for herself. Bob


48 posted on 07/04/2011 9:23:48 AM PDT by alstewartfan (When you're fresh out of lawyers, you don't know how good it's gonna feel! Al Stewart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: famousdayandyear
Palin endorsing JD Hayworth would have been outrageously courageous (the persona we all love)

It might have been considered 'courageous', but most would have considered it ungracious. Even JD Hayworth stated that he understood why Sarah endorsed McCain. If JD was content with it, why can everyone else be so, as well?

49 posted on 07/04/2011 10:04:16 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998
Sorry to burst your bubble, Illy'ich, but Palin can make "Joan d'Arcs" out of popsicle sticks with one hand tied behind her back, then sign yo pitty on the rummy kine. Sah d'atay.

(gratuitous ethnic references from the movie "Pootie Tang")

8^D

50 posted on 07/04/2011 10:05:09 AM PDT by Gargantua ("Palin 2012 ~ Going Oval")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
Sarah gave her endorsement to McCain out of a sense of obligation to him.

So, why doesn't the same reasoning apply to Rick Santorum endorsing Arlen Spector?

51 posted on 07/04/2011 10:07:35 AM PDT by RINOs suck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RINOs suck

Oh, this goes way beyond a “sense of obligation”.

http://www.seattlepi.com/default/article/Palin-McCain-one-of-the-finest-888764.php


52 posted on 07/04/2011 10:14:34 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (Always Remember You're Unique.......(Just Like everyone Else.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: normy
"Bottom line..Palin is a loser."

Well, it's apparent that you weighed all the empirical data, viewed everything through a lens unclouded by either agengdae or emotions, and came to the only conclusion logically available given what we now know. Well done. No, I mean it. :0)

So what's a clever gal like you doing when this joint closes? Want to grab a bagel and compare shopping hot spots? Is that your real hair color?

%(

53 posted on 07/04/2011 10:15:20 AM PDT by Gargantua ("Palin 2012 ~ Going Oval")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Gargantua

Palin is impressive, but can’t hold a candle to St. Joan. In a hundred years there’s a good chance no one will even know who Palin was.


54 posted on 07/04/2011 10:21:51 AM PDT by vladimir998 (When anti-Catholics can't win they simply violate the rules of the forum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: normy
McCain was the moderates dream. War hero, worked with the Dems, Senate Maverick (of course we know that means he went against Bush often) the big thing missing was the Conservatives hated the guy as a backstabber. In comes Palin, the candidate to bring in the Conservatives to the fold, instead she drove out some and brought in others. If McCain picked Huckabee he might have won.

Nope, he wouldn't have won, even with Huckabee. Those vaunted 'moderates' never had any intention of voting for McCain. They wanted to prove to the world how 'moderate' they were by voting for the black guy. Face it, if a white man with similar credentials to Obama had been the Democrat nominee, McCain would likely have wiped the floor with him, no matter WHO his Veep had been.

The difference in 2012 is going to be that many of those moderates have gotten their white guilt out of their systems. Now that they've seen what Obama's inexperience has wrought, they may feel themselves free to vote for someone else they believe can fix the mess he's created. Sarah has had experience in fixing messes; she did so in Alaska. When she is the candidate, with the complete stage, rather than coming in during the last two months as the Veep, in the background, I believe she will be able to woo many of those Independents and Moderates.

55 posted on 07/04/2011 10:22:23 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ThomasThomas

Not in this world but in the next, which is what is most important.


56 posted on 07/04/2011 10:22:38 AM PDT by frogjerk (Liberalism: The ideology of envy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

Palin certainly does not impress me one bit.

Here is an article that is honest in scope and points out the reality of who and what Palin is. Unfortunately, many here have placed her in a divine category, worthy of sainthood. She is a good person, but giving her this magical “perfect” status is alarming.

http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2011/06/03/the-damage-sarah-palin-could-do/


57 posted on 07/04/2011 10:37:32 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (Always Remember You're Unique.......(Just Like everyone Else.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: RINOs suck
So, why doesn't the same reasoning apply to Rick Santorum endorsing Arlen Spector?

No two situations are precisely alike. Dynamics will differ, and the individuals involved in each situation have their own unique records of public service to consider.

Perhaps you should make the case for why you feel the same reasoning should apply to Rick Santorum's endorsement of Arlen Spector.

58 posted on 07/04/2011 10:39:01 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: normy

Actually her role is usually leading from elective office, Palin did not only help us win seats, but she helped move seats farther to the right, she had an incredible win record, I think she was involved in over 60 races, which seats do you think she cost us?


59 posted on 07/04/2011 10:49:41 AM PDT by ansel12 (America has close to India population of 1950s, India has 1,200,000,000 people now. Quality of Life?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
Perhaps you should make the case for why you feel the same reasoning should apply to Rick Santorum's endorsement of Arlen Spector.

Either loyalty is a legitimate excuse for supporting a RINO against a conservative in a primary or it isn't. I don't see any difference between Santorum's support for Spector and Palin's for McCain.

60 posted on 07/04/2011 12:45:36 PM PDT by RINOs suck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson