Canadian Free Press doing the investigation of Obama American media won’t do

Upon his investigation a Canadian journalist has concluded that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi submitted TWO DIFFERENT DNC documents attesting and/or pertaining to the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama in 2008.

The Canada Free Press’, JB WIlliams, obtained the two separate documents “prepared by Democrats to certify Barack Obama as their nominee for president in 2008 that suggest House Speaker Nancy Pelosi knew there was an unresolved issue with his [Obama’] eligibility under the U.S. Constitution.”

The first verification contains the legal language stating both Obama and Joe Biden “are legally qualified to serve under the provision of the U.S. Constitution.” Nevertheless, the second document which was submitted to all fifty states “was missing the text CONCERNING THE ELIGIBILITY of Barack Hussein Obama.” (emphasis added).

While a same tell tale typo is in both of these official documents Pelosi signed off on, the actual legal language that Obama had eligibility is not in this second document Williams obtained!

Now, another very important notarized affidavit is surfacing in which senior election clerk Timothy Lee Adams on January 20, 2011, swore to the fact that his supervisor came to him and told him, using her Hawaiian dialect, that “Of course, there’s no birth certificate.

What?” He said she just said it to him and walked off. “She was quite a powerful lady.” Included in his affidavit, duly notarized, is the following: “Senior officers in the City and County of Honolulu Elections Division told me on multiple occasions that no Hawaii Long Form, hospital generated birth certificate existed for Senator Obama in the Hawaii Department of Health, and there was no record that any such document had ever been on file in Hawaii Department of Health or any other branch or department of the (HI) government.”……

“The Hawaiian criminal enterprise will do whatever the larger criminal enterprise (read DNC inc) tells them to do. I’m just surprised they have yet to issue the fraudulent copy”

April 20th,2009 (It did not occur to me at the time to copy URL & author’s name)

**[MargaretSmith/Banking Trade Commerce Canadian Printing Press/Obama]**

From the original report about Obama’s administration doing a long form Birth Certificate “Forgery”:

“They have already prepared the “forgery” with special paper and ink.

The document was printed on a fully functional 1960 Heidelberger printing press located at a print museum in Toronto.

Access was arranged by a trustee of the museum who is connected to a large Canadian banking/investment firm with major US interests.”

Expounding on this striking detail, some blanks needed to be filled in.

Locating the Museum in Toronto with a printing press that would do the job

Are you ready for this?

Research was done on nearly every Museum in the Toronto area for a printing press that was operational and could do a “forgery”.

Everything connecting museums in the area with this type and age of printing press kept pointing back to one Museum in the area.

The name of the Museum this the “National Museum of Science and Technology” in Toronto.

It has quite a collection of older printing presses. Below is a snippet of the Museums description:

Among numerous exhibits in this educational facility is a collection of printing equipment that includes flatbeds, jobbers, cylinder and rotary presses (http://www.briarpress.org/139)

Identifying a Trustee with links to Canadian banking and investment firms

The next item of business was to find any Trustees (as mentioned by the report) to this Museum that had a connection to a large Canadian investment firm. After looking into this, one person really stood out right away.

The Museum only has three Trustees assigned to it and Margaret Smith came up with a numerous ties to Canada’s economic and investment banking syndicate.

It is likely because she serves on the Standing Senate Committee on Banking, Trade and Commerce for Canada. This definitely qualifies her for being connected to not just one, but several Canadian banking and investment firms.

If it is like in the US, then she probably gets “kick-backs” from more than one firm, by introducing legislation to the Committee that will benefit the firms substantially. The Trustee of the Museum and member of the Senate Banking Committee appear to be the same Margaret Smith, though not 100% certain.

Canadian Source URL confirming Margaret Smith attending a Senate Banking Committee meeting: http://www.parl.gc.ca/36/1/parlbus/commbus/senate/com-e/bank-e/27mn-e.htm?Language=E&Parl=36&Ses=1&comm_id=3 (how much you want to bet this gets scrubbed?).

Canadian Source URL confirming Margaret Smith as a Trustee to the Museum (this one less likely to get scrubbed, but probably will)
Both sources were backed up, along with images.

There are still some questions left, like who did Obama meet with and that is also a member of this same Banking Committee on his recent trip to Canada?

JB Williams, bless his heart is barking up the wrong tree here. HI is the only state to my knowledge that requires both the state and national parties provide a sworn statement that the presidential and vice presidential are constitutionally qualified. The language included in the three DNC certificates provided to HI varies. It was added after the fact to Gore’s certification, left out Kerry’s certification altogether and included in Obama’s. All three DNC certificates issued to the other states were identical meaning verbatim and did not include the constitutionally qualified language. The DNC did not depart from its standard operating practice in regard to the language contained within the certification for Gore, Kerry or Obama it provided to the other 49 states.

What is hinky is the Democratic Party of HI modified its statement to EXCLUDE the constitutionally qualified language from the Obama certification Obama it provided to HI election officials. It is clear this was an intentional omission as the language for the DPH certificates for Gore and Kerry included the constitutionally qualified statement and it was verbatim in every regard.

While I do not disagree something is obviously afoul and the DNC most likely knew there was an eligibility problem, the DNC certificates of themselves are not evidence. The DPH certificates however are evidence that both the DPH and HI election officials knew SOMETHING. The HI Elections Division should have never accepted the 2004 Kerry DNC certificate or the 2008 Obama DPH certificate as it did not meet the requirements contained within HI Statute 11-113.

See:
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol01_Ch0001-0042F/HRS0011/HRS_0011-0113.htm

http://www.scribd.com/doc/32614617/Hawaii-2000-and-2004-Certs-Rep-and-Dem

http://www.scribd.com/doc/32614591/2008-HI-Certificate-of-Nomination-Obama

http://www.scribd.com/doc/95568414/Gore-2000-DNC-49-State-Certification (I also have one for Kerry but I cannot locate it at the moment.)

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.